I maaaaaay just have to raise some money to start distributing a few thousand of these:
And, of course, coating them with a caustic chemical.
I maaaaaay just have to raise some money to start distributing a few thousand of these:
And, of course, coating them with a caustic chemical.
When “progressives” win, two things happen:
They won’t be able to try Phase 1 for a bit yet.
But here’s hoping we’re seeing the beginning of Phase 2.
Just a further reminder…
…for those who may need it…
…(and “those who may need it” in are pretty much invariably Democrats)…
…that when the left jabbers about “unity”, they mean “everybody who isn’t united with us shuts up”.
At the, er, very least.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Sarah Hoyt makes an interesting observation: the “mostly peaceful” rioters and looters are suffering from Wealthy Heir disease.
You know what she means. She means the kid who got his trust fund money for his 18th birthday, bought a Camero, got drunk and wrapped it around a tree. She means the kid whose parents paid his tuition, room and board so he could drink and whore his way through a degree. She means the kid whose Daddy ran for Vice-President and can pull strings to have the charges dropped.
Not all of them, of course. The “mostly peaceful” demonstrators handing clothes out of the smashed window at Sak’s Fifth Avenue didn’t look like trust fund kids. The ones chasing a white kid down the street to beat him to death didn’t look like college students. But the young lawyers arrested for burning a police car were hardly the downtrodden oppressed masses yearning to be free. They’re supposedly the cream-of-the-crop. They’re oppressors-in-training. By historical standards, they’re unimaginably wealthy already – only jealousy and greed motivates them to demand more.
Rioters. Looters. Ingrates. Antifa. Liberals. Democrats.
Almost makes a guy reconsider that wealth tax we’ve been hearing so much about.
This is, of course, a part of Urban Progressive Privilege.
If there’s anyone in the world not entitled to call Jonathan Chait “wound emotionally too tight and intellectually too loose”, it’s David Corn.
Words to live by: Don’t go Full-Bore Sylvia Plath.
He went Plath.
I’m convinced most of the American Left stopped growing emotionally at around 14.
Macalester students, forced to “study” remotely, get not a dime’s worth of break on their tuition.
Their institutions’ president has other priorities:
Now might be a fine time for conservative entrepreneurs to start getting into the higher ed business.
I may owe Ryan Winkler an apology.
I mean, growing up in rural North Dakota back when only Al Gore had access to the Internet, even I knew what “uncle Tom” meant when applied to a black man – so naturally I figured someone in his position, Harvard grad and all, would as well. Clearly, so did many others.
And although I’m an Anglo from the northern Plains, I’ve known what a Coyote – a slang term for a human trafficker who brings people across the border, either as illegal immigrants, sex slaves or mules – was for quite a while now.
But apparently a Harvard education does one no better in this context:
Y’know what’s “sickening”? Having a bunch of people whose opinion is considered above the rest of the world by dint of being a “blue check”, who are given to lecturing the deporables about their cultural illiteracy, who are themselves so culturally illiterate:
Just remember that when Blue America starts talking about getting rid of the electoral college.
Well, sit on down and I’ll show you the most concentrated two minutes and twenty seconds worth of Urban Progressive Privilege you will ever see:
I suspect you could get a similar performance in Crocus Hill. Kenwood or Saint Anthony Park.
The NYTimes is trying to disappear some of their own paper’s history in re the “1619 Project”, which claimed that, based on the premise that America was founded primarily to exalt slavery, the nation was really founded when the first slave arrived.
Editors recently removed (without explanation or acknowledgment) the provocative statement that the project “aim[s] to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding” from the article series’ online introduction. Lead author Nikole Hannah-Jones has repeatedly claimed it is a myth that the project proposes 1619 rather than 1776 as the country’s birth year: She blamed bad-faith critics on the right for tricking the media into believing otherwise.
“One thing in which the right has been tremendously successful is getting media to frame stories in their language and through their lens,” wrote Hannah-Jones in a subsequently deleted tweet. “The #1619Project does not argue that 1619 is our true founding. We know this nation marks its founding at 1776.”
Forget for a moment that Hannah-Jones’ Twitter banner is a picture of 1776 crossed out and replaced with 1619. Forget that multiple progressive media outlets that were sympathetic to the project’s aims used the 1619-as-true-founding summary in order to explain it. Forget that a year ago, after the articles were published, both Hannah-Jones and New York Times magazine editor Jake Silverstein described the project in exactly these terms: “We sort of proposed the idea in a variety of ways that if you consider 1619 as the foundational date of the country, rather than 1776, it just changes your understanding and we call that a reframing of American history.” Just consider one last piece of evidence that Hannah-Jones is being deceptive about who invented the 1619-not-1776 framing.
My guess – she’s not being “deceptive”. She, and the Times, are backfilling and memory-holing because Identity Politics stands to cost the Democrats.
Am I the only one watching the various prosecutions underway from the riots a couple weeks ago, and wondering which ones are the “white supremacists?”
I’m sure stumped.
During the Bush years, as many as a third of Democrats had some level of belief that 9/11 was an inside job.
Today, a significant number – on social media, it looks like a supermajority – believe that Trump colluded with Russia, that Kavanaugh raped someone, that “white supremacists” started the riots, that “Anti”-fa is anti-fascist, that Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s purported “dying wish” should have some legal merit and that the Electoral College disenfranchises them.
Which is why we’re seeing this sort of “journalism”, doubtlessly placed by a Democrat attack-PR firm, about a movement whose adherence among the GOP is likely in low single digits.
Yep – it’s Berg’s 7th Law, and Urban Progressive Privilege – a gaslighting twofer!
Ryan Winkler, the House Majority Leader, isn’t thrilled with President Trump stealing Joe Biden’s thunder:
Then the Majority Leader has had a pretty sheltered life.
Know what’s the worst thing I’ve ever heard?
Other than the Holocaust, the Great Leap Forward, the Gulag, the Holodomor, the Rape of Nanking, the subjugation of Tibet, the history of Haitian slavery, or pretty much an garden-variety genocide?
Well, not this…
But it was pretty bad anyway. And if Bogdan Vechirko – who owned no “white supremacist” paraphernalia at all, and heroically avoided hitting anyone (who wasn’t trying to get hit) wants to sue for slander, I’ll host a fundraiser.
Have you people call my people.
The bail fund promoted by Kamala Harris kicks another sex offender loose.
This is the same basic bunch that bailed an “Anti”-Fa thug who beat the snot out a Twin Cities’ bar owner for…
…well, we’re not sure yet. But it was a mostly peaceful protest.
Remember when your “progressive” acquaintances would scoff and say “there’s no such thing as a ‘limosine liberal’, a ‘condo pink’, or any of that?”
And they’ll do it again.
But here – along with Lori Lightfoot’s haircut and the blowout that was apparently inflicted on Nancy Pelosi by GOP operatives – is Exhibit A.
I listen to NPR so you don’t have to.
And there are some reasons it’s worth it. I mean, that’s where you get Live From Here with Chris Thile.
Well, for now, anyway.
…well, a lot of racial virtue-signaling. I suspect the most lilywhite of America’s organizations is fearing a lot of backlash when the Bolsheviks come for the Mensheviks.
Speaking of which, it’s always a bit of a chuckle when the “progressives” that are NPR’s staff, social circle and pool of sources try to explain things like economics to the pool of “progressives” that are NPR’s audience.
Biss – a “non-fiction writing” major who has lived within the academic echo chamber her entire career, is the author of “Having and Being Had” – a primer on…
…wait for it…
Or, rather, a coddled, over-schooled/undereducated resident of the academic echo chamber’s perversion of the cartoon term “capitalism”, itself a hijacked representation of “the free market”…
…not that either term isn’t completely lost on Professor Biss.
Let’s start with this passage, which the NPR crowd will no doubt take for an emanation of wisdom, but merely proves that Biss’s son and babysitter are smarter than she is:
PFEIFFER: At one point, you’re talking about your son paying for a Pokemon card, although someone else thought he overpaid for the Pokemon card. What was it like for you to watch your son try to figure out what something was worth and why and maybe not figuring it out correctly?
BISS: Oh, it was amazing. In watching him learn how to play Pokemon the way it was being played in first and second grade at his school, I felt like I was seeing an economy be invented. But it was also somewhat excruciating to me because I saw the ways in which other children and his babysitter and I were training the values of capitalism into him. So, yes, at one point, he gave away a valuable Pokemon card because he just didn’t like it very much.
And then I heard his babysitter saying to him, were you a smart negotiator? And I thought, oh, no. What are we doing? This kid is only 6, and we’re already training him not to be generous and to get as much out of an exchange as he can possibly get out of it even if he doesn’t care about the thing he’s giving away.
PFEIFFER: Oh, that’s so interesting. I mean, diamonds are objectively very expensive and valuable, but if I don’t care about them and I just want to give them away, is that fine, or is that flawed financial thinking?
BISS: Under the logic of capitalism, it’s insane, right? But by some other logic, it makes perfect sense, especially since diamonds aren’t incredibly useful. You can’t eat them, and you can’t live inside them.
The interview – and one suspects the book – is a cavalcade of white progressive guilt, the sort of consequence-free wailing that afflicts our current layer of pseudointellectual societal overburden:
BISS: One of the things that I didn’t want to have happen to me as I entered this new life and lifestyle [i.e. – bought a house in a tony neighborhood near Northwestern Universitiy] was I didn’t want to begin to think that I had what I had because I’d worked hard, which is one of the patterns of thought very common to upper middle class. I don’t believe that I got what I got because I worked hard. I believe that I got what I got because the system favors me in a number of different ways – one, because I’m white, but also because I started out middle-class.
Notice she doesn’t mention “…because I’m part of an academic-industrial complex to which being a recipient of Urban Progressive Privilege gives me a priority ticket”.
Ms. Biss: If you’re that concerned about the things your “work” didn’t “earn” you, give up your teaching gig at Northwestern and become one of the people you describe later in the interview:
I think one of the possibilities that I could perceive, especially once the pandemic arrived, was the possibility of – what if we compensated the people we speak of as essential workers? So what if everyone who is essential to the daily workings of our lives was paid well and had health insurance and had basic security? That’s entirely possible. It’s even possible within capitalism, but that involves us making a series of changes in policy and, to some extent, in what we collectively value.
It’s entirely possible – say, within the context of a real epidemic, a modern-day Plague with a two-digit mortality rate, something that legitimately shuts down society for the duration of a disease serious enough to impinge even Nancy Pelosi or Lori Lightfoot’s lifestyles – for the skills and presence of “supply chain” workers, from the farm to the Walmart, to become very, very valuable. Vastly moreso than, say, writing professors at Northwestern.
But I don’t think that’s the “policy change” she’s referring to.
The bad news: these are the people teaching the “next generation of leaders”
The not-so-bad news: nobody she teaches will amount to anything outside the academic-industrial complex.
“You should be voting in your ‘best interests'”
You mean, the “best interests” that gave voters Camden?
The destruction on Lake Street and University Avenue?
The carnage every summer in south Chicago?
Those “best interests?”
Just wanna be clear, here.
What’s the most dangerous phrase in the world?
1980: “I’m from the governent and I”m here to help”
2020: “I’m an ‘ally’ and I’m here to help. “
A friend of the blog emails:
Privileged Liberal White People: we’re going to help those poor communities of black people. We’ll build a train so they can get around with a car!
Black people: But, we’d like to get around by car just like you.
PLWP: We’re going to help those poor black people by raising the minimum wage!
BP: But we’d like to have a job to support our families. This will just get rid of our jobs.
PLWP: We’re going to help those poor black people by building high density housing in their neighborhood. Let’s tear down the affordable single family housing stock to help them!
BP: But we’d like to own a house, just like you.
PLWP: We’re going to help those poor black people by taking away on street parking around their apartment buildings to build bike lanes!
BP: But we’d like to park by where we live just like you, especially in the winter. We aren’t biking.
PLWP: We want to help black people by not calling the cops when thugs take over their neighborhood. And we’ll tell the whole world!
BP: Seriously, stop helping us.
Biggest problem in my neighborhood, other than the issues above, most of my neighbors don’t bother voting in local elections.
Semi-related: It’s interesting, to me, to note that John Lesch’s district has the lowest voter turnout numbers in the state.
To the original point: Urban Progessive Privilege means never having had to confront the notion that your ideals are only “ideal” for people in your own class.
The “warlord” of the Seattle Peoples Autonomous Zone hands out AR15s to fellow “revolutionaries”:
Not a background check among ’em.
The gun groups seem to be silent on this particular example of gun proliferation.
“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”
— “Animal Farm”, George Orwell
So let me get this straight:
Lt. Governor Flanagan, who chairs the Capitol Architecture Committee, who is a “progressive” (koff koff) who has made her displeasure with the Capitol mall’s statue of Christopher Columbus amply known in the past, and whose entire place in the Walz administration is to placate the MN DFL’s ever more extreme left wing (who rejected Walz for endorsement at the 2018 convention, and certainly could do it again in 2022 if he doesn’t kiss up to the Left sincerely and often enough), may well have been involved in interfering with the response by the State Patrol who, despite six hours’ warning (according to Channel 5’s Tom Hauser) got the the Capitol juuuust too late to do anything about the illegal destruction of state property, which amounted to a de facto nudge and wink by the Walz Administration to people (who were, we’re told, “Frustrated” by their inability to get the statue removed, even though there was no record of any petition to remove the statue on record)…
…who were, in the most supreme of ironies, protesting government “overreach and unaccountability” in the Floyd case?
You don’t have to be a genius to see that there really are two Minnesotas, when it comes to the law; those who are in the favor of those in power, and those who aren’t. The state government deploys its full weight and might to go after bars in rural areas with no Covid problem, but allows Lake Street and University Avenue to burn (mostly at the hands of the sort of white leftists whom the administration can’t afford to offend or, really, discomfort in any way); some groups, favored by the DFL establishment, can block freeways with impunity while others, not so favored, get penned into ‘free speech zones’ at best.
This is “progressive” government.
*Totally* unrelated, honest – you need to watch this classic animated version of “Animal Farm” before the cancel culture gets it removed and disappeared:
SCENE: Debate hall at the University of Minnesota. Mitch BERG is getting ready for a debate with Stacey HINTON. HINTON – a white woman from Edina – is president of the group “Keep All Racists Equally Nonplussed”, a social justice group without portfolio. The moderator takes the stage, as a small audience rustles in its seats.
MODERATOR: Mr. Berg, Ms. Hinton, you know the rules (both nod ). Let’s get started. What do you advocate doing about the Covid virus.
BERG: Look, I think the only things that have worked are first, protecting the vulnerable – certainly more effectively than we do here in Minnesota – then isolate the infected, and re-open the economy for everyone else.
MODERATOR: Ms. Hinton?
HINTON: You’re white.
BERG: Well, yeah, I am.
HINTON: So that’s your privilege talking.
BERG: What does “privilege” have to do with observing that the places with the best combination of public health and medical performance all did exactly that?
HINTON: Check your privilege.
MODERATOR: OK. On to the next topic. Whither Minneapolis? We’ll start with you, Ms. Hinton.
HINTON: The rioting was a bunch of white boys running around vandalizing neighborhoods of color.
BERG: Well, there certainly were “white boys” and girls doing the rioting. The implied message is “white supremacist” boys and girls. If so, they were pretty ingenious “white supremacists”, coating entire neighborhoods with graffiti associated with the left.
HINTON: Spoken like a white boy.
BERG: What does that even mean?
MODERATOR: Let’s move along. What do we do about reforming law enforcement? Mr. Berg.
BERG: Get serious about reforming qualified immunity. It is used to excuse a lot of horrific abuses, not just by the police, but by every other variety of public employee. It basically turns public employees into a higher legal caste. This doesn’t bode well for self-government.
HINTON: Something a white guy would say.
BERG: Ma’am? Do you have any thing to add other than my ethnic background?
BERG: Let’s hear it.
HINTON: It’s true of all white guys.
MODERATOR: Let’s move along. Ms. Hinton – what do we need to do about race relations in this country?
HINTON: White people need to listen to black peoples’ stories, and check their privilege.
BERG: Huh. All due respect, ma’am, but that’s the kind of meaningless word salad that people like you – “progressives” who are, if I may say so, a lot whiter than I am use to try to diffuse their own white liberal guilt.
HINTON: Again, that’s your privilege talking, white boy.
BERG: To the extent I have “privilege”, it’s because I was born in a functional two-parent household, with parents who stayed together until I was an adult, taught me a work ethic, and made sure I stayed in high school. And that kind of privilege is not an exclusive club – in fact, like freedom, the more of this “privilege” society has, the more there is to go around.
But let’s cut the crap. The concept of “white privilege” was, from its origins, a way for wealthy white progressive academics to try to expiate their guilt about the privileges their class gave them. To insulate themselves from gnawing class guilt while preserving that holier-than-thou feeling that white progressivism feeds on, they created and adopted the preposterous concept that being white meant a hot tar roofer from Arkansas has “privileges” that Oprah and Jay-Z don’t, while giving the likes of Mark Dayton and Mark Zuckerberg a moral pass, like indulgences sold by “church” that never forgives and offers no salvation.
MODERATOR: Ms. Hinton?
HINTON: Whitey white white white white white. White white white.
MODERATOR: Thank you all for coming out to today’s debate!
SCENE: Mitch BERG is looking for almond flour at a Cub Foods, when Cat SCAT, designated “fact checker” at the (possibly fictional) progressive blog “”MinnesotaLiberalAlliance.Blogspot.com“, and the office manager at a small phrenology practice, glomphs up from behind.
SCAT: Hah hah, Merg! People are removing racist statues from the Capitol grounds! That’s gotta make all you fat angry old white men wet your pants with rage!
BERG: (Beholding the red-faced, utterly Caucusoid and, shall we say “zaftig” SCAT, and silently contemplating and then thinking better of commenting). Yeah, it’s the mob showing the rest of the world that they don’t have to play by the rules.
SCAT: It’s no different than the fall of the Berlin Wall!
SCAT: Haha! Yes! Take that!
BERG: OK, let’s compare and contrast.
Columbus: Problematic but incidental figure, who wasn’t even the first European to come to North America – that was the Norwegians, five hundred years earlier – and who has had no affect other than symbolism on anyone in centuries, the un-personing of whom from history should be a cause for a critical discussion.
With me so far?
SCAT: Yeah! Evil white man!
BERG: Riiight. OK – the Berlin Wall: Not just a symbol of the contemporary division of Germany and the current subjugation of tens of millions of people to the bloodiest regime in history, but an actual current militarized barrier along which seventeen people had been murdered in the decade, and three in the year, before it was destroyed. The demolition of which was subject discussed thoroughly but quickly in the immediate aftermath of people on both sides of the wall deciding to jettison the Communism that had reigned in the East (the government that many of the statue-yankers are shilling for, interestingly enough), and, other than the massive “vandalism” of the wall after the Bornholmerstraße incident and the collapse of the DDR (which was one of the great images of my lifetime, but remarkably ineffective, leaving as it did a, well, wall through the middle of Berlin), was dealt via due process leading to its orderly and deliberate demolition, with remarkable worldwide unanimity, mourned by nobody that didn’t have hands still dripping with fresh blood.
Other than that? Same/same!
SCAT: So what about the alt-right taking over those six blocks in Seattle, and turning it into a slave plantation?
BERG: It’s “Anti”-Fa, and they turned it into an “Occupy” camp, only mixing in extortion with the rape and filth, and you’re changing the subject as well as lying about the substance of both subjects…
(But SCAT has already wandered away)
This was the House Democratic leadership, doing their (nothing but) symbolic photo-op before the George Floyd funeral:
They’re wearing “Kente” cloths – apparently Ghanaian in this case, but there are similar adornments all through Africa. They have cultural significance.
And to Pelosi and her little claque, they are nothing but costumes.
Some actual Africans were not amused at the virtue-accessorizing:
But remember – don’t go eating burritos, honky.
Urban Progressive Privilege: when making the right progressive-y noises is enough, at least within your social circle.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
My brother died one month ago today. No funeral – they were illegal. Covid. It was SCIENCE!
Then the Covid rules changed: we could have a 10-people funeral. That wasn’t enough for both our side and the widow’s side of the family to attend. No funeral. SCIENCE!
Then the Covid rules changed again: we could have a funeral, 25% capacity, social distancing, masks for all. SCIENCE!
We’re burying my brother tomorrow. Afterwards, we’ve rented a picnic shelter in the park to eat box lunch, watch a tribute video and share memories. Well, some of us are. The picnic shelter is open on three sides but has roof and one wall so it’s considered a “structure.” There’s a 10-person limit in the picnic shelter. The rest of us must stand outside and take turns rotating through, with masks, and social distancing. Because Covid, you know. It’s SCIENCE!
I can’t help noticing the crowd at the George Floyd memorial. Capacity, social distance, masks – whatever happened to all that Science?
Maybe it’s like rock, paper, scissors: Fire burns Science; Fire wins. Instead of following the rules like a good little boy, I should have burned down a Black neighborhood.
I’ll keep that in mind.
Well, torching any low-income or immigrant neighborhood will actually do…
… how many mulligans does a democrat get before people start actually calling them on there, well, “inconsistencies”?
The answer, of course, provided they are progressive enough, is “as many as they want”
This is not the Babylon Bee. ￼￼
The article itself is a moderately interesting read, if only to (try to help sort of maybe kinda) understand the minds of those whose entire frame of reference begins and ends with progressivism filtered through the lens of identity feminism.