Author Archive

Hot Gear Friday

Friday, July 17th, 2009

My posse and I are heading to Wisconsin later today and decided to jump in last-minute with a bunch of other colleagues that are going on a seven-hour tour bike tour of the Milwaukee area tomorrow morning. Normally, the three of us are Harley guys but the dealership didn’t have enough units due to our late entry.

So we’ll suffer along on these three machines…

…a 1203cc V-Twin Buell Ulysses XB12XT

…an 1125cc V-Twin Buell 1125R

…and a Harley Street Rod.

You won’t be hearing from me for a few days.

She’s Lying

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

…and she’s pretty good at it too.

I spent a fair amount of time watching video excerpts of the Sotomayor hearings last night.

Initially, her cool, calculated and over-enunciated responses disarmed me and left me thinking if we have to live with a SCOTUS appointee borne of Comrade Obama’s rule of the administrative branch any way, I can live with this.

…and then I slapped myself.

She’s good…or her coach is.

Sotomayor: “No, sir. As I’ve indicated, my record shows that at no point or time have I ever permitted my personal views or sympathies to influence an outcome of a case. In every case where I have identified a sympathy, I have articulated it and explained to the litigant why the law requires a different result. … I do not permit my sympathies, personal views, or prejudices to influence the outcome of my cases.”

Her repeated assertions that forging policy remains the domain of Congress flies in the face of…

Court of appeals is where policy is made…and I know, I know this is on tape and I should never say that”

I found her responses in sharp contradiction with the record she ironically kept referring to and moreover with her own widely-publicized statements of the past.

Judge Sonia Sotomayor said President Barack Obama didn’t ask her about abortion before her U.S. Supreme Court nomination, as she renewed her promise to lawmakers that she would interpret the law impartially.

“I was asked no questions by anyone including the president about my views on any specific legal issue,”

True or not, this is really immaterial. He didn’t have to. Her record and public statements are well documented. She is likely a token appointee. Furthermore, vetting has not been a strength of the Obama administration.

She is by no means unqualified – but is she suitable? Did President Obama select the best candidate at hand, or the best “Wise Latina?”

I’d like to hear what our crew of commenters think of Sotomayor and her confirmation hearings.

  1. Do you think it’s a waste of time (she’s going to be confirmed any way)?
  2. Do you believe her assertions these past couple of days or is she just reading from a prepared inventory of talking points?
  3. Does she really disagree with the president who said “[in] 95 percent of the cases, the law will give you the answer, and the last 5 percent legal process will not lead you to the rule of decision. The critical ingredient in those cases is supplied by what is in the judge’s heart.? Eighty percent of judging is the law”?
  4. Does her judgment of the New Haven, Connecticut firefighters race-bias lawsuit, subsequently overturned, unwind her repeated “look at my record” plea?
  5. How would the court (or your life) be impacted by the addition of Sotomayor, judging by her record and not her testimony?

The Matrix: Natural Selection Meets Text Messaging

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

A fifteen-year-old girl is texting while walking along a sidewalk with a friend and falls into an open manhole that workers were just about to cone off (allegedly).

She’s okay. Her parents want to sue. But who is really at fault here?

Now the important questions here are:

  1. How did both people miss an open manhole directly in their path?
  2. Did the text “Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Ooof! OMG! Mother.” make it to the other party?”
  3. Would cordoning off a manhole with “Men Working” signs and orange cones have stopped an iPhone-thumbing teen any way?
  4. Why are street-level utility portals called manholes? Why not personholes?

These are questions for all mankind.

Watch the video and discuss.

In related news: Oprah Spares Two Entire Families from Falling Down a Personhole

Because I Say So

Saturday, July 11th, 2009

The Teleprompter in Chief defies reality, regurgitating well-worn propaganda that flies in the face of reality as revealed in real numbers.

President Barack Obama said his $787 billion stimulus bill “has worked as intended” as he pushed back against Republican criticism that his recovery program has failed to rescue the economy.

“It has already extended unemployment insurance and health insurance to those who have lost their jobs in this recession”

…which is a good thing, and probably all the “Stimuless” spending package should been enacted to do; provide a safety net. The rest of the plan is a combination of deferred liberal agendas and political payback.

Meanwhile, unemployment continues to rise, oil prices are falling (which believe it or not is bad), and the stock market has fallen four weeks in a row in anticipation of an extended worldwide recession as global government borrowing digs an ever-deepening crevasse.

Oil prices and the stock market are accepted leading indicators. Obama’s rhetoric has no substantive or predictive value whatsoever.

In asking for public patience, Obama said the recovery act “wasn’t designed to restore the economy to full health on its own, but to provide the boost necessary to stop the free fall.”

This is what you call backpedaling – where are even some of our 2-3 Million New Jobs? – a number Barack Obama pulled from his backside some time ago – why is unemployment above 8% and still rising? If this is not a free fall….

…the bill “was designed to spur demand and get people spending again and cushion those who had borne the brunt of the crisis,” the president said.

Both missions: Unaccomplished.

Obama said the measure “was not designed to work in four months — it was designed to work over two years.”

“Remember, we’re only 140 days into this deal,” Biden said in a speech in Cincinnati. “It’s supposed to take 18 months.”

Well, at least you guys have your stories straight.

I’m just saying…

Friday, July 10th, 2009

Does That Work?

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

“Viagra and Candy.”

Warren Buffet:

The Legendary Investor Is Critical of the First Stimulus Package, Comparing It to Viagra and Candy.

…and yet he condones another stimulus package, as if the same people that designed the first one will get it right next time.

Warren: stick to picking stocks. You’ve not been so great at that either of late.

Stimulus Package

Thursday, July 9th, 2009

4-5-6-7-8-9

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

At 4:05:06 tomorrow morning, 7/8/09….

Although the alignment may not mean anything specific, it could be a good day to do something for yourself and others, said Betsy Carlson, a Palm Springs tarot card reader and numerology expert.

Hey Betsy, interested in running for Senator?  (I digress again)

“It’s a good day to make money and have good health,” she said.

The sum of the time’s digits equals six, if all numbers are added until there’s a single figure left (4+5+6=15; 1+5=6).

Also, the numbers within the date add up to eight.

According to numerology, No. 6 represents providing a good service to humanity, while No. 8 represents making money and being healthy, Carlson said.

Add all the numbers together and you get 39, the percentage that worldwide CO2 will increase to by 2030 (eek!), and a Song by Queen about “twenty volunteers who leave a dying Earth on a spaceship in search of new worlds to settle.”

Like, way cool dude.

As for me, I’m going to get up early and clip my toenails. This was a good reminder.

He’s Qualified

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Go for it Alec!

Emmy Award winner Alec Baldwin is eyeing a post-acting career that could take him off a Hollywood soundstage into the halls of Congress.

Why not? He’s no less qualified than some recent office-holders including a Fake Wrestler, a Neighborhood Organizer, an Action Hero and a Pornographer-er I mean Satirist.

A native New Yorker, Baldwin said he has been approached by an unnamed Democratic law firm who wanted him to run for governor of Ohio, and he has also considered moving to New Jersey or Connecticut to run for office. “I’d love to run against Joe Lieberman,” Baldwin said of the Independent Democratic senator who is no favorite of the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. But Baldwin dismissed the idea, saying “It’s all fantasy.”

Congratulations Minnesota – you’ve started a Saturday Night Live Carpetbagging trend!

Baldwin, who currently stars in the NBC comedy “30 Rock,” told Playboy magazine that he is seriously considering running for Congress. But he acknowledged his opponents would have plenty of fodder to use against him.

Playboy? Isn’t that where our Senator From New York published his thesis?

A Bit Too Small

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Last month our Supreme Leader was quoted as saying “I’m not naive,” words that history will make famous some day. His advisors, being liberals, have only one lever to pull. Having pulled it harder than its ever been pulled before and to no avail, their advice?

The U.S. should consider drafting a second stimulus package focusing on infrastructure projects because the $787 billion approved in February was “a bit too small,” said Laura Tyson, an adviser to President Barack Obama.

“A bit too small.” Who are these people? Should it have had an “eency weency bit more pork?” Doubling it would not incent businesses to hire new employees right now or convince consumers to stop saving and start spending (hey, they’re smarter than the people they elected – maybe there is Hope®).

The Obama stimulus already is the New Larger Size version of the failed Bush stimulus. Remember?

Hmm, what sort of policy would have incented hiring and spending? That’s a tough one. Anyone?

“The economy is worse than we forecast on which the stimulus program was based,” Tyson, who is a member of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory board, told the Nomura Equity Forum. “We probably have already 2.5 million more job losses than anticipated.”

Let me tweak that comment for you Ms. Tyson: “The economy is worse than we forecast because of the stimulus program.” Washington D.C. should be renamed “Ground Zero.”

The stimulus program will result in higher inflation and will require higher taxes. The anticipation of both is already putting pressure on businesses, who will continue to run as lean as they can for a long, long time. In fact, business owners are in fear of the government’s next move. Employees know this. The trickle-down effect is that even those that have jobs are hoarding cash and cutting expenditures.

Not very stimulating.

Maybe we should follow the MAC’s proposed signage plan and apply it to the economy. Let’s put up $2 Million signs everywhere “Be Happy. Spend Money.”

Tyson, 62, later told reporters that the U.S. can afford to pay for a second package, even as the fiscal deficit soars. She said the budget shortfall is “likely to be worse” than the equivalent of 12 percent of gross domestic product that the administration forecast for 2009 and the 8 percent to 9 percent it projected for next year.

We can “afford to pay” is an egregious choice of words given the fact that no one is “paying” – we are borrowing. I suppose her assessment is based on the fact that China hasn’t canceled our Visa card yet.

Tyson said the U.S. should shift away from its dependence on consumption to grow, and promote expansion through investment and exports. The dollar will need to weaken in the longer term to promote export-led growth, she said.

So, we shouldn’t consume, but let’s hope the rest of the world does? Remember kids what liberals mean when they say “investment?” I wonder how my Social Security “investments” are doing?

I think you’ve done enough to weaken the dollar in the long term Ms. Tyson. Thank you.

The Obama administration and its advisors are not naive; they know exactly what they are doing. They are holding the economy hostage until they get their way, executing an agenda despite its effects on the economy and leaving the “fixing” to the next administration.

More on the Californication of America

Monday, July 6th, 2009

Barack Obama’s liberal ideology, lack of economic acumen coupled with a growing gap between what he thinks America wants (or should want) and what it actually wants, puts him on a Highway to Heckfire®.

The California morass has Democrats in Washington trembling. The reason is simple. If Obama’s health-care plan passes, then we may well end up paying for it with federal slips of paper worth less than California’s. Obama has bet everything on passing health care this year. The publicity surrounding the California debt fiasco almost assures his resounding defeat.

California offers us a glimpse. Obama calls it Hope® and Change®.

It takes years and years to make a mess as terrible as the California debacle, but the recipe is simple. All that you need is two political parties that are always willing to offer easy government solutions for every need of the voters, but never willing to make the tough decisions necessary to finance the government largess that results.

Oops. Too late. We’ve arrived. Obama and Company is on pace to do it in months and months.

The federal picture is so bleak because the Obama administration is the most fiscally irresponsible in the history of the U.S. I would imagine that he would be the intergalactic champion as well, if we could gather the data on deficits on other worlds. Obama has taken George W. Bush’s inattention to deficits and elevated it to an art form.

The Obama administration has no shame, and is willing to abandon reason altogether to achieve its short-term political goals. Ronald Reagan ran up big deficits in part because he believed that his tax cuts would produce economic growth, and ultimately pay for themselves. He may well have been excessively optimistic about the merits of tax cuts, but at least he had a story.

Obama has no story. Nobody believes that his unprecedented expansion of the welfare state will lead to enough economic growth. Nobody believes that it will pay for itself. Everyone understands that higher spending today begets higher spending tomorrow. That means that his economic strategy simply doesn’t add up.

Teleprompters don’t do math.

Poll: You Can Call Me Al

Sunday, July 5th, 2009

Color me surprised, but as of this posting, the clear initial winner was “The Senator from New York”

After recounting and recounting however, I was able to arrive at a result more in keeping with the end I had in mind. I will hereby refer to The Senator from New York as Stuart Smalley, and in limited engagements Big Fat Idiot.

Thank you for your participation. I apologize for your disenfranchisement*.

*Yes, that’s a word.

2.2 Million Dollar Sign of the Times

Sunday, July 5th, 2009

In 2008, 34 Million passengers traveled via Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport.

Faced with complaints that an estimated 20,000 people show up at the wrong terminal each year, MAC has been considering proposals to change the terminal names on the signs and list the airlines that fly out of each terminal.

In 2008, 34 Million passengers traveled via Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport.

If 20,000 people can’t make it to the right terminal, that’s 0.059%; less than six in ten thousand people.

The price tag to make sure people get to the right terminal at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport has soared to $2.2 million, more than twice the original estimate.

When the revised proposal goes before the committee, Hogan predicted that the new cost estimate will be a consideration in how the vote goes. “But in the big scheme of things, we just spent $3 billion to improve the airport, and if there are still people having trouble getting to the right terminal, that’s a small price to pay.”

The last sentence of that paragraph is rather demonstrative as to why government shouldn’t be in business, health care – or running airports for that matter.

In 2008, 34 Million passengers traveled via Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport.

Over 90,000 people travel through our airport per day. 20,000 per year can’t discern the difference between “Lindberg” and “Humphrey.”

34,000,000

vs.

20,000

Managing to the exception needlessly costs taxpayers and travelers.

There will always be percentage of people who can’t figure out where they’re going and as the percentages get smaller, the resources to required to remedy the CRISIS(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) increase exponentially. Spending $2.2M of OPM is easy when there is no accountability; no career repercussions for spending resources foolishly.

An expenditure judged to be a waste in a well-run corporation is deemed an “investment” by government.

That’s Not What We Meant

Saturday, July 4th, 2009

President BHO enlisted the support of our forefathers against their will in his 4th of July radio address.

He said the same “unyielding spirit” that drove the pioneers and Depression-era workers was needed now to push for a national health care overhaul, make major energy policy changes, and deal with a struggling economy, he said in his weekly address.

“We are not a people who fear the future. We are a people who make it,” he said. “And on this July 4th, we need to summon that spirit once more. We need to summon the same spirit that inhabited Independence Hall two hundred and thirty-three years ago today.”

Yeah, I am pretty sure our forefathers, having fled tyranny, taxation without representation, and the plundering and ravaging of Great Britain were thinking big government, a huge national debt, unfair and burdensome tax codes, an administration seeking to usurp “checks and balances,” post-modern moral relativity, and “dialogue” with the enemies of freedom and human rights. That’s not what drove them to endure the hardships of an oceanic voyage and a revolutionary war.

That is the spirit we are called to show once more. We are facing an array of challenges on a scale unseen in our time. We are waging two wars. We are battling a deep recession. And our economy – and our nation itself – are endangered by festering problems we have kicked down the road for far too long: spiraling health care costs; inadequate schools; and a dependence on foreign oil.

Meeting these extraordinary challenges will require an extraordinary effort on the part of every American. And that is an effort we cannot defer any longer.

…so let’s borrow 800 Billion Dollars. If that’s not a deferral, I don’t know what is. Oh, and not every American. Just the 40% or so that actually pay taxes. True to form, there is no mention of the federal government’s part in our current malaise.

Now is the time to reform an unsustainable health care system that is imposing crushing costs on families, businesses, large and small, and state and federal budgets. We need to protect what works, fix what’s broken, and bring down costs for all Americans. No more talk. (No more talk? Then what do we need Obama for?-JR) No more delay. Health care reform must happen this year.

…because dagnabbit, only 80% of Americans are satisfied with the current system.

One can imagine the disgust John F. Kennedy (“Ask not…”) would have, let alone our forefathers, if they could see rugged individualism replaced by a nanny state, the enabling of bad personal decisions, the welfare rolls both individually and coporate, IOU’s issued by states, the US Federal Government  becoming one of the largest employers in the world, the interpretation or utter disregard for our Constitution by our courts; and more recently what the Obama administration and our liberal congress have proposed in the name of “Progress” in America.

They might have stayed home.

Now That’s Funny Right There, I Don’t Care Who You Are: Stephen Colbert on Anderson Cooper

Saturday, July 4th, 2009

You Can Call Me Al

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

As you know, Johnny Roosh likes to employ fitting nick names for political objects of disregard here at Shot In The Dark and I would once again like to enlist your input.

Best Nickname for Al Franken
Frankenfreak
Al Frucken
Lying Liar
Paul
The Senator from New York
Stuart
Big Fat Idiot
He Thinks He’s Good enough, Smart Enough, and Doggone it, He Thinks People Like Him
  
pollcode.com free polls

As always, our polls work best when you act like a Democrat: vote early, vote often. Thank you in advance.

Title courtesy Paul Simon

Democrats have PhD’s in OPM

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Lawmakers, failing to realize home is where the crisis is, are spending taxpayer dollars on travel around the world, and are taking their families with them. It’s always easier to spend Other People’s Money, especially when you are a politician, historically more so when you’re a Democrat.

Some members of Congress have complained in recent months about chief executives of bailed-out banks, insurance companies and car makers who sponsored corporate trips to resorts or used corporate jets for their own travel.

…and yet:

Hundreds of lawmakers traveled overseas in 2008 at a cost of about $13 million. That’s a 50% jump since Democrats took control of Congress two years ago.

I think Lawmakers should learn more about the world before they become lawmakers. I think Presidents especially should have relevant experience before running for office (crickets chirping)…but I digress.

Maybe then they will discern beforehand, that spending 800 billion borrowed dollars isn’t going to cap unemployment at 8% (now 9.5%) or stimulate anything for that matter.

Lawmakers say that the trips are a good use of government funds because they allow members of Congress and their staff members to learn more about the world, inspect U.S. assets abroad and forge better working relationships with each other. The travel, for example, includes official visits to American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Journal analysis shows that the government has picked up the tab for travel to destinations such as Jamaica, the Virgin Islands and Australia’s Great Barrier Reef.

Learning about Jamaica? Next time I travel to a vacation spot, I’m going to write off the whole trip on my taxes. I will have been “learning” about the world for my business. It’s research I’ll say.

In February, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi led a delegation of Democratic lawmakers to visit U.S. troops in Afghanistan for a day. Before landing in Kabul, the eight lawmakers and their entourage of spouses and aides spent eight days in Italy, spending $57,697 on hotels and meals.

Scores of lawmakers are spending this week abroad on taxpayer-funded trips. Congressional offices say they won’t release details of the trips for security reasons.

Sure.

This is not the Change® I voted against.

Embarrassment

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

…is only a matter of time.

BREAKING: Minnesota’s highest court rules for Al Franken

The unanimous opinion ruled that Franken “received the highest number of votes legally cast” and is entitled “to receive the certificate of election as United States senator from the state of Minnesota.”

Minn. rules for Franken in Senate fight

Franken, a former Saturday Night Live star making the leap from life as a left-wing author and radio talker to the Senate, planned a news conference later Tuesday and didn’t immediately comment.

With credentials like that, it’s official:

Wellstone

Dayton

now Franken.

It’s a threepeat of embarrassment.

Sadly, Mr. Franken will provide bloggers plenty of antics to write about; hardly a silver lining.

Pawlenty on Obama: Out of Control, Irresponsible

Monday, June 29th, 2009

“…the President said in an interview not that long ago ‘We are out of money’ with all due respect Mr. President, if we’re out of money, quit spending it!”

…also, at about nine minutes in, Pawlenty shares what he thinks of the President’s performance six months in and calls out the “Stimulus” Bill and the Federal Government’s encroachment into private industry.

Sin Tax

Sunday, June 28th, 2009

I don’t remember this garnering a lot of attention on the part of the media or blogosphere when in January the legislature passed a sin tax (although they won’t call it that) to curb the excessive use of yet another damaging substance:

Water.

Before approving the higher rates this year, Minnetonka City Council Members Brad Wiersum and Tony Wagner wanted to know whether the change to graduated fees was showing signs of working.

“Have we changed behavior or have we raised revenue?” Wiersum asked.

In the first year, “We changed behavior slightly, but not to any significance,” Wagstrom said.

Personally, I think watering your lawn and treating it with chemicals is silly and wasteful, especially in Minnesota where it will be frozen to death a few weeks after you have achieved green carpet nirvana. My opinion notwithstanding, municipalities should charge residents what it costs to deliver clean, safe water.

…and not a penny more.

In the past, if we’ve had a shortage, cities have relied on watering bans or odd/even day restrictions.

…but that doesn’t raise any more revenue now does it? And in the end, people that use more already pay more.

The sin tax on water is yet another violation of the principal of “government for the people;” another attempt to raise revenue and increase government influence under the guise of a crisis.

The Californication of America

Sunday, June 28th, 2009

Its easy for the rest of America to disassociate with the fiscal crisis in California. After all, it represents a bigger-than-life culture of Hollywood, celebrities, extreme lifestyles and a Bush-era “conservative” Guvernator. Even more so in Minnesota where our culture and demographics make us an unlikely analog.

Nonetheless, we are subject to national policies now mirroring those of California and to think the results will somehow be different on an national scale is a predictable exercise of liberal insanity.

California, too, spent lavishly in the fat years and issued bonds when state revenues did not cover the costs, bringing its once-sterling credit rating down to the nation’s lowest. So, too, U.S. Treasury bonds, T-bills and the American dollar are now increasingly suspect.

California, like Minnesota has a mandatory budget-balancing provision in force and watching California comply is going to be a lesson in fiscal responsibility – the hard way.

with the state under a constitutional mandate to balance its budget, yet facing a $24 billion deficit this July, a chainsaw is about to be taken to state government.

At arms length (a 2000-mile arm that is), California’s issues hold little import for Minnesotans, and probably won’t have an immediate effect on us here. We should count ourselves fortunate that our Governor is willing to take the heat by refusing to hike taxes and un-allotting what our legislature wouldn’t un-budget. What is troubling is California’s microcosmic prognostication for the rest of the country.

California and it’s economy are faced with the fallout of massive over-spending, immigration, health care and arbitrary and burdensome emissions regulations – which have failed by the way. Sound familiar?

Some 38,000 of 168,000 state prisoners may be released. As Barack Obama is pushing universal health insurance, California will cut Medi-Cal for the poor. Education will be slashed, resulting in a shortened school year, thousands of laid-off teachers, school closings and an end to summer programs in a system that has plummeted from the nation’s best to one of its worst, as measured by dropout rates and academic achievement.

The Obama administration represents the worst of fiscal liberalism as evidenced by the climate bill passed by the House, massive bailouts and a stimulus package that is nothing more than a veiled attempt to enlarge the federal government. Obama is making all the wrong moves, belying the lesson California’s fiscal train wreck offers the rest of us, and deservedly drawing comparisons to Jimmy Carter.

Under George W. Bush and Obama, the U.S. government has undertaken huge new responsibilities: No Child Left Behind, Medicare prescription drug benefits, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the takeovers of banks and auto companies, bailouts without end and national health insurance.

The “We Inherited it from Bush” plea will provide little cover as the Obama administration and virtually the same Congress that was in place during much of the Bush administration continue to ignore the signs. In six months they have done more damage to our nation’s solvency than Bush and Company did in eight years.

Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan carried California nine times. But the state is now a fiefdom of liberalism. John McCain’s share of the vote was smaller than Barry Goldwater’s. California today believes in Big Government, open borders, diversity, multiculturalism and the politics of compassion. But what liberalism has wrought in California, its native-born are fleeing.

The rest of us have nowhere to flee. We can’t all move to Florida.

I’m just sayin’…

Saturday, June 27th, 2009

HT [click pic]

Do You Remember the Time

Friday, June 26th, 2009

One of his lesser-known songs (and videos for that matter) Do You Remember the Time is one of my favorite Michael Jackson songs; the second track of Dangerous, released in 1991. Click the pic for the video.

As Things Were II

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Lest we not forget…

I Got Book Learnin’

Friday, June 26th, 2009

I watched TresSec Geithner on Jim Lehrer the other night (the video is available in the link below as well) and thought the following interchange (emphasis mine) said so much about the elitist arrogance and stupefying lack of practical experience that the Obama administration represents, from the very top down.

TIMOTHY GEITHNER: In the financial sector, the financial markets require well-designed regulation. We did not have well-designed regulation. We had the worst financial crisis in generations because of basic failures in the design of regulation.

JIM LEHRER: Finally, President Obama said yesterday that the real cause of all of this was a culture of irresponsibility. You’ve worked in and around the financial industry for years. How would you describe that, what that culture was? What caused it?

TIMOTHY GEITHNER: I’ve never worked in the financial industry, just to say. I’ve always worked in public service and the government.

That’s okay, Timmy. Your boss hasn’t even done that. But there are some really well-organized communities in Chicago now.

Silly Mr. Lehrer for thinking the man charged with regulating our nation’s financial system might actually have worked in it (or paid his taxes for that matter – he must have skipped that chapter whilst basking in academia).

How unremarkable is it that a man who has spent his entire life working in government fails to see that in fact government overreach was the cause of this crisis, and is now the root of it’s persistence.

His prescription? More of the same. Just “designed” better.

--> Site Meter -->