Megan Rapiinoe isn’t boring and irrelevant to me because she’s a women’s soccer player and a “progressive”.
She’s boring and irrelevant to me because she’s a soccer player and a “progressive”.
Glad we could settle that.
It’s the aftermath of the Independence Day weekend. It’s July, and the Twins are seriously in contention.
We shouldn’t HAVE to think about Soccer. I’d hope that we are better, as a society, than that. Our forefathers fought and died so that we’d be *free* of things like Eurovision, parliamentary government, and soccer. And this time of year, I like to honor and respect their sacrifice.
But I’m genuinely curious about something, and would love to find some genuine answers.
With the US Women’s Soccer team winning their fourth World Cup, they’ve proven themselves to be the most successful soccer team in the US. Which is a little like being “the best funk band in Sweden”, but certainly deserves respect.
But now, the news is full of their next story – going to court for “equal pay”. The US Men’s soccer team – which qualifies for the World Cup about as often as Swedish funk groups got on Soul Train – gets paid more, for fewer games, and enjoys much less success than the women. They enjoy other benefits – like better hotels, better facilities, better travel arrangements, and not being identifiable as “soccer players” by most Americans. The women play more, are more successful – and, some say, should be paid much better for their time.
I don’t have a problem with that, as far as it goes; also, I don’t care ,because again, it’s only soccer.
Men’s World Cup soccer is, of course, the most popular athletic spectacle in the world. There’s an insane amount of money changing hands due to that Godforsaken sport.
Does anyone know if the US women generate more money than the men do? Or that women’s World Cup, worldwide, generates as much / more money than the men’s sport?
I’ve heard various reporters and opinion-mongers say it’s only be “Fair” for the women to get paid more – but on economic matters, most journos are…well, we’re back to “Swedish Funk Band” analogies again.
Does anyone know how the numbers – all of ’em, not just the cherrypicked ones – break out?
As the Twins continue what is so far a stellar season – winning .678 as this is written, which is the best in the majors, still, by .001 point – I find myself in the painful position of reminding people about the law.
Berg’s Law.
The local media is starting to talk with a straight face about the Twins and post-season. Maybe even the World Series.
A reminder, Twin Cities media; it’s called “Berg’s Law”, not “Berg’s Suggestion”, for a reason. And Berg’s Fourth Law of Media/Sports Inversion is in full effect, and no less binding than Berg’s Seventh.
To wit: “Minnesota sports team may be a contender until the moment the local media actually believes they will be contenders. At that moment – be it spring training, late November in the NFL season, or week 72 of the NHL playoffs – the season will fall irredeemably apart.”
It’s iron-clad. It’s immutable. And it’s the law.
I’m a User Experience Architect.
If for some reason I decided to take two years to become an abstract sculptor – well, Mazel Tov for me, but barring some pretty significant Contract-Fu on my part, I’m not going to get paid to be a User Experience Architect. Or sculptor, to be honest, but that’s skirting the point.
If you’re not doing the thing that you’re supposedly getting paid for, unless your potential services are so valuable that the client is willing to pay to keep that potential on tap, you might need another source of income.
National Public Radio seems to have taken up the “cause” of female athletes – Olympians, mind you – whose athletic sponsorships are jeopardized by taking time off from their sports to have kids. NPR’s Michel Martin talked with runner Alysia Montano about the way she was thrown out on the street after becoming pregnant:
And so in that off-year, I’d hoped that we would conceive and be able to have our daughter and return to the sport. And I did conceive. I did have my daughter. And my daughter was two months old. And I got a phone call that said, I want to talk about your contracts in regard to your performance this year – which means – you mean the year that I’ve been with child? And then I was – my payment was reduced.
Wait.
Back up.
Her payment – for running – was reduced, not eliminated, during a year in which her running was eliminated?
OK, surely she suffered grievously in other ways:
MARTIN: And what about your health benefits? I mean, that was another thing that emerged in the reporting on this is that there are athletes whose health insurance was terminated. And I can’t think a very thing – many things more frightening than either being pregnant or having a child or having a newborn with no health insurance – summarily terminated. So what about you? Did you at least have health insurance to cover the delivery or the postpartum period?
MONTANO: Yes. So the way that it works is a tier system. The luck that I did have with my daughter was I fell within the tier system because I made the Olympic team in 2012, and the protection was there for me. Now, if I didn’t make the Olympic team in 2012 and I became pregnant, I would lose my health insurance.
So let me get this straight – Nike is paying you to…run. Something that, all due respect, is the nich-iest of niche sports – a sport that literally nobody ever in history has gone into thinking of making a living at. And when you’re running, albeit not an Olympic level for a year, due to a personal (albeit blessed) choice that biology has pretty much limited to you, you still got paid.
Could there be a more first world problem?
Well, I suppose when you’re talking about “elite” athletes…:
My point and my stance is this should not be because I am an Olympian. This needs to be something that is in place for women athletes regardless.
“Regardless” of what? Level? Sport?
If I’m a company selling – let me stress this – sneakers, and I’m paying someone to…run, am I bound to support them unto death, regardless?
And am I the only one frantically and vainly combing their memory right now looking for a male athlete with an endorsement contract that included years of…well, not using the product?
Apparently when I call this a First World Problem, I’m only off by magnitude:
MARTIN: There are other women in this fight with you. We saw Alysia Montano and Kara Goucher share similar stories. What does it mean to have them alongside you?
Montano later notes the real problem:
She says she wants to make sure Nike writes this protection into the contracts of new and current female athletes because, she says, track and field athletes tend to sign contracts before they are the age in which women typically start thinking about having families, and by the time they do, they are locked into contracts without protections for maternity leave.
So it’s a matter of business education, as opposed to rampant sexism.
SCENE: Mitch BERG, in home office, writing. Hears loud, unison yelling.
BERG (thinking): “Is my neighbor watching “Triumph Of The Will” with the window open again?”
Listens carefully.
“Nope. Just a “MN United” game. A mile away”.
And SCENE
…I could only get one right myself.
From the Minnesota Vikings social media:
Narrator: unfortunately, the sandwich landed wide and to the right.
And, since the World Series hasn’t happened yet, this is the last football will be discussed in this space until, well, after the World Series.
When John McEnroe recoils at Venus Williams’ behavior, you know someone really uncorked it.
Men don’t have the right to break rules without repercussion. John McEnroe was getting penalized for his nasty behavior in 1981. Jeff Tarango was banned from Wimbledon for abusing an umpire in 1995. Now Williams lost a match because of her penalizations for her abusive behavior. She’s joining a club filled with men who have suffered as she did for similar behavior.
The “rights” Williams is fighting for seem to be the ability to be free from the same rules men have to follow in order to be equal with them. That’s not equality, that’s asking for special treatment.
Yet we’re being lead to believe that Williams is bravely standing up against an unfair system of men that punishes women unjustly. While there are a few ridiculous calls out there made against women in the past (Alizé Cornet’s code violation for fixing her shirt while men are known to go topless on the court being a glaring one) what Williams did was childish, abusive, and just plain mean. Not only did it paint an innocent man doing his job as a villain, her attitude stole a moment of pure glory away from another woman who even looked up to her.
And it’s not as if Williams hasn’t been down this road before. In 2009, Williams lost a match after having a point deducted after she abused an umpire, and that umpire was a female. This entire debacle isn’t a story of Williams facing sexism, it’s a story of Williams lack of control over her temper.
And, from what I’ve seen, about a lot of middle-aged women who are upset thatthe “powerful middle-aged woman on her inexorable comeback” narrative has been sidelined.
Oh, whoops. Didn’t see you there. I was just dozing at the big news.
Minnesota has a miniimum wage of $9 an hour.
Minor league baseball players, working on a (very low) salary and putting in long hours, frequently earn less than that.
Saint Paul is about to phase its minimum wage up to $15 an hour. That’s pretty much more than anyone on a Single-A team makes.
And so the Saint Paul Saints – after wheedling a stadium out of the city’s taxpayers – say they may have to shut down if they don’t get an exemption:
Noting league rules limit the baseball team’s payroll, the Saints say without the exemption they could possibly be forced to cease operations.
“We’re in a league that has a salary cap,” Saints Executive Vice President and General Manager Derek Sharrer told state lawmakers earlier this week. “So … if minimum wage and overtime laws were to impact us, then we may be in a position to not be able to abide by our league bylaws, which would force us not to be able to operate.”
The issue comes just three years after the Saints moved into their new home, CHS Field, in downtown St. Paul. Public funds contributed $51.4 million to the ballpark’s construction.
They’ll get it. Lawmakers love sports teams.
All the businesses in Saint Paul without the same level of political clout?
Let’s just watch the implosion.
All that fuss over the Super Bowl? All that Cold War era security downtown? It was supposed to make “us” money – right?
Not so much, according to the NYTimes:
Sports economists don’t view the situation quite the same way. They said the economic impact study for the Minneapolis Super Bowl began by saying all the right things about how past estimates had “been criticized as extremely overinflated, inaccurate, even purposely misrepresented.” In the end, though, it did the same thing.
“They always talk really good about that stuff, and then they go off the rails,” said Victor A. Matheson, a sports economist at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Mass.
Matheson has written extensively about the effect of Super Bowls. He has found that they usually generate anywhere from $30 million to $130 million in economic activity for the host city.
“Not nothing, and not what you would sneeze at,” he said, “but somewhere between a quarter and a tenth of what is being claimed.”
Take hotel rooms, for example. To host the Super Bowl, Minneapolis had to show that there were at least 24,000 of them within 60 minutes of the stadium, capable of accommodating visitors during the entire 10-day Super Bowl celebration. Accordingly, the economic impact report estimates the Super Bowl will generate 230,000 nights of hotel stays.
But if the Super Bowl were not in town, many of those hotel rooms would have been filled anyway, by business travelers, conventiongoers and — yes, even in Minnesota in the dead of winter — tourists. It is the net occupancy gain, not gross occupancy, that matters, said Frank Stephenson, an economist at Berry College in Mount Berry, Ga.
And on, and on.
Helga Braid Nation’s precious stadium – money extorted from taxpayers via the most base emotional manipulation this side of emotional domestic abuse, is a net wash, maybe, as of today – the peak of the stadiium’s public profile as of the first and last Super Bowl it will host.
…is that a few hundred thousand mouth-breathing morons ruin the good name of dozens of Philly sports fans.
We are excited to serve everyone biscuits tomorrow morning at our Philadelphia location but in order to do that it needs to be not burned down please
— Hardee’s (@Hardees) February 5, 2018
I mean, I’m glad the Iggles won, if only out of homer pride (I went to high school with Carson Wentz’s father, and high school and college with his uncle. Have I mentioned that North Dakota is a small place?) and because Pats fans aren’t a whole lot better.
But I’m always amazed people don’t remember it’s a game.
Welcome to Minnesota.
It gets cold here. We’re kind of famous for it.
Oh, the weather this week? This isn’t cold. This is pretty middle of the road for the middle of winter. Not especially notable.
“Boston Strong” my ass. Suck it up, buttercups. Only a week to go. Do a polar plunge.
With the mathematical elimination of the Chicago Bears for the NFL playoff scene back in early September, and Carson Wentz’s injury leaving him out of the Philadelphia Eagles lineup at the Super Bowl, I officially have exactly the same reason to care about the Super Bowl that I always do; none whatsoever.
And try as I may, I cannot work up the faintest glimmer of interest in major college basketball, although that brand of the sport stands head, shoulders and ankles above NBA hoops.
Hockey? I know why people like it. It just leaves me cold. No pun intended.
And as this post move, there are roughly 3 weeks until pitchers and catchers report to spring training – one of the glorious to glorious ceremonies in American life, indeed, But still a long, chilly slog before the boys of summer take to the diamonds.
But this is America. We don’t stay trapped in worlds we never made – we build our own.
No, I’m not just talking about this post; it would be accurate, but not complete. No, I’m talking the special little fantasy world that sports fans build around their pastime – spending their hard-earned money to watch millionaires chase balls around stadiums built by billionaires (with generous, coerced tax pair support) and the crimes against manners, decency, decorum, morality, property and other people that carry out in their zeal to live out that fantasy.
And so it’s time to inaugurate what may be perhaps (eventually) the grandest of all American sporting traditions; The Shot in the Dark First Annual Disgusting Fan tournament.
The rules are simple; in the comment section of this post, nominate the fan base of a team, along with one or more citations about their crude, violent, depraved, entitled or otherwise filthy behavior.
When the nominations are all in, I’m going to set up a bracket with the series of seeded polls (not the kind the city of Philadelphia greased to try to curb the lunacy of Eagles fans – the other kind) which will lead us to a champion – The most disgusting fan base in all of sports.
We will observe the following rules:
So there you go! Get your nominations in, and the voting will start next week!
I’ve watched it many, many times; the Keenum to Diggs pass that made decades of Minnesota sports fandom suck just a little less.
Or so I’m told. I’m just counting down ’til pitchers and catchers report, honestly. But while I think I’ve watched less than a half-dozen NFL games from the opening gun to the checkered flag since the greatest game of all time (the 1985/86 Super Bowl, pbui), I did manage to catch the last six playing / forty actual minutes of Sunday mights division final.
And the the pass, with :10 on the clock, was one of those things like Jack Morris’ seventh game and Kirby Puickett’s homer in game six (I don’t have to go into more detail, do I? Exactly) that even casual fans will be talking about for decades:
So – great play. Amazing.
But even with all of that – there are some people out there to whom I just want to say “Dude, yoiu take this stuff way too seriously“.
I’m not even being snarky, pinky swear:
It’s up there with “PEARL HARBOR ATTACKED” and “DEWEY WINS”, in m y book.
It’s called “Berg’s Fourth Law”, and not “Berg’s Fourth Joke” or “Berg’s Fourth Wry Quip”, for a reason.
It’s about time.
A long time ago, in a beautiful but cold place far far away, a communist dictator built a colosseum. Being committed to the populist flim-flam most totalitarians use to get help in seizing power, he named it “The People’s Stadium” – although “the people” only got to use it with the permission of the dictator’s cronies.
And the dictator built a train – “The Peoples’ Train” – to bring people from the miserable, decaying, crime-sodden cities to The People’s Stadium.
The dictator and his cronies planned a massive rally to celebrate their power and perspicacity; the entire world’s media would be there to see the dictator’s work.
And the dictator worried: while he put on a slick facade for the foreign press, some of the locals were unruly, and parts o the city were falling apart.
So the dictator took steps to make sure The People wouldn’t screw up The People’s Event at the People’s Stadium before the eyes of the world. First, he barred The Hoi Polloi from the Peoples’ Train, to make sure they’d never encounter foreign visitors.
And then, to take no chances, he deployed his Army in the People’s City, to make sure the locals stayed in line.
Minneapolis officials are calling on Gov. Mark Dayton to mobilize the state National Guard for the Super Bowl, amid questions about whether the city’s police force has enough officers to effectively patrol neighborhoods and handle other demands.
Even with dozens of departments across the state pledging to send officers to help with security, Mayor Betsy Hodges and mayor-elect Jacob Frey wrote in a letter on Tuesday that the city’s police “cannot by themselves meet of all the safety and security needs of the 10 days of Super Bowl LII while maintaining public-safety operations for the entire city.”
When I wrote my book Trulbert: A Comic Novella ab out the End of the World as We Know It, I wrote the scene in which a thinly disguised Roger Goodell-type NFL commissioner exacted concessions out of Minneapolis’ dictator, Myron Ilktost, to be as over the top as I could imagine; a complete NFL takeover of all civic resources, free transportation, prostitutes, whatever the NFL wanted. And when I went back and edited and re-wrote, I massaged it to make it even more over-the-top. I was satisfied that real life could never imitate my fiction.
Kudos, Roger Gooddell and Mark Dayton. You’ve proven me wrong.
…that after shaking down taxpayers in their franchise cities for hundreds of millions of dollars, the NFL responds by being completely tone-deaf.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Players continue to kneel for the national anthem so the NFL decided not to broadcast that part of the game. Out of sight, out of mind, right?
No. Fans aren’t stupid. We can tell you’re trying to hide the ball and we know you’re doing it because you’re siding with the protesters against the fans, which annoys us even more. Ratings are down another 5% from last week.
I suspect we’re going to get a new self-destructive behavior metaphor: kill the golden goose, cut off your nose to spite your face, hoist on your own petard, New Coke, shoot yourself in the foot, and soon: “pulling an NFL” meaning “driving away your own customers to prove how virtuous you are.”
Joe Doakes
They’re smarter than us, you know.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Week 4, the NFL is in chaos of its own making.
The traditional way to show respect for the national anthem is to stand, face the flag, place your hand over your heart. Doing anything else is a protest. Some players sit, some kneel, some give the Black Power salute, some link arms . . . doesn’t matter: if you’re not doing it right, you’re protesting. Television is trying to hide the protests from the viewers by skipping the anthem, cutting in late, but it’s not working. Viewers notice. Viewers get upset. Why are they upset?
There are 168 hours in a week. Your game is on for three of them. We don’t tune in to learn your opinions on social policy, we tune to watch the team play football. Don’t hijack my football game for your lecture; protest on your own time.
The AFL is gone. The UFL is gone. There’s no reason the NFL can’t go broke. All you need to do is drive away enough customers.
Joe Doakes
I’m doing my part.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
There are 32 teams in the NFL and each team has a 53-man roster, for a total of 1,696 players in the NFL.
There are 15,588 college seniors who are eligible to be drafted from the NCAA to the NFL. Add in a few more from other, non-NCAA schools, and we’re talking about 17,000 or a 1-in-10 ratio. But most players last several years, which means that for every man that makes it into the NFL, many more don’t make the cut. How many, I don’t know. 20? 30? 50?
What’s the qualitative difference between the guys who make it versus the guys who don’t? Aside from the Heisman Trophy Winner, I’d bet it’s a razor-thin margin. Which means the NFL could afford to dump a powerful number of existing players to replace them with almost-as-good players, at least for a while. Ever see the Keanau Reeves movie “Replacements?” Like that.
Wouldn’t even have to do it. Just threaten it. Call in some of those replacements for tryouts. Let the regulars know their replacements are warming up. “See that line of guys out the door and down the block? They all want your job. How badly do YOU want your job? If you are more interested in social justice antics than playing football . . . .”
Joe Doakes
SCENE: Mitch BERG walks into Sluggo’s, a sports bar on University [1]. NFL games are on on six big-screen TVs around the room. Around five, there are small, dilatory groups watching games. Around one TV, though, there are a group of people crowded around; men in “Che Guevara” and “Don’t Park the Bus” t-shirts, a few younger women in similar attire, older women in “peasant” dresses. BERG recognizes several people from the group: Avery LIBRELLE, Moonbeam BIRKENSTOCK, Inge CARROLL, Edmund DUCHEY, Brian FURIOUS, Sol GALLIVAN, Gutterball GARY, Cat SCAT, Professor William KRIEPPI, Gretel STROMBERG, Betty Rae TORSTENGAARDSEN and other liberal activism / alt-media / blogging mainstays.
BERG: So…uh, hey. Watching some Football?
LIBRELLE: Yes, Merg. It’s the American pastime!
BERG: (thinks about it, decides not to pursue the error). Huh. So all of…(points at the crowd, who seem to be staring, uncomprehending, at the screen)…you are football fans.
DUCHEY: My whole life. While you’ve been writing “Sh*t in the Park” (some of the other gathered liberals snicker) I’ve been watching the Vikings greats like Pele and Bill Havlicek.
BERG: Huh.
(BERG looks, notices that the teams have not yet taken the field. Suddenly, it dawns on him).
BERG: So – you all remember Tim Tebow, right?
(General incomprehension breaks out. Then Gutterball GARY chimes in).
GARY: He is the Christianist who took a knee before games.
(General hissssssssssssing breaks out from the crowd)
CARROLL: He hates women!
STROMBERG (sotto voce): “womenandtheirchildren”
CARROLL: (sotto voce right back) What, ,you think women are defined by their children?
SCAT: He was a racist, sexist, ableist, ageist, classist, Christianist… (trails off)
(CARROLL and STROMBERG continue to argue. On the TV, the teams are coming out onto the field)
BERG: So – Tim Tebow was all sorts of awful things because he exercised his First Amendment right to express his faith in public.
(Generalized booing and hissing).
FURIOUS: Everybody shut up. It’s starting.
SCAT: Oooh, I love the suspense.
(The national anthem starts. The camera pans over dozens of player taking knees. FURIOUS and DUCHEY frantically note the names and numbers of players that remain standing. Cheers break out throughout the crowd)
BERG: So – NFL players who take a knee over “social justice causes”…
TORSTENGAARDSEN: Heroes speaking truth to power.
BERG: While Tim Tebow…
BIRKENSTOCK: Racist sexist classist ableist cisgenderist Nazi who is literally Hitler.
(Anthem finishes. The entire crowd risers from their chairs and heads for the exits)
DUCHEY (to GARY) Good game. Good game.
(Within seconds, the table is empty. The WAITRESS comes over.)
WAITRESS: 35 people at a table, and I got six dollars in tips.
BERG: Wow. They stiffed you pretty bad.
WAITRESS: Well, technically, kind of – they ordered about $100 worth of kombucha, artisanal tea and one “gluten free lite beer”, and the rest just had water.
BERG: You don’t even have kombucha or artisanal tea here, do you?
WAITRESS: I can’t hear you. Naaah naaah naaaah. (Walks away)
(And SCENE)
What do you get when you combine:
I had to check this twice – but the City Pages actually has the story: Governments, acting on “information” from “progressive” “feminist” groups around the country, are pouring money into sex trafficking enforcement based on absurd predictions about the nuimber of prostitutes supposedly showing up for Super Bowls:
He didn’t have to look hard for supporters. Dallas Police Sergeant Louis Felini told The Dallas Morning News that between 50,000 and 100,000 prostitutes were expected to come into town. The call for even more outrage was sounded by a study from the Dallas Women’s Foundation, which said the throng would include 38,000 underage prostitutes…Before Super Bowl XLIX in Glendale, Arizona, Cindy McCain — wife of Sen. John McCain — declared the Super Bowl “the largest human-trafficking venue on the planet.” Glendale produced a lengthy public service video broadcasting the evils of the flesh trade.
But according to police, not one person was busted for prostitution-related crimes or sex trafficking in the days leading up to the game.
The results? Nearly no arrests.
Deterrence? Perhaps.
“Progressive” delusions about the habits, peccadillos and appetites of the wealthy (who are, let’s be honest, the only people who can ever afford to go to the Super Bowl)? Definitely.
Oh, yeah. Minnesota’s doing the same. Bigly.