Archive for May, 2010

It’s What He Says It Is

Monday, May 17th, 2010

In America, we have a veto to protect the minority from the depredations of the majority.  It’s part of our system here in Minnesota; it has been since we became a state.

The whole point is to prevent majorities, even prohibitive majorities, from running roughshod over the minority.

Cut to Keith Langseth, who entered the Legislature the same year Jimmy Carter came to the White House, knows better.  As Govenror Pawlenty ended the session without caving in to the Dems’ control of both houses of the Legislature, Langseth groused…:

“I’ve never seen anything like it,” said Sen. Keith Langseth, DFL-Glyndon, who has served in the Legislature since 1974.

Langseth expressed exasperation with Pawlenty and his refusal to give in on the budget. “I’ve served with six governors, and five of them know what democracy is about,” Langseth said. “You compromise.” DFLers hold strong majorities in the House and Senate.

Yes, “you” do compromise.

If “you” are the DFL, “you” always means “the GOP”.

You Better Learn Something, Boy, While You Still Can

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

I’ve written it before; the Iron City Houserockers are the greatest band you’ve never heard of.

And it was thirty years ago today they released their definining – but not quite definitive – album, Have a Good Time (but Get out Alive)!

The Houserockers were led by Joe Grushecky, a high school special education teacher who had never quite put away that rock and roll jones.  He started “the Brick Alley Band” in 1976, plugged away building a huge reputation on the Pittsburgh bar circuit, and in 1979 released Love’s So Tough, an album that was…

…like a zillion other debut albums by bands on shoestring budgets; with tinny production by a couple of no-name fader jockeys, Love’s So Tough stood out in some of the details, mostly a keen eye for the anxious desperation of his fellow working stiffs, and and a raw spirit that cut through the crappy production.

Cut through it enough to draw some big label attention; the band was picked up by MCA records, and paired with “Miami” Steve Van Zandt – Bruce Springsteen’s second guitarist – for their major label debut.

The result was Have A Good Time…

The Iron City Houserockers (from L): Marc Reisman, Joe Grushecky, Eddie Britt, Gil Snyder, Ned Rankin, Art Nardini

And at a time when rock critics on both sides of the Atlantic were swooning over the “anger” and “grittiness” of the so-called “punks”, it was the real thing.

Part of it was the band.  Van Zandt (who produced five songs before leaving the project, turning it over to Ian Hunter and Mick Ronson, who were themselves at the top of their commercal game at the time) has a long history of overwhelming his productions with serial waves of bombast (see Lone Justice’s Shelter); it took a strong band not to get lost in Van Zandt’s huge, pounding vision.  And the Houserockers were up to the task.  Grushecky sang and played rhythm guitar; the rhythm section of Art Nardini (bass) and Gil Snyder (drums) anchored a band of…

…bar room players, and on the surface nothing more, really; Eddie Britt was a serviceable lead guitar player; Ned Rankin played classic barroom piano and organ; much of the band’s sound hinged around harmonica whiz Marc Reisman.

Individually, then, they were just another bar band.

But they were much more than the sum of their parts, especially hitched to Grushecky’s music – where again, the right combination of time, band, producer and inspiration transcended the obvious limits.

On Love’s So Tough, Grushecky’s music had been like cut-rate Springsteen, or leaner and meaner Bob Seger.

But on Have A Good Time, driven by first by Van Zandt’s rock and roll myth-chasing and then by Hunter and Ronson’s then-peaking creativity, the band and the music exploded into something vastly more than the sum of its parts.

The title cut sets the stage; the song attacks from the first bar with a ferocity that The Clash never approached:

You never fit quite right in school
Went out and broke all the rules
Talk so loud and act so cool – that’s right
Only sixteen when you left home
Thought you could make it on your own
Because you were born with the right to roam the night

You said “don’t put those chains on me
I am young and I am free
And I’ll be what I want to be” – that’s right

Have a good time but get out alive
Don’t you know only the strong survive
Have a good time but get out alive

You always did what you wanted
It didn’t matter who you hurt
But you didn’t hurt no one like you hurt yourself
You took anything that you could get
Did it all with no regrets
You tried so hard but you can’t forget your past

Don’t you know this life is killing you
You act crazy but don’t be a fool
Do what you want to do but keep in mind

Have a good time but get out alive
Don’t you know only the strong survive
Have a good time but get out alive

After one long night
When Bobby was involved in a senseless fight
He woke up in jail with a broken old man
The old man was staring down at him
He said “boy you better wipe off that stupid grin
And learn something now while you still can”

Have a good time but get out alive
Don’t you know only the strong survive
Have a good time but get out alive

No video exists that I can find of the Houserockers in their prime; here’s Grushecky’s latest incarnation of the band from five years ago, doing a version that doesn’t show too much wear and tear; the band features Nardini and Reisman as well as Grushecky’s son on guitar.

Much of the album was cut from the same cloth; three of the five other Van Zandt-produced tracks (“Blondie”, “Angela” and “Don’t Let Them Push You Around”) are subtle as buckets of scrap steel to the forehead, blazing gems of rock and roll ferocity that mocked the art-school pretensions of the “punks”.

Hunter and Ronson’s seven tracks are  more subtle; “Pumping Iron”, “Running Scared” and “We’re Not Dead Yet” sound like Bob Seger songs fed through Hunter and Ronson’s glam pub rock in a way that, miraculously, stripped off the glam; “Hypnotized” is a paranoid minor-key rocker that falls flat, as does the ballad “Price of Love”.

But it’s the end of Side Two that gives us the album’s biggest, riskiest moment.  It’s two-song couplet, “Old Man Bar/Junior’s Bar”, that is the most thrilling, sobering moment on the whole album.

“Old Man Bar” starts with an accordion playing an Italian-sounding lament, with keyboardist Gil Snyder singing in a voice that sounds – honestly – sixty years old with forty-five years of three packs a day.

Going down to Dom’s Cafe, just to have a drink
The old men in their same seats down the row…
Telling tales of World War Two for anyone to hear,
their insides lined with scars that never show.

Old Man Bar is where I am and where I’ll be
Old Man Bar with a jukebox full of memories
Old Man Bar until they kill the neon light
I hope nobody sees me here tonight.
I hope nobody sees me here tonight.

A sad, almost depressing song about the kind of bar, and patrons, you see on every seedy tumbledown strip wherever you are.

And the song – the according, and Mick Ronson’s mandolin part – keen to an arthritic, tired stop; the record courts four…

…and Snyder slams the snare to launch “Junior’s Bar” – a song with the same chord progression as “Old Man”, but with the whole band telling the story of a man thirty years younger:

Going down to Junior’s Bar, just to have a drink
hoping for a one-night rendezvous.
The girls down there, all at the bar, dressed up and looking good,
Gonna show them all my new tattoo…

Junior’s Bar, where the band is playing just for me,
They move the crowdn they play real loud
It’s a poor boy’s symphony
Junior’s Bar, until they kill the neon light
I hope I don’t go home alone tonight
I hope I don’t go home alone tonight

“Junior” was as glorious a rock and roll anthem as has ever been played; the original featured Ellen Foley on a delicious background vocal, and a guitar solo that may have been played by Britt, but had Van Zandt all over it.

I can’t even find the audio for “Old Man”; here’s “Junior”, again with a newer incarnation of the band.

Have A Good Time… was uneven album; the band’s full promise would be revealed a year or so later, when Amercan roots-rock impresario Steve Cropper would produce Blood On The Bricks, one of the most perfect albums in the history of rock and roll.

But the highlight moments on Have A Good Time… – the title cut, “Blondie”, “Angela”, “Old Man Bar/Junior’s Bar” – are, in the annals of America’s brief “heartland rock” phase in the eighties, among the best songs ever; harder-edged than anything Springsteen has ever done, sharper and more immediate than Bob Seger at his best.

The idea of American Rock and Roll may never have been carried off better.

Thank You, Margaret Anderson-Kelliher

Saturday, May 15th, 2010

Thank you so very much for wasteing an hour of taxpayer time by convening the House a solid hour late this afternoon.

The taxpayers’ loss was the NARN’s gain.

Things Go Better With Talk

Saturday, May 15th, 2010

Today, the Northern Alliance Radio Network brings you the best in Minnesota conservatism from 9AM-3PM.

  • Volume I “The First Team” –  Brian and John or some combination thereof kick off from 11-1.
  • Volume II “The Headliner”Ed and I follow from 1-3PM Central.  Today we’ll be interviewing Governor Pawlenty in the 1PM hour, and GOP-endorsed gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer in the second hour.   Tune in pronto!
  • The King Banaian Show! – King is on from 9-11 on AM1570, Business Radio for the Twin Cities!  We’re broadening the franchise; two stations, now!
  • And for those of you who like your constitutionalism straight up with no chaser, don’t forget the Sons of Liberty, from 3-5!

(All times Central)

So tune in to all six hours of the Northern Alliance Radio Network, the Twin Cities’ media’s sole guardians of sanity. You have so many options:

  • AM1280 in the Metro
  • streaming at AM1280’s Website,
  • On Twitter (the Volume 2 show will use hashtag #narn2)
  • UStream video and chat (at HotAir.com or at UStream).
  • Podcast at Townhall, usually by Monday
  • Good ol’ telephone – 651-289-4488!
  • And make sure you fan us on Facebook!

Join us!

A Rabbi, A Country Singer And An NRA Instructor Walk Into A Bar…

Friday, May 14th, 2010

The battle for the Second Amendment, in my lifetime, has turned nearly 180 degrees.  When I was a kid (and a liberal), things were looking pretty bleak; US V. Miller was broadly (and mistakenly) accepted as a precedent; the media and big government culture largely regarded firearms as a social illness that needed to be controlled and then eradicated.

But in one of the greatest grass-roots political movements in American history, millions of law-abiding citizens have turned the tide, for now – vote by vote, state by state, and finally, even turning much of this nation’s bobbleheaded “legal elite” around, to the point where the forces of good prevailed in the Supreme Court two years ago, in the Heller decision.  And with any luck, sometime in the next month or so, the McDonald case will incorporate Heller to all fifty states, causing the “individual rights” interpretation of the Second Amendment to become binding on all lower levels of government.

This is good.

One thing one can not say is that the human rights and civil liberties interpretation of the Second Amendment won because the broad sweep of the extreme “progressive” movement got especially better informed on the subject.

Because if this post at Mahablog is any indication, we have a long, long way to go.

Not content with merely supporting an individual right to own firearms, the National Rifle Association is hellbent on eliminating all restrictions on any citizens carrying guns anywhere he or she wants, including churches, workplaces, and now bars and restaurants. This is in spite of the fact that even in the most 2nd-amendment lovin’ red states a large majority of people think it’s a real bad idea for a bunch of drunken yahoos to be packing heat.

So many responses.

For starters:  the term “packing heat” should be a signal that whomever is writing really knows nothing about the topic.  I know – it’s a correlation that doesn’t equal causation, but there is an extremely high correlation between people who use the phrase (which has been otherwise absent from American English since the 1930s, except in old gangster movies) and abject ignorance on the subject.

Next – “Maha” claims that “big majorities” oppose the rights of legal permit-holders to carry in churches, bars and restaurants.  I’m not sure where she gets this – I’d love to see a cite – but it reminds me of the polls the “progressives tossed about from the seventies through the nineties that claimed a huge majority supported gun control.  The devil was in the details; the vast majority approve of some controls.  Keeping guns away from criminals and convicted felons is “gun control”, and I favor it; I’d be part of that putative “vast majority”.  It’s fodder for giggly statistical games, but it’s not really honest.

Because the only numbers that really matter are these; a law-abiding citizen with a carry permit (which proves, in 40 states, that he or she has no criminal record, no documented drug or alcohol problems, and in many of them has passed a skills course) is vastly less likely to harm you or anyone else than the general public – as in “two orders of magnitude” less.

Yes, the new Tennessee law that lifts all restrictions on where a citizen can carry a concealed weapon, including into bars, provides that the carrier must abstain from drinking.

I have to wonder – do these people either read, or talk with each other?

Because it was two years ago that this blog humiliated the Minnesoros “Independenton this exact question.   It’s been legal,l in überliberal Minnesota, to carry permitted guns in bars since 2005, provided one’s blood alcohol level is below .04 – half the level allowed to drive a car.   This is true in many other “shall issue” states.

You don’t have to look very hard to find stories of people shooting people in bars.  But you have to look long and hard to find any involving legal carry permit-holders.

The NRA pushed hard for the new Tennessee law:

The NRA’s argument is that while the militia may be “well-regulated,” any restriction on an individual citizen’s ability to carry a firearm amounts to an “abridgment” of the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. This assumes that all such rights are absolute and untouchable by law under all circumstances, but we certainly have never treated any other right that way.

And we don’t treat the Second Amendment that way.

“Maha” writes imprecisely – which is as good as most “progressives” can do on the subject, to be fair.  The NRA is pretty absolutist about the rights of law-abiding individual citizens.  The NRA has also led the way on laws to punish gun possession and use by criminals.

The rub, of course, is that “progressives” never, ever distinguish between the law-abiding and criminals when the topic is guns (or, for that matter, quite a few other topics as well) – which we see in the following clip:

Freedom of speech doesn’t include a right to publish and distribute hard-core pornography, for example. Freedom of religion doesn’t rubber stamp human sacrifice.

That “Maha” thinks my right as someone with a clean criminal record is on par with human sacrifice is almost as telling as the fact she thinks that there are any restrictions on hard-core porn.

The NRA is using bullying tactics to impose its will on lawmakers, even when a whopping majority of constituents (and probably the lawmakers’ consciences, if they have any) disagree with the NRA’s position. There are some cities and states in which a big majority would prefer some level of legal gun control, for safety’s sake.

If decades of statistic don’t show you that controlling the rights of the law-abiding in the interest of  “safety” isnt’ a canard, the example of Chicago is probably lost on you.

Anyway – the issue is at a bit of a head, with the nomination of Elena Kagan to the SCOTUS, and with the high court’s upcoming McDonald decision.

“Maha”:

Now the wingnuts are screaming that Elena Kagan is opposed to gun rights because

Elena Kagan said as a U.S. Supreme Court law clerk in 1987 that she was “not sympathetic” toward a man who contended that his constitutional rights were violated when he was convicted for carrying an unlicensed pistol.

Note the “unlicensed” part.

We do.  That’s the point; it is impossible, in DC, Chicago and other cities, for the law-abiding citizen to get the “license”.  In other cities – New York is a great example, as was Minnesota until 2003 – it was entirely a matter of the applicant’s political clout and connections.

More recently she has said,

“There is no question, after Heller, that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to keep and bear arms and that this right, like others in the Constitution, provides strong although not unlimited protection against governmental regulation,” she said.

Right.

And it’s the “…although not unlimited…” bit that we are watching closely.

A conservative’s idea of a “reasonable limit” is “keeping guns out of the hands of criminals”; a “progressive” thinks that putting a gun into anyone’s hands at all makes them suspect.

I don’t read Mahablog much.  But I noticed she’d linked to me:

But that’s not good enough for the gun nuts, who predictably compared Heller to Third Reich Nazis.

Which is a rather “un-nuanced” view of what I actually wrote.   Read it yourself; I criticize those who defend Kagan’s 1987 comments on the Second Amendment by saying “it reflects what the “elite bar” thought at the time”.

The “elite bar” once thought that a black man was worth 2/3 of a white man, and defended slavery with carefully-written, legally-scrupulous opinions – that were morally utterly vacant, since they abridged basic human liberties.

The “Nuremberg Laws” were perfectly acceptable law under German jurisprudence, too.  The German “legal elite” said so.

There’s no comparing the results of the two; Slavery and the Holocaust were evil, while gun control is merely stupid and racist.

But my point wasn’t comparison; it was simply that a stupid opinion isn’t made correct because “the elites believed it was correct”.

The crazy part of this is that the basic position of the gun lobby — that the 2nd amendment protects an individual right to own firearms — is settled law at this point. And the issue of gun control isn’t even on the progressivist back burner any more, compared to, say, 15 years ago. It’s not even in the bleeping kitchen.

And how do you think it got that way?

Because millions of us schlumpfy, un-hip guys and gals in flyoverland – the ones that Bill Maher giggles at – made it that way, one vote and one state and, finally, one justice at a time.

And, by “Maha’s” leave, we’re going to make sure it stays that way.

About the only way gun rights are going to be seriously challenged in the foreseeable future is if there is a huge swing of public opinion in the direction of more gun control. A few shoot-outs in Tennessee roadhouses might do it.

Keep waiting.

And if you look at the statistics, you might wanna bring a water bottle.  You’ll be waiting a long, long time.

Side note:  Let’s see if Barbara “Maha” O’Brien is any better at allowing dissenting comments than she used to be.

UPDATE:  Nope, she’s not.  I’m told that several comments critical of her “position” have been removed.

Why are some liberal bloggers so utterly gutless?

Chanting Points Memo: Emmer’s “Absences”

Friday, May 14th, 2010

If you believe the Dem’s current chanting points on the subject, you’d think that Tom Emmer had spent the last year at Sandals. 

Of course, when they say this they are seemingly oblivious of then-Senator Obama’s 300 missed Senate votes during his presidential campaign (documented all over the place).

Don’t they think people remember this?

But even more interestingly – its seems his endorsed opponent so far, Speaker of the House Margaret Anderson-Kelliher, has not only missed 51 votes this session, but – according to a source at the Capitol, “Al Junhke was voting from the speaker’s chair for Speaker Kelliher all afternoon – she was not even in the chamber”.  Word has it there’ll be photos of Rep. Juhnke leading the House, which is I’m sure exactly what Rep. Kelliher’s constituents wanted.

Another capitol GOP source notes ” Tom (Emmer) actually missed a vote this afternoon because he got held up in the hallway talking to MPR about missing votes. True story! This is getting ridiculous.”

It is indeed.

:(

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

He

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

It’s the new Matt Entenza TV spot.

Entenza – with whom I’ve co-hosted a public event, a few years ago, and whom I found to be a perfectly likeable guy, although in contrast with Ed Schultz (one of the stars of the evening), a wolverine is good company, too – tells his tough yet heartwarming story:

After watching the spot, especially the tagline (about wanting to help Minnesota create more such heartwarming and inspirational stories), I have to ask, though; what state program were Entenza’s benfactors on, that allowed them to be so noble?

The Pack Is Back

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Poll finds Republicans are getting theor coalition back in order:

Republicans have reassembled their coalition by reconnecting with independents, seniors, blue-collar voters, suburban women and small town and rural voters—all of whom had moved away from the party in the 2006 elections, in which Republicans lost control of the House. Those voter groups now favor GOP control of Congress.

“This data is what it looks like when Republicans assemble what for them is a winning coalition,” said GOP pollster Bill McInturff, who conducts the survey with Democratic pollster Peter Hart.

That’s good news.

The bad news is that, on a national level, I’m not sure it’s because of anything the GOP has actually done. (I’ll except Minnesota – which is a new tack for me.  The MNGOP has, I think, done an uncharacteristically good job of reaching out to people; I’d like to see more, but a journey of a thousand miles does begin with a single step).

Can mass revulsion with the Democrats carry the day?  It’s a fragile strategy at best…

But you have to have people voting for you before they can affect the party – and more people are passionate about the right side of issues today.  The fundamentals, as John McCain might have said, are looking pretty solid.

Let’s Try To Focus Here

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

I’ll give Obama this much; his administrtion is playing the “Is Kagan or is Kagan not gay?” card at just the right time; it’s occupying our peabrain media so much so that none of them, even were they so inclined, will ever even ask about her record on human and civil rights:

Elena Kagan said as a U.S. Supreme Court law clerk in 1987 that she was “not sympathetic” toward a man who contended that his constitutional rights were violated when he was convicted for carrying an unlicensed pistol.Kagan, whom President Barack Obama nominated to the high court this week, made the comment to Justice Thurgood Marshall, urging him in a one-paragraph memo to vote against hearing the District of Columbia man’s appeal.

Apologists say that she was reflecting the view of the “elite” bar in the years before Heller.

Rubbish.  Adolf Eichmann reflected the “legal” view of Germany’s elite for 12 years; he was still wrong.

We – the good guys – don’t have the votes to scupper Kagan.  I’m afraid it’s a done deal.

WELCOME MAHABLOG READERS!:  I responded to Barbara “Maha” O’Brian’s misleading, context-challenged little swipe at me in this post here, which is a vastly better-thought-out response than her original grab-bag of ofay stereotypes and lack of legal understanding, deserved.

You should ask Barbara a question, though; why does she delete comments that challenge her?  Does she have that big a need for control?  That’s kinda strange.

The Self-Fulfilling Perception

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

So yesterday, as Mr. Dillettante notes, Bob Collins of MPR (writing at “Gather.com”) and I got into a rhubarb over the interpretation and meaning of a sign he saw at Jason Lewis’  annual Tax Cut Rally last weekend, and the fact that it was displayed at all. 

In his article on Gather, Collins posted the photo – of a sign that says “Tax Cuts: Even A Monkey Can Do It”, with some form of stylized hand-drawn chimpanzee in the middle.   He also posted a link to a WaPo article that notes that the Tea Party is countering the “perception” of racism (shown in a series of polls that that while Tea Partiers overwhelmingly say that they are not motivated by racism, Democrats really really double-dog believe they are.

To summarize Collins’ point, between his article and the comment he left  (and feel free to jump in if anyone thinks I’m summarizing unfairly):

  1. A “perception” exists that the Tea Party is at least partly motivated by racism.
  2. There is no doubt whatsoever that the sign was racist.
  3. If the presence of so much as one sign doesn’t prove the “perception” correct, the fact that nobody kicked him out of the rally does.

As Bob put it in one line, “the medium is the message”.

My response:

  1. Of course you can find racists at Tea Parties.  No movement of several million people – especially one with absolutely no barriers to entry whatsoever – is going to be free of at least at thin film of bigots and idiots.  You’ll find them at a “Prairie Home Companion” taping, for that matter.
  2. The odds are better than even that the person holding the sign was a ringer – a lefty like this very special young fella who gets his jollies presenting his opposition in the most loathsome possible light by providing a living caricature of it.
  3. Even if it wasn’t a ringer, to a big chunk of the population here in 92% white Minnesota, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar a monkey is just a monkey, more a symbol of simple-minded rote cognitive simplicity than a racist slur.  Granted, one has to tread lightly around terms like that when an Afro-American is the subject, but I think Collins is at some risk of superimposing his own templates and prejudices onto the topic.
  4. This is not only Minnesota – the land of millions of Scandinavians who won’t return an undercooked egg to the kitchen for fear of raising a fuss, much less confront an offensive stranger –  but a rally full of people who are inclined to be libertarians; who believe, as a matter of principle, that everyone, even the most depraved, as a right to free speech, and that indulging in stupid, bigoted speech reflects on them, not on oneself.  (To say nothing of people, like me, who are pretty much oblivious to signs anyway).  It’s whythe last Tea Party rally detailed a security group specifically to find, photograph and discredit such signs (which, in news that is completely unrelated, I’m sure, didn’t appear at that Tea Party rally).
  5. The “perception” exists because the Adminitration and the mainstream media – pardon the very deliberate redundancy – want it to exist. As the Media Research Center noted, the major-media’s coverage of the Tea Parties has been so consistently dismissive, slanted, biased and wrong that it’s very difficult to believe it’s not part of a concerted pattern; in other words, the “perception” exists because the mainstream media, and the administration it overwhelmingly supports, wants that perception to exist, no matter how it has to waterboard context and mangle fact to make it happen.  Indeed; the mainstream media (as the MRC noted) devoted slavering coverage to the tiny fringe of racist and off-color signs at Tea Parties, but utterly ignored Pajamas Media’s successful effort to expose a large number of these “racists” as lefty ringers – but the drumbeat of stories and “infotainment” about the Tea Parties’ supposed “racism” didn’t take so much as a breath.

Or to put it in one line; “2+2=The Narrative, Winston”.

So I’d like to follow up the discussion with a few questions of my own.

  1. So after the Seattle WTO riots, the union roughing up the Young Republicans at the Minnesota State Fair and breaking into the state GOP campaign office in 2006, the conviction of a would-be firebomber in connection with the Republican National Convention in Saint Paul, the assault on a Tea Partier at Senator Carnahan’s office (with racial epithets, against a black man, no less), the Bill Sparkman suicide, the professor and out-of-control Obama supporter murdering her five colleagues, the Bush-deranged guy in Texas crashing his plane into an IRS office, the Pentagon Station shootings (by another BDS sufferer), and the violence and vandalism-prone immigration rallies, is there a “percpeption” that the American left is prone to meeting dissent with thuggish and violent behavior?
  2. If not – in other words, if a years-long pattern of thuggishness and violence doesn’t create every bit as much an “perception” as the selective display of some ignorant and racist (and likely spurious) signs – then why not?
  3. Could it be because the industry that creates these “perceptions” is selective about the “perceptions” it chooses to create and propagate?
  4. If not, why?

I’ll welcome any actual answers.

Fool Britannia

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

In 1598, William Shakespeare wrote of English politics in his otherwise unremarkable play “King John”:

O inglorious league!
Shall we, upon the footing of our land,
Send fair-play orders and make compremise,
Insinuation, parley, and base truce
To arms invasive?

412 years later David Cameron enters stage left, arms as invasive as ever before in Britain’s Conservative Party.  Will he be equally as unremarkable as “King John”?

In the last year, the youthful, moderate, almost too-charismatic leader of the Tories has yo-yoed from political genius/cross-Atlantic conservative inspiration to cautionary tale and nearly (within the last 24 hours) the head of the loyal opposition instead of Prime Minister.  Instead Cameron sent “fair-play orders” (which in Shakespeare’s era was tantamount to surrender) and made compromise with the exceedingly left-wing Liberal Democratic Party to form the oddest fusion since the Second Coalition of the Napoleonic Wars.  Or maybe Elton John and Eminem at the Grammys.

The tendency in Anglo-American political relations has long been to see parallels across the pond.  Churchill and Roosevelt, Reagan and Thatcher, Blair and Clinton.  Indeed, from the moment Barack Obama positioned himself at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, conservatives both of the big ‘C’ and litle ‘c’ variety, began to argue that Cameron was positioning himself as a fellow change agent en route to occupying 10 Downing Street.

Perhaps the most accurate link between between Obama and Cameron was their first and foremost notion of what such “change” meant – having the other party out of power.  Most certainly for Cameron, at least on the campaign trail, having Gordon Brown out of power was the only real change he promised to offer the United Kingdom:

A Herd Becomes A Pack

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

David Kopel notes that Colorado will now allow permitted concealed carry at its community colleges.

Colorado is joining Utah in allowing licensed carry at all state higher education campuses. As I detailed in Connecticut Law Review article, there have never been any problems caused by the Utah policy, or by licensed carry at Colorado State University, which has been in effect since 2003.

After an avalanche of nothing happens at Utah and Colorado schools, perhaps some common sense will prevail.

All Hail The King!

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

The DFL on Monday voted for an epic tax hike (disguised, per usual, as negotiation) in the middle of an epic recession/depression.

The answer – the real answer, anyway – is to toss every single DFLer responsible for this vote out this November.

My friend and longtime radio colleague King Banaian is trying to do just that up in House District 15B in Saint Cloud, against Larry “Haw” Haws.   King responds to his opponent’s vote for the tax hike (emphasis added):

“Last night my opponent voted to increase taxes on small businesses and what he considers wealthy Minnesotans,” Banaian said. “The last Economic Update from the Finance Department cited consumer confidence and sentiment being ‘mired’ at low levels and ‘lingering employment concerns, slow wage growth, and tight credit are likely to inhibit household spending until 2011.’ Even if you believe Minnesotans don’t pay enough, this is a terrible time to raise taxes.”

“But we do pay enough. The DFL bill that Rep. Haws voted for would give Minnesota the 4th highest marginal tax rate in the country on incomes of $200,000. Higher rates in California have done nothing to cure their budget problems. Why does Larry Haws think this is a good example to emulate?”

“The answer to every DFL problem is to look at small businesses as an ATM from which they can cover their need for more money. They have enough; the real need in Minnesota is to reduce spending, not raise taxes. Rep. Haws had the opportunity to balance the budget by ratifying Governor Pawlenty’s spending reductions but voted against that. When I get to St. Paul, we will set priorities that do not ask already-generous Minnesotans for more,” Banaian concluded.

Or as another conservative candidate might say, we need to stick the budget in a vise and “drill baby, drill”‘.

I’ll await word from the Strib on exactly how King’s position is “extreme”.

(Via Gary @ LFR)

Scandinavians Rejoice!

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Eleven-foot “King Herring” washes up in Sweden:

The Regalecus glesne, known as the King of Herrings or Giant Oarfish, was found dead in the small fishing village of Bovallstrand on Sweden’s west coast, about 90 kilometers (56 miles) from the Norwegian border.

“Down at the water, there was something big floating. At first we thought it was a big piece of plastic. But then we saw an eye. I went down to check and saw that it was this extremely strange fish,” Kurt Ove Eriksson, the passer-by who found the specimen, told daily Svenska Dagbladet.

The rarely seen regalecus, the world’s longest bony fish, can reach up to 12 meters.

No, it is a big deal:

“The last time we saw a King of Herrings in Sweden was in 1879,” the House of the Sea museum in Lysekil, where the fish was taken to, said in a statement.

Some say the fish is dead.

I think Herring the Grey will be replaced by Herring the White.

Chanting Points Memo: The Black Bag

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

You pretty much expect the DFL to lie about things; they’re stuck behind an administration that is becoming less popular daily and a Congress that might, maybe, outpoll Charles Manson.  They’re strapped to a Healthcare bill that is about to blow up in their faces, electorally. 

And at a time when jobs are tight and even legal immigrants have had enough of illegal immigration, they are flogging the idea of open borders.

The facts of their own positions are against them.  You can hardly expect them not to aim for the gutter.

This little fella’s name is Robert Erickson.  He joined the Emmer “Cinco De Mayo” parade – but he’s no Emmer supporter:

The handmade sign says Your Papers Please.

The handmade sign says "Your Papers Please".

He writes a leftyblog called “Columbus Go Home” (I’m not going to link it; too depressing).  If you see him at a parade, he should be politely asked to leave.

Since the Democrats have no actual counterarguments, and they’re losing in all the polls that matter, we have to be all the more vigilant about things like false-flag dirty tricks and dumbed down chanting points like these…

 

Macalester Coeds display their solidarity with their Latina sistas.

Macalester coeds display their solidarity with their Latina sistas.

…aimed at voters who just don’t know any better, it’s vital the Republican activists watch out for things like Mr. Erickson, with too much time on their hands and too little respect for other’s free speech.

WELCOME, “PHOENIX WOMAN” READERS: Glad you stopped by!  Just to clarify, though – whenever leftybloggers say that people like me “seethe with envy” or are “having a cow” or are “melting down”, they are pulling it (to phrase it in Latin, which is so much classier than English) De Anus

Of course, “she” would be accountable for this sort of thing – if she blogged under her actual name.

Perhaps that’s why “she” stays anonymous…

Oy

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

As long as I can remember, American Jews have regarded Israel about the same way as northeastern Catholics look at abortion; something that’s supposed to be of overriding importance, but doesn’t really affect their voting patterns.

But Obama’s radical dissociation from Israel, and his shameless treatment of Prime Minister Netanyahu, seems to be provoking a change.  I heard these numbers over the weekend, while interviewing Mark Miller of the Republican Jewish Coalition; for the first time,   American Jews are souring on Obama and the Democrats:

United States President Barack Obama has lost nearly half of his support among American Jews, a poll by the McLaughlin Group has shown.

The US Jews polled were asked whether they would: (a) vote to re-elect Obama, or (b) consider voting for someone else. 42% said they would vote for Obama and 46%, a plurality, preferred the second answer. 12% said they did not know or refused to answer.

Now, that doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll go to the GOP endorsee; that’s the GOP’s job to take care of.

Still, you don’t see these kinds of numbers every day:

In the Presidential elections of 2008, 78% of Jewish voters, or close to 8 out of 10, chose Obama. The McLaughlin poll held nearly 18 months later, in April 2010, appears to show that support is down to around 4 out of 10.

The poll showed that key voter segments including Orthodox/Hassidic voters, Conservative voters, voters who have friends and family in Israel and those who have been to Israel, are all more likely to consider voting for someone other than Obama.

Among Orthodox/Hassidic voters, 69% marked ‘someone else’ vs. 17% who marked ‘re-elect.’ Among Conservative-affiliated voters the proportion was 50% to 38%. Among Reform Jews, a slim majority of 52% still supported Obama while 36% indicated they would consider someone else. Among Jews with family in Israel and those who had been to Israel, about 50% said they would consider someone else…

It’s still two and a half years ’til the election, so nobody needs to get excited.  But not since Reagan have we seen such an erosion among Jewish support for the Democrats.

Because The Media Says There’s A Problem, That’s Why

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Bob Collins at MPR’s NewsCut NewsQ Gather.com posts a picture…:

Notice the sign with the little arrow by it?

Notice the sign with the little arrow by it? Click for a larger view. Photo by Bob Collins.

…showing a sign saying “Tax Cuts: Even A Monkey Can Do It”.   That’d be one sign, out of hundreds of signs and thousands of people at the Jason Lewis Tax Cut rally, with a (possibly) racist overtone.

Was that the sign’s intent?  “A monkey could do it” is a not-uncommon way of saying “Duh”; the Bush years saw more than a few “Chimp” references that passed without (disapproving) comment from the mainstream media.

If it was racist – was it a tax protester, or one of the ringers sent from the left to stand by the media’s cameras to smear the tea party?

We don’t know.  Bob Collins didn’t check.  Perhaps it was because it didn’t fit the narrative that the media has set up about the Tea Party, which both the WaPo article and (wittingly or not) Collins extend – that it’s racist until proven otherwise.  Or maybe he didn’t feel like walking through the crowd to check.  We’ll never know.  For the media’s narrative about the Tea Parties, “knowing” might be inconvenient.

Not sure if Bob ever asked Jess Mador how many racists signs were at the 4/15 rally?  There were none.  Partly, I’m sure, because the Tea Party publicized the fact that its security people would have cameras, and would be actively looking for scabrous signs, to post on blogs and run down identities.  I’m not sure that that would have kept a racist away – it’s not like they read blogs.  We don’t know.  But there was not one single racist sign at the rally, and near as we can tell only one questionable one at the Jason Lewis rally last weekend.

Collins adds a bit from a WaPo article quoting a few Tea Partiers and bunch of Democrat pundits saying the Tea Party is “fighting a perception” of racism – that, nobody adds, was largely a media meme in the first place, borne of cameras lingering and editors drooling over signs at previous rallies that were – let’s be blunt – spectacularly non-representative of the Tea Parties as a whole.  “But nearly three in 10 see racial prejudice as underlying the tea party”, the article says, elaborating that “About 61 percent of tea party opponents say racism has a lot to do with the movement, a view held by just 7 percent of tea party supporters.”  In other words, the left – which includes the media – spreads the meme that supports their prejudices; the Tea Party itself rebukes the idea.

How to get to the bottom of this?

I invite Bob Collins to come with me to the next Tea Party event.  We’ll skip the usual MPR Reporter drill – hanging out in front of the crowd taping speakers.  We can wander around there the real fun is; the middle of the crowd, the fringers, the vendor row, where all the real conversation happens.  Y’know – doing a crowd on the dynamics of a grass-roots movement by actually meeting the movement.

Pass the word.

Minor Surprise

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

This story caught me just a tad off-guard:

Minnesota’s largest teachers union has thrown its support behind Democrat Margaret Anderson Kelliher’s campaign for governor.

Education Minnesota endorsed Kelliher on Saturday after a yearlong search.

Normally I’d say “after a year-long search for what – someone who could spell?”, but this year is a little different.  Matt Entenza founded MN2020 in large part to curry favor with public employees unions (leading to hatchet jobs like last  year’s jihad against charter schools, which beggared fact but, one would suspect, buffed his cred with the MFT.

I’m going to guess that the union chose long-term political infrastructure over short-term favor-banking.

I thought this was an interesting statement:

Union president Tom Dooher said in a news release that Kelliher shares the union’s determination to create an education funding system that is sustainable and sufficient.

Huh?

Achievement gap?  Minority dropout rates?  Bad math and science scores?

No.  Stable funding is the priority.

Fall Gelb

Monday, May 10th, 2010

It was seventy years ago today that Germany executed Fall Gelb– “Case Yellow” – the codename for the invasion of Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourge.  About three weeks later, the operation continued with Fall Rot – “Case Red”, the invasion of France.  We’ll come back to that one in a bit.  Both nations – low-lying, largely few natural defenses other than the Rhein and Maas rivers, and saddled with the same sort of preventive neutrality that Norway tried to practice, fell quickly.

Rotterdam bombed by the Germans

Rotterdam bombed by the Germans

The Germans’ goals weren’t just taking the three small countries – although Germany craved ports on the North Sea and, eventually, the Atlantic.  The primary goal was to sucker the French Army to send their best troops charging into Belgium (along with their British allies) to the rescue – and to get cut off in Belgium and Northern France, while the Germans outflanked the Maginot line and charged into the heart of France.

The entire campaign was, in other words, a hip fake.

German Pzkw II tank in Holland in 1940.  Outclassed by many French and British tanks, it nonetheless was often found where they werent.

German Pzkw II tank in Holland in 1940. Outclassed by many French and British tanks, it nonetheless was often found where thos tanks weren't.

But it was a very risky hip fake.  The Germans were trying to capture both countries with a minimum of force, to conserve troops for the real battle, taking out France and destroying or capturing the British Army on the continent.  Many of the German troops were older reservists, from units that had been only half-trained.  The Germans’ best troops – their most experienced Panzer divisions, their first-line infantry – were being saved for the push into France.

The Germans employed the first of what we’d today call “commando raids” to take a key obstacle, the Belgian fort at Eben Emael, manned by over a thousand Belgian troops with artillery and machine guns, which covered the key crossings of the Albert Canal and the Meuse/Maas river.

Armored observation cupola at Eben Emael, with a view of the terrain the Germans would have to cross.  From this cupola, an observer would call down artillery fire on attackers.

Armored observation cupola at Eben Emael, with a view of the terrain the Germans would have to cross. From this cupola, an observer would call down artillery fire on attackers.

A force of 78 German paratroops landed in gliders on the fairly undefended roof of the fort, and planted armor-piercing explosives on the gun turrets, silencing the fort’s main defense until the rest of the German army could cross the bridges below.

The German paratroopers that captured Eben Emael

The German paratroopers that captured Eben Emael

Paratroops were the solution to a more difficult problem in the Netherlands.  The Dutch had, since the 1600s, planned to defend the economic and industrial heartland of their flat, almost indefensible country by flooding the low-lying farmland east of Utrecht.  The “Waterlinie“, or Water Line, created a putative “Fortress Holland”, effectively turning the nation’s heartland into a peninsula, nearly an island,with its east covered by the Water Line and a chain of forts, and the south by the Rhein River.

A Dutch fort/gun position astride one of the dijks at the edge of the Water Line.  The dijk would be the only safe, dry road through the waterlogged, trench-ridden landscape.  Dutch soldiers, so the plan went, would make sure invaders got an even drier welcome.

A Dutch fort/gun position astride one of the dijks at the edge of the Water Line. The dijk would be the only safe, dry road through the waterlogged, trench-ridden landscape. Dutch soldiers, so the plan went, would make sure invaders got an even drier welcome.

The Dutch flooded the water line well before the German invasion.  But German paratroops captured the bridges over the Rhein, and poured troops across under complete air superiority, outflanking the Water Line for the first time since the 1600s, dooming the nation’s resistance.

The Netherlands fell, effectively, in a matter of days.  Belgium held on longer – but it was, in fact, irrelevant in the greater scheme of things.

But as we’ve observed in the previous parts of this series, on the invasions of Poland, Norway and Denmark – American education has been sorely lacking at this part of history, unless the goal is to teach people media myths, not merely American but in fact German.

Over the decades, plenty of wives’ tales have come to be accepted as common currency.

“The Low Countries were weak and pathetic“.  Well, yes and no.

Belgium and the Netherlands both realized, as did Norway and Denmark before them, that they had no chance fighting against any of the major powers, Britain or France or especially Germany.  And like Norway and Denmark before them, they had spent most of the years since World War I embracing strict neutrality; not taking either side in any war.  Of course, watching the world order fraying after about 1936 had caused alarm in both nations (and watching the Japanese grow ever more militaristic also spurred the Dutch, who at the time owned Indonesia as a colony) into belated action.  Both nations started rebuilding their long-neglected defenses; both were too late, of course, but it wasn’t without effect.

The Dutch submarine O19.  When it was built, it was perhaps the best submarine in the world.  It served with distinction through the war, being lost when it ran on an uncharted reef in 1945; its crew was rescued by an Ameircan submarine.

The Dutch submarine O19. When it was built, it was perhaps the best submarine in the world. It served with distinction through the war, being lost when it ran on an uncharted reef in 1945; its crew was rescued by an Ameircan submarine.

Along with the successful raids on Eben Email and the bridges to bypass the Water Line, the Germans tried again to cut the head off the Dutch Government and capture Queen Wilhelmina, landing paratroops at three airfields around the Dutch summer capitol at Den Haag.   The paratroops suffered terrible casualties at each of the airfields; worse, the paratroops were unable to secure the area around the airports, so Dutch anti-aircraft fire destroyed many planed bringing reinforcements.

German Junkers 52 transport, destroyed on the ground at a Den Haag airfield by Dutch infantry.

German Junkers 52 transport, destroyed on the ground at a Den Haag airfield by Dutch infantry.

Finally, Dutch counterattacks led each of the raids to retreat, with heavy casualties; over a thousand paratroopers were captured, and between Dutch antiaircraft fire and planes being caught on the ground by the Dutch infantry, the Luftwaffe lost half of its entire air transport fleet – losses that it keenly felt later in the war.  The German paratroopers themselves were bled white by the resistance, and between the terrible losses in Holland and even worse losses the following year on Crete, the disaster led to the German airborne arm being grounded the rest of the war.  Queen Wilhelmina, like Norwegian King Haakon before her, fled to the UK to lead a government in exile, lending the Dutch puppet government no legitimacy.

As the German panzers approached Rotterdam, the German paratroops that had taken the bridges tried to force their way across; a company of Dutch Marines in their striking black uniforms stood in the way.  For the better part of four days. the Marines kept the two German forces apart, denying them one of their key routes into Fortress Holland.  This resistance was a key part of the Germans’ decision, on May 14, to terror-bomb Rotterdam – the first of many terror-bombings in the West – and the threat of many more such attacks.  The threat – and the carnage in Rotterdam, with 800 civilians dead – led to the Dutch government’s surrender.

And it was only then that the Marines gave up.  The German commander was shocked; he expected a battalion of 800 Marijniers; as he saw the survivors of the company – 100 men and change – emerge from the rubble, he ordered his own troops to salute them.

According to Walter Lord in Miracle at Dunkirk, the Germans ranked their opponents in descending order of ferocity, tenacity and courage at the end of the 1940 campaign, according to the observations of German units in the field.

In order, they were the Dutch, Belgians, British, and finally the French.

The French Were Cowards:  We’ll talk more about this in a few weeks, when we get to the actual invasion of France.  But suffice to say it’s a lot more complicated than that.

While the histories of the era relate the supremacy of the German “Panzers” – tanks – in fact the French had more, and largely better, tanks than the Germans.  It’s a truism among military geeks that the French employed their tanks badly, spreading them all over the front while the Germans concentrated theirs in a tight mass of steel that was sent slicing through the lines into the enemy’s rear.

But the French met the Germans in the biggest tank battle in history (until the huge battles in North Africa and Russia later in the war), the Battle of Hannut, in which French tank and infantry, fighting with the kind of skill that the legends of French cowardice have found too inconvenient to remember, held the Germans to a tactical draw and an operational defeat. halting a German armored advance.

French tanks, destroyed in action at Hannut.

French tanks, destroyed in action at Hannut.

The French victory turned out to be more or less irrelevant – the real attack came a few days later, through the Ardennes Forest, the same place where Germans had attacked to rout the French and Belgians in 1871 and 1914, and where they’d surprise the Americans in the winter of 1944.   This attack caught the French, Belgians and British by surprise, crossing the Meuse river (in one of the cases where French troops – thirty-something reservists, mostly – actually did break and run under heavy attack from German Stukas.  The attack drove straight to the English channel in a matter of four days, cutting off the troops that had prevailed at Hannut and many other places along the northern front.

And it was there, really, that the Battle of France was decided.  France’s best troops – their elite, their best-equipped, their tanks, their best of everything – had raced north to rescue the Belgians.   Although three weeks and change would pass before the actual invasion of France, the initial plan – to draw the French and British into Belgium and cut them off – succeeded brilliantly.  The entire British Expeditionary Force, and a third of the entire French Army, was trapped in Belgium and  northern France.  They would engage in an epic retreat to Dunkirk, and be snatched from the jaws of disaster by an epic national response…

…but we’ll get to that in a few weeks.

Conventional Delusion

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Eric “Big E” Pusey of the Minnesota “Progressive” Project has the wonks disease, and he’s got it bad.

He’s all atwitter about the current bit of conventional wisdom – that Tom Horner of the Ventura “Independence” Party is going to soak enough votes away from Emmer to tip the election.

Yesterday, the Independence Party nominated former Republican Tom Horner as their MN-GOV candidate. Horner’s entrance into this race makes it far more likely that a DFLer will win in November.

But for Jesse Ventura, the “Indpendence” party – which has its roots in Ross Perot’s “Reform” Party, although Ventura pretty well roto-rooted any Perot connection when he took over the Minnesota chapter – has been nothing but a spoiler, with varying success.  It’s likely Tim Penny soaked away the votes that might have put Roger Moe in office eight years ago; for that, we owe Penny our thanks.  The brittle, petulant Dean Barkley likely made the Franken/Coleman race as close as it was. 

And…:

In 2006, Peter Hutchinson won the IP endorsement and split the moderates with liberal tendencies away from DFLer Mike Hatch, but Horner will have little appeal to these voters. No, Horner will be peeling away moderate conservatives who cannot stomach Tom Emmer’s far right agenda.

That depends on a couple of big “ifs”.

First, Horner (and the DFL wonks that will be providing most of his PR “oomph”, to the extent that he has any) will have to convince “moderate Republicans” that Emmer is “far right”.  He’s not.  He states a pretty solid meat and potatoes pro-growth case;  he’s not even campaigning on social issues at all, except by example.

Horner will have to convince people in a very Reagan-y year to vote for another Arne Carlson. 

And he’ll have to do it with very little money. Although the IP has managed to maintain its grip on major-party status by the barest of margins (with attendant waste of state campaign funds going to their little vanity exercise), that’s about it.  There’s no big push for Horner anywhere (but the DFL); there’s no “Hornmentum”.

This also makes the road for Margaret Anderson-Kelliher easier if she ends up winning the August DFL primary.  Instead of needing to make sure a moderate candidate with liberal tendencies (like Hutchinson) doesn’t peel away her voters, she needs to focus on higher turnout in key DFL areas.

While in the meantime Emmer builds up votes on his home turf – the “Key MNGOP areas of everywhere but Minneapolis, Saint Paul and Duluth” – and Horner builds up his home turf…

…oh, wait.  He has none. 

Let’s get serious here.  Any “moderate” “Republican” who is wobbly on Emmer (and we’re not talking Seifert people, here; we’re talking the party’s less-and-less consequential Arne Carlson/Dave Durenberger wing) is probably every big as fair game for a DFLer to pick off as the underfunded, under-charisma’d, under-interesting Horner.

But we’ll see, soon enough.

Suffice to say that if Emmer wins, I’m going to have a huge “conventional wisdom” bonfire this November.

UPDATE:  The more I think about this, the more wrong Pusey’s “conventional wisdom” seems. 

Kelliher, Dayton and Entenza are all farther to the left than Emmer is, especially when you consider that the “Center” has displaced to the right since 2008.  I think it’s distinctly possible that Horner could leach more votes from the DFL. 

That is, of course, based on a couple of assumptions:

  1. Emmer continues to run his current cool, calm, collected campaign.  I believe that the wave of provocations – the ugly racist heckling at the May Day and Cinco De Mayo parades, Kelliher’s alleged chanting “KKK Go Away”, and so on – are attempts to try to break Emmer’s cool, to try get him to lose his purported short temper.   It’s not going to work; Seifert’s people tried and failed to get him off the high road, it’s for damn sure the DFL can’t. 
  2. The DFL nominates a DFLer.

I am not a betting man – but if I were, I’d say we have another log of conventional wisdom for the bonfire.

Stateswomanly

Monday, May 10th, 2010

The Tom Emmer campaign has been aggressively pushing itself into places where, the conventional wisdom says, Republicans just don’t go.  Right after the MNGOP convention, Emmer paraded at the Longfellow May Day parade, promting all manor of victorian vapours among the lefty pundits who have, for some reason, stopped being big champions of the First Amendment since Barack Obama took office.

Last weekend it was the Cinco De Mayo parade, on Saint Paul’s West Side.  The Bill Jungbauer campaign blog  observed some intensely bigoted behavior…:

Another event that was totally outrageous occurred when we passed the dfl booth. About fifteen people stood in front of the booth in the street and chanted loudly in our faces, “KKK go away.”

And an interesting VIP (emphasis added):

Among the crowd was none other than Margaret Anderson-Kelliher, the endorsed democratic candidate for governor. The fascist, tax and spend feminazi was the ring leader amongst her merry band of liberals. So, rather than everyone sharing in our right to free speech and expression, these leftists, led by MAK, chose to disrupt and disturb us and those around us. The wonderful people of the community who only wanted to enjoy their celebration stood in witness to MAK and the democrats leftist hatred, exposing to us all their true fascist tendencies.

I don’t like bandying the “F” word around pointlessly – and I personally would like some third-party verification – but if a candidate herself gathers a pack of supporters, not to question or counterdemonstrate, but to heckle her opponent with defamatory ad-hominem, it’s not all that far off the beam.

What do you Democrats have to say about your endorsed candidate engaging in that kind of behavior?

Isn’t this the “angry” “provocation” that you are all mewling about the GOP doing (without, as always, providing any examples)?

UPDATE:  We may have video on the way shortly.  Stay tuned.

Busy

Monday, May 10th, 2010

I love this story:  the world’s biggest beaver dam has been discovered in Canada:

A Canadian ecologist has discovered the world’s largest beaver dam in a remote area of northern Alberta, an animal-made structure so large it is visible from space.

Researcher Jean Thie said Wednesday he used satellite imagery and Google Earth software to locate the dam, which is about 850 metres (2,800 feet) long on the southern edge of Wood Buffalo National Park.

Average beaver dams in Canada are 10 to 100 metres long, and only rarely do they reach 500 metres.

First discovered in October 2007, the gigantic dam is located in a virtually inaccessible part of the park south of Lac Claire, about 190 kilometres (120 miles) northeast of Fort McMurray.

The dam’s been underway for decades.

Impressively, it’s a bit of infrastructure that’s been built with no debt and no tax hikes on the local population.

In other Canadian rodent news, the Lemming population is working on their mass transit system.

Obama: “Information Is Ignorance, Peasants”

Monday, May 10th, 2010

President condemns ubiquitous dissent:

“You’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t always rank all that high on the truth meter,” Obama said at Hampton University, Virginia.

[Like “the only reason not to support Obama is his skin color?” – Ed]

“With iPods and iPads and Xboxes and PlayStations, — none of which I know how to work — information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation,” Obama said.

What an incredibly illogical statement – unless by “empowerment”, he means government power.

He bemoaned the fact that “some of the craziest claims can quickly claim traction,” in the clamor of certain blogs and talk radio outlets.”

All of this is not only putting new pressures on you, it is putting new pressures on our country and on our democracy.”

In other words, the President doesn’t trust the peasants with all of that crazy infomacation.

Heard In Conversation

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

Norann Dillon’s website; she’s running for MN Senate against Terri Bonoff in District 43.

Mark Miller of the Republican Jewish coaltion’s email is “mille399” at the domain tc.umn.edu.

They’d both love to hear from  you.

--> Site Meter -->