It is, although not for long, I suspect.
The Monday, April 10 NPR Morning Edition piece on Richard Florida and “creative class” workers leaving the rest of the city behind. It’s he that is largely behind one of the Big Left’s current conceits; that briniging “the creative class” to big cities will revolutionize them, bringing them a new lease on life.
How’s it working?
From an NPR interview with Steve Inskeep:
Richard Florida promotes what he calls the creative class. He has said for years that cities prosper when they attract upscale innovators and entrepreneurs. Make your city a place where the creative class wants to live, and they, in turn, will create jobs.
INSKEEP: Many cities followed that advice. And now Richard Florida faces the downside. The creative class, he says, is creating cities that are massively unequal.
Well, there’s a freaking shock.
Manufacturing plants create several jobs in the area for each job actually in the plant; truckers, waitresses, janitors, HVAC contractors, management consultants, contractors, you name it.
Ad agencies don’t.
RICHARD FLORIDA: …Which is terrifying to me. The middle class in this country has declined. But, more importantly to me, the middle-class neighborhoods, those platforms for the American dream, have been decimated.
Of course, if you read this blog you are a solid decade ahead of the typical NPR listener. It was in 2007 that Joel Kotkin foresaw all of this; the fact that the middle class is decamping to the third-tier exurbs, and to smaller and middle-sized cities. Major cities are turning into an inner core of the wealthy, surrounded by formerly middle-class areas that the social service buearucracy has taken over to warehouse the poor.
Of course, NPR, being a PR wing of the Democrat party, knows who not to blame if it wants its belly rubbed (emphasis added):
INSKEEP: And that metric is especially bad in big, progressive, otherwise successful cities. Those cities are often led by Democratic mayors who criticize inequality…Have progressive policies failed those places?
FLORIDA: I think we’ve abandoned progressive policies. We’ve had an incredibly daunting and troubling reaction. I had to rewrite this entire book in the wake of Trump’s election. I mentioned, you know, I had called for a federal urban policy. I had called for the newly-elected Democratic administration to appoint a council of cities, you know, of great mayors to deploy federal resources.
Can you imagine? Bill DeBlasio, Rahm Emanuel and Betsy Hodges getting together to “deploy” even more money?
The article gets even more out of touch. You’re on your own.
Mayor Betsy Hodges is having a meeting tonight:
MAYOR BETSY HODGES
FOR A SPECIAL
“ONE MINNEAPOLIS IN THE TIME OF TRUMP”
MONDAY, APRIL 17, 2017
SHIR TIKVAH CONGREGATION
1360 West Minnehaha Parkway
EVENT IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
Parking Available at Burroughs School
(Enter on 50th Street)
And on Adjacent Streets
When politicians start referring to polities as “one” of anything, you know you’ve got a problem on your hands; in this case, a one-party city that feels perfectly find using city government as an extension of Democrat party politics.
Shelley Garland – whose bio describes here as “…an activist and a feminist and is currently completing an MA degree in philosophy. When she’s not gagging at South Africa’s unique brand of rainbow politics, she’s working on ways to smash the patriarchy”, writes in – where else – the HuffPo:
Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.
If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.
Ms. Garland – “progressivie” utopianism has given us ever single one of the woes of the past 100 years. No exceptions.
And if you want to deny me my franchise, I urge you to get about 30 of your friends together and see just how toxic masculinity can get.
…got into an argument over this past weekend’s festivities in Berkeley, where Real American pro-free-speech activists banded together to deter, and occasionally, where necessary, necessary meet, “anti-fascist” fascist violence at a pro-Trump rally.
Devil (on Mitch’s left shoulder): Oh, God, I am so freaking happy to see that the good guys – any good guys, people who try to express their views peacefully, fought back against the Blackshirts and other neo-fascist thugs. Those little upper-middle-class fops are bullies, every one of them. They sucker-punch, they gang up on lone people, they use weapons like sticks and pepper spray against the unarmed and unsuspecting, they throw smoke bombs at old ladies and punch out teenage girls – but I’m gonna guess every one of them crapped their pants when they saw Real Americans lined up to stare their snowflake asses down.
Angel (on Mitch’s right shoulder): Yeah, it’s tempting to cheer. But remember – if 200 Republicans, conservatives, Tea Partiers or Trumpkins go to the hospital, it’ll warrant not a single headline – but the moment Joshua Micah Gildersleeve from Oberlin gets his face scuffed up, it’ll headlines across the entire mainstream media, and the left will make “right wing thuggery” a chanting point forevermore.
Because you know it as well as I do, Mitch’s-inner-devil; the only damage the media and the people who set our society’s opinions care about is damage to the kids who look like their kids.
Devil (on Mitch’s left shoulder): So we should sit still and be placid, passive victims and punching bags for those worthless bullies?
Angel (on Mitch’s right shoulder): That’s not what I’m saying. But let’s be realistic; if a couple black guys punched out a Klansman in self-defense in 1920, it was a tree falling in the forest that was used by the bullies to justify even more violence. Hell – they’re trying to provoke violence, so they and their patsies and enablers in the MSM can tell the gullible general public “Look at what these big bag righties did to our best and brightest!”
Devil (on Mitch’s left shoulder): Bu you know as well as I do they don’t even need any kind of resistance to their “resistance” to “Justify” any of that. And..
(Devil notices Angel removing halo, donning a Gadsden Flag t-shirt, and picking up what looks like a stuffed sweat sock).
Er, Angel? What is that?
Angel (on Mitch’s right shoulder): It’s a sweat sock with a big russet potato in it.
Devil (on Mitch’s left shoulder): Er…what the…why?
Angel (on Mitch’s right shoulder): Hits like a truck full of bricks, doesn’t leave a mark.
Devil (on Mitch’s left shoulder): Um…again, why?
Angel (on Mitch’s right shoulder): (pulls stocking cap low over head). I’m heading down planetside. I’m gonna find the next snowflake anti-Free-Speech rally. If they try to bully anyone else into silence, I’m gonna go all Old Testament Angel on them.
Devil (on Mitch’s left shoulder): But…you’re the angel of Mitch’s better nature…
Angel (on Mitch’s right shoulder): I’m an angel. I’m not an idiot.
On March 4, a group of thugs, concealed in an un-permitted counterprotest, attacked a pro-Trump rally in the Rotunda at the State Capitol; a 17 year old girl was punched, at least one man was maced by someone who was trying to crash through a group of Trump supporters to disrupt the peaceful pro-Trump rally, a woman was hit in the head by a smoke bomb – an incendiary device…
…and you have already spent more time reading this than Ramco Attorney John Choi spent in deciding not to press charges against the six upper-middle-class snowflakes that were arrested, incuding Linwood Kaine, son of Hillary Clinton’s veep candidate.
They are, of course, the children of the golf buddies of the city’s DFL establishment, or at least the children of similar Democrat apparatchiks elsewhere. Urban Liberal Privilege grants them a separate, unequal, nicer brand of justice than the rest of us get.
But there’s an effort afoot to change that. The “Protecting Civil Discourse” rally on March 18 demanded that the Ramco and Saint Paul City Attorneys offices actually listen to the actual evidence, and follow the logical conclusion and charge the snowflakes.
Calls and emails are eminently appropriate:
- John Choi – Ramsey County Attorney 651-266-3222 (elected 2010)
- Cyndy Melby – John’s Exec. Assistant email@example.com
- Samuel Clark – St Paul City Attorney 651-266-8710 (Mr. Clark was U.S. Sen. Klobuchar’s State Director & was appointed by Mayor Chris Coleman 3/2015).
- Laura Pietan – Assistant City Attorney 651-266-8740
- Chris Coleman – St Paul Mayor 651-266-8510 / firstname.lastname@example.org (2018 Minnesota Governor Candidate)
Of course, John Edwards was right – there are Two Americas. The children of our misbegotten “elite” live in one of them, where people with the right political backing can beat people up, block freeways and vandalize not merely freely, not merely at will, but with a nudge and a wink from the powers that be.
Time to let those powers know we’re watching.
Last weekend, a group of “anarchists” attacked a pro-Trump rally at the Minnesota State Capitol. Thugs wearing helmets and masks sucker-punched and kicked unsuspecting peaceful demonstrators, and in one case sprayed mace into a crowd of people.
It was not a spontaneous event; they were quite obviously organized, equipped, and had planned for the event.
They sprayed what was described as “Bear Mace” into a crowd of unsuspecting people – which can easily be a lethal weapon for people with respiratory conditions. There were six arrests.
The entire fracas was caught on film, in front of dozens of witnesses. There is not problem showing the violence, brutality and intent of the event.
No matter. They are aligned with the left against the right. And in Saint Paul, that’s license to block streets, clog freeways…
…and now, to physically attack people with potentially lethal force. Ramsey County has declined to charge the arrested protesters – four boys and two girls – with anything.
Monday, the Ramsey County Attorney’s Office said there were insufficient facts to prove felony-level riot. The attorney’s office said State Patrol has presented the case to the St. Paul City Attorney’s Office for consideration of misdemeanor charges.
That is bullshit, stacked high and deep.
If it were a bunch of rednecks from Isanti County who’d maced the “Womens’ March” a couple weeks ago, they’d still be in jail.
Look at the boys and girls who were arrested. Check out the names: Anton. Isabell. Linwood. Those are upper-middle-class white kid names. Breck School names. Names that drive Subarus until they get a Volvo. Names like the children of John Choi’s law school classmates and Chris Coleman’s Crocus Hill and Kenwood cronies have.
It’s the special, deluxe, “for progressives only” justice, part of the “progressives only” school, university, public sector union and non-profit parallel universe of power and privilege that the Big Left in Minnesota gets.
UPDATE: I’ve seen reports that Linwood Kaine is the son of Hillary Clinton’s VP candidate.
Well, I’m gonna guess there were some lawyers involved, huh?
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Mayor of New York wants to build dozens of new homeless shelters.
Homeless? What homeless? Where did all these homeless people come from, all of the sudden? I didn’t hear anything about homeless for the last eight years. Trump has only been in office for a month and already, we need to build more homeless shelters?
And what’s this about clusters? Seems as if Queens and the Bronx have most of the present homeless sites instead of trendy Manhattan. I wonder why?
And what does this line mean: “Yet he provided no details about where these shelters will be built, a glaring omission that follows furious protests over the last year when the city tried but failed to locate shelters in some neighborhoods.”
Hypocritical NIMBYs in New York? The most Liberal, caring, compassionate, Democrat city in the world?
Hard to believe, isn’t it?
Being told I am “using my white privilege” to make a point…
… by a white liberal in a comment thread on the Minnesota Public Radio website.
For my part? I’ve decided that Bill Maher is right; the best way to deal with this sort of
smog smug, entitled babble is to point it out, laugh at it, and mock it.
To: NPR, the Strib, Alondra Cano, and every other Twin Cities liberal that’s spent the lasdt six months romanticizing the NoDAPL “pipeline” protest
From: Mitch Berg, Ornery Peasant and actual North Dakota native
Re: Just Curious, Here
You all – media and political figures alike – have spent the past six months romanticizing the “No Dakota Access Pipeline” protests more thoroughly than a Scarlett Johansson cheesecake photo shoot.
NPR / MPR? You had your reporters out in the wilds of south-central North Dakota, doing your best to make the protests sound like an organic grassroots phenomenon, sprung up from the soil to protect the river. Y’know – the Missouri. The river that flows through middle of the Dakotas and Nebraska.
Of course, while your reporters (yours too, Strib) plead “It’s Settled Science” on many convenient issues, you ignored it over and over again on this issue. It’s a simple fact – while the oil that powers your Subarus does indeed have some risk of spilling in its remote location far from any major population center, it’s many orders of magntitude per barrel lower that that same risk the way the oil is currently transported – by truck and train, through the middle of Bismarck, Jamestown (blocks from my father’s house, actually), Fargo, Fergus Falls, Saint Cloud, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Madison and Chicago. As in astronomically more safe.
But let’s not pretend that Alondra Cano knows the first thing about statistics, or cares a rats ass about a bunch of white, rural, Trump-voting North Dakotans’ safety (or, for that matter, how many Strib or MPR reporters could name the river the “protesters” are “protecting”). And your logical consistency about the oil that powers your cars and buses and printing presses and transmitters is no less dubious than about where your food comes from. Yep, same place.
In fact, let’s forget the logical and moral inconsistency of your entire story – you media figures’ selective and incurious reporting, you politicians’ illiterate grandstanding. Ignore it all for now.
Let’s focus on today – where the “protesters” have left an ungodly mess at their “protest” site. North Dakota’s top tow-truck driver notes:
There are roughly 200 vehicles down there at last count, ranging from cars and pickups to rental trucks. We’re going to have a very drastic situation trying to keep these vehicles from getting into the river – what everybody’s been trying to protect from day one. We can’t leave them there. We don’t know what kind of biohazard is going to be produced with all the fluids or any other garbage that’s inside the vehicle.
Here’s a Bismarck TV station’s report:
So – for six months you, the Twin Cities’ left leaning media and grandstanding left-wing politicians, romanticized the NoDAPL “protests” and “protesters”.
Just as you did “Occupy”, and the RNC protests , and the various G7 protests, and every other “protest” you can imagine (except the Tea Party, naturally).
And just like every protest other than the Tea Party, the NoDAPL “protesters” left behind filth and squalor.
And they left by the banks of the river they were supposedly “protecting” – cars full of fuel, human waste, and over a thousand tons of general trash. All right there, waiting for the next Missouri River flood.
This, mind you, in a part of the state that is very sparsely populated even by North Dakota standards – miles down a two-lane road from Mandan. Not the wealthy exurbs from which most of you media and political figures hail.
Oh, yeah – and it’s upstream from the Standing Rock reservation.
So – if you’re not running stories about the squalor left behind, and – this is for you, Alondra Cano – actively soliciting people and money and other resources for cleaning up after the people you encouraged to leave the mess, you’re not only hypocrites…
Suck on that.
That is all.
On the one hand, she writes indulgent, entitle twaddle like Girls. Including lines like:
… and the other thing about me is I give zero f***s about anything, yet I have a strong opinion about everything, even topics I’m not informed on.”
Which is simultaneously risibly vacuous and as perfect a sample of Urban Liberal Privilege as you can find. (The phrase “Zero F****s Given” is a primary indicator of a deeply vapid person).
On the other? She throws Paul Krugman under the bus.
Talk about a fight where there is no winner, except all the rest of us.
Conor Friedersdorf in the LATimes writes a piece opposing “Calexit” – the proposed secession of California from the union.
Say what you will about the merits or problems with this idea – it’d remove the biggest single glob of “progressives” from the voter roles, and one of the most toxic gobs of unreformed pension debt from the future’s federal budget, both of which are huge wins.
But let’s not focus on the pros and cons of Calexit. Let’s focus instead, for the moment, on this paragraph from Friedersdorf:
Secession would not improve our values. But it would practically ensure that the rest of the U.S. would drift farther away from our laid-back tolerance and easygoing diversity
Do whatever you want, California – the US will in fact be better off without you all.
But try looking at yourself through the eyes of sane non-narcissists for a while. You might learn something.
A group of the Brownshirt Youth (known, locally, in this case as the “Knights of Socialism”) are offering to teach inept milllennial snowflakes how to beat up Republicans.
The “Knights for Socialism” group at the University of Central Florida (UCF) held a workshop Sunday to teach left-wing students how to “BASH THE FASH” with a “Leftist Fight Club” open to everyone but Republicans.
“In response to the record number of hate crimes [sic] against Latinxs, Immigrants, Muslims, Women, the LGBTQIA+ community, Jews, African Americans and other minorities since the rise of Donald Trump and other Alt-Right Neo-Nazis, Knights for Socialism has decided to host a series of self-defense clinics for anyone that wants to learn how to BASH THE FASH,” asserts the Facebook event page for “Leftist Fight Club: The Rumbles at Lake Claire.”
I can see it now. Four or five slobbering dingoes (“Knights of Socialismi”) attack a conservative student.
Conservative pounds them into a fine pulp.
Dingoes sue the student and the University.
I joke. But I’ve found my jokes are usually more accurate than the news, these days.
Berkeley Republicans involved in organizing the Milo Yiannopoulos even that was shut down by Campus Blackshirts last weekend were in legitimate fear for their lives:
By the time he got to the Martin Luther King Jr. Student Union to begin prepping for the event at 5:30 p.m., a throng of students and other demonstrators flanked the building. As he walked through the crowd, protesters surrounded him and closed in on him, pushing and shoving him from all sides.
“We know who you are, you can’t hide from us,” Tahmas recalls them saying as he pushed through the crowd.
“It was so violent at that point,” he said. “They were surrounding me. They were assaulting me.”
Rattled but essentially unharmed, he made it into the building. There he met up with Yiannopolous and other Berkeley Republicans. But it was not long before someone pulled the fire alarm. Then protesters began shooting M-80 firecrackers at the building, with several narrowly missing the group and the police officers attempting to guard them.
Tahmas said one of Milo’s security guards, a former Navy Seal, even commented: “I haven’t seen protests like this since Afghanistan.”
And if you’re a Berkeley Republican, you’ve got a stalker. Oh, yes you do:
Don’t you just love the fact that someone who can write “I don’t believe attendance – support – of an event of this nature should be shrouded in secrecy. I believe it is in the public interest to know who supports this kind of thing” is, naturally, anonymous?
As I pointed out the other day – like the original Brownshirts and Blackshirts, this sort of thing is intended to drive everyone to the extreme, to empty out the center.
And at this exact moment, reading this story, it’s working. I want Milo to come to the U of M, and I want to gather up a few hundred people who actually support free speech, and meet these cowards face to face and rip their ofay little facemasks off.
It’ll pass in an hour.
Demand the expulsion of a “fascist”, and the gunning down of his supporters, by the military.
Question for Sarah Silverman and her ilk: who do you think the military are? The children of families with two parents with masters degrees in Non-Profit Administration from Saint Olaf, who shop at Whole Foods and drive Subarus and listen to NPR and take the SPLC seriously?
A candid history of the soon-to-be-late HBO series “Girls”, starring, well, everyone involved in the show.
I’ve seen a grand total of five minutes of “Girls” – don’t ask – and won’t pretend to care for it any more than creator/star Lena Dunham or executive prod Judd Apatow will claim I’m supposed to.
But written in between the lines of the article is the extent to which Urban Liberal Privilege greases the skids of Hollywood.
Massachusetts set up a hate crime hotline after Trump’s election.
Most Nearly as many calls were from Trump supporters.
All is proceeding exactly as predicted.
UPDATE: Enh. Pre-coffee blogging can be dangerous.
When a leftist high on his own sense of intellectual entitlement punched white supremacist Richard Spencer last week, the leftyverse erupted in a wave of self-congratulatory justification; even the NYTimes wiggled its way into justifying physical violence (by liberals only, of course) against those declared “Nazis”.
Alex Griswold notes how very stupidly caustic this idea is.
Among criticisms of Spencer’s white supremacist website are that it is “a notoriously racist publication… reminiscent of early Nazi propaganda with anti-Semitic illustrations of Jewish people.” It “has motivated others to participate in hate crimes against Muslims.” It caters to “already angry people who are trembling with xenophobia and paranoid discomfort that immigrants are coming to take over their way of life.”
Given all the above, is it okay to attack Spencer? Kill, even? Would you say he was asking for it?
Wait for it…
Those raising your hands: what if I told you all the above quotes were actually criticisms of Charlie Hebdo?
Griswold notes the primrose path that this idea takes us down:
The man who punched Spencer took the law into his own hands and appears to have unilaterally declared he was too dangerous to be allowed to speak. If we praise that man, we teach others to do the same so long as there are enough people to declare them heroes on social media. That includes the alt-right, that includes Islamists, that includes anyone with an ax to grind in today’s hyperpartisan world. Wherever words have no effect, fists and baseball bats will become the substitute.
Embrace this man, renounce the classical liberal understanding of free speech, and you light a fuse. Don’t act surprised when it blows up in your own face.
Do you suppose our “elites”, in and amid their juvenile justification for violence (I’ve heard “processing grief” as a justification) realize that…:
- They started with a President who got into office with a set of calculated lies – and helped launch a movement that calculated them better
- They ran a campaign based on identity politics – and were shocked when their enemies became an identity group in response.
When do you suspect is going to happen when the left starts attacking people?
Maybe that’s the idea.
I’ve been writing this blog for fifteen years. In that time, I’ve written something like 20,000 posts. I’ve written about a lot of topics, of course – but there’ve been some recurring themes.
Liberalism is bad for children and other living things. The right to keep and bear arms is key among the things that separates citizens from subjects. The less centralized authority is, the better. The justification for “elites” being “elite” fades rapidly over intellectual generations.
And the Star/Tribune editorial board is a bunch of out-of-touch upper-middle-class patricians with little comprehension of the political world since Walter Mondale left office.
And I’m unlikely to change that any time soon.
But like the proverbial blind squirrel, they get one right once in a while, in their piece giving grudging support – the same grudging support I give – to increasing the penalties for blocking freeways during protests:
Blocking a freeway or a train track goes beyond peaceful protest. Those are inherently aggressive acts, designed to trigger a confrontation with law enforcement. They pose an immediate hazard to the protesters and motorists, as well as law enforcement.
The Legislature must be mindful of the right to peaceful protest, and of the danger in ignoring the concerns of those who feel aggrieved. But protesters must recognize they do not have a right to jeopardize the safety of others.
They’re pretty close, here. Earlier in the piece, they say:
Any law that seeks to restrict the right to protest must strike a careful balance that preserves public safety, without trammeling on the right to speak against perceived injustice.
As Walter Hudson points out, there is no “balance” between freedom and criminal behavior.
If this particular reform doesn’t pass, though, I’d like to propose a further, different reform. Currently, the “right” to block freeways is entirely contingent on a group’s level of favor with Betsy Hodges’ and Chris Coleman’s administrations. Both need to stay cuddled up to the far left – so Black Lives Matter has carte blanche.
So I say go ahead – let people protest on the freeways. But require a permit, same as any other protest that impacts the public – not to censor the event, but to allow people notice. And require them to be issued to everyone.
So if the pro-lifers think they’d draw attention to their cause by protesting on the main arterials leading into Kenwood, Crocus Hill, Nicollet Island and Edina, keeping the DFL’s grandées from getting from their non-profits to their feminist drum circle meetings, they’d be able to do it, too. They can check their Urban Liberal Privilege!
It’s a plan B.
Women berating Trump supporter on a plane is ejected as fellow passengers, likely of all political stripes, cheer.
The guy – a working schlub who flew to DC to watch the inauguration – was trapped in the window seat by a HIllary supporter who oozed hate and entitlement.
While I enjoy flying, I hate sitting in airliners. Being trapped by someone with pathological Urban Liberal Privilege is among my worst nightmares.
Perhaps for the first time in 25 years, I agree with Michael Moore on something.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
I watched the inauguration. I was expecting an earth-shattering kaboom when Trump was sworn in and the world ended, as Liberals have been telling me it would do. Makes me wonder what other lies I’ve been told.
Remember the federal employees who promised to quit and celebrities who promised to move if Trump became President? Can we get an updated head count on that?
As Bogey reminds us…
…word of mouth is not always a good guide in life.
To: Some Of You Trump Opponents Out There
From: Mitch Berg, Ornery Peasant
Dear Hollywood and New York Showbiz and Media “Elites”
As we come up on inauguration day, some of you are still sore about Donald Trump. I get it. I mean, I didn’t vote for him, either.
You’d like to pretend he’s not your president. Yadda yadda. Whatever. Gotcha. It’s a free country (and will stay that way, so quit your whining), so you can say what you want, and I can mock you for it. But relax; I’m not mocking you for that. Not now.
No, this is worse.
It’s come to my attention that some of you Hollywood types are calling yourselves “the Resistance”.
You are among the wealthiest, most privileged, most untouchable residents in one of hte wealthiest, most privileged parts of the wealthiest and free-est society in the world. You lost an election. In four years, you’ll get a rematch (although the way you all are going at this point, most of you will stroke out by mid-terms). And you will get the rematch; there’ll be no dictatorships, no camps, no nothing. Why, I bet a President Trump won’t even jabber about siccing the Federal Elections on your blogs, or turn a politicized IRS and DHS loose on your political movements, the way Obama did for eight years. Our democratic process, imperfect as it is, will go on, and if you don’t go full-blown Joan Crawford on us, you might have a shot, again, someday, God help us all.
So stop using – I believe the term these days is “Appropriating” – the term “Resistance”. That’s a term used by people who had actual skin in the game; the Jews who, as disarmed as you want us all to be, fought back against the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto; the Norwegians who overcame the impossible and destroyed the Nazi nuke program; the Polish fighters who rose and took Warsaw, only to be betrayed by one dictator and hunted down like rats by another; the Danes who, the risk of a summary execution hanging over their heads, snuck their nation’s Jews out to safety; people who, with all hope extinguished, still pulled together and rose up and, mostly, died, but gave their tormentors and murders and bloody nose and, in a few cases, against higher odds than Michael Moore winning the NYC Marathon, survived the war to witness against their captors.
Real people, who left behind whatever hadn’t been taken from them, and fought a real enemy who promised to kill them and their families if they failed.
Not overpaid, plushbottom Hollywood prima-donnas upset that they can’t install their choice of president by coup now that the hoi polloi have rejected their candidate.
Here’s my promise to you; call yourselves “the resistance” to my face, and I will spit in yours.
That is all.
Hearing the strum und drang from Democrats over Trump’s impending inauguration brought this little tidbit to mind:
It’s from the fake-news site and memes-for-dumb-people mill “Occupy Democrats” – one of very few “news” “sources” in the world not equipped to mock Minnesota Progressive Project’s relative intelligence – back in 2012.
Suddenly, I suspect, dissent is the highest virtue again.
“Urban Liberal Privilege” is when nothing you say is ever inconsistent, much less wrong.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Got this message from the Real Property Section of the Minnesota State Bar Association, sent to all members:
“The MSBA Real Property Law Section seeks feedback on what our members find valuable about the Section. To streamline the process, we put together a short survey for members, and in return, five members who complete the survey will be rewarded with a gift card to Target worth $50 in stores or online. The information gathered from the survey will be used to evaluate the Section’s current and future initiatives and keep us focused on the things that matter most to our members.”
Sent this message in return:
Dear MSBA: I won’t be completing the survey. I thought I’d let you know why not.
I pay dues to support the section out of my pocket, not reimbursed by my employer. The section will use my dues as a reward for contributing to the survey. But not in cash which members could spend on anything they like; the section will only allow winners to spend the reward at a particular vendor.
The reason that matters is this particular vendor has chosen to embrace controversial corporate values which are not shared by everybody in the state, such as the recent bathroom controversy or even stocking policies under which customers cannot buy ordinary items sold at other discount retailers such as spark plugs. Target management makes these decisions to make a political statement of its corporate values, the better to market its brand to its selected customer base.
Fine, Target can make marketing decisions as it sees fit. But by specifically choosing that particular vendor over Walmart or Fleet Farm or a Visa gift card spendable anywhere, the Real Property Section signals to members that it shares Target’s value system and wishes to contribute to its bottom line profitability with my dues. What does that action say to members of the section – or to the public at large – who do not share those values?
It doesn’t matter whether I, personally, share Target’s values. I don’t think MSBA should be in the business of rewarding businesses on the basis of which political positions they embrace. I think MSBA and all its sections should be neutral. I don’t wish to participate in an activity that makes it appear that I, as an attorney and officer of the court, have chosen to promote one set of controversial values over the values held by other citizens of this state. Therefore, I will not complete the survey.
This is the sort of unconscious Liberalism that blindsided Hillary supporters. They literally don’t think anybody disagrees with them, never even occurs to them to wonder about it. I doubt my note will do any good – I suspect they write it off as “another cis-gendered White male curmudgeon” – but somebody ought to say it.
Someday, the concept “Urban Liberal Privilege” will need to be officially codified.
This is certainly a case study.