Democrats couch a Democrat leading in a poll of “registered voters”…
… in a state that doesn’t have voter registration?
Democrats couch a Democrat leading in a poll of “registered voters”…
… in a state that doesn’t have voter registration?
The lefty media has been giggling like schoolgirls over this story – a Texas waitress, who got not one but two $2000 tips from Rush Limbaugh – and gave the money to a pro-infanticide group:
“That was like blood money to me,’ Tierce told The Dallas Morning News.
Tierce was the former executive director at the Texas Equal Access Fund, which provides money to women who can’t afford to get abortions.
She was the “executive director” of a nonprofit that provided infanticide to poor women, AND a waitress?
Tierce said it felt right to her to give the money to the TEA Fund.
‘It felt like laundering the money in a good way,’ she told the newspaper.
‘He’s such an obvious target for any feminist or sane person.
Yeah, Ms. Tierce seems pretty sane to me.
The part that I get the chuckle over? Ms. Tierce, and the media bobbleheads who’ve been reporting the story, keep saying that Ms. Tierce “gave Limbaugh’s money” to the infanticide charity.
When Limbaugh left the tip – of his own free will, mind you, not as part of some “living wage” wealth transfer – it became her money.
She gave her own money to her own group.
This story isn’t “Man bites dog”. It isn’t even “dog sniffs dog”. It’s “Deeply morally ugly woman gives her own money to a group she used to run, while taking a snotty, stupid swipe at someone who has the temerity to “share the wealth” of his own free will, rather than at government gunpoint”.
The Star/Tribune is covering what appears to be an escalating war between a number of Minneapolis street gangs. Yesterday’s piece, bylined Libor Jany, breaks things down…
…well, almost. I’ll add emphasis:
The three people shot Tuesday were believed to have had some involvement in the Soundbar shooting, community leaders said.
But those were only the most recent.
• Eulalio Gonzalez-Sanchez, 36, of Minneapolis, was gunned down about 6:25 a.m. Sunday at the corner of 22nd Avenue NE. and 7th Street as he walked home from the bus stop. No one has been arrested in the case.
• Earl Lee Malone, 18, of Edina, was fatally shot and left in front of a house on the 2600 block of Knox Avenue about 11 p.m. Saturday. Police later arrested a 21-year-old man in connection with the shooting, but it’s unclear when charges will be brought.
• Jemario Langston, 17, of Minneapolis, was shot and killed Sept. 16 by assailants who chased him to his aunt’s house. After hearing gunshots, the aunt opened her back door to find his sprawled body. No one has been arrested.
The Bogus Boys have been locked in a long-simmering struggle with several other South Side gangs, including the Bloods, “10s” and “20s,” said Ferome Brown, an activist who attended Tuesday’s meeting and works to steer young people away from gangs.
Many of the gang members he works with, Brown says, grew up in the same neighborhoods.
That’s a good run-down of a neighborhood in crisis…
…but wait. See the empasized stuff? Earl Malone? We talked about him earlier today. He was shot in self-defense. The media knows this – as in this WCCO-TV piece filed a day earlier than the Strib’s piece.
Now, it’s entirely possible that the carjacking that Mr. Malone apparently attempted may have been gang-related.
But lumping a self-defense shooting – one in which a community member defended themselves against an immediate threat to their life and health – is not the same as gang bangers carrying on an endless blood feud. It’s just not.
Does the Strib know the difference?
Twin Cities’ media all atwitter over over a candidate – GOP, naturally – allegedly hanky-pankying with a realtor.
It’s NEWS, dammit!
Unlike Governor Dayton’s mental health, Rep. Ryan Winkler’s racism, Senator Sandy Pappas’ support for terrorists, Rep. Phyllis Kahn’s attempts at voter suppression (no, not in DFL terms, the real one), the extremely cozy relationship between Governor Dayton and his ex-wife’s attack-PR firm, to say nothing of complicated stuff like the effect DFL tax and wage policy is having on business and jobs around Minnesota.
Nothing to see there. Move along, peasants.
Last week, I lit up MPR’s “Poligraph” feature for checking the “accuracy” of an utterly subjective bit of political smack-talk by GOP Gubernatorial candidate Jeff Johnson.
Last Friday? Poligraph used subjectivity to “fact-check” GOP 8th CD candidate Stewart Mills.
To be fair, Catherine Richert did smack down one of the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee’s more risible claims, that Mills opposes Obamacare because he is floating on a raft of insurance industry money:
To support part of its claim, the DCCC points to information collected by OpenSecrets.com, a website that tracks campaign money. The website shows Mills has taken $7,100 from the insurance industry. But that’s the entire insurance industry, not just health insurance companies.
According to Mills’ campaign finance records, he’s gotten $1,000 from the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association PAC, and that’s it.
OK. So far so good.
But this next part?
Popularity!: I suspect that if you passed a law that compelled the government to send out a $10,000 check to every citizen at Christmastime, it’d be “Popular”. (Or perhaps a law allowing people from small radio stations to take their pick of equipment at public radio stations).
But would “popularity” make it a good idea? More to the point – would opposing it be wrong because it’s “popular?”
We return to Richert’s piece; as we read it, look for any objective evidence that Mills’ position is wrong:
The DCCC also claims that Mills wants to scrap popular parts of the Affordable Care Act, including a provision that prevents insurance companies from rejecting patients with pre-existing conditions and another provision that allows children to stay on their parents’ plans until they turn 26.
Here, the DCCC is on stronger footing.
Campaign spokeswoman Chloe Rockow says Mills isn’t opposed to making sure young adults and those with pre-existing conditions have access to health insurance – he just thinks there are better ways of doing it.
For instance, Mills wants to strengthen privacy rules for people with pre-existing conditions and to reinstate the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association, which is a special health insurance program for people with pre-existing conditions who can’t get insurance elsewhere. That program is being phased out, because those people are now get insurance through the Affordable Care Act.
Richert’s conclusion (with emphasis added)?:
… the group is correct that Mills isn’t keen on Obamacare, including two provisions that are relatively popular with the public.
Let’s be clear, here: Richert is checking the DCCC’s statement. She finds half of it questionable (the insurance money), and half of it accurate (like every single Republican I can think of, Mills opposes Obamacare and thinks we can do the same job much more efficiently by tweaking existing programs).
In other words, the DCCC says that Mills supports GOP policy?
That’s not even dog bites man. That’s “dog sniffs dog”.
Which is fine, if journalistically a little pointless.
But Richert points out in several places that the programs that Mills would scrap are “popular”.
What earthly journalistic difference do the programs’ “popularity” have?
While Richert is correct in pointing out that the DCCC’s money claims are wrong, she’s essentially pointing out in her second point that the DCCC is, indeed, pointing out correctly that Mills is campaigning as a Republican, with what looks like a little gratuitous reassurance to MPR’s DFL-leaning audience thrown in for good measure.
So I give this episode of “Poligraph” a grade of “Huh?”
With all due respect to MPR’s News department (and, stereotypes aside, I’ve tried to pay it where it’s been due, as with the exception of everything Keri Miller touches it often has been), it seems that “Poligraph” is explaining the obvious.
UPDATE: Gary Gross at Let Freedom Ring also covered this bit earlier in the week, and has unsurprisingly similar conclusions.
This was the first year since the passage of shall issue firearm carry that the Minnesota State Fairgrounds loudly, visibly posted itself as a “gun free zone”.
The Fair’s spokesperson Brooke Blakey was even just a little bit obnoxious about it before the fair started. Near as I could tell, it was the first time anyone associated with the state fair has ever gotten really aggressive about alienating fairgoers with legal carry permits.
You hardly need me to tell you what happened next, do you?
According to State Fair Police Public Information Officer Brooke Blakey, at least two suspects took more than $10,000…The suspects struck when the building was closed to the public, restraining at least one person who had been working in the booth, and a beer supplier.
Police say this is the first robbery of its kind at the Minnesota State Fair.
The fair has it’s first armed robbery in 150-odd use the the month that a fair officer gets snotty about law-abiding gun owners?
Pure coincidence, I’m sure.
CORRECTION: Flawed as her (and, mostly, the Fair Board’s) reasoning may be, I misread the piece in which Ms. Blakey was quoted. The obnoxious bit (“She also had talks with gun-rights supporters who – contrary to fair policy – wanted to strap on their sidearms and walk down the middle of Dan Patch Avenue“) was written by Delma Francis, in the Minnesota Womens Press, reprinted in the Twin Cities Daily Planet – both of them shrill leftist outlets supported by liberals with deep pockets.
I apologize for the error.
The Claim: Every weekend for the past forty years, Garrison Keillor has closed his “News from Lake Wobegone” segment by claiming all the men are strong, all the women are good-looking, and all the children are above-average”.
But we wanted to know – is it true?
The Evidence: In Keillor’s favor, we note that not only is his claim – like Jeff Johnson’s statement that Governor Dayton is “in trouble” – subjective, but it is in fact dramatic license, a tag line to a series of fictional essays.
However, the winner of the 2014 World’s Strongest Man competition is Žydrūnas Savickas, of Lithuania.
The world’s foremost empirical test of female beauty is the Miss Universe pageant – and the most recent winner, in 2013, was María Gabriela de Jesús Isler Morales of Venezuela.
And since Minnesota stopped requiring graduation testing in 2013, it’s impossible to empirically say what “average” is, or whether Lake Wobegone’s children – fictional though they may be – are above it.
The Verdict – So since neither the world’s strongest man nor most beautiful woman resides in Lake Wobegone, and there is no means to measure the children, we give this claim a rating of “Misleading”.
That a man’s reach exceed his grasp, etc, etc.
“The Alliance for a Better Minnesota – which, as most MPR listeners are unaware, is essentially a political PR firm funded by wealthy Democrats, government employee unions, and Governor Dayton’s ex-wife Alita Messinger, has been running a well-funded advertising and social-media campaign for the past few electoral cycles labeling their Republican opposition, jointly and severally, as “Wrong for Minnesota”
“What does this mean? And is the claim accurate?”
“The Evidence: While one can expect any politician and their supporters to reflexively label their opposition as “wrong” – moreso in today’s polarized climate than ever – the terms “right” and “wrong” are themselves terms with deeply subjective meanings. The meanings of the terms are, in fact, more tied to philosophy than politics”
“Poligraph consulted leading philosophers from all major worldviews – from structuralists to neo-Dadaists, and even a few with tendencies toward nihilism – and while there was no agreement on an absolute definition of “right” or “wrong”, much less one applicable to Minnesota, and Minnesota politics specifically, the general consensus was that the term “wrong” is intrinsically tied to the perception of both the “speaker” and the “listener” or consumer of the statement.”
“However, ‘the idea that one speaker could judge something ‘wrong’ for an entire state of 5.5 million independent agents, just on their say-so, is just plain bizarre”, according to a consensus statement signed by every single philosopher we consulted.”
“The Verdict: The Alliance for a Better Minnesota’s claim that any individual politician is “Wrong for Minnesota” is Misleading. ”
“It’s also deeply pretentious, illogical, philosophically vacant, and to some points of view just a little bit morally repugnant.”
Mark Twain once observed that there are three types of media “fact-check” efforts: Democrat PR puff-pieces, Bald-Faced Democrat PR puff-pieces, and legit ones.
A good fact-checker will note that Twain said no such thing. My first paragraph was really a bit of hyperbole.
As such, it wasn’t intended to be a “factual” statement, per se, as one intended to express a subjective opinion and win people over to my side of an argument (or at least mock those who oppose me). It’s a form of rhetoric; using language to try to persuade and convince.
So while it’s not strictly “factual”, it is two things:
Hyperbole is but one tool the rhetorician uses to state his case.
OK. I have a question: Of the three choices I gave in the first graf, what is the latest edition of MPR’s “Poligraph” – a DFL PR Effort, a Bald-Faced PR effort, or legit?
Read reporter Catherine Richert’s latest effort, and you be the judge.
The latest poll numbers must be scaring the DFL; the Strib has officially switched into full-time shill mode.
In a paper full of “reporters” whose prime directive seems to be “fawn on the DFL”, Ricardo Lopez seems to be aiming for Columnist’s Row with yesterday’s paeon to the wonders of the Minnesota economy:
With business on the upswing and a state unemployment rate that’s among the lowest in the nation, Republicans lack a key issue voters often gravitate to during election season.
Four years ago, when the unemployment rate topped 7 percent and the state faced a projected $6.2 billion deficit, then-gubernatorial candidates Republican Tom Emmer and DFLer Mark Dayton presented voters with starkly different plans to stem the hemorrhaging of jobs and balance the state budget.
Since Dayton took office, the economic picture has brightened considerably. Minnesota employers have added more than 150,000 jobs, helping the state recover all the jobs lost during the recession. The real estate market has rebounded, and state finances are also strong. The most recent report available showed a projected state budget surplus of more than $1.2 billion, generated in part by the higher tax rates Dayton pushed through in 2013.
“There’s no question it would be easier for me as a challenger if everything appeared to be in shambles, that’s clear. But it’s not.” said Jeff Johnson, the Republican nominee hoping to unseat Dayton this fall. “I actually rise to that challenge of sharing a message that aspires to something much better than we have right now.”
Except that as we’ve pointed out, the economy is only “good” when you cherrypick the numbers pretty carefully.
But it’s the cherrypicking, not checking and balancing, that the people of Minnesota are going to get from the media.
Expect a “Minnesota Poll” showing Dayton 80 points ahead sometime soon, here.
Anti-NRA “Daily Beast” writer wonders why the NRA – which famously rails against domestic overreach – isn’t defending black people in Ferguson Missouri (with the not-so-muted conclusion that it’s all in the racism).
The real answer: for the same reason the National Organization of Women isn’t protesting against whaling.
The NRA focuses like a laser beam on the Second Amendment.
You’ll note – although the “Daily Beast” writer does not – that the NRA supported to the hilt the action by Otis McDonald, which led to the Supreme Court incorporating the Second Amendment as a “right of the people”.
Odd how that got forgotten.
I’m not “Minnesota Nice”.
Partly it’s because I’m not from Minnesota. I’m “North Dakota Dour and Taciturn”. Minnesota is a South Beach conga line dance compared to North Dakota.
And when I hear “Minnesota Nice”, what I think is “Minnesota Passive-Aggressive”.
Bill Salisbury – one of the deans of Minnesota political reporting – and Don Davis, who fills the same bill with the Forum News Service, noted over the weekend that the ”Governor race could be ‘Minnesota nice’”.
And my impression is proven correct.
That, and my belief that too many journos either think Minnesotans are stupid, or are actively trying to make them that way, as in this featurette on our two major gubernatorial candidates.
You can read the whole thing – but here’s the part that got my attention:
The Hennepin County commissioner and former legislator from Plymouth [endorsed GOP candidate Jeff Johnson] is an affable guy who shuns angry attacks on political opponents. That description also fits Dayton.
Except that Governor Dayton doesn’t have to attack anyone. He’s got his boss’s ex-wife’s group, “Alliance for a “Better” Minnesota”, to do that for him.
You know – the group that ran the epic, toxic sleaze campaign against Tom Emmer in 2010; the one that called Jeff Johnson “evil” over Christmas last year.
The Democrats could run Shirley Temple against a Republican Beaver Cleaver; we’d soon hear see a commercial with Eddie Haskell complaining that Beaver bullied him as a child.
Katie Kieffer is back in town, and she’ll be signing copies of her first book, Let Me Be Clear, tomorrow night at O’Gara’s in Saint Paul.
Hey, it worked for Vince Flynn.
I may just stop by.
MNSure is a disaster that’s going to cost us hundreds of millions of dollars – much more, in fact, that most of the state’s natural disasters. .
Behind the happy talk, the state’s economy is showing signs of slowing.
Our major cities’ minority achievement gaps are worse than those in Philadelphia, New Orleans and Detroit. Indeed, we are worse than the proverbial “cold Omaha”.
So what’s been the top news of the week among the left and media (pardon the redundancy)?
Follow-up question: What is it that bothered the left/media about Mr. Fields’ tweets? Was it the politicization of a tragedy? Or was it that someone would tweet something grossly inappropriate?
I’m sure we’ll hear back on that.
I hate to indulge in schadenfreud.
But I’m only human.
Arbitron numbers are in for the Fargo-Moorhead area – and the two big lib-talk hosts at KFGO (which is sort of the WCCO of the Fargo metro area) are sucking fumes.
Joel Heitkamp is off sharply, according to Rob Port.
But even more sweet? Mike McFeely – the sportscaster turned incompetent liberal talking head – is sucking pond water.
Conservative talk thrives in liberal bastions like the Twin Cities, Chicago and LA – as a contrarian Jeremiah, and a rallying point for the areas beleaguered conservatives. You’d think, orthagonally, that liberal talk would work for the same reasons in relatively conservative places like Fargo (although Fargo is the most liberal major city in North Dakota).
I guess not.
We talked about the cafe last week; they aroused the ire of the entire Minnesota Left – few of whom would ever seem to have been at the River Oasis – by putting their “minimum wage fee” on their receipts:
First things first: It’s a classic American diner – like Mickey’s on West Seventh, or Keys, and not a whole lot of others out there anymore. The food was excellent.
I had the pleasure of talking with Craig Beemer, the owner, on my show on Saturday afternoon (and his wife on Saturday morning). And we learned a couple of things about the place, and the “controversy”.
Money: One of the left’s main whining points about the public “minimum wage fee” is that it’s “disrespectful to the employees”.
Of course, it’s a stupid point. Unlike most restaurants, the Beemers already pay the back of the house staff – the line cooks, dishwashers and the like – better than minimum wage, and (according to Beemer) very competitively with the similar places in Stillwater. That’s the kind of “respect” I actually cared about when I was a low-wage employee.
The only people making minimum wage are the waitstaff – and when you add on tips, they’re making closer to $25 an hour, often more, and the minimum wage is not an issue.
Except for the Beemers, for whom the wage hike was a $10,000/year hit on the bottom line. Remember – restaurants across the river in Wisconsin have a minimum wage of $3-and-change per hour.
Because they have a tip credit.
Power: Which is what Governor Dayton’s sons asked for earlier this summer. Andrew and Eric Dayton, owners of “The Bachelor Farmer”, a chi-chi restaurant in Minneapolis, complained to Dadders because the new, higher minimum wage hike was harshing their fiscal mellow. They asked for…
…a tip credit.
Bonus Explanation For Leftybloggers, none of whom apparently have ever worked for tips: you don’t work for minimum wage. Even when there’s a “tip credit” in effect and your “wage” is $3-and-change/hour, like in most surrounding states, you’re still making more. How much more? If you work at a crummy place with lousy food, maybe not enough more. If you work at Manny’s Steakhouse and tend to tables that rack up $400-$1000 for a meal, you can make well into six digits. In between? It’s a complex set of dependencies; waiting skill, clientele, season, even the weather.
But for all the crap that Tom Emmer took for his “waitstaff making over $100,000″ “gaffe” four years ago, you might be amazed at the number of waitstaff that take home solid middle-class “living wages”; $50,000, $75,000 and more.
Which isn’t bad for a trade that requires no education, licensing or anything but talent and hard work.
Which may be what bothers liberals about all of this.
“If Ifs, Ands And Buts Were Candy And Nuts, We’d All Have A Wonderful Unbedankfest”: Here’s another note for ignorant leftybloggers; a “tip credit” acknowledges the fact that for a good waiter at a good establishment with a good clientele, the minimum wage is the fringe of their income; the owner can apply some of the waitstaff’s tips to the wage, in effect.
“I think tipping is just wrong”, whined a massive clot of liberals last week, “and I think we should do away with it; it’s unfair. They should all just be paid”, they say, reflecting the “progressive” desire to oversimplify the free market (and working for tips is the ultimate meritocracy).
Of course, it’s been tried. Not a few restaurants have tried to abolish tipping – paying their waitstaff more, and jacking up the prices accordingly, to a brief flurry of adoring media attention.
Then they quietly vanish. And a few years later, the cycle repeats.
“It’s So Tacky!”: Tackier than jamming down a minimum wage increase with the barest possible minimum of debate, and then reconsidering when the governor’s kids get into a jam?
“Why don’t they publicize all the costs that hit their bottom line?”: Because if they use too much electricity, they can unscrew the lightbulbs in the bathrooms. If the price of tomatoes goes up, they can use fewer of them in their recipes. If Ecolab cleaning products are too expensive, they can switch to Servicemaster. In other words – as with everything in the free market (including restaurant choices), they, the consumer, can say “no” and pick a better option.
But they can’t switch states. Tempting as it is for many businesspeople. Government is the one thing you can’t say “no” to, without having men in uniforms with guns busting down your door eventually.
And the hypocrisy of a “progressive” movement that twisted itself into knots to try to legitimize the “Occupy” movement turning around and attacking an actual working business for using its right to free speech is enough to put me off my breakfast, were it less delicious.
“What are you going to do, Berg? Hang out there all the time?”: It’s not really about me. But when in Stillwater – a place I may get to annually – sure why not?
The “point” they’re shooting for is that conservatives won’t be going there forever, and the liberals among the Oasis’ clientele will stay gone.
I’m going to guess that most of the people doing the “protesting” have never been there, and would never have gone - and if they did, they were, like most liberals, lousy tippers anyway.
Anyway - kudos to the Beemers. And thanks for a fantastic breakfast, a great discussion, and for fighting a battle that a lot more people need to fight.
Earlier this week, Sally Jo Sorenson of Bluestem Prairie unleashed the nagging, hectoring, joyless scolding hordes of the Minnesota left on the River Oasis Cafe in Stillwater for daring to protest against the DFL’s minimum wage hike jamdown by informing their diners how the price hike was affecting their meal price.
The comments on Sorenson’s piece were the same sort of uniformed ad-hominem that the mindless cattle of Minnesota specialize in, in their bovine way. And given that most of them are idlers with more time on their hands than brain cells to burn, we can only assume that they’ve taken other actions against the River Oasis.
Because protest is a good thing, unless it’s the DFL that’s being protested against.
Anyway – any establishment that’s got the seeds to tell the emperor they have no clothes deserves the thanks of the people who really make this state work, the taxpayers for whom the DFL has such oozing pustulent contempt.
So here’s what I’m thinking. I’m gonna run out there (here’s the map link) for breakfast Saturday morning.
And if you’re a Minnesota taxpayer, businessperson or citizen who thinks that real people speaking truth to stupid power is a good thing, I’ll invite you to join me. For breakfast.
(Separate checks, by the way).
If it’s just me, that’s fine. But feel free to come on out. Drop me a comment if you get a moment, just so I know whether to expect company.
…when liberals actually realize they have to pay for the “progressive” legislation they demanded.
A cafe in Stillwater tacked on a “Minimum Wage Fee” to their bills, to show their customers – this being Stillwater, mostly DFLers – what their “generosity” with other peoples’ bottom lines was costing everyone.
Sally Jo Sorenson – one of the handful (literally – maybe five, no more than ten) liberal bloggers in Minnesota who don’t belong under police surveillance – just doesn’t like those peasants getting uppity:
The restaurant industry had tried–but failed–to make the case to the Minnesota legislature for a “tip credit” system under which wait staff could be paid less than the new minimum wage. New legislation raised the state’s minimum wage to $8.00/hr on August 1, with new raises for workers until the wage is $9.50/hr in August 2016.
Accurized: The restaurant industry’s case had no more chance of being heard in a legislature dominated by a DFL that owed their union benefactors big bucks than Ice Cube has of getting applauded at a Ted Nugent concert. The minimum wage was going to pass, no matter what.
And once the DFL has spoken, to the left (via Sally Jo Sorenson), people should just shut up and forget all that “free speech” and “protest” crap.
The cafe in question should oughtta be careful, of course; next, it’ll be the IRS.
Reading the smug, PC commenters (as if Sorenson deigns to print any other kind) is just precious.
I’d like to find out what the cafe is, so I can grab breakfast there this weekend and thank them for forcing the Minnesota left to marinade in its own cowardly hypocrisy.
Back in the eighties, the first time I worked in Twin Cities radio, you could always tell when a station needed a publicity boost. There’d be an “incident” – a disk jockey would “say” something “objectionable”, or “insult” a “guest”, or some other shenanigan on the air, which would “lead” to a “suspension”, which would get all sorts of coverage from “news” people.
For example, back in the late eighties, “Cadillac Jack” at KDWB “insulted” British pop tart Kim Wilde on the air, and was “suspended” for a week. The Strib, the City Pages and the Twin Cities Reader all slurped up the “story” like puppies racing toward spilled hot dogs.
Of course, the “incident” was about as real as a pro wrestling match; it was a PR stunt coinciding with a jock’s planned vacation. In radio, then as much or more than now, if you actually screwed up for real you got unceremoniously fired, very very off the air. The number of such “incidents” that actually happen, spontaneously, in major-market radio is microscopic. How microsopic? The “real” incidents are practically legends in the radio business.
“Blaze” of “Glory”: Jason Lewis “quit” his afternoon-drive show on Genesis Communications (heard locally on AM1130 KTCN) yesterday. A monologue ended with a vow to “go Galt” and stop “feeding the Beast” – after which he stomped out of the studio. His producer vamped for a bit, and then, luckily, longtime Twin Cities talkradio journeyman Dan Conry just happened to be available to finish out the last half of Lewis’ show.
So I can be forgiven for having an eighties flashback, can’t I?
I don’t know much – I’ll be talking with people I know in the business over the weekend – but if I were a betting man (and I’m not) I’d bank on the following:
It’s savvy marketing, and it’s classic radio – the kind of thing the pasty-faced computer-programmers who dominate the industry today have forgotten how to do.
Lewis, in his day – his first hitch in Twin Cities radio, at KSTP back in the nineties through the early 2000s – was one of the fathers of modern Minnesota conservatism. There’s no overstating how vital he was in putting grassroots libertarian-conservatism on the Minnesota agenda during those years; had there been no Jason Lewis, conservatism would likely have remained a backroom aberration in the MNGOP for much longer than it did; the “moderate vs. conservative” battle would have stayed mired in the eighties for another decade or more. The Tea Party in Minnesota built on a basis of activism that Jason, more than any single person, established.
His first hitch? That was some heady stuff.
Changes: Lewis’ second stint – his return to KTCN and then Genesis, since the mid-late 2000s – was a little more subdued.
Lewis was different in his second go-around; the ebullient crusader for truth and justice was replaced by a hectoring professor who was always the smartest guy in the room and who made damn sure you knew it. He became less a party guy (although talk of him running for Senate kept circulating every election cycle) and more of an ideological libertarian-conservative.
And that’s not a criticism; it’s a perfectly valid character for a talk radio personality (see also Mark Levin), and not necessarily a bad idea in a talk market that had filled up with crusading everymen – including yours truly – since his first debut in the nineties. Although part of me thinks his second go-around would have been better with Joe Hanson producing him; Joe could cut anyone’s unnecessary pretensions off at the knees
The industry has changed a lot over the past 20 years, of course; the days of drive-time talk show hosts, even on small networks like Lewis’ 40-odd stations on Genesis, drawing low-to-mid six figure salaries were coming to a close (damn the luck).
I hope the next chapter in Jason’s media life is a good, rewarding one. I can’t imagine him “retiring” (or anyone else, these days, for that matter).
I remember during Jason’s time at KSTP, during my own long break from talk radio (1987 to 2004), listening to Lewis doing his thing as I drove home from work or tootled around town in a car full of kids doing my errands, pondering what life’d have been like had I stayed in radio, and thinking “that’s the host I always wanted to be when I grew up”.
And in my little one-day-a-week talk radio hobby, I guess that’s what I’ve been shooting for for the last ten years. To be a little like Jason.
Not exactly like Jason, of course. I make a lousy professor. But to be seen as someone who knows what he’s talking about, and who wants to convince the unconvinced, and wants to take my – our – political beliefs to the street and change things? That’s what I wanted. It’s what I shoot for.
And so I wish Jason all the best, and hope I haven’t heard the last of him.
In recent years, this blog has made great sport of criticizing the MinnPost‘s coverage of Second Amendment issues, noting that much of their coverage has been both anti-gun and comically poor, and pointing out they are sponsored by the Joyce Foundation, which actively sponsors many anti-gun groups (including Protect MN here in Minnesota, and the national-scoped “Violence Policy Center”, or “VPC”).
On the other hand, Joyce has sponsored the work of reporter Mike Cronin, who is three parts into a series on America’s gun culture (check out his installments so far on his introduction to shooting, attending a permit training class with Andrew Rothman, and his conversations with violence victims). The series, thus far, is genuinely fair and balanced; I’ve talked with Cronin, and he seems interested in keeping it that way. That’s all to the good.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
They completely missed the real scandal, which is President Obama’s imperial disregard for the law, but at least this is a step in the right direction. Sorry about the annoying survey pop-up, no wonder nobody reads that newspaper.
Gun-running to Mexico and refusing to enforce the borders don’t bother the editors. Closing the ocean is no problem. Targeting Americans for drone strikes is fine. But sneak a peek at a journalist’s email and they turn on you like savages.
Better late than never.
it’s hard to come up with even a short list of things that’ve disgusted me about this administration, and about this country during this administration, but on the very short list would have to be the fact that the media only act like watchdogs when the media, itself, is affected.
There needs to be in accounting for that, someday.
You can’t escape it on Twitter or in the Media – the DFL and its various spokespeople, and the media (pardon the redundancy) crowing about Minnesota’s job numbers.
Because raising taxes creates jobs, dammit!
Except, as Bill Glahn notes, the numbers just don’t add up.
The state and its minions have been crowing that the state gained 8.500 jobs in June, and a total of 10,700 jobs so far this year.
Doing the arithmetic, that total means Minnesota gained 8,500 jobs in June, but a mere 2,200 jobs in the five months of January through May, combined.
And it the numbers get more interestinger:
Each month DEED also reports on the jobs created in the previous 12 months, for a rolling look at the number of jobs created for a year-long period. For the 12 months ending June 2014, DEED reports Minnesota created almost 53,800 jobs. That figure would mean that we’d created 43,100 jobs in the six month of July through December 2013, but a mere 10,700 jobs in the most recent six months. Rather than suggesting an economic boom, those numbers indicate a real weakness in our state’s economy.
Bad, politically-driven reporting from the state? Casual illiterate reporting from the media?
Glahn’s not done:
But consider this anomaly:
Reporting Jobs Gained Month Month YTD Last 12 Mo. June 8,500 10,700 53,779 May 10,300 — 45,617 April (4,200) — 41,934 March 2,600 — 41,582 February (100) — 44,714 January 600 — 52,160 Total 17,700 Adding together the number of jobs created each month in 2014, as reported by DEED, produces a total of 17,700 jobs for the year so far. So that means that sometime during the last few months, 7,000 jobs have vanished from the official state rolls.
“Unexpectedly” vanished, of course.
Glahn predicts the state’s rosy “8,500″ number for June will be gradually revised out of existence.
To be replaced – this is my prediction – by more inflated, misleading predictions intended to lull the incurious.
And the news consumers they report to.
A Conservative media outlet (blogger, talk host, writer, etc): Sees a story about a two-bit Democrat candidate whom even fellow Democrats shun at the polls making an over the top depraved statement. He briefly considers posting it as a sign that it’s truly Democrats who are waging a “war on women” – but notes that the guy is so fringe that even most Democrats refudiate the guy. Decides that writing about the guy would give him just a little more unjustified publicity, opts to do his little bit to return the creep to obscurity by ignoring the story.
A Liberal media outlet – say, “Think” Progress, gets a story about an obscure GOP candidate who’s running third in the primary for a city council seat in Brackwater Alabama saying “AIDS is God’s revenge on gays”. Within 12 hours, every liberal media outlet from MSNBC all the way down to Dim Tim Sweeney’s twitter feed, and thence further to AM950, bleats “PROMINENT REPUBLICAN SAYS GOD HATES F**S!”.
The Chicago Police discovered a “sniper nest” atop a public parking garage near a Chicago college:
Officials say they found a high-powered semi-automatic rifle about a block from the campus of Kennedy King college, near 64th and Lowe last Thursday. Officers say the nest was found on top of a garage across from a soccer field on campus.
Snipers. Deadly, cold-eyed marksmen…
…with weapons that can reach out hundreds of yards – sometime over a mile – to put a bullet precisely into a human head.
At the scene, officers recovered a fully loaded Mac-10.
The MAC10 is a civilianized version of the MAC-10 submachine gun – an ultra-short-barreled weapon designed to “Spray and Pray”; fire 20 shots a second at point-blank range. But being civilianized, it doesn’t ”spray” – it’s semi-automatic. It has a four-inch barrel – the same as a modestly-respectable handgun. But it’s not even as accurate as a modest-quality handgun (and even a high-quality target handgun is useless beyond about 30-50 yards). The MAC’s “sights” are a v-notch cut in a piece of steel. It’s got a trigger pull like an old Mattel cap gun. And it fires pistol ammunition, meaning by definition it is not “high-powered”.
It is a glorified, heavy, badly-balanced, expensive handgun, with an effective, aimed range of about 30 feet. Not “a block and a soccer field and change”.
Kennedy King officials say they have notified students. Although, it does not appear that anyone on campus was ever in any danger.
I know that the NRA and other Second Amendment groups offer classes to journalists about how not to sound stupid when talking about firearms. Someone might want to send the TV station behind this story a gift certificate.
The Star/Tribune Editorial Board, perhaps shockingly, called for a special prosecutor in the IRS Scandal:
That’s a necessary step, and the request should be expediently heeded by the Obama administration. Although there are two investigations underway in the Republican-controlled House, a nonpartisan review by an investigator with bipartisan respect and technological expertise is sorely needed. The public needs reassurance that the nation’s tax-collection agency is run with integrity and that anyone who may have abused its formidable authority has been held accountable.
So far, so good.
But then we swerve into the weeds:
The decision on whether to appoint a special prosecutor, officially called a special counsel, lies with the Department of Justice.
That’s long for Eric Holder. The guy who’s been stonewalling several other investigations of Obama administration corruption, Fast and Furious chief among them.
IRS officials have insisted that the lost e-mails were just an unfortunate computer meltdown and that the extra scrutiny of groups with “Tea Party” and “Patriots” in their names was a regrettable mistake. If this is trumped-up, as Democrats often and sometimes accurately deride other House investigations, there’s nothing to fear by appointing a special prosecutor to put this long-simmering scandal to bed.
Or – as Holder will do – whitewash it.
Still – while the Strib’s editorial board exhibits its inner pollyanna about the DOJ’s inner gestalt, at least it’s heart is in the right place, kind of:
It’s foolish to think this is going to blow over — or that it should. A May 2013 report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration unequivocally concluded that the agency used “inappropriate criteria that identified for review Tea Party and other organizations applying for tax-exempt status based upon their names or policy positions.’’…a thorough reading of the report underscores that conservative groups were targeted.
The real question is: can we, The People, trust an Obama Administration appointee to police his boss?
There was a time we could count on the media to ensure someone like Holder’s behavior would be above board.
Perhaps we need a special investigator into that …