With the loathsome Gawker a thing of the past, Twitter is the next useless, left-biased internet institution I’d love to see spiral in.
Marty Neuman – who took over Keegans when the great Terry Keegan retired – is bringing another of my favorite brands to Nordeast across from Surdyk’s:
The owners of Keegan’s Irish Pub are opening a franchise location of Red’s Savoy Pizza next door to their University Avenue location, in what was formerly the clothing boutique Mona.
Keegan’s Owner Marty Neumann says he bought the franchise for the location. He’s looking to have the Red’s Savoy open by Jan. 1st.
No word whether Alondra Cano has criticized the deal for appropriating Italian culture, but this is otherwise fantastic news.
Or most technical “standards”, really:
And don’t get me started on the Chicago Manual of Style…
The best comment I’ve seen about the new iPhone 7’s replacement of the headphone jack with a pair of tiny, non-connected Bluetooth buds:
Of course they are. Something’s gotta keep bluetooth device manufacturers busy…
Today is the 25th birthday of the Linux operating system – which has morphed from Linus Torvalds’ hobby into the operating system running the vast majority of the world’s servers, including the ones bringing out this blog.
Here’s the current Linux family tree:
In my home, we have a couple of Macs, a couple of Linux machines – and, since nobody is paying me to use one, no Windows boxes at all.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails in re tomorrow’s “Gun Buyback for Artists” in Minneapolis:
Minneapolis is having a gun buy-back [tomorrow]. I’m thinking of dumping some relics from my gun locker. I need SITD readers to check my reasoning.
After Hillary is elected, the economy collapses and the Zombie Apocalypse hits, when there is no ammo left on the shelves, we’ll have to scrounge for ammo which means bartering with thieves who steal it.
Where will they steal it? From government storage, as the government will be the only ones with a supply line. So we’re looking at standard government calibers; the government doesn’t stock weapons chambered for exotic ammo so that will be impossible to find. Weapons chambered in exotic calibers will be useless, even for barter.
What will be considered “exotic” at that time?
.45 ACP was popular after WW II and Special Forces use it now, but ordinary military does not. They won’t be stocking it in quantity after The Crash. That ammo will be highly desirable but hard to find. Exotic.
.38 Special and .357 Magnum were popular cop revolvers until about 2000; nobody carries wheel guns as primary weapons. They won’t be stocking that ammo in quantity after The Crash. Backup guns and snub-nose hold-outs, maybe, but how much ammo will they store for them? Not much.
.40 S&W was popular with cops for a short time because the FBI tried it; but as of June, the FBI is going to 9mm. St. Paul PD switched from .40 Glocks to 9 mm Glocks five years ago. I suspect law enforcement is going softer and smaller because women and minorities can’t handle the bigger pistols with the hotter loads but the reason doesn’t matter – what matters is what ammo they will have in stock.
Okay – so police, federal law enforcement and military are all going 9 mm. That’s the pistol round I’ll have the easiest time scrounging. Which means dump pistols chambered for .22 LR, .380, .38 Special, .357 Magnum, .40 S&W, .45 ACP.
Now for rifles, it’s a different story. .22 LR in a rifle is a fine squirrel/rabbit gun. And everybody shoots .223/5.56 in the AR15. Those will be fine to keep around. I might even consider a Hi-Point 9mm Carbine; the maximum effective range is only about 100 yards but since the ammo is compatible with my pistol ammo, I only need one caliber in the backpack.
But for pistols, I’m seeing a shift in the prevailing wind away from exotics. I might as well take some items to the gun buy-back: liberate space in the gun locker and get paid by Liberals to do it.
What do you think?
I think there’s no better way to start a bunch of gunnies duking it out that to broach this topic.
Which is fun!
On the one hand: cocktails good.
On the other hands: “cocktail culture” bad.
And the effluvia of “cocktail culture?” Just plain silly.
Although two thubs up to the entrepreneurs involved!
Starting later this month, Uber will allow customers in downtown Pittsburgh to summon self-driving cars from their phones, crossing an important milestone that no automotive or technology company has yet achieved. Google, widely regarded as the leader in the field, has been testing its fleet for several years, and Tesla Motors offers Autopilot, essentially a souped-up cruise control that drives the car on the highway. Earlier this week, Ford announced plans for an autonomous ride-sharing service. But none of these companies has yet brought a self-driving car-sharing service to market.
I’m never going to ride in, much less own, a self-driving car.
Partly, it’s because driving is just plain fun. Not always, of course; navigating 494 when it turns into an Andean goat path after a major blizzard is no fun (and would be less so in a self-driving car).
Partly because I know programmers, and especially project management – and I drive better than they program. All due respect.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
I get calls from people wanting to know how to fix problems with real estate title documents, almost always sound like 20-something women, who treat commas as question marks with a rising voice inflection. It’s painful to listen long enough that I can give the obvious answer.
“Hi. My name is Kelli? From Big Title Company? I just have a quick question and I’m hoping you can help me.”
“We have this customer? And she got married? And changed her name? But she used her old name on the documents and the County won’t accept them for recording because the name doesn’t match.”
“So how do we fix that?”
“Throw them away and start over. Do it right this time.”
Maybe the hesitancy is a generational thing, afraid to make a statement that someone might pounce on as offensive? I don’t notice it with male callers or older women.
I don’t know.
But I do know the Millennial generation is on track to replace the Baby Boomers as the most overanalyzed, overhyped generation in history.
If you’ve been wanting to join the discussion in the comment section, but couldn’t find a “Register” link? The problem has been fixed. You can now register as a new commenter.
I blame Boko Haram.
Technology has wrought many wonders.
BBC filmmaker Ted Harrison has claimed that it could just be a few short years before developments mean that they can create the feeling of human touch…the technology could be developed that would leave the door open to fans imitating sexual contact with their idols.
Which, in a world where pornography eats up about a seventh of the internet’s capacity, the idea that people will eventually use technology to simulate the wango tango is a dog sniffs dog story. Duh; of course they will.
Perhaps it’s a sign that I do too much political blogging that the first thought that crossed my mind with this story was this question: given the fanatic loyalty liberals have for their politicians, if this technology had been available over this past year, how often would Hillary (and Bill) Clinton and Bernie Sanders have been the subject of, um, transactions?
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Just completed my mandatory annual data security training. From the module on passwords:
A password will not include anything that is meaningful to the user, such as a name (either real or fictional), a date (such as family birthdays and anniversaries), telephone numbers, postal codes, car registration numbers and so on. But DO NOT write down your password or use the “remember password” feature in any Web browser.
So . . . a password can’t anything to me, but I must remember for 30 days until I change it to a new meaningless phrase that I also can remember, but which does not repeat any password I’ve used in the past.
Holy crypto, Batman. Did I get transferred to the NSA without realizing it?
Who knows a government operation better than a government IT department?
It’s a rhetorical question.
There are two types of people in the world:
Type 1: People who don’t sort people into elaborate taxonomies.
Type 2: People who DO sort people into elaborate taxonomies.
- Type 2a: People who create taxonomies for a living
- Type 2a1: People who do it for academic purposes
- Type 2a2: People who do it as market research
- Type 2a3: People who do it for illicit purposes (arguments exist over whether this is a separate subclass)
- Type 2b: Those who create taxonomies for recreational purposes
- Type 2b1: Those for whom the exercise is a study in human nature
- Type 2b2: Those for whom it’s a study in order and structure that could apply to any group or set.
- Type 2c: Those who create taxonomies due to mental illness
- Type 2c1: Obsessive-compulsives
- Type 2c2: Obsessive “Sorters”
- Type 2c3: Classic overanalyzers
That is all.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
There are 10,000 sworn officers employed in Minnesota. They shoot an average of 10 people per year for the past 15 years No police officer was charged in any of those deaths. There are 200,000 Minnesotans with valid permits to carry a firearm. The Violence Policy Center (a gun-control advocacy group) tracks their offenses going back to 2008. Permit holders shoot an average of 2 people per year. Four permit holders have been charged with crimes (two are pending).
Police shoot 1 person per 1,000 cops. Permit holders shoot 1 person per 100,000 permit holders. Permit holders shoot fewer people in total, and fewer people per capita, than police. Minnesota police are 100 times more likely to shoot somebody than Minnesota pistol permit holders.
Minnesota police shooters are never charged, just like FBI shooters are never charged. That could be because no Minnesota law enforcement officer has ever made a mistake; it could be because of institutional bias shielding members of the law enforcement community from the consequences of their mistakes; or it could be because the law gives police officers special privileges that are denied to permit holders.
What is the correct procedure when an officer is approaching a vehicle during a traffic stop? Hand on pistol, just in case the driver is a threat to the officer.
What is the correct procedure when the driver identities himself as a cop? Most likely, the officer can take his hand off his pistol because even though the driver has a gun, that particular driver is not a threat to the officer. If the officer wants the driver out of the car, what’s the procedure to secure a fellow officer’s gun — take it away or let him keep it?
What is the correct procedure when the driver identifies himself as a permit holder? Statistically, that driver is even less likely to be a threat to the officer than when the driver is a cop. Shouldn’t the “not-a-threat-to-the-officer” procedure be similar – hand off the pistol? If the officer wants the driver out of the car, what’s the procedure to secure a permitted carrier’s gun – take it away or let him keep it?
If the procedures are not identical, why not? If the statistics show permitted carriers are less likely to shoot than fellow cops, why is the procedure different? Tribalism, loyalty to the Blue Line Clan? Stereotyping? That’s not a rational basis for treating safer people worse.
If there were a rational basis for a difference in procedures, how should they differ?
And most importantly of all, how do we inform officers and permitted carriers of the procedure, to make sure that nobody dies from mis-communication?
It’s the second-scariest thing about carrying.
AM1280’s got a new show – “Meat Masters Radio“, heard every Saturday at 4PM.
It’s a show about…meat. Grilling it, smoking it, eating it, you name it.
I’m hungry just writing about it.
And I’m happy to welcome it to the weekend shift at the 1280!
…about nuclear power plants.
Briefs have been filed in support of a challenge to Paramount Studios’ trademark on the Klingon “language”.
The briefs have been filed in Klingon.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
I got sick of Microsoft pelting me with emails so I downloaded the free upgrade to Windows 10. Naturally, the software developers couldn’t resist “helping” and “improving” by moving things around.
Control Panel still exists, but it’s not called that. It’s in “Settings” and you get there by left-clicking the “Windows” icon in the lower left (formerly the “Start Button”) to bring up the “Life at a Glance” panel of icons that includes the “Cog” which looks like a gear wheel to me. Left-click that to get to another page of groupings and click around those icons until you find the Control Panel feature that you wanted in the first place.
Not an improvement, in my opinion. They’ve made it harder to find, probably intentionally, so that mere users don’t change the default settings approved by the god-like geniuses who set up the new user interface. After all, I don’t own the software, I merely have a license to use it, when it feels like working, which is not all the time.
“Task Manager” doesn’t show up at all and I can’t figure out why not. What – the developers think the apps will never hang up? I’ll never need to crash a program to get out of it? Nonsense, it’s Windows, of course they’ll hang and of course I’ll need to crash them. Already have. But to get that power, you must to right-click the black stripe at the bottom of the screen (the “Task Bar”) to bring up an alternate context menu in which Task Manager is one choice. Nobody tells you that, it’s not in the help menu, I had to find it on YouTube. Windows REALLY doesn’t want the mere operator messing around with useful stuff like how to get the computer working again.
I know, I could spend the money on Apple which would work first time, every time, but I hate how fascist they are (Ve haf made ze settings unt you vill use zem unt you vill like zem and you vill not change zem, verstehen sie?). Or I could learn to use Ubuntu or Red Hat or Linux and spend the rest of my life fighting with incompatible software workarounds. Or buy a Chromebook and give my every thought to the Democrats (technically the federal government bureaucracy, but that’s pretty much the same thing nowadays).
I just want it to work. It doesn’t seem like so much to ask.
I work in “User Experience Design” for my day job – it’s a fancy term for “making software suck less for real people”. I read stories like this, and hear “permanent job security”.
Journalist tries – and miserably fails – to keep up with Winston Churchill’s daily drinking pace…
…and, in the process, indulges in some journalism, popping a few myths about Churchill’s drinking. His celebrated whiskey-and-sodas before noon included just enough whiskey to wet the bottom of the tumbler; his two bottles of champagne a day were pint-sized, not the liter or larger sized bottles common today.
But still, the guy drank a lot.
Oh, just read it.
I was bored the other night, so I started watching random old films on Youtube.
One of them was a documentary of sorts about an aircraft carrier off the coast of Vietnam, from fifty (!) years ago.
And I thought I’d borrow a page from Lileks; I grabbed the first name I could actually read, and decided to see what the internet could find me.
The first name I registered on was the pilot of the last plane in this clip (an A4 Skyhawk) – Lt. Junior Grade Dave Griggs:
Sure enough, he’s out there. He went on to become an astronaut – and in April of 1985, conducted the first unscheduled spacewalk in history – accompanied by Utah Senator Jake Garn, the first sitting Congressman in space.
He was killed in a private plane accident in 1989.
I need more hobbies.
And about how I feel as a North Dakotan in the Twin Cities.
My stomach still hurts from laughing.
SCENE: Mitch BERG is walking out of the downtown Saint Paul Dunn Brothers coffee. He runs into Chuck DUUUUHHHH, third-shift Twitter operator for “Minnesotans for Rand Paul”.
DUUUUHHHH: Hey, Merg! Did you seen the NEWS of the hotel FIRE in DOOBBAI?
BERG: Well, yeah – but before we get to that, I gotta say I’m amazed that you actually talk like you type on Facebook and Twitter, with occasional interjections in all caps.
DUUUUHHHH: Ha HAH. So there was a building fire, but it wasn’t hot ENOUGH to melt STEEL. Why DIDN’T the hotel fall TO the ground?
BERG: Because the fire was apparently in the cladding, on the facade, and never had a chance to weaken the structural steel.
DUUUUHHHH: Because steel melts at 2000 DEGREES FARRENHEIGHT, and so it didn’t LIQUIFY the GIRDLES.
DUUUUHHHH: THAT is your opinion!
BERG: Sure, whatever.
DUUUUHHHH: So by your logic, since it wasn’t not enough TO liquify steel, the HOTEL should HAVE fallen to the ground! Like Building SEVEN!
BERG: That’s kinda a non-sequitur.
DUUUUHHHH: That’s JUST your opinion! You’re not an engineer!
BERG: No, that’s true. But I have some command of basic logic. Look – you see to be of the opinion that if every skyscraper fire doesn’t end in a complete implosion, then 9/11 was an inside job.
DUUUUHHHH: Don’t be a sheeple! The GOVERNMENT lies to people all THE time! Why would a building fall when jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to melt steel?
BERG: Sure, government lies. No argument
But steel doesn’t have to melt to be a problem. Steel loses its strength and becomes basically pliable hundreds of degrees below its melting point:
DUUUUHHHH: He’s no engineer!~ And that doesn’t explain why all three BUILDINGS fell inside their FOOTPRINCE.
BERG: All three buildings transferred their weight via a web of girders to their central cores, which transferred the weight to the ground. Since the weight is all going down the middle of the building, where would you expect them to fall?
DUUUUHHHH: That’s just your opinion! You’re JUST closing your mind to all the engineers AND physicists who QUESTION the OFFFICIAL 9/11 story!
BERG: And you’re closing yours to the many engineers who point out that steel bends at a lower temp than jet fuel burns, and that buildings fall in the direction their weight transfers, absent some other force.
DUUUUHHHH: But you’re ignoring the fact THAT steel melts at 2000 degrees!
BERG: I answered that above.
DUUUUHHHH: And why did all three buildings FALL INSIDE their own footprint?
BERG: We just talked about that.
DUUUUHHHH: And why DID THE buildings collapse when the TEMPERATURE wasn’t enough TO LIQUIFY steel?
DUUUUHHHH: And without getting STEEL UP to 2000 degrees, it had to be a controlled demolition, OTHERWISE how do you explain the building FALLING IN its footprint?
BERG slowly tiptoes away.
How many police killings are a combination of bad shooting habits (most usually violation of absolute imperative to “keep your finger off the trigger until you’re ready to shoot”) and a gun that is designed to shoot, with absolute reliability, after a short trigger stroke?