If you don’t support Elizabeth Warren in 2016, the terrorists have won.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
We’re number One – in presidential motorcades. And room service tab.
As my buddy quipped: “For that kind of money, we could have bought Port Au Prince and held all future meetings there, for free!”
It’s all getting just a little bit banana-republican.
SCENE: Avery LIBRELLE is waiting at the light rail station on University Avenue.
Seeing Mitch Berg driving past, LIBRELLE leaps and, incredibly, sails through BERG’s passenger side window and lands sitting upright in BERG’s passenger seat.
BERG: What the…
LIBRELLE: Hahahahahahahahaha, Merg! You and your conservative teabagger friends “won” the South! Now, you can keep it?
BERG: Um, right. Mary Landrieu lost, leaving not a single Democratic Senator, Governor or Democrat-controlled Legislative chamber in the entire old Confederacy.
LIBRELLE: Yeah! You got all the racists! The journey you started in 1968, when you inherited all the racists with Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, is complete! You guys got the KKK vote!
BERG: You’re still babbling about the so-called “Southern Strategy?”
LIBRELLE: Yes! The racists, upset about the Civil Rights Act, all voted GOP!
BERG: OK – let’s accept for a moment purely for sake of argument that the South is more “racist” than the rest of the country – which is deeply debatable, but again, it’s for argument’s sake – and that people vote first and foremost over racial issues.
LIBRELLE: Yep. Absolutely!
BERG: OK. So the South voted for Nixon – but then, so did Vermont and California and, in 1972, Michigan, New York State, and even ultraliberal Minnesota. So they’re all racists, too, right?
LIBRELLE: The South were voting their consciences, though!
BERG: Were they indeed?
LIBRELLE: Even though these rhetorical questions of your always end up with me falling into a trap that makes me look stupid and uninformed, I’ll say “hell yeah!”
BERG: OK – so the Democrats controlled every single southern Congressional delegation until 1994. And the GOP didn’t win a majority of southern Governor’s offices, to say nothing of state legislatures, until well into the 2000s.
By the way – the Klan hasn’t been a factor in Southern Politics since the sixties, maybe the seventies at the very latest. So it would be more realistic to say that Republicans oversaw the extinction of mainstream racism in the Deep South.
(BERG’s car pulls up to stoplight. LIBRELLE steps out, walks between traffic to nearest train station).
BERG: Avery? Avery?
That which does not kill us makes us stronger.
So those of you who follow this post through to the bitter end will be ten feet tall and armor plated in about fifteen minutes.
There’s an election in two years – and the Democrat Party has decided to try to kick off the battle via the medium of the popular song.
There are three contenders, and they’re all pretty freaking awful.
But American needs to know; what’s the worst of the noxious bunch?
Let’s meet the offenders. Then let’s get down to voting.
Contender #1 – The Hillary Clinton Country-Western Song: This is Hillary’s opening bid for popularity in a part of the country that would rather catch a stream of projectile diarrhea than vote for Hillary Clinton.
It’s got everything that people in America’s heartland look for in a leader: central-casting “country” people; folksy abbreviations on videos (“Learnin’ Hindsight’s Always Right”, “‘Cuz Our American Dream’s At Stake”), because we like our videos to do their local patois the same way Hillary Clinton does it in her speeches – clumsy and patronizing; clunky, greasy references to inside-the-Beltway chanting points (“let’s smash that glass ceiling!”, indeed).
Hard to pick the biggest groaner; for my money, it’s the moment around 1:50, where the hot babe on the motorcycle gives the guy a ride on the back. That’s right, guys – you’ve been living in two-income families for a generation now, but deep down inside you’re all still sexists!
You just know some consultant – in my mind’s eye, “he” looks like Pajama-Boy – got major kudos for this idea. Maybe even got it stolen by a bigger consultant.
The video reportedly cost the Hillary PAC a million dollars to make. I have a hunch most of it went to AFTRA fees for the guys in the band – the only four males in Los Angeles would could pull of “Country Western Band”.
Or is the worst song…
Fauxcahontas’s Faux Faulk Frenzy: On the surface, it seems like Elizabeth “I Lied About Being Cherokee” Warren’s song couldn’t be any more different; lazily-written, badly-sung pseudo-”folk” music is as organic to the cultural left as Whole Foods, Terry Gross or Gluten-Free Coffee.
And whomever produced this atrocity got some of the surface anti-glitz “glitz” as right as Hillary’s crew got “country” wrong. ”Run Fauxcahontas Run” has lots of the veneer of bad coffeehouse folk music; the big chorus stretches eleven syllables to cover fourteen syllables of rhythm; the dork-fingered guitar-playing sounds so much like it’s being played by a Sylvia-Plath-obsessed Vassar women’s studies major…
…that you know it can’t be. It takes professionals – session musicians earning triple the musicians union scale – to play that badly, that well; it takes a professional singer to to edge that close to sounding like a lesbian slam poet without serving into pure caricature…
…as much as the lyrics do.
Before It Was Hilarious: Of course, the control for this experiment was this little ditty from 2008, a classic hymn to The One…
…complete with adoring crowds chanting, Nuremberg-style, in the background.
Nothing more needs to be said, right?
A Time For Choosing: OK – so what is the worst Hymn to a Candidate ever?
This may be the most important vote you take this year.
Who could have seen this coming – an administration that, for all of its chatter about “shovel ready jobs” and “infrastructure”, is hog-tied to its allegiance to academia and liberal plutocrats, having big trouble with working class voters, especially white ones?
As the price of fuel, staple foods, education and healthcare skyrocketed, all that talk of blue-collar work evaporated.
Glenn Reynolds writes:
That was actually an original part of Barack Obama’s stimulus plan, but it was derailed by feminists within the Obama coalition who thought it would produce too many jobs for men. Christina Romer, then-chair of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, reported: “The very first email I got … was from a women’s group saying ‘We don’t want this stimulus package to just create jobs for burly men.’ ”
Well, if you’re offended by jobs for burly men, you probably won’t do well with working-class men, or with the working-class women who are often married to burly men. And, as Joel Kotkin notes, many other Obama policies — promoting urban density, which creates fewer construction jobs; fighting oil and coal extraction, thus targeting industries that create high-paying blue collar jobs; and even opening up immigration, which drives down wages for the working class — all seem designed to punish people who work for a living, even as expanded benefits for the poor seem designed to reward people who draw government checks for a living.
The parallels in Minnesota are – or should be – tantalizing to conservative Republicans; the DFL is even more the lapdog of urban academia and plutocrats than the national party; I’m not sure how Rick Nolan beat Stewart Mills, and I’m not sure he’ll do it again. And when Collin Peterson finally retires in the 7th CD, that district will be Republican for a generation or two…
…entirely on the dynamics in Reynolds’ article.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Obama is a lame duck with delusions of royalty. He’s going to issue whatever Executive Orders he wants, knowing his hand-picked Attorney General won’t let Republican lawsuits affect his actions for years, if ever.
Republicans could impeach The First Black President, but Democrats have been slavering to be thrown in that briar patch, it’d set the Republican Party back a century.
Republicans’ only power is the purse. Maybe the Republicans should start advertising “Do not plan your vacation to visit any national parks or public monuments, Obama is going to shut them all down on July 1.”
He’ll do it in response to our shutting off the money, true; but why take the heat for it alone? Get out in front of him, for a change. Start telling people right now “There’s only one way to stop an out-of-control dictator so get ready for it, we’re shutting ‘er down.”
Watch for a media campaign claiming that the “power of the purse” is racist…
“Please keep focusing on that guy in Big Stone County. Please keep focusing on that guy in Big Stone County. Don’t focus on this. Please keep focusing on that guy in Big Stone County”.
Rock and roller and conservative icon Ted Nugent tweets about Obama’s response to Ferguson:
Obama’s empty neutrality, moral bankruptcy and political cowardice is now undeniable to even his most loyal cheerleaders and boot-lickers!
— Cornel West (@CornelWest) November 25, 2014
Well, Ted Nugent saying that sort of thing about Barack Obama barely rises to Dog Bites Dog, now, does it?
We’re already down to convention-planning time.
And while the Democrat National Committee is pondering New York, Philly and Columbus, Ohio, Kevin Williamson has a more appropriate idea:
The Democrats, if they had any remaining intellectual honesty, would hold their convention in Detroit. Democratic leadership, Democratic unions and the Democratic policies that empower them, Democrat-dominated school bureaucracies, Democrat-style law enforcement, Democratic levels of taxation and spending, the politics of protest and grievance in the classical Democratic mode — all of these have made Detroit what it is today: an unwholesome slop-pail of woe and degradation that does not seem to belong in North America, a craptastical crater groaning with misery, a city-shaped void in what once was the industrial soul of the nation. If you want to see the end point of Barack Obama’s shining path, visit Detroit.
Not, he points out, that New York and Philadelphia aren’t headed in the same direction…
…”when Obama’s lost SNL, he’s truly lost” – I mean, nobody really thinks about SNL much any more, do they?
And the “funny” thing is, this is better “Journalism” than most of the mainstream media has done on the subject of Barack Rex’s overreach.
It’s no wonder that the White House and its allies aren’t citing the recent elections or polls in defending their actions. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll taken ahead of Obama’s move found that voters opposed him taking executive action without approval from Congress by 48 to 38 percent. Even among Hispanics, only 43 percent favored the action versus 37 percent who opposed it.
Look for this to be as far as the media (AKA “The Praetorian Guard”) to go in criticizing Barack Rex.
I’m starting to develop this theory that the Democrats’ “messaging” strategy is developing into something like this:
- Tell voters pretty much whatever you think they want to hear.
- Assume the voters are too incurious to check up on it.
- There is no point 3.
Submitted as evidence: Barbara Boxer’s speech against the Keystone Pipeline; I’ll emphasize the real howlers:
Not only would the construction of Keystone put no negative pressure on gasoline prices, an argument President Barack Obama has also made, but the California senator claimed it would have the precise opposite effect. “We’re going to see higher gas prices because of this,” Boxer insisted.
These and other comments delivered by Boxer over the course of her hours on the floor on Tuesday were equally confounding, but her most mystifying pronouncements were those in which she touted the bustling green economy of her home state.
“Ask yourself the question, is it worth exposing our people to these risks who I stood with shoulder to shoulder, and is it worth exposing the planet to these risks when we can create millions of jobs in a clean energy economy like we’re doing in my state,” she said. “And we’re going gangbusters!”
“I come from a state that is booming with hundreds of thousands of jobs with balanced budgets — clean energy future — and I come from a state that embraced cleaning up the environment and building the economy and jobs,” Boxer later added. “And they go hand in hand.”
Repeat after us: Scarcity leads to lower prices; plenty leads to higher prices. California is going gangbusters. The budget – “balanced” via tax hikes – is sustainable; the California pension bubble isn’t going to burst. Green energy is a goldmine for workers!
It sounds good on camera. It plays well with people who still think government still tells the truth, and that media will tell them if anything’s amiss. It plays well with Gruber’s America.
The question isn’t “has the Democrat party switched to an all-lie messaging strategy”. The queston is “given their assumptions, why would they not go to an all-lie messaging strategy?”
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
A few years back, the local media ran big stories about government workers getting huge raises despite tough times. Outrage followed.
Wasn’t true, of course, it was “accurate but false.” Turns out that public employees are paid on a 2-week pay period system instead of being paid on the 1st and 15th. We get 26 paychecks per year instead of 24. But every seven years, payday falls on New Year’s Day which is a holiday, so the check is cut one day early and that results in 27 pay checks issued during in that year.
Is that a raise? No – the employee keeps the same hourly rate of pay. The money would have been paid in the new year, but for shifting the payday backwards. It’s a fake controversy based on a calendar quirk. It’s like claiming a 63-year-old man is 9 years old because he was born on Leap Day so he’s only had 9 birthdays. Calendar quirk.
Look for those stories again this year.
People who put these sorts of things out there as if there’s not some sort of “gotcha” involved annoy me to no end.
Fauxcahontas: n: Elizabeth Warren.
The DFL has a long, filthy history of dropping hit pieces in the closing hours of campaigns that would make people who care about petty annoyances like “right and wrong” and ‘truth” puke up their skulls. Classic example – this piece from 2010, which tried to whip up ingorant anti-Arab sentiment against King Banaian – who happens to be of Armenian descent.
But the people who do Democrat “Farmer” Labor Party hit pieces don’t bother with right and wrong. Their ends justify their means.
I cited this piece, dropped against Stacey Stout in House District 43B, on the show over the weekend. I called it “Evil”.
Uh oh. An abusive guy (are there any other kind in the DFL’s world? Other than Pajama Boy, I mean?)
This ad proves that the DFL is counting on finding a plurality of incurious cretins. And in 43A, it apparently worked.
Let’s go through this point by point:
Stout, like most people who don’t see “people with swastika armbands” as a government model to emulate, opposed a DFL proposal to take guns away from people accused, as opposed to convicted, of domestic abuse.
The “Gun Show Loophole” is a fraud; every gun show I’m aware of requires an NICS background check, and require a police-issued “Permits to Purchase” to buy a gun. The bill the DFL refers to would have required people to transfer all firearms via a Federal Firearms Licensed dealer. That means if you’re handing a gun down to your kid, or lending a shotgun to your friend for duck season. This does nothing but raise the price of firearms (FFLs don’t work for free) and create a paper trail for every gun – the same trail that police departments in Connecticut and New York are trying to use to confiscate firearms.
As to her opposing a background check for “assault weapons?” That was a proposal that would have added a second, utterly redundant background check for buying such weapons.
Stout made the right call in all three cases – if “following the law and the Constitution” is what you care about, which for the Democrat party it is not.
Taking those stances, in favor of the law-abiding citizens’ civil liberties, and turning them into “support for rape and domestic abuse?”
If you’re a DFL official, you might want to steer clear of me today.
And if you voted for Peter Fischer over this ad? Sorry for all the two-syllable words.
SCENE: Mitch BERG is walking through the woods in Como Park, looking for a place to practice the bagpipes.
Suddenly, Avery LIBRELLE jumps out from behind a tree.
LIBRELLE: Hey, Merg! Your sides has been owned again!
BERG: Er, Avery? What are you doing in the middle of the woods?
LIBRELLE: Stakeout for climate criminals. So anyway, we were talking about how your side has been owned again.
BERG: ”We” weren’t. You were.
LIBRELLE: Hahaha. And it comes from Canada. Here. Read it.
LIBRELLE: So yet again, a Canadian proves he knows what’s best for us better than the American electorate does.
BERG: Well, no. He’s shown he’s absorbed Deb Wasserman-Drescher’s chanting points like a Macalester College poli-sci grad. Pretty much every point Richard Brunt of Victoria British Columbia says is wrong.
LIBRELLE: No way!
BERG: Way. Corporate profits are high because companies are sitting on cash, rather than investing. The “under 6%” unemployment number is a sham; the percentage of people in the workforce who are working is essentially unchanged since the lowest point in the depression. The GDP growth rate Mr. Brunt is bragging about is the slowest of any recovery in the post-war era. This is especially noteworthy because, normally, steep sharp recessions have steep, sharp recoveries (see 1982). This one was a steep recession with a painfully-slow recovery. How painful? The current GDP growth is equal to the WORST quarter of growth in the recovery from the 1982 recession.
Gasoline prices are “falling” to about $1 more than they were when Obama took office. Worse than that when you adjust for inflation.
LIBRELLE: Hah, Merg! There is no inflation!
BERG: Does you or Mr. Brunt ever buy bread, beef, chicken, eggs or health insurance? …? CPI shows low inflation, but that’s largely a function of the price of debt – which is being kept artificially low:
Oh, yeah – and oil imports are declining partly due to the slow economy, and partly due to drilling in the Dakotas, which is basically happening over Obama’s, let’s just say, passive-aggressive objection.
As to the “respected around the world” bit? That’s just delusional.
LIBRELLE: That’s just like a typical Repblicon. A message based on fear!
LIBRELLE: Yeah. Fear of black people!
BERG: How did fear or black people enter the conversation?
LIBRELLE: You’re afraid, aren’t you? Boo! There’s a black guy sneaking up on you!
(BERG turns, inflates the bag on his pipes, and starts playing random noises to drown LIBRELLE out as he walks back to his car).
To: New GOP Majorities in the MN House and US Congress
From: Mitch Berg, Uppity Peasant
Want something to show you’re serious about getting the boot of government off of innocent citizens’ necks?
Including, preferably, eradicating laws that allow corrupt pettifoggers to run rackets with the blessing of “the law”.
Do it now, so we can see who the real enemies are.
That is all.
There’s an old saying; “success has a thousand fathers; failure is an orphan”.
In the wake of the Democrat party’s nationwide electoral humiliation, the left is looking for things to hang their hopes on.
It’s human nature; the good guys were doing it two years ago, too.
So here’s what the Democrats are hanging their hats on; in a blue state, a 67 year old governor who gets mistaken for his entrepreneur anscestors, a superannuated standup comic, and a couple of congressmen dragged out of mothballs at the Museum of Pettifogging eked out wins in a state where…they were expected to eke out wins.
But remember – whatever success there is has a thousand fathers. Er, parents. And the local left is stepping all over itself to claim their piece of the
“In These Times” is the sort of “progressive” publication you can imagine a room full of Grace Kellys producing. I don’t read it much, because it’s just not a challenge.
But in their post mortem of the MN elections, they made an interesting and, dare I say, surprising claim.
No, it’s not the callow reference to stereotypes. That’s no surprise from any “progressive” publication:
Mike McIntee, who lives in Eagan and is executive producer [Hah! - Ed] of The UpTake, a citizen journalism-driven, online video streaming website, has seen his first-ring suburb change politically. The residents of Eagan’s cul-de-sacs no longer exclusively resemble an episode of The Brady Bunch, but include different ethnicities and low-income housing.
“White People” = “Brady Bunch”.
Anyway – here’s the interesting part (emphasis added by me):
McIntee also credits the work of Protect Minnesota, which works to end gun violence by turning it into a political issue in urban and suburban areas. Protect Minnesota sent out mailers this election season attacking candidates who opposed gun control. Its gun-safety champions who won on Tuesday include Ron Erhardt, who represents the suburb of Edina. Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association’s influence may be waning in Minnesota. Three rural DFLers who were endorsed by the NRA all lost.
The gun grabber group led by Heather Martens known mainly for its comic ineptitude, has done more harm than “good” for the gun grabber movement in the past…couple of decades. They mobilize no significant people (a couple of dozen might turn out for a vital hearing, as opposed to hundreds of Real Americans.
But what of their claims?
- McIntee claims “Protect” Minnesota sent out “mailings attacking candidates“: Now, the Minnesota Human Rights community is pretty good at keeping tabs on what the orcs are doing. And nobody seems to have seen a “Protect Minnesota” mailer. None. Michael Bloomberg and the DFL both hit on guns – but both groups carefully excised the hapless “Protect Minnesota” from their strategy.
- What “Gun Safety Champions?” Protect MN is a lobbying group, not a PAC. Did they endorse candidates? If so ,they broke the law; lobbying groups can’t endorse candidates.
- They’re claiming credit for Ron Erhardt? If Mike McIntee or Heather Martens wants to make the claim that guns were behind Ron Erhardt’s razor-thin win in Edina, feel perfectly free. But be ready to be slapped down hard. It’s an absurd claim.
- They’re Claiming They Have The Momentum?: “Three rural DFLers endorsed by the NRA” lost – but then, most rural DFLers lost, whatever their NRA and MNGOPAC endorsement. The election wasn’t about guns! But even so, over 3/4 of MNGOPAC’s endorsed candidates, GOP and DFL, won on election night – and many of the ones that lost in Greater Minnesota lost to other candidates with high GOCRA and MNGOPAC ratings. Either way, gun owners won. To claim the Gun Rights movement lost last Tuesday is a Baghdad-Bob-level bit of delusion.
But delusion is Heather Martens’ stock in trade. From the “Protect” MN website:
Look, “Progressives”; if it makes you sleep easier at night thinking that…:
- Mark Dayton, who has spent the past two cycles trying to defuse Real American opposition by claiming he has a couple of .357 Magnums at home for self-defense, and
- Al Franken, who touches on guns as obliquely as his caucus will allow him to, and
- Rick Nolan, who ran away from the anti-gun movement (ineptly), and
- Colin Peterson, with an NRA “A” rating, along with…
- 11 new Republicans, all of them pro-gun, mostly MNGOPAC endorsed, all of them Second-Amendment-friendly, and
- a solidly pro-Human Rights MN House, with Michael Paymar’s Metrocrat caucus demoted to the cheap seats…
…are a “victory” for “gun safety?” Go for it!
It’s Heather Martens’ take, and it’s delusional…
…but I repeat myself.
Note to Mike McIntee and the rest of the “progressive” feed trough; if that’s the best source you can pick, no wonder you guys are getting your asses kicked on Second Amendment issues.
One of the brighter spots in Tuesday’s proceedings was the crushing victory of Peggy Bennett over Shannon Savick in Albert Lea.
It was an old-fashioned whooping – 53-40. Not even close. And that was with an Indyparty candidate who took 6% out of the race, likely mostly from Bennett.
I’m still doing the end-zone happy dance in my head.
Shannon Savick was one of the DFLers from Greater Minnesota who supported Michael Paymar and Alice “The Phantom” Hausman’s gun grab bills in the 2013 legislature.
And she was one of the DFLers who joined Hausman and Paymar in getting up and theatrically walking out of the hearing room when the Real Americans of the Second Amendment movement started their testimony against their proposals. Indeed, the DFL made a shameful spetacle of ignoring their opponents’ testimony.
Watching their bills – and all of their support from Michael Bloomberg – go down to whining, piddling defeat – was sweet. And it was what mattered most.
But seeing Shannon Savick tossed out of office with all the ceremony of a day old egg salad sandwich is right up there.
OK, Ms. Savick. NOW you may get up and leave the room.
UPDATE: It wasn’t just Savick – and it wasn’t just in Minnesota. Gun grabbers were crushed nationwide. It was lopsided in the Senate, of course – but the most astounding progress was among governors.
To sum it all up? The NRA-endorsed candidate won in Maryland.
Perhaps bigger, but definitely more subtle? The flip of the Senate will at least slow down President Obama’s ongoing campaign to pack the Federal Appelate courts with gun-grabbing activists.
It was a good Tuesday for Pro-Second-Amendment Real Americans from coast to coast.
The Minnesota legislature wants to make it as easy as possible for voters to get to the polls.
In major, DFL-dominated cities, anyway; Minnesota urban transit systems will be providing free transportation all day tomorrow, courtesy of the Democrat-controlled 2014 legislature:
The faith-based group ISAIAH works to increase voter turnout. Organizer Matt Gladue said the new law might help people in a rush with work and children to get to the polls before they close.
“Any law that removes the substantial barriers people face to getting to the polls on Election Day is a good law,” Gladue said. “If it allows one, a hundred or a thousand people to get to the polls who wouldn’t be able to do it, it’s a good thing.”
No word yet if ISAIAH is going to help farmers in Pennington County make the long, cold drive to their polling stations after a long day in the fields…
An activist with the Mali Marvin campaign (running against Deb Hillstrom in Brooklyn Center) provided an account on Facebook about the obstruction every Republican activist in a DFL town knows first-hand (included in full below):
Black Chicago preacher endorses the GOP candidate for governor of Illinois over the loathsome Pat Quinn…
Corey Brooks, a South Side pastor featured in an ad endorsing Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Rauner, says he’s moved his family from his home while police investigate an overnight burglary of his church, as well as threatening derogatory phone calls he received which claim he’ll be beaten for being Rauner’s “puppet.”
On Saturday, Brooks rushed to the New Beginnings Church of Chicago after a maintenance employee found the church’s back doors shattered and an estimated $8,000 stolen from a glass charity box, meant to build a community center across from the church.
Democrat apologists will no doubt say that it was just typical street crime.
How many common thug burglars operate from a political/racial agenda? Emphasis added below:
“The death threats seem to be related to [GOP candidate] Bruce Rauner,” Brooks said at the church Saturday. “They say his name as well as mine and most of the references were in response to me in support of him. So it’s really derogatory, real racial, a lot of homophobic words. It’s real life threatening.”
Brooks said he received the five phone calls on Friday. He recorded one of them, and provided it to police. In that call, which was played for the Sun-Times, a man’s voice is disguised via a high-pitched filter. He is heard calling Brooks a “token n—–.”
How many common burglars in Chicago would you think even know the GOP endorsed a candidate, much less take the time to pitch-shift their voice on the phone?
Their message sounds a little like Minnesota Progressive Project reads:
“We on you boy, we on you. And you ain’t got nobody that can stop us, nobody. Who you go [to] the deacons? They can’t stop us. We going to beat your fat a– in front of your mama congregation Sunday. Yeah we going to steal the sheep of the hypocrite. You’s a hypocrite we going to beat your fat a– in front of your own congregation. Who you got that…f— we going to beat their a– too. They can’t protect you. You sell out you Uncle Tom a– n—–. You token. You a puppet for Bruce Rauner you puppet n—– a–. P—- a– n—–,” the voice says on the recording.
Read the whole, disgusting thing.
And imagine if it would be different here in Minnesota if a black pastor in North Minneapolis or Frogtown broke from the DFL.
I’d bet $20 on “no”, but I’ll forgive you for not taking the bet.
Durable goods orders are off.
Representative Shannon Savick is a first-term Democrat from House District 27, the Albert Lea area, south of the Metro. She’s a member of the Democrat Farmer Labor party. She’s blessed with a fairly well-off rural community for whom the consequences of DFL control aren’t yet life-or-death, and the presence of the Albert Lea Tribune, a newspaper that gives the City Pages and Star Tribune a run for their big-city money as mouthpieces for the DFL. The paper has, of course, endorsed Savick.
Everything seems hunky-dory for Ms. Savick, who is running for a second term.
Everything but one; an especially noxious vote against Minnesotans’ human rights and civil liberties during her freshman session in 2013. It was a bill by Rep. Paymar that would have:
- Banned “Ugly Guns”: The bill would have banned firearms with scary military-looking cosmetic features
- Banned Large-Capacity Magazines: Paymar wanted to force law-abiding homeowners and citizens to be forced to reload 2-3 times as often if they are beset by determined, dissociative or chemically motivated attackers.
- Private Transfers: While even some Second Amendment people think this – requiring all purchases to go through a federally-licensed firearms dealer (FFL), to close the non-existant “gun show loophole” – doesn’t sound too noxious on the surface, its byproduct -a paper trail for all guns – makes the next step, universal registration, trivially easy.
Savick was one of four outstate DFLers – including John Ward, Erik Simonson and Paul Rosenthal – who voted for this atrocity of a bill.
At the risk of sounding crass, I’ll tell the truth; the bill was an attempt to kick in the teeth of every law-abiding gun owner in Minnesota.
Even worse? During the public hearings on these bills – where pro-Human-Rights activists outnumbered Victim Disarmament activists by close to 30-1 – Savick joined her Metrocrat colleagues in walking out of the hearings when it came time for opponents to testify against the bills.
Despite this deeply misguided vote, and deeply stupid bit of theatrics, the conventional wisdom had Savick as a pretty sure bet for re-election.
The calculus must have changed. Savick is pulling an Ann Wynia – protesting her history with firearms:
I remember when my dad gave me my first gun when I was 16. It was a Marlin .22 bolt-action rifle. I have many fond memories of carrying that gun as I went hunting with my cousins. Over the next 30 years or so, I acquired another five guns, some for shooting and some for collecting.
I share this because I have recently been asked about how I feel about guns. People are concerned that I might be a gun-hating politician who wants to take away their guns.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I own and shoot guns. I have a permit to carry. A few months ago I hosted a permit to carry class in my basement so others could get their permit. And actually, I am a pretty good shot.
Just thought I should set the record straight.
If you have questions about this, please don’t hesitate to call me.
Oh, I’ll call.
Because owning guns is easy (thanks to us Second Amendment activists, anyway). Mark Dayton says he owns guns. Carl Rowan owned guns. A rabidly anti-gun Missouri state Senator was arrested with a gun in Ferguson a few weeks back.
But the Second Amendment isn’t about hunting.
Representative Savick: Can you name a single vote you took in the past two years that supported the rights of the law-abiding Minnesotan to keep and bear arms for self-defense?
Can you find some action on your part to atone for your votes for Paymar’s agenda?
Have your people call my people. But just in case my people are calling your people anyway.
Savick’s opponent, Peggy Bennett, is having a forum at the Hayfield American Legion tonight at 7PM.
A couple of weeks ago, I was doing a piece about Tina Flint Smith, Minnesota’s first whore. Having someone like that in the office of lieutenant governor would serve to concentrate all of the power of the executive office…
… wait – did I just call Tina Flint Smith a whore?
Dang. That’s bizarre.
Anyway – I was talking with a Republican friend about “Take Action Minnesota”, the community organizing group run by that door-to-door, bore-on-the-floor whore Greta Bergstrom. The group has been working overtime…
…What? Really? I did? I called her a “whore?” Not only that, but concocted a cutesy rhyme to set it all off? Oh, not again. How could that possibly happen?
Well, I guess it just goes to show you it could happen to anyone.
Accidents! Who knew?
Or at least that’s what the media wants you to think about – I’m sure it’s just a coincidence – a Democrat saying it about South Carolina governor Nikki Haley (emphasis added):
FLORENCE, S.C. (CBS Charlotte) – Democratic gubernatorial candidate Vincet Sheheen is coming under fire for accidentally calling Gov. Nikki Haley a “whore” at a campaign event.
Sheheen was caught on video at an appearance in Florence last week stating “we are going to escort whore out the door” referring to Haley. His gaffe appeared to be a slip from the tongue and he quickly corrected himself stating “we’re going to escort her out the door.”
So Shaheen “accidentally” used a rhyming couplet, for which he corrected himself, before yukking it up with his peckerwood supporters?
But immediately after correcting himself, Sheheen has an almost gleeful interaction with the crowd and laughed at his gaffe. Video of the event has gone viral.
Who hasn’t had that happen, honestly?
I’m imagining a world where the Democrat Party didn’t have a media “accidentally” serving as their Praetorian Guard.
The big DFL strategy in this election, so far, seems to be to scare to death the voters who they haven’t bored to death.
There was a debate on Wednesday in Bemidji. Since a couple of districts – 2A and 5A – are in play in the Bemidji area, candidate from both were apparently in the ring.
The topic turned to gun control:
In response to a question on gun control, [HD2A GOP challenger Dave] Hancock said shooting incidents usually occur in places where guns are banned.
“If we look we look at the areas where tragedy has occurred with guns, they are usually in gun-free zone(s),” he said. “Where you have people armed and carrying concealed weaponry, the criminal in use of a gun thinks twice.”
That’s pretty much the fact. Hancock got it right. No surprise there.
Here’s where it gets interesting – and when I say “interesting”, I mean “A DFLer starts saying things that misinform the uninformed”. The DFL’s Joe Persell responded to the question; I’m going to add emphasis:
Persell disagreed, saying carrying weapons can exacerbate tense situations.
“Folks that are out there carrying, playing cop … I don’t think we want them to be doing that,” he said. “There’s more instances of people being killed because they are carrying, and they think somebody said something nasty, and they felt threatened, and so they shot them.”
Really, Rep. Persell?
I wanted to ask Rep. Persell to name one example of either of a Minnesotan…:
- being killed because they were “playing cop”
- killing someone who “said something nasty” to them.
Conversation: I sent Rep. Persell an email asking for clarification. He contacted me, saying he’d been taken out of context in the Bemidji Pioneer. We wound up having a conversation last night. I pointed out that there has never been such a case involving a legal post 2003 carry permit holder in the state of Minnesota (although there were a few incidents with pre-2003 permits – the ones issued by sheriffs).
Rep. Persell told me that the conversation referred to the Second Amendment as a general, nationwide issue, and that he was referring to cases like those of Michael Dunn, the Florida man who shot a teenager over, the court case said, “loud music”.
Those cases certainly grab the headlines – the media, being left-of-center and largely anti-gun, makes sure they do.
But even those lavishly-publicized incidents are exceedingly rare. I ran the numbers, nationwide, a few years ago; in a typical year, a carry permittee is two orders of magnitude less likely to commit any kind of crime than the general public.
So while Persell wasn’t “lying”, per se, he was focusing attention on a type of incident that is exceedingly rare in real life. While his original quote in the Bemidji Pioneer may have been out of context, the context of his remark is misleading and inflammatory.
The problem with guns, statistically, nationwide, isn’t a guy with a carry permit killing someone unjustifiably. It’s the thousands of criminals without permits who kill people without regard to the law at all.
Hope that word gets out…