…people are tired of being told what “their best interests” are by elites with no skin in their actual, local game.
SCENE: A group of people are sitting in a cafe in south Minneapolis.
Harland BERG and a few other people sit around tables, absently drinking coffee and reading the Minneapolis Star when Oscar KJEDELIG walks into the room.
KJEDELIG: We need to prevent Germans from caucusing at the Farmer-Labor Party caucuses next week.
KJEDELIG: Yes! Germans follow a crazy dictator who wants to bring world war.
BERG : Well, some certainly do.
KJEDELIG: “Look at this book! (He waves a mimeographed copy of a pamphlet entitled “All Germans Want To Start A War”, by…well, it’s hard to tell who wrote it). Read it and you’ll know everything.
BERG: Like you do?
KJEDELIG: Of course.
BERG: Well, I do speak the language, and did study a whole hell of a lot about Germany and the Germans, and I happen to know that the desire to start a world war is correlated with Germans who live in places where the Nazi Party is in control. Germans living in Canada, Australia, Chile, and especially places like the Dakotas, Montana, New Ulm Minnesota and so many other places have absolutely no correlation with Germans who want to kjill us.
In fact, we can test it now. (BERG turns to Will HEINRICH, a first-Generation German immigrant sitting at the next table). (BERG switches to German) “Hey, da, Willi – wollten Sie eine Weltkrig anizufangen, und “untermench” umzubringen?”
HEINRICH: Solche quatsch! Ich habe dreiβig Jahre in Amerika gewohnen! Ich war im Groβer Krieg im Amerikanischen Heer!
BERG: So there you have it. Not that I know anything about Germans.
KJEDELIG: That’s not what this (waves the pamphlet) says.
BERG: The pamplhet is wrong.
KJEDELIG: That’s not what the pamphlet says.
BERG: It says it’s not wrong.
KJEDELIG: It says anyone who disagrees is working for the Germans.
BERG: Of course it does.
KJEDELIG: Clearly you hate America.
When Donald Trump was elected, Big Thinkers with Bylines predicted that he – and the BREXIT movement often associated with him and his rise – would gut US markets.
They also said that his intransigence would make American foreign policy even more fraught than it had been.
I’n not exactly “tired of winning” yet, but it’s interesting how turning foreign policy and defense over to grownups – people who’ve read enough non-intersectional history to know that coddling bullies just gives you more bullies – is slowly moving some of the world’s needles in the right direction.
Noted in advance: It’s the Daily Mail, which gives tabloids in general a bad name.
On the other hand, the story’s too good to doubt: British SAS troopers (the unit Delta is modeled after), ambushed in Afghanistan and running low on ammo, take drastic measures to hold out until help arrived:
The veteran sergeant is said to have cut-off the gunman’s head in one swoop after running out of ammunition during a fierce six-hour gun battle.
After killing him, the elite soldier then used the jihadist’s own weapon to kill more ISIS henchmen.
To make the episode even more movie-perfect, the troopers were rescued by a couple of American attack helicopters, in a scene that reads not a lot different from the climactic scene in Lone Suirvivor.
Daily Mail, schmaily schmail. I want to believe it.
Explosion that some are calling a “Failed Suicide Attack” in NYC.
Several people were injured after a device partially exploded inside a tunnel, the New York Post reports.
An officer reportedly told CBS News that cops are looking at a possible suicide bomber, although the situation is said to be “fluid”.
Berg’s Nineteenth Law is in full effect, of course. Nothing you hear from the mainstream media, much less social media, is worth the pixels they’re printed on at this point.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Army helicopter flying over Staten Island had a mid-air collision with a quad-copter (which the media calls a drone).
Civilians are supposed to fly them lower than 400 feet but since there’s no altimeter, that’s hard to gauge. The helicopter claims they were slightly above that altitude and maybe they were. The article expresses alarm because bits of the drone wreckage nearly made it into the transmission housing, could have caused catastrophic failure and crashed the helicopter.
The Liberal response, of course, will be to ban anybody from flying anything that might interfere with helicopters, despite the fact that responsible operators know the rules and where to fly. But Amazon will be sold out in a matter of minutes, as soon as Sheik Mohammad realizes he can bring down Blackhawks with $100 drones operated by children. The skies above conflict areas will be swarming with them. Maybe we need a more robust solution?
Maybe more, smaller drones to bring the bigger drones down first?
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
While we’re pondering the right lessons to learn from the Islamist attack on 9/11, perhaps we could take a moment to ponder the right lessons to learn from the Islamist attack on our consulate in Benghazi?
Maybe unarmed guards and compromised e-mail contributed to the attack? Maybe lying about the cause and pressuring people to remain silent afterwards hinder us from stopping the next attack? Maybe this is part of the swamp that needs draining?
The idea gets my vote.
It’s 9/11 today, as most of you are aware.
If you’re younger than 34, it happened when you were still in school. And it shouldn’t blow my mind that people who were toddlers on 9/11 have graduated from high school – but it does.
Put another way – if 9/11 were December 7, we’d be in 1956; the war would have ended 12 years ago; Elvis would be at his peak, Germany and Japan would be back from the stone age and rebuilding their economies, and we’d be on the brink of the space race. Tempus fugit.
After the attacks, one of the social undercurrents – which morphed, as social currents do, into comedy that often tried too hard – was the notion that if we gave up our freedoms out of fear of terror, then “the terrorists will win”.
So today, 16 years later, government goons grope us in line at airports (but miss all the dangerous stuff anyway), and we don’t complain because, well, we gotta make our flights; the whole exercise seems designed more to train people to get in line and shut up than to find terrorists.
We fill out paperwork if our bank deposits are too big. We watch as our police departments turn into playtime special forces teams, chasing after pot dealers and trial skippers with armored cars and assault rifles. We see our Fourth Amendment gradually being reduced to toilet paper – and, in parts of the country where the people are more amenable to presenting their papers on demand, the Second as well.
And on the campuses where the generation that has the same memory of 9/11 that I have of Barry Goldwater (hint: I was a toddler) are getting “educated”, people are being badgered into line by social codes imposed by self-appointed cultural police no less zealous than the Wahhabi morality police, enforcing a social code that are no less absurd than the rules, and rulers, in Afghanistan 16 years and one day ago today – enforced (!), in some cases, by people whose only difference from ISIS’s morality police is that they haven’t cut off anyone’s head.
I’m less and less sure this nation – or at least it’s self-appointed culturaloverlords – learned the right lessons from 9/11.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
President Trump gave a speech in which he explained why he’s changed his mind on pulling out of Afghanistan: it would create a power vacuum and enable the Taliban to sweep in. Instead, we’re going to stay and kill terrorists until conditions on the ground allow us to leave. But we’re not going to engage in nation-building.
Great, he’s going to pivot to Afghanistan and focus like a laser on killing terrorists. Where have I heard that before?
I don’t object to killing terrorists but why aren’t we nation-building? Because nation-building was proposed as the cure for the root cause of terrorism but it turns out the root cause of terrorists is not poverty or lack of democratic institutions. Establishing a puppet regime with purple-finger elections and midnight basketball won’t stem the flow of terrorists so we’re not going to waste time and money doing it.
Fine. If that’s not the root cause, what is the root cause of Islamic terrorism?
I suspect the root cause of Islamic terrorists is radical Islam, even if everybody in Washington is terrified to say it. Why not fight them? Because there are different sects with different agendas and different funding, making them hard to find and kill, and the press would crucify you for trying.
But we know one of those sects is Wahhabism. Which is funded by Saudi Arabia. Which is run by the Royal Family of the House of Saud who the US protects from domestic unrest with US troops even as the Saudis work to get OPEC to undermine American domestic oil production.
As it sits now, our War on Terror policy is to kill the individual puppets but support the puppet masters even as they attack our economy. That’s insane.
Forget the terrorists. Let them squat in their mountains and kill each other. Close our border so terrorists can’t come here, then go after the root cause. Go after the money.
Issue drilling and pumping permits to produce oil on leased federal lands which will flood the world market with American oil and depress Saudi incomes.
Declare Saudi Arabia to be a financier of terrorism and seize all Saudi money in American banks.
Pull US troops out of Saudi Arabia to force them to spend their remaining money defending themselves from their own people. If we have any AK’s laying around that we captured in Libya, hand them out to the locals as we’re leaving Saudi Arabia. Regime change on the DIY plan.
We’ve been fighting a War on Terror since 9-11 by going after street-level terrorists. It’s not working. Try something else.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Somebody threw an improvised explosive from a moving van onto the lawn at a mosque in Minneapolis at 5:00 a.m. last Saturday. Blew out some windows, nobody injured. Governor Dayton is all over this ‘act of terrorism’ which is part of a massive upsurge in violence against Muslims nation-wide, all caused by Trump, no doubt.
Except . . .
Most Minnesotans couldn’t identify a mosque if they were standing in front of one. Most Minnesotans couldn’t identify an imam if they were standing next to one, nor would they know his daily schedule to target him. Minnesota has no history of violence against Muslims (Catholics, yes; Muslims, no). IEDs are not a weapon commonly used in Minnesota crimes. It doesn’t feel like a Minnesota crime.
You know who could identify a mosque, uses terror as a weapon and is familiar with IEDs from the Old Country? Muslims. You know who blows up buildings all over the world? Muslims. You know which Minnesota minority has contributed the most new members to Islamic terror groups? Muslims. You know which religion has sects utterly devoted to killing each other? Shia and Sunni Muslims. This feels like a Muslim crime.
If the bombing was a real act of terror, how does the Governor know this was Minnesotans persecuting Muslims? How does he know it’s not ordinary Islamist sectarian violence?
And what if it wasn’t a real crime at all? The bombing was carefully timed to avoid hurting people and to do only cosmetic damage. Nobody has claimed responsibility. There are no suspects. What if this is another in a long string of hate crime hoaxes? You know who has the most to gain from a hate crime hoax? I’ll give you a hint: remember the ‘flying imams’ fake hate crime at the airport and who benefitted from that? Muslims.
The Governor insists this is an act of terrorism committed by cowardly Minnesotans. I’ve been skeptical since day one and now, we have more evidence it may have been a publicity stunt. Muslims are complaining Trump hasn’t dropped everything to rush to Minnesota to condemn the bombing. “He has to come here and at least express his feelings and say this is bad.”
No, that’s precisely what Trump does NOT need to do. Amazingly, he’s sharp enough to know it. The press secretary got it right. It’s a local crime, if it’s a crime at all. There are no national security implications. There is no federal government component that is being ignored. This is not a matter for the President.
Listen up, guys. You are not the boss of him. You don’t get to tell him where to go and what to say. Acting like you’re so special that the President himself is at your beck and call . . . is the attitude that got him elected in the first place. And Muslims setting off bombs in America is the reason his ban on travel from war-torn Muslim countries ban is entirely justified.
We don’t know much about the bombing – which was nearly two weeks ago – yet.
But Joe articulated a few points that I felt, but couldn’t quite put my finger on.
SCENE: Mitch BERG is pumping gas at the corner Superamerica when Polly LITTELL – proprietor of the Facebook page “Makeng Minnessota GRAET AGEN” page, pulls up to the next pump.
BERG: Oh, hey, Pollly. (Eyes the meter on the pump, shakes the handle in a futile effort to get it to pump faster).
LITTELL: So a MUSLIN cop, Mohammed NOOR, murdered a white woman in South MInneapolis! It’s terrorism!
BERG: Er, OK – why do you say that?
LITTELL: Because it’s in the Koran that THEY are supposed TO attack us when THEY CAN.
BERG: OK, Polly. So it was terrorism.
LITTELL: Yes. Just like they are told to do IN THE Koran.
BERG: So this “act of terrorism” involved shooting one woman. Not his partner. Not every other bystander, and every cop that responded. And then, surrendering and apparently following the standard post-shooting process that a non-Muslim, non-terrorist cop would follow.
LITTELL: Why do you hate America?
There are reports that ISIS’s putative caliph, Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, is pining for the fjords.
The Pentagon is treating the reports as unconfirmed.
But that’s not stopping Mattis’s Pentagon from talking some grim, pointed smack with the story:
A spokesman for the U.S.-led anti-ISIS coalition told CBS News in an emailed statement that, “we cannot confirm this report, but hope it is true. We strongly advise ISIS to implement a strong line of succession, it will be needed.”
I’m a sucker for this kind of story; Roy Larner, a 47 year old bloke from London, took on three knife-swinging terrorists with his fists, yelling “F**k yoiu, I’m Millwall” (a Brit soccer team):
Now out of the intensive care ward of St Thomas’ Hospital, where he was treated for knife wounds all over his body including his neck, the father-of-one has told The Sun how he reacted when the killers burst into the restaurant shouting “Islam, Islam” and “This is for Allah”.
“Like an idiot,” he told the newspaper, “I shouted back at them. I thought, ‘I need to take the p*** out of these b******s’.”
“I took a few steps towards them and said, ‘F*** you, I’m Millwall’. So they started attacking me.”
No mythmaking needed; Larner is pretty sober about the actual consequences of what he did; he was stabbed eight times:
“It was the worst thing I could have done as they carried on attacking me.
“Luckily, none of the blows were straight at me or I’d be dead.”
Again – such a good thing the British people are utterly disarmed; who knows how bad things could’ve gotten?
The people of London are a lot more courageous than their city’s government.
Stories are filtering out of London about people resisting their attackers during Saturday night’s terrorist attacks around London.
This from John Holbrooke, a Brit lawyer who’s been covering not only terror, but the way the Brit poltical establishment has been bending over backwards to not, y’know, call it anything of the sort.
And at least we – the people who think Western Civilization, not to mention innocent human life – is with defending have something to be proud of today.
Good thing the people of London are disarmed, and have to resort to pint glasses (the waste of Brit beer alone is inhumane) and chairs to protect their lives.
Of course, that’s why the attacks aren’t happening in Dallas or Memphis or Bismarck or Jacksonville.
P.S: I’m about ready to call this the second Battle of Britain.
Donald Trump called ISIS “Evil Losers” in the wake of the Arianna Grande bombing last night.
Some on the left called the appelation the illiterate interjection of a trained chimp.
Not so much, says Scott Adams, who has over the past two years proven to be the only pundit in American who actually gets Trump. It’s part of Trump being, as Adams calls him, the Master Persuader.
He’s “branded” ISIS. And – says Adams – it’s genius:
If you call them monsters, they like it. If you call them ISIS or ISIL they put it on a flag and wave it around. If you call them non-Muslim, it just rolls off their backs because they have Korans and stuff. Almost any other “brand” you can imagine is either inert or beneficial to Loser recruitment.
Loser is different. No one joins the Loser movement. Try at home, with your family or friends, to concoct a more effective brand poisoning than Loser. You probably can’t. Remember, your brand has to fit with future confirmation evidence. The Losers on the battlefield will continue to be losing, so the brand is engineered to get stickier over time. Your alternative idea for a brand solution has to have that quality of future confirmation too. Good luck finding a better persuasion brand.
This is not accidental. President Trump does (laugh if you will) have the best words, at least for this sort of thing. He’s proven it over and over. Just ask Jeb, Ted, and HIllary.
The whole thing is worth a read.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
I’m a pre-operative transgender woman. I demand entry into this unit so I can shower with young, blonde Norwegian women. It’s my right.
Kidding aside, it might be a smart move. Women get to serve which shuts up the feminists. But they’re segregated, which eliminates sexual harassment. Plus, it’s easy to reassign an entire unit to safely guard headquarters when the shooting starts, rather than pluck individual grunts out of an integrated unit to cut down on white-knighting.
This way, the politicians can say “Yes, you are equal to men, you can do everything they can do. Grrrrl power!” Might be worth looking into for Army units. You notice they’re not giving the girls any expensive equipment to operate and maintain, like their own aircraft carrier or submarine. I suspect there’s a reason for that.
On the one hand – not so fast. Norway’s military is already pretty gender-integrated. Don’t be surprised if you see a female frigate commander sooner than later.
On the other? The Norwegians’ unit – a section of the Norwegian Army’s Jegertroppen, loosely translated as “Rangers” – is a special forces unit, roughly on part with the Airborne Rangers, and hauling a lot of expensive equipment around isn’t really part of the mission. The stated mission – having female troops to deal with female Muslim suspects – isn’t entirely daft. And for the unstated, and these days probably tertiary, part of the mission, providing a guerilla cadre if Norway is every conquered again – it makes complete sense.
Sweden’s analogue to the WaPo is calling for cars to be banned to prevent terror attacks.
Cars and other vehicles “have turned into deadly weapons”, and should be banished from cities to stop attacks like the one in Stockholm from happening in future, according to Aftonbladet editorialist Eva Franchell.
Crackdowns on immigration or extremist ideology are not the way forward when it comes to terror prevention, according to the veteran journalist, writing after Friday’s terror attack in Stockholm left four people dead.
Instead, it is cars — which she calls “effective murder machines” — that Franchell says “must simply be removed from city centres and places where people gather, if people are to be protected in future”.
Vehicles are “easy to steal, and so nothing has been able to stop their advance”, writes Ms. Franchell.
Precisely. If you get rid of the cars, then they’ll have no weapons.
Just like banning selective fire AK-series assault rifles prevented the massacres at Bataclan, Brussels, and Charlie Hebdo.
But it‘s just the Swedes, right?
Well, yeah. But the way American leftists genuflect to our idiot Scandinavian cousins, it’s only a matter of time before some Bernie Brah suggests the same thing.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
President Trump gave a speech [last week] referring to problems caused by immigrants in which he mentioned “what’s happening last night in Sweden.” But nothing happened [last] Friday night in Sweden so the media are giving him a hard time about it.
Oops. The immigrants didn’t riot in Sweden until Monday night.
Look, it’s no big deal, it was a minor staff error. The speech he gave Saturday was meant to be given Tuesday, they’re just out of order, that’s all. Simple mix-up, could have happened to anybody.
And you’re missing the point: Sweden is a nice, clean, civilized country. Sweden let in a pile of immigrants who aren’t assimilating. The immigrants are causing problems such as a massive spike in sex crimes. We should learn from Sweden’s example and reconsider our own immigration policy before we suffer similar problems. What’s controversial about that?
Rhetorical question, right?
SCENE: Mitch BERG is stopped at a light on University Avenue. He sits, window rolled down, waiting for the green.
Avery LIBRELLE pulls up next to BERG is a city bus. The window is cracked open.
LIBRELLE: Hey, Merg! Dona’d Trump’s immigration moratorium is pure racism!
BERG: Was it racist when Obama barred immigration from Iraq?
LIBRELLE: No, and..
BERG: And remember – these immigrants are from the same countries Obama has spent the last years bombing and droning, likely in violation of all manner of law in the process.
LIBRELLE: Trump has been. doing all sorts of unconstittions……
(But BERG has rolled down his window and driven away)
On Tuesday afternoon, the FBI confirmed the motives of the recent shooting attack at Fort Lauderdale Airport in Florida. The assailant, Esteban Santiago, claimed to carry out the attack in the name of the Islamic State.
During Santiago’s bond hearing, FBI special agent Michael Ferlazzo confirmed that he did carry out the attack in the name of the Islamic State, according to CNN. At this point, it is not yet clear if he is linked with the terrorist group or if it was a lone-wolf, IS-inspired attack like dozens of others that have recently taken place (Nice, France, Berlin, Germany, Orlando, FL, etc.).
While Florida is a shall-issue state, all civilian carry is banned in Florida airports.
Which is why Santiago was unable to carry out his attack, and nobody died. Right?
What happens when you count the dead over the past sixteen years in Chicago – which hasn’t had a Republican, much less conservative, mayor in several generations?
You get more blood and gore than our two official war zones, that’s what.
What do you suppose would happen if the mainstream media and Hollywood covered Democrat failures like they covered George W. Bush’s mistakes?
“But Mitch! You heard the President last year – Chicago’s violent crime wave is happening because people can buy guns in Indiana.”
If that were true, then why isn’t Indiana awash in blood, too?
No, for some reason Indiana – and, for that matter, most of Illinois – has a fraction of Chicago’s violent crime rate. Of course, the feds have been derelict in their own job, opting out of the business of prosecuting “straw buyers” – who, along with theft, provide most of the guns used by Chicago’s gangs.
Maybe some of the gun movement’s shrill scolds can whitesplain us why the US attorney for Northern Illinois hates black people…
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
The story was that intelligence agencies had learned Saddam Hussein was trying to buy yellowcake uranium to build nuclear weapons to use against the United States, which would have posed a threat to our national security, so we had to go to war against him to prevent him from using weapons of mass destruction on us.
The entire international coalition shared the intelligence evidence as did select members of Congress including John Kerry and Hillary Clinton, both of whom supported the war based on that intelligence assessment.
Except – no yellowcake. Turns out the intelligence was faulty. Nobody should have relied on it, much less gone to war over it. Bush lied, people died.
Fast forward a decade. Portions of the intelligence community believe Russia hacked into the DNC computers but portions of it do not, the evidence is unclear, the motive is unknown, the result on the election is impossible to prove. But some idiots in Congress are ready to start a war over this? And not just war with some two-bit tin pot dictator, war with a nuclear nation whose conventional military forces dwarf ours?
Insane. Literally, not sane. Should be locked up as a danger to themselves and all the rest of us.
Knowing some of this might come from reading military history.
But you can count liberals who read military history on one hand.