It is your duty as a virtue-signalling progressive to indulge this urge at all costs, whatever it takes.
And, added Rasmussen, 31 percent believe “it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years.”
The new polling evidence of fear in the country over political division follows the harassment of three top Trump aides, including spokeswoman Sarah Sanders, ordered out of a southern Virginia restaurant, and senior adviser Stephen Miller whose condo drew protests from liberals.
It also follows a call by liberal California Rep. Maxine Waters to bring pressure to Trump officials when in public and urgings from legal experts for Trump aides to apply for concealed carry permits and buy guns.
Having seen “Anti-Fa’s” handiwork – un-“othering” political violence for the left – I am becoming more and more inclined to agree.
A friend of the blog writes:
Saw this on Twitter. Tweeted from someone living in San Francisco. But, retweeted by someone living in St Paul.
Funny thing- I think both cities have most of those things.
I doubt either the original poster or the retweeter choose to live near those places. Just like public transit, this list seems like a Yes in somebody else’s backyard.
That’s the thing about creeping socialilsm; it’s always inflicted on someone else.
“Woman” (probably) throws drink at conservative minx Tomi Lahren – local liberal hamsters applaud like trained chimps.
This article by the City Pages’ relentlessly dumb Mike Mullen:
The Fox News contributor apparently stopped and turned back to confront the water-thrower’s table, at which point a man yelled, “Fuck that bitch!,” “Fuck that hoe!,” “Racist-ass bitch!,” before asking: “Why you even out here?”
Within a couple seconds, she wasn’t: Lahren ended the confrontation and left the scene.The woman left standing there talking to patrons after Tomi retreats might just be Lahren’s mom: TMZ reports “some of the water got on Tomi’s mom as well.”
TMZ also passes along information from “sources close to Tomi,” who report that this drink-throwing was “completely unprovoked.” Completely! Except for, like, 500 things she’s said on national television.
That anyone can make me actually root for Lahren should tell you something.
And the fact is (and it is a fact), at best Minnesota “progressives'” notion of debate runs to:
- One round of factoids
- A round or two of logical fallacies (mostly ad hominem and strawmen)
- A round or two of name-calling
- If they haven’t broken off and run away, physical violence.
But let’s just bask in all that Minneapolis “progressive” tolerance.
So far, at least.
It’s from Toby Young, a former British pratfall journalist who’s become a charter school advocate in the UK. The entire article is worth a read (and I urge you to do just that) and illuminates exactly how much Big Left hates apostates.
But the quote is so important in so many other areas:
In today’s world, actually doing things to aid the disadvantaged counts less than making dumb jokes. If you’ve done the latter, you’re no longer allowed to do the former. As Young puts it, “Virtue-signaling is more important than being virtuous.”
I’m going to remember this (to the extent that I didn’t already think it) every time I (accidentally) watch The Daily Show, (inadvertently) catch a bit of Chelsea Handler, watch the ELCA-coiffed criminal-safety protesters gamboling about the Capitol sputtering their half-understood nonsense, or watching collect kids barking at the moon over the threat other peoples’ free speech poses them.
Illinois counties, sick of Chicago’s anti-gun idiocy, are declaring themselves “sanctuaries” from Blue Illinois’ gun laws:
At least five counties recently passed resolutions declaring themselves sanctuary counties for gun owners — a reference to so-called sanctuary cities such as Chicago that don’t cooperate with aspects of federal immigration enforcement.
The resolutions are meant to put the Democratic-controlled Legislature on notice that if it passes a host of gun bills, including new age restrictions for certain weapons, a bump stock ban and size limit for gun magazines, the counties might bar their employees from enforcing the new laws.
Go ahead, Rahm Emanuel. Foray out into the countryside looking to confiscate guns.
You too, Ron Latz.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
First half property taxes are due May 15th. When I arrived at work this morning, customers were already lined up outside, waiting for the doors to open at 8 AM.
Retail stores open at midnight on Thanksgiving to serve customers. Banks are open on weekends to serve customers. Why aren’t we having extended hours when we know demand will be heavy?
Why doesn’t government have customer service?
It doesn’t need it. While in the private sector “Service” means, well, service, in government it’s a euphemism for “showing the proles who’s boss”.
What Linda Slocum was in Minnesota, this hamster is on the national level:
In a USA Today op-ed entitled “Ban assault weapons, buy them back, go after resisters,” Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., argued Thursday that prior proposals to ban assault weapons “would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come.”
Swalwell proposes that the government should offer up to $1,000 for every weapon covered by a new ban, estimating that it would take $15 billion to buy back roughly 15 million weapons — and “criminally prosecute any who choose to defy [the buyback] by keeping their weapons.”
In the past, Democrats and gun safety groups have carefully resisted proposals that could be interpreted as “gun confiscation,” a concept gun rights groups have often invoked as part of a slippery slope argument against more modest proposals like universal background checks.
I’ll frame my response in the form of song – in this case, to the tune of the Beatles’ classic “Revolution”:
You don’t say that you want a civil war,
Well, you know,
You will get one anyway.
You don’t want people to have guns anymore,
Well, you know,
You want to take them all away.
But if you advocate going door to door,
There won’t be no Democrat party any more…
And don’t you know that that’d be…
I’ll just leave it right like that.
UPPER MIDDLE CLASS NPR-LISTENING WHOLE FOODS SHOPPING DEMOCRATS FROM GOOD NEIGHBORHOODS WITH “GOOD SCHOOLS”: “The problem with Republicans is that they’re just so racist”.
EVENTS: “Hello, Mr. and Mrs. Upper Middle Class Democrat from a Nice Neighborhood: We’re going to fulfill a liberal goal and start busing your kids and seriously integrating your school district”.
The California state assembly is weighing a bill that would ban engaging in any “…transaction intended to result or that results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer” that advertise, offer to engage in, or do engage in “sexual orientation change efforts with an individual.”
Which would ban “conversion therapy”, certainly.
it’s also band the Bible and any other work of Christian orthodoxy – both selling and buying.
This is extraordinarily radical. Christian orthodoxy is simple — regardless of a person’s desires (their “orientation”), the standard of right conduct is crystal clear. Sex is reserved for marriage between a man and a woman. When it comes to “gender expression,” there is no difference between “sex” and “gender,” and the Christian response to gender dysphoria is compassion and treatment, not indulgence and surgical mutilation.
And whatever you believe, on either side, this is a complete trashing of the First Amendment.
Y’know – the one that supposedly even liberals found sacrosanct…
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Ban bullets so criminals can’t kill people with them.
Brilliant. And let’s ban ink and paper, so people can’t commit hate speech. Because ink and paper aren’t speech, so they’re not protected, right?
Liberals, endlessly rediscovering yesterday’s ideas.
Of course, ink and paper are only speech when it’s a newspaper doing the writing.
No, that’s not habitual conservative kvetching. It’s a SCOM ruling. Which is finally up for appeal.
Tesla – intended originally to be a “disruptive” force in the automotive industry – is getting disrupted…
…by – what else? – the State of California.
A university student is under investigation for blowing the whistle on a hack “professor” who believes conservative students are “evil” – her words – and is acting on the belief:
Siena College student Zack Butler is currently under investigation for allegedly violating the school’s code of conduct and could face punishments as severe as expulsion.
His crime? Posting copies of an email sent March 20 by philosophy professor Jennifer McErlean to an alumnus expressing her resentment toward conservative students and a free speech event they’re set to host next week, a Turning Point USA conference called “Let Freedom Ring” that will feature a variety of prominent conservative movers and shakers.
In the email, McErlean decried conservative students as “evil,” noting she quit a civil discourse committee because working with conservative students was making her “miserable,” according to a copy of the email obtained by The College Fix.
She also let the alumnus know that her quitting this committee has freed her up to protest the “Let Freedom Ring” event.
Sounds like she could fit in at any college or university in the Twin Cities.
However, Mr. Butler is my hero for the day:
Two days after the email was sent, Butler and a friend posted around 600 copies of the email around campus.
“As a conservative student, I was bothered not only by the email but also the response, or lack there of, by the administration and felt something had to be done,” Butler said in a Facebook post. He added their goal wasn’t to offend anyone or to gain attention, but simply to “keep the dialogue going.”
Mr. Butler still has that idealism that comes with youth.
Of course, Big Left wants no “dialogue” – on academia any more than on guns, abortion, the welfare state, political correctness, or anything else. They want a monologue; they talk, and you sit, handcuffed to the chair, and listen. Gagged, if need be.
Laura Ingraham’s ratings at their highest point ever.
The Atlantic hired, and then fired, Kevin Williamson – perhaps America’s best political journalist, and one of the best interviewees I’ve ever had in a decade and a half of doing the NARN.
Andrew McCarthy has thoughts on the subject.
I’ve observed for years that one of the greatest side-effects of Urban Progressive Privilege is a complete inability to “debate” anyone who’s not part of their club – because they have no concept of cognitive dissonance when it comes to politics or any area of life touched by politics (and politics touches every area of their life.
Differ with an blind date’s politics? Ghost ’em!
Differ with a fellow student’s politics? Shame them!
Disagree with a co-workers’s politics? Slander, ostracize and try to destroy them!
The CD8 DFL had a very long convention on Saturday, After ten ballots, everyone promised to go to the primary.
Nothing especially unusual htere.
The unusual thing? The DFL trucked a bunch of Latino activists from the Twin Cities to canvass for the Metro DFL’s chosen candidate.
Phifer, a college professor who previously worked at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement, initially entered the race to challenge incumbent DFL Rep. Rick Nolan.
When Nolan announced his retirement in February, Phifer had the advantage of a five-month head start over the four candidates who jumped into the race afterward. It showed on Saturday: her blue-shirted supporters were a vocal presence in the convention hall, and she got the most votes of any candidate on each of the 10 ballots.
But Phifer’s background as an ICE employee revealed a deep rift on immigration: members of the Latino DFL Caucus protested her candidacy and urged delegates to reject her in a speech from the floor, one of the convention’s most dramatic moments.
Which leads us to the sort of unintended comedy that makes me love the Metro DFL so much. Alondra “The Brain” Cano, tweeting (what else) about a Duluth DFLer’s response to the fllood of – I”ll emphasize this – non-CD8 ringers – with the sort of club-footed fake victimization that’s become her trademark:
Don’t you just love it when elected members of a one-party autarchy with boundless political privilege and power unimaginable to regular schnooks start whining at other people with similar Urban Progressive Privilege about what victims they are?
…is being able to blame “privilege” for every transgression, real or perceived, for which one’s facts, logic or intellect doesn’t equip one to respond.
A friend of the blog writes:
I guess we uppity peasants got put in our places. If one complains, uprises against the government, it is only because of privilegeand wealth. We are instead to sit passively, for the good of all, and let organized city services have their way with us. After all, they apparently make better choices for us then we can make ourselves.
Really. And here I thought it was our right to protest when government over stepped into our lives. I guess I will remind people of this when the next Black Lives Matter protest happens over an incident with an organized city service.
As we noted when we first defined Urban Progressive Privilege, another of its great privileges is not having people calling you on inconsistencies.
David “Boss” Hogg, head of the Bloombergjugend, is taking a “gap year” to “work in the midterms“.
I figure that’ll be with half a point in every red District.
Republicans just don’t want to work across the aisle.
This, the Democrats say about a party that’s nominated John McCain, Mitt Romney, Dubya, Tim Pawlenty, Mike McFadden…
…well, you know the list.
But on the
far left, chucking even Big Left’s current unconvincing veneer of “bipartisanship” is becoming outré:
In this current period of American politics, at this juncture in our history, there’s no way that a bipartisan path provides the way forward. The way forward is on the path California blazed about 15 years ago.
In the early 2000s, California faced a similar situation to the one America faces today. Its state politics were severely polarized, and state government was largely paralyzed. The Republican Party was trapped in the brain-dead orthodoxies of an ideology stuck in the past. The party was controlled by zealous activists and corrupt special interests who refused to face up to the reality of the new century. It was a party that refused to work with the Democrats in good faith or compromise in any way.
To which their response is – let’s not compromise in any way ourselves!
The solution for the people of California was to reconfigure the political landscape and shift a supermajority of citizens — and by extension their elected officials — under the Democratic Party’s big tent. The natural continuum of more progressive to more moderate solutions then got worked out within the context of the only remaining functioning party…California today provides a model for America as a whole. This model of politics and government is by no means perfect, but it is far ahead of the nation in coming to terms with the inexorable digital, global, sustainable transformation of our era.
You could say Cali provides a model for the rest of the country…
Wonder if Lori Sturdevant is going to give Leyden and Texeira a stern talking-to?
UPDATE: Not sure if Sturdevant’s read it, but Kurt Schlichter has.
California is a bankrupt failed state that is essentially Illinois with palm trees and better weather. Outside the coastal urban enclaves where Jack and his pals mingle, drinking kombucha and apologizing for their white privilege to their baffled servants, it’s a crowded, decaying disaster. Bums wander the streets, littering the sidewalks with human waste. Crime is rising. Illegal aliens abound, more welcome in the Golden State than actual Americans. California is an example all right, but a cautionary one.
Read both of ’em. The Second Civil War is underway. Not a shot has been fired (well, not many of them anyway) – call it the Civil Cold War if you’d like.
…reading stories of anti-gun politicians and their staffers owning the guns they desperately want to deny the little guy.
An international group of scientists have spent the past couple of decades working to distill the essence of Urban Progressive Privilege into one, single, blog post.
To: National Rifle Association
From: Mitch Berg, devious peasant
Re: David “Boss” Hogg
You need to pay any price, bear any burden, to get David Hogg a TV show. Perhaps on Fox News.
You’ll have a supermajority in favor of the post-Heller interpretation of the Second Amendment for the next two generations.
With rhetoric like this:
“The pathetic f***ers that want to keep killing our children, they could have blood from children splattered all over their faces and they wouldn’t take action because they all still see those dollar signs,” Hogg said before describing the “exhaustion” he’s experienced as a result of his month-long stint as a political activist.
“At this point its like when your old-a** parent is like, ‘I don’t know how to send an iMessage’ and you’re like, ‘Ok give me the f***ing phone’ and you take it and you get it done in one second. Sadly, that’s what we have to do with our government because our parents don’t know how to use a f***ing democracy so we have to do it.”
Prime time cable network nightly show. Now.
Maybe have John Paul Stevens for his first guest.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Retired Supreme Court Justice Stevens calls for the repeal of the Second Amendment. It’s a relic of the 18th century.
His proposal would make sense if humanity had been so fundamentally transformed by the passing years that we no longer needed a check on government power. Looking around the world, or even at our own FBI, that doesn’t seem to be the case.
Hey buddy, you know what else is a relic of the 18th Century? The Constitution itself. Let’s dump that, too. Make Donald Trump President-for-Life, abolish the concept of judicial review and expand Congress to 5,000 members that can form and dissolve coalitions at will, as other third world s***holes do.
Why not? What could possibly go wrong?
With the modern left, today’s jokes are tomorrow’s crises.
I suppose we owe liberal retired SCOTUS judge John Paul Stevens a twisted thank you for accidentally telling the truth and calling for the outright repeal of the Second Amendment.
And for more than just exposing the manipulative lie. As Glenn Reynolds notes, Stevens’ statement reveals something I suspect much of the left would rather have kept quiet:
1. Calls to repeal the Second Amendment are, despite whatever gyrations the callers go through, tacit admissions that the Second Amendment bars sweeping gun control.
2. Good luck with that, we’re more likely to see an amendment banning abortion pass than one repealing the Second Amendment.
3. The Second Amendment, according to the Framers (and some Supreme Court dictum) recognizes a natural right; repealing the amendment doesn’t extinguish the right.
4. Nothing could be better for the GOP in 2018 and 2020 races than for the Dems to make this an issue.
Further proof, as if any were needed among those paying attention, that there can be no compromise. Ever.
Well, I guess it’s back to Uber. Or cabs.