Fine Line
June 19th, 2025 by Mitch BergJoe Doakes, formerly of Como Park, emails:
Isreal is bombing Iran. The Nimitz carrier group is being re-deployed. Questions are coming from all sides about the proper role of the United States in this conflict. I must confess I’ve been struggling lately to refine my personal ideology.On the one hand, I believe in Washington and Jefferson’s idea of peace, commerce, and honest friendship toward all; entangling alliances with none.On the other hand, I believe Iran when they say that if they had the bomb, they would use it to attack The Great Satan meaning the United States. They would also destroy Israel but that’s not my problem – my problem is the defense of my country. So letting Iran have the bomb becomes a legitimate issue of self-defense.Self-defense does not require that we act preemptively to prevent Iran from getting the bomb. Richard Fernandez wrote an excellent piece called The Three Conjectures in which he postulates that muslims will eventually get the bomb and will use it on us after which we will obliterate the entire Middle East. Problem solved.Do we want to wait for that casus belli or act before it happens?If we do act preemptively, should it be done Constitutionally by declaration of war and mobilization of our military the way we did the first and second World Wars? Unconstitutionally, by mobilization without declaration as in the first and second Gulf Wars? We have spent an enormous amount of money and lives over the last century with little to show for it. Maybe it’s better if we let the Jews handle this problem for us, possibly with some quiet support in the background?Plus how do we keep Russia and China out of the mix while we let our proxy Israel blast their proxy Iran?I’m struggling to find the right balance. I suspect Trump is too, and I must admire him for the job he’s doing walking the fine line of keeping the pressure on while keeping us (mostly) out.
Joe Doakes




