Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Why doesn’t the public trust the media?
Because the public keeps trusting its lying eyes?
If it bleeds – or coughs, stings, goes “boom” or rots your insides out as you hack lungs out – it leads.
Animated infographic showing how media hysteria compares to actual deaths caused by the stories they were about.
I’m not saying I don’t trust the American mainstream media.
Because why stop with America?
Yesterday, we reported on the fishy use of camera angles in presenting Saturday’s Dreamsicle rally in Minneapolis. While the media narrative was that the events were well-attended, the photographic evidence from the even couldn’t be shot from angles tight enough to show that attendance was sparsse at best…
…and, from the looks of it, mostly not people from North Minneapolis.
Today, it’s the Minnpost. Read their photo caption (before it gets disappeared):
“We’re the MinnPost. We’re funded by the Joyce Foundation, which also funds “Protect” Minnesota, not to mention contributions from Minnesoto’s gun-phobic self-appointed elite. So when we say there were hundreds at a gun grabber rally, but only a couple dozen are ever visible, nearly all of them painfully obviously the saime white, ELCA-hair-coiffed Subaru-driving Whole-Foods-shopping Southside liberals that turn up for every gun-grabber rally, well, who are you going to believe? Us, or your lying eyes?”
Oh, yeah; it’s not just photographic history being fluffed:
North Minneapolis resident Nikki McComb said she’d like to see more creative solutions in addressing gun violence. For instance, she said, she helped run a north Minneapolis gun buy-back project last year called Art Is My Weapon, which bought back weapons, no questions asked, and redistributed the disassembled pieces to north side artists for use in their works.
What made the project so effective, McComb said, was that it rid the streets of 250 guns while giving something positive back to the community. “We’re just really trying to use art as a catalyst for change,” she said.
Remember that “Gun Buyback” fiasco? Read the story. It got some guns – out of gun owners’ closets and attics, not “the streets”.
Observers say it was more like single digits; not even a quarter of “250”
The MinnPost: doing Fake News (at least about guns) before it was called that!
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Hollywood is where they make movies, fictional stories presented for entertainment. They are carefully scripted, staged and shot to show the best angles and most effective presentation.
Pallywood is the term given to movies made by Palestinians, fictional stories presented to gin up outrage against Israel. They are carefully scripted, staged and shot to show the best angles and most effective presentation.
And now we have CNN-wood, a fictional story presented by CNN to pretend that ordinary Muslims are against ISIS and Islamic terrorism. The story was carefully scripted, staged and shot to show the best angles and most effective presentation.
Movies that we know show fake scenes is one thing. We willingly suspend disbelief to enjoy the story. Propaganda that we suspect may be fake is something else, but we are suspicious enough not to be taken in.
The news media creating a news story that it knows to be fake, but which it presents as the truth, is a deliberate lie told with intent to deceive. If we cannot rely on the news to report honestly, how can we distinguish it from propaganda? And if we can’t distinguish it, why should we give journalists any respect?
(MItch: we can’t, good question, and as a group we should not; there are honest journos, but the institutions are rotten to the core).
Stories like this validate Trump’s assertion that the major media is fake news.
They make Trump credible.
And I think about half of this country knows that.
(And a quarter thinks the media is in the bag for the right. Yep. They’re out there somewhere).
The thing to remember, when reading of the medias “reporting” about Trump – in this case, about his budget – is that so much of it is completely made up.
Over at the WashEx, a catalog of the ongoing reportorial flubs, context-manglings, bobbled facts, unreliable anonymous sources with the wrong story, and just plain made-up BS…
It’s not only helpful to view the MSM as Democrat operatives with bylines; it’s pretty much the only intellectdually honest approach.
You’d never know it from watching/reading the WaPo, the NYTimes, NPR and the big three – but the American public trusts used car salesmen more than journalists.
Nope – not making it up: According to an Emerson College, poll, the public trusts the Trump about a quarter more than the mainstream media:
The Trump administration is more trusted than the news media among voters, according to a new Emerson College poll.
The administration is considered truthful by 49 percent of registered voters and untruthful by 48 percent.
But the news media is less trusted than the administration, with 53 percent calling it untruthful and just 39 percent finding it honest.
Question: what are the other 39% thinking of?
The Daily Caller notes that the “database” used by the liberal media to try to create hysteria about mass shootings, overstates the number of such incidents by at least an order of magnitude:
The website “Mass Shooting Tracker” (MST) has been regularly used by news outlets, like The Washington Post and PBS, to claim “mass shootings” occur much more frequently than they actually do. MST uses an alternative definition of “mass shooting” that greatly overstates their frequency relative to the commonly-accepted definition used by law enforcement and academics.
MST openly acknowledges it uses the alternate definition to “punch a hole in the NRA argument.”…MST’s defines a mass shooting as any shooting where four or more people are injured or killed, not counting the shooter. This isn’t an official definition taken from law enforcement or academia, but appears to be originally created by anti-gun activists on Reddit.
Of course, it’s something that Shot In The Dark readers knew well over a year ago.
Congress’s Democrat brain trust jumped on the news that former National Security Advisor Flynn had tweeted he was a scapegoat.
They were obliging enough to do it on video:
And who can blame ’em? It was in the NYTimes and the WaPo.
Of course, it was fake news. When it’s political and it’s in the Times or the WaPo, one should assume it’s fake, and verify.
It didn’t pass the stink test, of course. When it comes to this administration, it almost never will.