… It was an “undocumented visitor”.
To: The Blue States
From: Mitch Berg, Uppity Peasant
Scotland has voted to stay in the United Kingdom (provided the UK’s taxpayers pay more for its care and feeding).
But perhaps there’s a lesson in there for you.
Given your contempt for those who think differently than you – “What’s the Matter With Kansas“, anyone? – and the conceit you cling to that you pay the nation’s freight (it’s BS, but it’s Krugman, so you all are attached to it), perhaps it’s time for you to follow the Scots’ example.
Maybe you should get high on dudgeon, and take your toys and go elsewhere?
That’ll show us!
That is all!
Drescher Schultz will likely not be The Nanny the chair of the DNC too terribly much longer.
And it’s interesting to notice, after two years of “War on Women” rhetoric (much of it put into the public arena by Wasserman
Drescher Schultz herself), that the Democrats’ bench of (obligatory) female prospects to run the DNC is so very very shallow:
Here’s the reality: No matter the outcome for Democrats in November, Wasserman Schultz will likely be shown the door, with another woman to replace her. But, the list of possible replacements is a not-so-long list of two: Stephanie Schriock, who heads the Democratic women’s group EMILY’s List, and Stephanie Rawlings Blake, the mayor of Baltimore.
The world of politics still has a recruiting problem when it comes to women, and Wasserman Schultz is perhaps both a beneficiary and victim of that reality.
Looks like a certain party needs to start putting together binders and binders full of women…
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Got to the office Monday, arms and back were sore from a weekend Honey-Do project. No pain pills at the office.
I had bottles of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in my desk drawer, but new office assistant (21-year old woman) re-organized. The bottles had expiration dates of 2011 and 2012 so she threw them away. She didn’t want me to poison myself with expired medication.
I didn’t have the heart to tell her that acetaminophen and ibuprofen do not expire. She means well, she just doesn’t know any better.
She’s a perfect Democrat: she causes others to suffer pain but since she was acting with good intentions and didn’t mean to cause harm, she can’t be blamed for it.
Although she won’t be a true democrat until she actively demonizes you for seeking a solution she disagreed with…
The BATFE is now collecting racial data when you go to buy a gun:
With little fanfare, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in 2012 amended its Form 4473 — the transactional record the government requires gun purchasers and sellers to fill out when buying a firearm — to identify buyers as either Hispanic, Latino or not. Then a buyer must check his or her race: Indian, Asian, black, Pacific Islander or white.
Now, the purpose of the form is supposed to be to collect information needed to screen potential purchasers for criminal background.
So what’s race got to do with it?
…“This issue concerns me deeply because, first, it’s offensive, and, secondly, there’s no need for it,” said Evan Nappen, a private practice firearms lawyer in New Jersey. “If there’s no need for an amendment, then there’s usually a political reason for the change. What this indicates is it was done for political reasons, not law enforcement reasons.”
Yet another example of politicized “law enforcement”.
Preferred One – the company chosen by about three of five people that were able to actually enroll in MNSure in the past year – is bailing out of Minnesota’s troubled health insurance exchange.
At a news conference Tuesday afternoon, [MNSure CEO Scott] Leitz said he is disappointed with the decision but Minnesotans will still have other options for health insurance through MNsure.
“We level the playing field for consumers. We provide options so Minnesotans can make wise choices,” he said. “We anticipated some bumps along the way, and we’re still seeing some of those bumps.”
He’s half right. MNSure – like Obamacare – removes actual choice.
But the bumps? Those are real.
This is a huge hit for MNSure (emphasis added):
As of Aug. 6, Preferred One had 59 percent of the individual market MNsure enrollees. Blue Cross Blue Shield was a distant second at 23 percent, with HealthPartners, Medica and UCare much further back.
Preferred One got such a large share, because they had the lowest rates of the five insurance companies in the program.
And I’m going to hazard a guess that the bulk of Preferred One’s customers were the ones who were getting the lowest subsidies – i.e. the ones that MNSure was counting on to pay the bills for the subsidized, high-risk customers.
It’s possible this could signal big rate increases to be unveiled in early October, and that could have a significant impact on the elections.
“One of the big land mines looking out over the campaign will be when MNsure announces its new rates for health insurance premiums,” University of Minnesota political expert Larry Jacobs said. “If those go up by 10 percent, some have even suggested 15 percent, then that could really shake up this election.”
So let’s get this straight: because of Democrat/DFL medding in healthcare, you can’t keep your doctor, but your rates will skyrocket.
Just wanna make sure we’re clear on this.
Of course, since there are DFLers involved, “clarity” will be hard to come by:
State Rep. Joe Atkins, DFL-Minn., also commented in a statement saying in part, “MNsure is a marketplace where consumers can compare and shop for quality health insurance. It is no different than Target or Cub Foods in that some products will come and go. Preferred One may be leaving, but MNsure still has great products.”
Of course, that’s lunacy. MNSure would be like “Target or Cub” if the state made it illegal to shop at Aldi, and taxed you extra for shopping at Kowalski’s.
Oh, yeah – and if the state paid low-income people to shop there, maybe:
Anyone who has PreferredOne through MNsure can still directly renew through the company, but they won’t get the government subsidy. To get the subsidy, they will have to choose a different insurance plan starting Nov. 15.
This is what the DFL hath wrought.
RELATED: Big Left squirts tears, blames capitalism, pimps single-payer.
Kevin Williamson’s conclusion:
The only thing stopping federal authorities from suffocating free speech — not only by independent groups such as the SBA List, but by individuals, trade groups, National Review, and the New York Times — is the First Amendment.
And Harry Reid wants to gut it. Figure out why that is and you’ll know everything you need to know about the Democratic party, which with each passing day functions less and less like a political party and more like a crime syndicate.
What led him to the conclusion?
Well, here’s the opener:
Dissent is the highest form of patriotism. Dissent is the lowest form of crime. If you are a drone in the hive of the Left, it is possible — easy, in fact — to believe both of those things at the same time.
Just read the whole thing.
Two years of “war on women” rhetoric gets the Democrats…
Women surveyed said they disapprove of Obama by a 50 percent to 44 percent margin — nearing an all-time low in the poll. It’s almost the reverse of the 55 percent to 44 percent breakdown for Obama among female voters in 2012, according to exit polls.
His approval rating among women has slipped four percentage points from a year ago and 16 points since his second inaugural in January 2013, when his approval was 60 percent among the group.
I’d like to think it’s because women felt the Democrats were patronizing them, and that they’re smarter than that.
I said I’d like to think it.
Oh, yeah – and yoots are unamused:
Among younger voting-age Americans, Obama’s approval rating stood at 43 percent. That marked an 11-point drop since June among those 18 to 29 years old. Voters younger than 30 supported Obama by 60 percent to 37 percent in 2012.
I’m not one of those who thinks that the whole world needs to turn on the wishes of the under-thirty set; most of them will be changing their minds, one way or another, between 25 and 35 anyway.
A regular correspondent emails:
Just an update on this story.
Jim Golden resigned his position as State Medicaid Director [a few weeks back]. Rumor has it that April Todd-Malmlov has a new job in Washington DC.
Romance is a good thing, I guess Costa Rica is a good place for it.
You may remember April Todd-Malmlov as the MNSure “director” who took a vacation in Costa Rica with Mr. Golden about the time MNSure’s website was garnering headlines as among the worst in the country.
So I guess it all works out: guy (apparently) gets girl, girl gets newer and probably bigger and better government job, the taxpayers get…
…well, we’ll get back to you on that.
A regular reader emails:
So I am driving home listening to MPR/NPR and hear this article below. Essentially Camden, NJ, couldn’t afford the “work rules” negotiated by the local police union spending $180,000 per cop. So they turned it over to the county and a new contract with new rules which brought the cost down to $90,000 per cop. Crime is down, more cops are on the street, more community policing.
And I thought…isn’t that kind of the same thing Scott Walker did with the teacher contracts? Hmmmmm.
We’re seeing it all over the country; when public sector unions are stripped of their undue influence (even just by making them voluntary), costs go down and services improve.
That’s why I’m pushing Walker for President, so far.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Remember when all President Obama planned to do was cure the sick, end joblessness, slow the rise of the oceans, heal the planet, end war, secure our nation’s borders and restore our nation’s image abroad?
That was nothing.
Now he’s going to “eliminate the the schism between Sunni and Shia that has been fueling so much of the violence in Syria, in Iraq.”
As Powerline asks:“Whoa! We are going to ‘eliminate the schism between Sunni and Shia?’ The schism that goes back to the 7th Century? And we are going to “eliminate the schism” through diplomacy?”
No. Not “we.” President Barack Obama, possibly assisted by Secretary of State John Kerry. After all they have promised to accomplish so far, why would you have any doubt? Nobel Committee, call your office.
In a side note, in re last night’s speech, a friend of mine texted me in re the President saying ISIS – the “Islamic State in Syria” – “wasn’t Muslim” ; apparently their name is…
“Innocent Separatists Impacted by Sophistry”.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
President Obama will address the nation Wednesday, September 10th, outlining his plans to fight Islamic terrorists.
Islamic terrorists have hit America twice on September 11th. If they have something lined up and hit us again on Thursday, right after President Obama tells the world his grand plan to fight Islamic terror, the entire world will him revealed as a clueless but arrogant poseur. No Greek playwright would have written a character with that much hubris, the audience wouldn’t have believed it.
Do I want to see American interests hit by terrorists just to see Barack Obama humiliated? As Jack Benny used to say: “I’m thinking.”
I get Joe’s point – but I’m not thinking about it. Of course not.
The problem, of course, is that the questions “to attack or not to attack?”, and “where and when?”, are questions that belong to those who are on the offensive; those who have what in strategic and tactical circles is called “the initiative”, or in sports circles “momentum”.
Say what you will about the US’s actions between 2002 and 2008 – the human, financial and moral costs, the politics, the morals of the tactics and methods and the whole enterprise – but we were on the offensive. We, largely, chose when and where the war would be fought.
We’re on defensive now. We – Barack Obama – lost the initiative; squandered the “momentum”.
The other side chooses whether Barack Obama spends tomorrow in the Situation Room or on the Golf Course.
I’m praying for Golf.
The problem is, they’ll choose it the next day, and the week after that, and the month after that…
…and “ensuring that we’re the ones who make that choice – and make it a moot one through sheer force of diplomatic, moral and if necessary military power” is one of precious few legitimate reasons to have a government.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
The US has become so impotent in the Middle East that Egypt and United Arab Emirates have stepped up to fight Muslim terrorists, without bothering to mention it to us. The Obama Administration was taken by surprise.
This might be a good thing, in the long run. Washington and Jefferson warned against entangling alliances. Classical Liberals argue it’s not the federal government’s job to be the world’s policeman; we should let other nations sort out their own problems.
President Obama might end up implementing the most libertarian foreign policy since the founding.
Or he might be a clean, bright, good-looking, articulate Black man who has been promoted above his level of competence.
Hard to say at this point what his legacy will be.
It is indeed.
But I have a hunch both Jimmy Carter and the Neville Chamberlain estates are deeply thankful for it.
The larger point? Obama may do for our foreign policy what his economic policy will inevitably do for the economy at this rate; bring them back to their Jeffersonian origins through the sheer unsustainability of their Obamian reality.
The Good News: Aaron Rupar yesterday became the first Twin Cities reporter to cover Ron Erhardt’s bizarre alleged [*] outburst to Andrew Rothman, of the Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance. Rothman was contacting the 84-year-old Edina representative to remind him to return his biennial gun rights survey. According to an affadavit from Rothman, Erhardt told him to stop contacting him or he’d “blow your head off”.
The Better News: If you get your news from Shot In The Dark, you knew this almost a month ago.
The Bad News: While the various gun-rights commenters in the City Pages’ comment section present themselves well, it’s depressing to note that each of the deranged-sounding anti-gun commentators’ votes count as much as that of a smart person’s (and that’s assuming that Mark Ritchie doesn’t allow them to vote more than once).
And By The Way: Merry early Christmas, Dario Anselmo.
A volunteer for Mary Franson’s opponent posted this on Facebook the other day:
It’d be interesting to know if Jay Sieling, the DFL candidate for which the woman above volunteers, endorses the tacit threat of violence against Representative Franson.
MNSure is a disaster that’s going to cost us hundreds of millions of dollars – much more, in fact, that most of the state’s natural disasters. .
Behind the happy talk, the state’s economy is showing signs of slowing.
Our major cities’ minority achievement gaps are worse than those in Philadelphia, New Orleans and Detroit. Indeed, we are worse than the proverbial “cold Omaha”.
So what’s been the top news of the week among the left and media (pardon the redundancy)?
Follow-up question: What is it that bothered the left/media about Mr. Fields’ tweets? Was it the politicization of a tragedy? Or was it that someone would tweet something grossly inappropriate?
I’m sure we’ll hear back on that.
The Lightworker, on his penchant for trampling the separation of powers:
“The American people don’t want me just standing around twiddling my thumbs and waiting for Congress to get something done,” Obama said.
Well, yes, Mr. President; if Congress doesn’t pass legislation, those of us who understand the Constitution, especially the bit about “separation of powers”, most certainly do want you to go golfing, rather than usurp the role of Congress.
Head for the golf course, Mr. Lightworker.
Well, it’s official – at least a few of us are going to be meeting out at the Riverside Oasis Café in Stillwater tomorrow morning at 8 AM.
Our goal, of course, will be to put our appetites where our mouths are when it comes to the left’s whingeing about the café putting a “minimum wage fee” on their receipts, showing customers the impact of the DFL’s minimum wage hike on their bill.
The DFL – including Gov. Mumbles – have reacted to this “affront to employee dignity” by ranting like spoiled toddlers and threatening to boycott the restaurant, throwing the benighted employees of work.
So I’ll take my First Amendment with the side of hashbrowns, please.
And if you happen to be in Stillwater at 8 AM tomorrow, stop on by.
EVERY LIBERAL IN MINNESOTA: “Clearly the owner of the cafe hates his employees, because he’s making the minimum wage an issue on his receipts. So we’ll show our concern for the employees by boycotting the place and trying to put the employees out of work”.
…when liberals actually realize they have to pay for the “progressive” legislation they demanded.
A cafe in Stillwater tacked on a “Minimum Wage Fee” to their bills, to show their customers – this being Stillwater, mostly DFLers – what their “generosity” with other peoples’ bottom lines was costing everyone.
Sally Jo Sorenson – one of the handful (literally – maybe five, no more than ten) liberal bloggers in Minnesota who don’t belong under police surveillance – just doesn’t like those peasants getting uppity:
The restaurant industry had tried–but failed–to make the case to the Minnesota legislature for a “tip credit” system under which wait staff could be paid less than the new minimum wage. New legislation raised the state’s minimum wage to $8.00/hr on August 1, with new raises for workers until the wage is $9.50/hr in August 2016.
Accurized: The restaurant industry’s case had no more chance of being heard in a legislature dominated by a DFL that owed their union benefactors big bucks than Ice Cube has of getting applauded at a Ted Nugent concert. The minimum wage was going to pass, no matter what.
And once the DFL has spoken, to the left (via Sally Jo Sorenson), people should just shut up and forget all that “free speech” and “protest” crap.
The cafe in question should oughtta be careful, of course; next, it’ll be the IRS.
Reading the smug, PC commenters (as if Sorenson deigns to print any other kind) is just precious.
I’d like to find out what the cafe is, so I can grab breakfast there this weekend and thank them for forcing the Minnesota left to marinade in its own cowardly hypocrisy.
The Minnesota Gun Owners Civil Rights Alliance has spent the past few weeks compiling its biennial legislative report card.
As, for that matter, have a lot of Minnesota activist groups. It’s election season, after all.
“No more surveys! You come near me, I’ll blow your head off” was Erhardt’s response, according to GOCRA. I have sent Rep. Erhardt an email asking for elaboration.
I’m trying to imagine what’d happen if a pro-life Representative had said that to a volunteer from Emily’s List? If a fundamentalist Christian rep had said something like that to a gay marriage advocate?
I’m not saying that only Democrats have this sense of depraved entitlement.
Just that only Democrats can get away with it in this state.
Note to Aaron Rupar, Rachel Stassen-Berger and Tom Scheck: Boy, wouldn’t this be a big, juicy story to report on!
(Note to the Dario Anselmo campaign: Merry Christmas)
Nobody is going to “impeach” President Obama.
Oh, some fringers will write angry demands for impeachment; some overwrought but underinformed people on the far outskirts of the political mainstram will take up the call, wave their signs, buy their T-shirts and bumper-stickers – the usual stuff.
But there’s not going to be an impeachment, because it is legally and practically impossible. While the House might hypothetically be able to write, vote on and pass “Articles of Impeachment” – sort of what an indictment would be in a criminal case – the Democrat-controlled Senate would never vote to impeach a sitting Democrat President.
The GOP on Capitol Hill knows this. So does everyone on both sides who paid attention during civics class.
That’s a class that apparently doesn’t include a lot of wealthy, ignorant Democrats (ptr):
President Obama and the Democratic Party are presently peddling a conspiracy theory that Republicans have a secret plan to impeach him from office. Their reason for selling this theory is nakedly self-interested: to raise money from gullible donors and drive turnout from excitable but poorly informed voters who may be unhappy with the President’s job performance but remain personally loyal to him.
Democrats, of course, are just cynically exploiting anything that can help them gain partisan advantage. What is much more disappointing is the media playing along with this agitprop campaign, in particular by hounding Republican candidates across the country to discuss impeachment and then turning their answers into “Republicans talking about impeachment” stories even if they strenuously deny that they’re interested in such a thing (or, as commonly happens, if they duck the question or offer vague answers designed to avoid alienating voters who might very much like to see the President impeached or at least see something tried).
It reminds me of the “when did you stop beating your wife”-style beginnings of the “War on Women” meme two years ago; the Democrats and media (ptr) began wagging the public dog on the issue, conjuring up a non-existent movement just in time for election time.
Expect an avalanche of this in the next two years.
Alison Grimes, the Democrat candidate to try to replace Mitch McConnell, said (with emphasis added):
Obviously, Israel is one of our strongest allies in the Middle East, and she has the right to defend herself,” Grimes said. “But the loss of life, especially the innocent civilians in Gaza, is a tragedy. The Iron Dome has been a big reason why Israel has been able to withstand the terrorists that have tried to tunnel their way in
You know what would happen if a Republican woman had said that, right?
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
President Obama praises Muslims for contributions in building the very fabric of America.
Really? Name three.
Much as I support recognizing immigrants’ contributions, I got nothing.
In the whole history of pop music, the whole “hypstr chicks warbling out-of-tune protest-y songs over campfire-style guitar-strumming” is the third worst genre ever hatched (behind only “hypstr chicks warbling out-of-tune protest-y songs over plinky pianos” and, worst of all, “hypster chicks warbling out-of-tune protest-y songs over ukuleles”). Wanna call that part of the “war on women?” I’m OK with that. The genre is that bad. Someone’s gotta say it. I’ll take the hit for the betterment of humanity.
On the other hand? If you are a progressive, this song is the call to action you need…:
…because if you are a “progressive”, Elizabeth Warren – Cherokee chieftain that she is – is the only intellectually honest choice for President in 2016.
You don’t have to believe me. The out-of-tune chick warbling partly in-tune over the politely-strummed, co-op-approved campfire guitar has spoken.