Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Liberals instinctively maintain an excruciatingly calibrated hierarchy of victim-hood to determine who occupies the superior rank in any given situation. Hillary lost the nomination to Obama because Black outranks Woman. We all know that Gay outranks Christian and last month’s Bathroom Wars made clear that Trans outranks Women, too.
Orlando must have been an eye-opener for GLBT who have been accustomed to holding the top rung of the ladder. Not only did a Muslim man specifically target gays for massacre, he boasted about it as he was doing it. But today, the so-called “leaders” that GLBT thought were on their side, are defending the Religion of Gay Hatred. The President won’t even mention its name. Liberals are more worried about “toxic masculinity” than about actual dead men.
A week ago, homophobia meant which bathroom to use; today, it means which gravestone to choose. Bad news folks: you’ve been out-ranked. No civil rights for you. Only Last Rites.
The “leaders” are also busily trying to manufacture a “gay muslim” constituency with which to feel solidarity – completely avoiding and ignoring the point of the entire massacre to begin with.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
When Central Americans sneak across the border to the US, the ones who get caught claim asylum as refugees. That entitles them to due process which means a hearing on their claims. Except the courts are backed up for years.
We don’t keep refugees in concentration camps at the border, we release them on their own promise to appear. And being potential refugees, they’re immediately eligible for welfare, plus they can work pending the hearing, and the US Government pays their way to be resettled across the nation while awaiting the hearing.
The Orlando gunman worked for the company that has the contract to provide the transportation.
Well, at least he’s not working at an airport…
David French at National Review notes that ISIS has won both a tactical and strategic victory in Orlando – and done it on the cheap:
On Sunday, June 12, ISIS won a dramatic victory. Without risking any of its terror assets and without having to spend one dime of its financial assets, an ISIS volunteer vindicated its strategy of inspiring terrorist acts and launched the deadliest attack on U.S. soil since 9/11. The act not only shattered the lives of the victims and their families. It no doubt inspired still more jihadists to plot their own attacks both at home and abroad. Facing battlefield reverses in Iraq and Syria, ISIS struck back at its chief enemy. But the wins didn’t stop there. Incredibly, ISIS won not just in Orlando. It’s winning the aftermath. The American response to the attack has been beyond ineffective, veering decisively toward the counterproductive. We’re doing nothing more to deter or prevent terror attacks and everything to deceive our own people about the true nature of the threat. Rather than unite to fight a common enemy, we’re dissolving into partisan, polarizing stupidity.
Going after the NRA over Orlando – which many politically and socially prominent gays and media figures are doing – is a little like attacking the Eastern Orthodox Church over Hitler’s invasion of Russia; they weren’t there, and they had nothing to do with it.
French notes the deepening vacuity of our political class in dealing with this:
- The western and moderate Muslim world’s campaign against ISIS remains dilatory and indecisive.
- It’s not only validated ISIS’s latest tactic of farming out its terrorism in the West to “do it yourselfers” who get their information from ISIS’s very polished print and web presence, it gave them a poster boy with a big victory.
- The entire US response so far? Jabbering about gun control (which doesn’t affect terrorists in the least – even if you went door to door and grabbed every gun in the United States tomorrow, they could switch to gasoline, dynamite or knives), scabrous pronouncements against Christians and gun owners.
Everything but the two things that would work: getting serious about ISIS, which is not only not the “JV team”, but is running rings around Barack Obama, and decreasing the number of places where citizens are rendered statutorily helpless targets.
For the 22nd year out of the past 22, the Department of Homeland Security warns us that “right-wing extremism” is coming. Boy, howdy, is sure is.
Aaaaaany day now.
Yep! This is the last warning!
No, stop laughing!
And it’s gonna be as bad – no twice…no, eleventy-teen times as bad as Islamic Extremist terror:
Also this week came news of the DHS comments concerning right-wing extremists, which were made during the Homeland Security Advisory Council’s January meeting – only one month after Muslim terrorists Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik killed 14 Americans in an attack in San Bernardino, California, in December 2015.
“Member [Austin Police Chief Art] Acevedo reminded the Council that the threat from right-wing extremists domestically is just as real as the threat from Islamic extremism,” the official meeting minutes state.
Johnson apparently agreed with Acevedo’s sentiments, the official records noted.
Sometime in the next three months, look for DHS to reclassify Islamic Extremism as “right wing”.
The last spent cartridge casing had barely pinged off the ground when the ghouls of Minnesota’s “Safe Criminals” movement came streaking out of the shadows to rip the bloody shirts off the (ahem) victims of an ISIS terror attack to try to jam their agenda down our throats.
Theatrical deep breath, here.
OK. From the top:
- Universal Background Checks: For whatever reason, notwithstanding the fact that Omar Mateen had been under investigation for his terrorist sympathies and was famously unstable, Mateen didn’t come up on any background checks. Why? Bad reporting? Official political correctness? Let’s assume both. Either way – while “universal background checks” would have made owning a gun harder for any of Mateen’s potential victims, it would have done nothing to stop him.
- Rethink Carry Laws: OK, let’s think. Had one single gay man in that bar – a “gun free zone”, as usual – had a gun, it might have changed the course of events (as it does more often than our disinformed, and sometimes disinforming, media believes). Of course, carrying a gun in a bar is a misdemeanor in Florida, which seems not to have been much of a deterrent to Mateen. So yes, maybe it’s time to “rethink” the law to de-stigmatize the law-abiding citizen.
- Not “normalizing carrying”: Ever notice how places where law-abiding citizens normally carry are almost never the target of mass shootings or terror attacks? And when they are, the attacks are more likely to end with dead shooters and terrorists?
So yes, Kim Norton – take a moment to stop gorging yourself on the blood of innocent victims and do some re-thinking. Please.
Of course, Kim Norton is a gun-grabbing ninny because she gets paid for it (or will be, soon). Rabbi Latz – apparently the brother of Senator Ron “I Went To Harvard, Don’t You Know” Latz – tweeted in response to a local human rights advocate who pointed out exactly what I pointed out to Rep. Norton, above:
That Latz, rabbi at a “progressive” congregation in Saint Louis Park (who was in the process of dislocating his spine while bending over backwards to pin this atrocity on gun owners, rather than an ISIS terrorist) is in mid “smug response” with this tweet is the sort of inevitability that you learn to accept when dealing with orcs and the gun issue.
That a liberal rabbi, in the midst of a smug, know-nothing dismissal, tries to invoke the dissenter’s soul is purely loathsome. The “Rabbi” is a blot on his calling.
Later, when I called him on his lack of command of the facts, he sniveled:
“Rabbi” Latz is a thug and a wanna-be bully for abusing his ecclesiastical position to support a political agenda (an agenda I believe, and can prove, to be morally retarded, but that’s really irrelevant to the issue at hand – thuggish bulliness). I may not “have all the answers” – but despite the fact that he has none, he not only trumpets his ignorance, but wraps it in unearned self-righteousness.
There may be few people in politics I respect less than “progressive” clergy.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
This report claims deaths caused by Muslim terrorists are on the rise, exponentially. I remember when Muslim terrorists were the JV, when they were petty crime, and when attacks were proof they were losing.
There’s a JV involved.
It’s in Washington.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Despite passionate denials by the Pollyanna Pair — Dog Gone and Penigma — I remain convinced that Brussels and Paris are linked. They are small unit actions in an slow-motion war being waged by fundamentalist Muslims against the West. The incomparable Fernandez explains why it’s worse than I thought.
In the six months since the Paris attack, Belgian authorities searched the Muslim-dominated neighborhoods where they believed accomplices were living. Authorities couldn’t find the bombers because they were being hidden by their neighbors.
The Brussels bombers were not lone wolves acting against the wishes of the Muslim community. They were supported and protected by members of the Muslim community. When Dutch householders hid Jews from Nazis, we applauded. But when Belgian Muslims hide suicide bombers from law enforcement, we have a different view.
Digging out the remaining co-conspirators and future martyrs will be arduous if the Belgian government even has the stomach for it, must less the money and manpower to answer the question: When will we know we’ve got them all? How far down does the tap root go? When will we be safe?
Geert Wilders, candidate for Prime Minister of the Netherlands, says if he wins he’ll crush Islamic terrorism, close the national borders and de-Islamize The Netherlands. Sounds like a new buzz-word has been coined, more catchy than Reconquista 2.0. One could pass it off as racist hatemongering except Wilders presently lives under a death sentence because of a fatwa issued against him by Imam Feiz Muhammad.
Now the really big question: are there embedded terrorist cells here, in the United States? Maybe even in our own Minnesota Muslim community? The San Bernardino attack and US Attorney Luger’s recent indictments suggest there may be. What are we going to do about it?
What are we going to do?
Where “we” means “our current ruling class?”
I’m going to guess “vigorous virtue-signaling”.
This observation is a whack upside the head (emphasis added):
Some U.S. counter-terrorism officials say much of the gap between Washington and Belgium — and some other European countries — is cultural. Europeans’ deeper commitment to personal privacy sometimes prevents or delays sharing of information such as travel data — that is taken for granted in the United States.
The idea that Europe – the contintent of sheep-like government-addled socialized drones who gave us Naziism, Socialism, Communism and Soccer – have more commitment to personal privacy than the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave is a jab in the gut.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Read the Old Testament. War was constant in ancient times, tribe against tribe.
Read Medieval history. War was constant in Medieval times, family against family.
The Treaty of Westphalia, signed in 1658, nationalized war. From that point on, “war” could only be conducted by nations. All other violent conflict was “crime.”
We’re still operating under that intellectual framework. President Obama doesn’t consider terrorism to be “war” because it’s not being waged by a distinct nation. It’s just “crime.” That’s why he sent the FBI to investigate the Benghazi consulate bombing – to look for clues so they could prosecute the criminals who blew it up and murdered our ambassador.
At some point, we need to shed our antique notion. Military historian William Lind theorizes war has moved into a new generation characterized by smaller groups loosely affiliated in furtherance of a long-term goal.
That’s what Belgium looks like to me.
That’s what war looks like today.
The good news: we’ll never see another World War 2 again.
The bad news: we’ll never see another World War 2 again.
Anyone with a living soul was nauseated by the display in Cologne on New Years Eve, where thousands of men of “North African” descent roamed the street in gangs, sexually assaulting women and impeding the police’s attempts to respond.
Here in the US – where this sort of thing is thankfully very rare – the responses depended on the responder’s politics.
People on the left strenuously denied there was a problem, or blamed it on fraternities affiliated with the NRA.
People on the right bought another box of ammo.
Either would be more productive, I suspect, than this group of…er, males in the Netherlands:
I’m sure the women of Cologne are thankful for the “solidarity”.
A more productive statement? Germans are doing their best to arm themselves, as best they can given Germany’s patriarchal gun laws.
And where real people try to arm themselves, you can count on the media to get the Victorian vapours.
Or in this case, I suppose, the Hohenzollern vapours.
Which group do you suppose will actually benefit the women of Germany – the shooters or the Dutch guys in dresses?
I saw 13 Hours over the weekend.
Worst Fears Not Realized: I’ve been rooting for this movie for a long time – ever since I met “John “Tig” Tiegen (Dominic Fumusa), and Mark “Oz” Geist (portrayed in the movie by Dominic Fumusa and Max Martini, respectively), and got a chance to interview them on my show last year.
But when I saw that Michael Bay was directing it, I felt my hope curdle into a icy ball of despair. Bay was behind the loathsome Pearl Harbor and all the bad Transformers movies that followed on after the good one. (Of course, he also did The Rock and the very underrated Pain and Gain, so perhaps I’m being a little harsh on the Bayver).
But while it included some of Bay’s signature moves – the MTV-era editing, the slow-mo explosions, the Die Hard-style wisecracking between battle scenes – it all actually worked well. And sometimes superlatively – as in a scene when a group of State Department employees in an armored Mercedes are getting shot at at point-blank range by a group of locals. Really, really stunning sequence.
But the movie largely focused on the story. And it’s there that things get interesting.
The Story Behind The Story: The movie, of course, is about one of the most controversial events in recent years – the September 11, 2012 attack on the US diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya. During the attack, the US Ambassador, a State Department communications staffer, and two CIA security contractors were killed. The situation could have gotten much worse but for the team of CIA contractors – ex-military men working as guards for the CIA compound – who responded, defending the State Department compound for 13 hours, until a scratch team of American intelligence and military led a friendly Libyan militia to the rescue.
The controversy – for those of you who’ve been asleep for the past three years – is over whether a “stand down” order was given to successive levels of potential US paramilitary and military response, from the contractors on the scene all the way up to the Air Force in Italy and the 10th Special Forces group in Croatia. If so, of course, then the Ambassador and the contractors were left dangling for half a day without any government support. The Administration and the CIA have angrily denied it; Hillary Clinton said it made no difference at this point; the contractors on the scene all swear by it.
The movie plays a little peek-a-boo with the issue, but for one key episode; as the State Department and CIA staffers on the scene ask, then beg, for support, we are treated to scenes of CIA contractors being held on their leash; F16s in Italy sitting on the runway, unmanned; Green Berets in the Balkans, sitting and waiting.
Why? That question is left danging out there.
And two of the conservative reviews I’ve actually read mirror the controversy; Armond White thinks Bay defers to entertainment over substance, using the tension as just another showy Michael Bay editing trick. Cranky T-Rex at Hot Air thinks it’s a feature, not a bug:
Bay and screenwriter Chuck Hogan wisely avoid having the story they are telling sidetracked by political concerns. Instead they are able to hammer home the horrible truths about Benghazi that have thus far been written off as Republican political pandering.
Of course, this blog’s standard procedure is to assume all bureaucrats are lying, so you know where my money is.
The movie has been portrayed as a challenge to the inevitability of Hillary’s coronation. I’m way too cynical to think the American people are that perceptive – but hope springs eternal.
Brothers In Arms: The casting, of course, was interesting to say the least.
For starters – if there’s one actor in Hollywood that’s benefitted from being utterly and completely typecast, it has to be Max Martini, as Mark “Oz” Geist.
I interviewed Geist last year – and met him, shortly after that, at an event on the 13 Hours book tour – which was the first time I’d heard that the book was going to become a feature film (which shows you how closely I follow all things Hollywood.
And while I can’t honestly say I thought “Max Martini would be the perfect casting choice to portray Geist”, it all made perfect sense, personally as well as in terms of resemblance, in the actual movie.
Of course, the casting of Jon Krasinski as the pseudonymous and fictional “Jack Silva”, portrayed as a former SEAL colleague of Tyrone “Ty” Woods (played by James Badge Dale, of Longmire fame) is a little riskier. I thought, going in – “Jim Halpert as a SEAL?”
It’s not Krasinski’s first take at a military character (he played a bit part in Jarhead, in 2005), but it’s his first since he became “Jim Halpert” in The Office, one of the best sitcoms of the century so far. Did he blast out of the typecast?
Yes and no – and to the extent that he didn’t, that’s OK, since he’s not in the movie to portray a real former SEAL with a striking resemblance to a sitcom character; he’s basically the audience’s third-person-omniscient stand-in in the story.
Does he pass as a SEAL? Well, he doesn’t pass as the Hollywood stereotype of a SEAL – which is probably a good thing.
So yes, it took me a bit to get past the habits picked up in 11 years of watching The Office (and yes, I’ve seen every episode, at least in the first seven seasons, at least a few times, and yes, it’s better than the Brit version), but I pulled it off.
(The film’s other Office alum, David Denman – who played warehouse worker and Pam’s first fiance “Roy”, plays the real-life David “Boon” Benton, and passes pretty easily as a former Airborne Ranger).
Conclusions: As filmmaking craft? It was great bit of filmmaking. The things that play as whiz-bang cliches in most Michael Bay movies generally work, here.
Acting? It never stretches credulity.
Well, I’ll let you watch it, and leave it to each of you to figure out what you think about it.
Worth seeing in a theater.
…why smart nations didn’t negotiate with terrorists?
Some of you do. I know this.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
Lying about having lied. It’s like she just can’t stop herself. Learned it from Bill? Taught it to him?
“It would have been perfectly acceptable to say “Hell yes, I knew it was a terrorist attack as soon as it happened. But knowing that doesn’t tell you where this bunch came from, who’s supporting them, who’s funding them, so we can stop the next attack. We needed to keep the public spotlight off these terrorists while our agents and investigators back-traced them and their support network. So yes, I lied about the attack in the immediate aftermath, in order that I would not have to lie after future attacks, because there would BE no future attacks. And there haven’t been. Your side is the one that keeps screaming we’re in a war, now you’re bitching that I lied to the enemy to buy time to hunt them down and kill them. Make up your minds – do you want to fight terrorism, or not?”
Instead she lies to the families, and to the world, and then lies about having lied to them. For what possible benefit? It’s like she can’t help it. She’s just a liar.
…did gun control fail. Civilian guns are pretty much trayf in Canada.
The question is not were the two shooters acting in the interest of Jihad.
No. The question is “How will Kim Norton try to blame this on the law-abiding gun owners of Minnesota”.
…is being treated as a sign of how very out-of-touch and cripplingly politically-correct Chicago, and the city’s airport authority, are: airport cops – who are unarmed at O’Hare and Midway Airports – are being instructed to scamper away and hide in the event of a mass shooting at either airport:
“If evacuation is not possible, you should find a place to hide where the active shooter is less likely to find you. Block entry to your hiding place and lock the door,” but Matt Brandon, secretary-treasurer of the airport officers union, told CNN they have serious issues with the protocol.
“These men and women are sent to the Chicago police academy, and trained as police officers, and being a former police officer, I know your first instinct is to go to the problem — not run away from the problem.”
On the other hand? I think every cop in America should be given the opportunity to contemplate facing a mass shooting with nothing but their wits and charm…
…well, no. Not every cop in America.
Just every urban police chief.
Every urban police chief – the ones the gun grabbers always cite as supporting gun control – should be inveighed spend some time in a “gun free zone” as a “gun-free” person. Not as a Blue Noble with the power of life and death. No – just like every other schlub.
Failing that, though? Unarmed cops at two of the major airports in one of the biggest “gun-free” cities / crime cesspools in the country?
The Swiss – a nation that long ago learned the hard way that yearning for peace isn’t enough, and sometimes you have to defend it – are arming themselves, and doing it fast:
Applications for gun permits in Switzerland increased by 20% between 2014 and 2015, according to a survey conducted in 12 cantons by Swiss public television, SRF.
The survey, published on Wednesday, showed that in the 12 (out of 26) cantons surveyed, the Swiss are increasingly interested in purchasing pistols, rifles and other firearms for private use.
The greatest increase – more than 70% – was measured in canton Vaud, with more than 4,200 applications in 2015, compared with 2,427 in 2014.
There is a general climate of uncertainty and an increased fear of intruders, said Pierre-Olivier Gaudard, head of crime prevention for canton Vaud.
But Martin Boess, director of Swiss crime prevention, warned against the false sense of security that guns bring.
“When there are more guns in circulation, there is a greater danger for society,” he said in an interview on the 10 vor 10 news programme. “That’s shown by experience in places like the United States. When there are more guns, there are more accidents with guns.”
Why? Because the head of the Swiss Army (their equivalent to the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) is warning that the Swiss military, after two decades of politically-motivated drawdowns, is not going to be sufficient in the event of an asymmetric war (the quote starts with a Google translation, fine-tuned via my own German):
[General André] Blattmann writes, the situation’s risks are considerable: The terrorist threat is rising, asymmetrical wars threaten the peace in the world. In addition, there is an economic crisis. Even in the big surge of refugees and migrants looks like a danger to Blattmann.
Blattmann: “Social unrest can not be ruled out”, the vocabulary in public discourse will “dangerously aggressive”: “. The mixture is increasingly unsavory” .
Blattmann sees the basis of Swiss prosperity, “has been once again called into question.” He recalls the situation before and during the two world wars in the last century and advises the Swiss to arm themselves.
Swiss politicians responded with incomprehension at the army chief’s statement, and said his warnings are exaggerated.
The Swiss Armed Forces held maneuvers many years ago , focused on social unrest in Europe. Even the Economist warned [about the potential for trouble for the Swiss] already some time ago, before [the current] social tensions.
The Swiss are among the most well-armed people in the world, especially Europe. Eight million Swiss own 2.5 million guns – about half of which are service weapons related to the Swiss “national service”, from which Israel borrowed its own military model.
When you tell a gun-grabber that the Swiss – among the most peaceful, stable nations on earth – are heavily armed, and that most Swiss households have at least one selective-fire assault rifle in the closet, they’ll usually frump “that doesn’t count – those are military weapons!”. They’re wrong on three counts.
For starters – there are still well over a million purely civilian weapons!
Second – so the gun in the closet is military. So what? You think that would stop a criminal, all by itself? No – Switzerland adds a pretty significant sentencing enhancement for using a military gun for non-military purposes (even opening one’s “emergency” ammo container, kept with the serviceman’s rifle and uniform at home, is a criminal offense). So go figure – sentencing prevents crime! Case in point; when a bunch of Swiss yahoos staged a re-enactment of Abu Ghraib, they went to jail – for using their service weapons in the re-enactment.
Third? After a Swiss citizen completes their service in the reserve, they are eligible to purchase their longtime personal weapon for a fairly nominal price.
That means for servicepeople in the “baby boom” years, a SIG “StG 57” – AKA the “Rolls Royce of battle rifles”.
A twelve-pound beast of a rifle, capable of firing the full-powered 7.5mm Swiss round, fully-or semi-automatic, it still serves as a “designated marksman’s weapon” in the Swiss Army. The semi-auto only civilian version ran for $5,000 a pop on the US civilian market, back when they were obtainable at all. Swiss reservists of a certain age can have their long-time service weapons (with semi-auto only actions installed) for a couple hundred bucks – less than the price of an American video-game console.
The young’uns? They get the pretty spiffy, thoroughly-modern SIG 550s, in the NATO-standard 5.56mm caliber.
It’s basically a Swiss version of the M16/AR15, although it uses a much more reliable gas-piston operating system borrowed from the AK47. You can find ’em in the US; if you find ’em under $1,800, it’s a bargain. Swiss vets get theirs for less than the price of a laptop computer.
If the vet is an officer or senior NCO?
The SIG220 service pistol, one of the most coveted handguns in America, is the pistola franca of the Swiss armed forces. A Swiss service veteran can keep their 220 for a couple hundred bucks. When they get down to $1,000 in the US, people go crazy.
The Swiss Shooting Sports Federation – which is sort of like the NRA, but it also sells ammo and runs shooting ranges – has 175,000 members. That’s a higher percentage of the Swiss population than the NRA has in the US; in proportion to population, it’s the equivalent of seven million Americans going to the range and buying ammo.
Oh, yeah – and the Swiss firearm murder rate is about one quarter of the murder rate.
Pardon the gearhead tangent.
Now – General Blattman may be right, and he may be wrong. I have a hunch Switzerland will be the last place in Europe ISIS tries its luck.
Just so we make sure that I am either very clear, or very unclear – I fully support welcoming refugees to United States. I even more fully support being very very careful about the ones we admit.
What I would like to ask ISIS is, instead of wasting perfectly good passive aggression on the docile, bovine Swedish Lutherans, that they try this little stunt with some of the people in America who are getting so very, very smug and self-righteous about their sense of tolerance.
Thanks in advance.
They’re back. In the wake of the shooting at the abortion mill in Colorado Springs, and the shooting in Minneapolis (and to a lesser extent last week’s shootings in San Bernardino, which the left tried its level best to jam into the template), the talking heads of the left are furrowing their brows and warning us, yet again, about the imminent danger of “white christian right-wing terror”, which, we’re warned, is a huge danger, and could become the biggest most dangerous terror out there. Says someone in the government. Because science.
It’s BS, of course; while white “conservative” terror was a real thing during the heyday of the Klan, by the seventies it had largely faded to obscurity; today, the Klan and other white/”Christian” identity movements are a pimple on society’s tush.
Indeed, the numbers aren’t even arguable; left-wing environmental groups committed more terror attacks than all other sources combined from 2001-2011; while 9/11 outstripped them all in terms of dead people, the level of effort was lopsided in favor of the left.
And yet the left – from Janet Napolitano to MPR’s Bob Collins down to the dimmest writer at Minnesota Progressive Project, assures us that white terror is the real danger.
David French points out the absurdity of the left’s claim, against a backdrop of steadily diminishing domestic terror of all kinds:
Don’t tell the alarmists that, though. Even before this weekend’s shooting at a Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood clinic, left-wing sites trumpeted the threat of “Christian terrorists” while minimizing the threat of jihadists. This summer, the New York Times hyped a transparently idiotic study claiming that (mainly right-wing) homegrown extremists were deadlier than jihadists — by excluding from the death toll the almost 3,000 Americans who died on 9/11 and the nearly 7,000 Americans killed — not to mention the more than 52,000 Americans wounded — at the hands of radical Islamists overseas. SHARE ARTICLE ON FACEBOOKSHARE TWEET ARTICLETWEETSince the Planned Parenthood shooting, leftists have indicted the pro-life movement itself for the actions of a bitter and angry loner with no known connections to any activist organization. The Huffington Post wrote a story noting that Colorado Springs is full of — gasp! — Christians. Buzzfeed published a comprehensive report demonstrating exactly how abortion-rights activists intend to turn the Colorado shooting into a “rallying cry.”
What it is, is Berg’s Seventh Law in full effect.
(SCENE: Major Thomas ASHTON and Sergeant Major Iain MACTAGGART, members of the British 22nd SAS Regiment – Britain’s premiere Special Forces unit – are standing by a helicopter pad. Both are suited up for a mission that nobody will confirm is a hostage rescue mission deep into ISIS territory; guns, ammunition, grenades, radios, and survival gear)
ASHTON: Should be a bit of a dustup, eh, MacTaggart?
MACTAGGART: Aye. Not the first bloody time, Major.
ASHTON: True. All right, Sergeant-Major. Let’s check the men’s kit. This is going to be a nasty one.
(An orderly – Royal Air Force communications specialist Aircraftman Sheila O’RIORDAN – jogs up to ASHTON with a piece of paper. She stands at attention and salutes the Major)
ASHTON (taking the paper): Yes?
O’RIORDAN: Flash message from Ministry of Defense, sir.
ASHTON: Thank you. Dismissed.
(O’RIORDAN salutes. ASHTON returns the salute. O’RIORDAN jogs back to the radio tent)
MACTAGGART: So w`hat’s MOD say, Major?
ASHTON: President Obama has declared a climate conference. ISIS has surrendered.
MACTAGGART: ISIS couldn’t face the onlaught of Powerpoint, eh?
ASHTON: Sounds like the mission’s off.
MACTAGGART: Peace has broken out?
ASHTON: Yes, Sergeant-Major.
(Both men stand for a beat – and then erupt in laughter)
MACTAGGART: I’ll tell the helos to spool up.
ASHTON: Right. Wheels up in ten.
SCENE: Abu Bakr AL-BAGHDADI, leader of ISIS and self-proclaimed “caliph” of the new “Khelifa” or Caliphate, is in a conference with a group of his lieutenants, including Sheikh Abu Ali HABIB.
AL-BAGHDADI: Reports from the front look good. We’re holding the Kurds, we’re gaining ground in Syria, and the Iraqis are folding like a Salafist end-table.
LIEUTENANTS: Allahu Akbar!
AL-BAGHDADI: And the Great Satan is reacting as we expected; with dithering disguised as grand pronouncements.
HABIB: Caliph, I have some bad news.
AL-BAGHDADI: What is it, Sheikh?
HABIB: Little Miss Satanette – President Obama (group snickers) is holding a…
(HABIB pauses, catches breath)
….climate change conference.
(Entire group cringes in horror)
AL-BAGHDADI: That does it. Let’s give up. Find an evangelist; I’ll devote my life to Christ.
(Entire group pauses for a silent beat – then breaks into uproarious laughter)
(SCENE: Two Kurdish Peshmerga fighters, Ali and Sayid, are manning a Russian-built machine gun, scanning a valley warily, watching for ISIS movement. Suddenly, the radio crackles)
RADIO: Kebab Six to all Kebab. President Obama is holding a climate change conference. Six out.
ALI: (scanning with binoculars) Well, I’ll be.
ALI: (Hands Sayid the binoculars) Look!
SAYID: (Looks through binoculars) Wow.
(Cut to scene through binoculars. ISIS troops are climbing out of foxholes, hurling their weapons, ammunition and webgear into the distance, and running away, leaving a cloud of dust behind them)
ALI: Huh. Don’t see that every day.
SAYID: Like I’ve been telling you, Ali – it’s all about the climate.
ALI: Gotta hand it to you. When you’re right, you’re right.
Employment up between 2000-4000%…
SCENE: December 8, 1941, in the well of the House of Representatives – in an alternate universe. President Barack Delano Obama is addressing a joint emergency session of Congress.
OBAMA: Yesterday, December Seventh, 1941, is a day which will live in infamy.
Now, let me be clear: this attack did not represent the Real Japan. Japan is an ancient, honorable culture, dating back over 2,000 years; Shinto is a religion of peace, famous for its pastoral scenes and transcendental poetry.
And this attack does not represent the real Japanese people; a people who invented sushi, and baseball, and the number zero, named after their fighter plane.
We know the attackers were the junior varsity; who even knew the Japanese had aircraft carriers?
The lesson of yesterday? We must not give in to fear, or bigotry, in framing our response to this attack. We must not let fear drive us to launching an air raid on Tokyo, or a two-pronged offensive through the Solomon Islands, or an island-jumping campaign through the Central Pacific, because that is exactly what the attackers want. If they force us to attack them, we are playing their game, their way.
We must respond to the parts we control – to the National Rifle Association, which has, through the intransigence of Congressional Republicans, made it easier for criminals like the attackers to buy bombs than books in Tokyo.
I urge Congress also to accelerate passage of the Affordable Defense Act.
Thank you, and let’s not waste this crisis.
Joe Doakes from Como Park emailed about something I was just about to write about myself:
This is great comedy, truly, a classic.
It really is.