Author Archive

I want my Matrix

Friday, September 12th, 2008

…and I want it for free. 

Dear Starbucks, 

Screw you. 

Caribou, Bruegger’s, Dunn Brothers and a host of ma/pa coffee shops and restaurants give me WIFI access to the Matrix for free. I got it this morning while waiting for my oil change at Walser.

If I buy an Americano for three dollars plus, I expect you to throw in a few Megabits. 

I’ll not access your Web, if it’s not for free. 

No!  – No, Thank You to thee 

I need this great wonder invented by Gore 

But make me pay, and I’m out the door 

I do enjoy your extra burnt Espresso, 

But when I am surfing, you’ll not get my American Expresso. 

Regards, 

JRoosh 

PS Say “Hi” to Howard 

What is the Matrix?

Back to the Future

Friday, September 12th, 2008

In the Flesh… 

Dodge Challenger

6.1 Liter Hemi V8

425HP

…this one’s for you Kermit.

(more…)

Play on Words

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Bill Clinton and Obama release joint statement 

Clinton: I didn’t inhale.

Obama: I still do.

…keep moving folks. Nothing to see here.

State of the Race

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

A Moment of Silence

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

8:46:26 a.m (Eastern Time): American Airlines Flight 11 impacts the north side of the North Tower (1 World Trade Center) of the WTC between the 94th and 98th floors. American Airlines Flight 11 was flying at a speed of 490 miles per hour.

Obamanian World Tour

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

It would appear Barack Obama’s candidacy for President has a popular edge over John McCain’s outside the US among those queried. Probably because John McCain didn’t go on a whirlwind rock star tour. McCain is probably more concerned with what Americans think of their government than what the rest of the world thinks.

Democrat Mr Obama was favoured by a four-to-one margin across the 22,500 people polled in 22 countries.

It is interesting to note however, when you stack the electoral votes allocated to each of the countries whose citizens were polled, Obama and McCain are dead even.

Here’s a complete list of the countries included in the poll, along with the number of electoral votes in each:

Australia (0)
Brazil (0) 
Canada (0) 
China (0) 
Egypt (0) 
France (0) 
Germany (0) 
India (0) 
Indonesia (0) 
Italy (0) 
Kenya (0) 
Lebanon (0) 
Mexico (0) 
Nigeria (0) 
Panama (0) 
Philippines (0) 
Poland (0) 
Russia (0) 
Singapore (0) 
Turkey (0) 
United Arab Emirates (0) 
United Kingdom (0)

A Big Year for Comebacks

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

First Brett Favre, returns to the NFL via the Jets after being snubbed by the Pack.

The Results: Mixed

Then Lance Armstrong, returns to cycling after three years’ hiatus and a marriage to Sheryl Crow.

The Results: TBD (although he saved on TP)

And let’s not forget, JRoosh returned to blogging after a twenty four hour hiatus after being invited by Mitch Berg to join SITD.

The Results: You tell me

Seriously, I thought the above would make a good excuse to publicly thank Mitch Berg for the opportunity to be a part of a very important blog, one in an impressive array of MOB/True North/NARN Blogs, during a very important time in America.

I appreciate the feedback and commentary from each and every visitor, even if we vehemently disagree.

The next 50 or so days are going to be riveting.

And now back to our regularly scheduled program…

HaHaHa HaHa Ha…Ha…….Ha…..Ha……..Ha………..Ha. Huh?

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

Hey, wait. That’s not funny.

Comedian Al Franken Wins Minn. Senate Nod

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Comedian Al Franken grabbed the Democratic nomination Tuesday for U.S. Senate in Minnesota, setting up a showdown with Republican Sen. Norm Coleman.

What?

Not “Statesman” Al Franken?

Not “former State Representative” Al Franken?

Not “Entrepreneur” Al Franken?

Not “Former Mayor” Al Franken?

Not “former War Hero” Al Franken?

Not “Prominent Attorney” Al Franken?

Not “former Professor” Al Franken?

Not “Community Organizer” Al Franken?

Not “(failed) Radio Political Commentator” Al Franken?

Not even “long-time Minnesota Resident” Al Franken?

The AP, ostensibly not able to apply any other credible label to Mr. Franken, listed him as “Comedian” Al Franken.

Even less funny, 163,000 Minnesotans actually went out of their way to cast a primary vote for a candidate listed as a “Comedian.”

Seriously, folks (pun intended) are you telling me the best candidate the DFL in Minnesota can muster is a vulgar, tax-dodging, carpet bagging “Comedian?”

That’s all ya got?

Is this thing on?

The Chicken and the Egg

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

By now everyone is buzzing about the federal government bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Riddle me this:

  1. Whose idea was it?
  2. Was it smart?
  3. Was it necessary?
  4. Could it have been prevented?
  5. How did this happen?

The answers to these questions are easy.

  1. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson
  2. Yes
  3. Yes
  4. Yes
  5. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac knew that the federal government would bail them out if they ever got into trouble

The Chicken and the Egg.

More on “Whose idea was it?”:

WASHINGTON — President Bush may be the nation’s first M.B.A. president, but when Mr. Bush and a small coterie of advisers met in the Oval Office last week to complete their plan to rescue the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, there was no question who was in charge.

It was Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. who first proposed the idea of a government conservatorship, and broached it with Mr. Bush while the president was at his ranch in Crawford, Tex. It was Mr. Paulson who set the guiding principles for the subsequent deal; Mr. Bush endorsed them, a departure from usual White House practice, in which the president articulates principles for his underlings to follow.

Had the federal government not taken over these giants, we would most likely have experienced what is called a systemic breakdown of our nation’s financial system resulting in most likely a recession (already likely by most accounts) or even the next depression.

The moral of the story? You can’t have a free market system unless you truly have a free market. The implied bailout of these mortgage giants, which until this week were public companies, allowed (encouraged?) them to take unnecessary and unmitigated risks.

Risks otherwise unadvisable, especially given the small margin of extra return that could have potentially been delivered to investors, had the potential upside been fully realized.

And now the taxpayer has become the beneficiary of the not yet fully realized downside.

So who’s the idiot (sorry) uninformed overseer behind the formation of this disaster in the first place?

Care to wager as to what party he represents?

Taxpayers are now on the hook for as much as $200 billion to rescue Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and if you want to know why, look no further than the rapid response to this bailout from House baron Barney Frank.

Asked about Treasury’s modest bailout condition that the companies reduce the size of their high-risk mortgage-backed securities (MBS) portfolios starting in 2010, Mr. Frank was quoted on Monday as saying, “Good luck on that,” and that it would never happen.

There you have the Fannie Mae problem in profile. Mr. Frank wants you to pick up the tab for its failures, while he still vows to block a reform that might prevent the same disaster from happening again.

Could it have been prevented? (Yes – emphasis mine)

At least the Massachusetts Democrat is consistent. His record is close to perfect as a stalwart opponent of reforming the two companies, going back more than a decade. The first concerted push to rein in Fan and Fred in Congress came as far back as 1992, and Mr. Frank was right there, standing athwart. But things really picked up this decade, and Barney was there at every turn.

That is what happens when Democrats are allowed to stand behind our nation’s cash register. They’re like one of Donald Trump’s ex-wives…only you and I get to pay the bill.

Hand on the lever…

Monday, September 8th, 2008

A post-convention wrap-up: 

The RNC convention bump has McCain up +1.0. Time will tell if that will stick. The USA Today poll, Obama’s favorite isn’t good news for him. McCain +10.

Of late, polls of polls have shown Senators Obama and McCain deadlocked. But McCain clearly has the momentum right now…voters by the thousands in attendance to see McCain/Palin.

56 days to go.

Can America really be split exactly down the middle?

How accurate are polls at predicting the outcome of the election to come?

Is the liberal media behind the design of most of them? If so, do we assume McCain is doing better than he is?

When Americans step into the booth, hand on the lever, are they ready to vote for an African American President for the first time in history?

Conservatives – if the GOP candidate were Colin Powell, would race be even more a factor?

Personally, I hope race is no longer a factor but am I naive?

Is McCain, the more historically conventional candidate, the default if voters enter the booth undecided?

…or will they stay home?

Speaking of staying home, will Obama once and for all be the candidate that gets young, first-time voters to vote? If so, will they all vote for him?

If the polls continue to reflect a shift in momentum to McCain/Palin, should Obama dump Biden, in an unprecedented admission of a poor choice of VP, and select Hillary?

Is that what lunch with Bill is about? Change?

Liberals, Conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Undecided…all are welcome: Discuss. Pick any (or all) question(s) you’d like.

What do you think? 

You own your house…and now mine too

Monday, September 8th, 2008

Congratulations America. You just bought half the homes in America.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Federal officials on Sunday unveiled an extraordinary takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, putting the government in charge of the twin mortgage giants and the $5 trillion in home loans they back.

Under conservatorship, the government would temporarily run Fannie and Freddie until they are on stronger footing.

Which is to say forever?

Time will tell if this move will only serve to lengthen the “house cleaning” that the market would have delivered without the government’s intervention. Institutions of this size represent a pillar in our economy and financial infrastructure, and it’s hard to say whether a free market approach, a government intervention or something in between is indicated.

Treasury secretary Paulson hints that this may not be a permanent takeover.

Government support needs to be either explicit or nonexistent, and structured to resolve the conflict between public and private purposes,” Paulson said. “We will make a grave error if we don’t use this time out to permanently address the structural issues presented by the GSE’s,” he added, a reference to the companies as government-sponsored enterprises.

How much will this cost? No one knows yet. It will have a “B” in front of it.

Paulson said the Treasury Department would provide as much money as needed to keep the companies’ capital reserves from falling below the levels that would trigger rules that automatically put them into receivership.

I guess they were right…

Critics have long argued that Fannie and Freddie were taking advantage of the widespread assumption by investors that the federal government would bail them out if they got into trouble. Administration officials as well as the Federal Reserve have argued that the two companies used those implicit guarantees to borrow money at below-market rates and lend money at above-market returns, and that they had become what amounted to gigantic hedge funds operating with only a tiny sliver of capital to protect them from unexpected surprises.

Is there an upside?

Probably. The stock market should react favorably. Mortgage rates should fall almost immediately. 

The future? With a Dem-controlled Congress…guess who’s next:

Don’t Bail Out Detroit…Bury It

 

The Obama Stimuless

Sunday, September 7th, 2008

This Week on ABC is featuring an interview with Barack Obama.

When asked by George Stephanopoulos about tax cuts and the economy, Senator Obama spoke to the differences in the economic theories of his strategy versus Senator McCain’s.

Obama’s plan, tax cuts to the middle class is a bad idea, and an ill-advised one based on the notion that the economy somehow grows from the bottom up, which is in fact how Obama himself described his plan.

Ben Stein, Lawyer, Writer, Actor and Economist: I ADMIRE Barack Obama…But I am a bit worried that his knowledge of economics may not be as extensive as his legal background. In particular, he’s been campaigning with an idea of a second round of economic stimulus to combat the evident slowdown in the economy, to follow President Bush’s first round that is now wrapping up. The first round hasn’t succeeded, and Senator Obama’s ideas aren’t very promising, either.

The failure of the Bush stimuless program clearly confirms this. Tax cuts for the middle class amount to a few hundred dollars per year – essentially, another Bush stimulus check. Obama has said that he would be in favor of another stimulus package, despite recent evidence that it has failed. So how is that change? How is that different than Bush’s economic strategy?

In a nutshell, why have a stimulus program that may not — and probably should not — stimulate much consumption? And why help pay for it through taxes on a group whose members have done no moral or other wrong and who often are not particularly rich, either (not that it’s a moral wrong to be rich)?

These are complicated issues, and

I am not even remotely sure how to solve all of them myself. But some of Senator Obama’s plan is just hard to rationalize.

Our economy is fueled by consumer spending stemming from consumer confidence and job creation through the formation of new businesses. Tax cuts to those that start these new businesses have been shown time and again to stimulate the very growth that creates jobs and bolsters consumer confidence which leads to increased consumer spending and ultimately increased tax revenues.

It’s simple. Whose name is on your paycheck? Do you want the government to help this entity or person or harm them? Do you want them to be incented to hire more of you or not? Do you want them to be profitable so that they can increase your income at the next review or not?

Our economy is like a train. The engine is corporate America and small businesses – employers large and small. The train cars are working Americans – taxpayers. The caboose represents those that don’t pay taxes or are unable to work or provide for themselves.

Government? Government’s role should be to keep the tracks clear of danger and to help people get on the train, or back on the train if they get knocked off. Government’s role has however become the cargo, and to help more and more people become the caboose.

Make no mistake. We need the caboose. There are people that can’t contribute to our economy and the government should play a part in their care and protection. Liberals however are confused as to which end of the train serves the most important role in our nation and our economy.

Tax cuts and rebates to the cars in the train doesn’t make the train go any faster. Gearing our economy to the caboose hurts everyone on the train, including the caboose. Increasing government just increases the load for the engine.

So why do liberals continue to offer up this strategy as an economic policy? Votes. Political expediency. Obama is pushing this strategy to buy votes, plain and simple; just like every liberal predecessor. That’s not change either. That is the liberalism that is just another stripe in the spectrum of socialism.

What liberals don’t understand, and why usually the American electorate swings in the direction of the Republicans during economic challenges, is that in most cases, “wealthy” Americans are just regular people that took risks to leverage the American dream.

After eight years of Republican liberal fiscal policies, the American people are confused, which goes a long way to explain Obama’s popularity despite his lack of executive experience and ill-fated economic proposals.

John McCain is wise to distance himself from the Bush administration’s economic strategy and is attempting to make the case to voters that the solution to our economic woes is to shrink government, to keep money in the pockets of those that earned it and to stimulate economic growth through the creation of jobs.

Gearing our tax code to continue to penalize the “wealthy” in order to redistribute the booty to and eliminate the risks of life of those that would vote Democrat has weakened our nation and serves to drain the incentive of those that create jobs and take those risks that ultimately grow our economy.

Obama’s plan is a failure out of the box.

State of the Race

Sunday, September 7th, 2008

Shaken, not detonated

Saturday, September 6th, 2008

A couple of our loyal commenters accused law enforcement of “overreaching” during the pre-RNC house raids that uncovered various and sundry household items; asserting that the items uncovered could be used for anything.

Does Freedom of Assembly Include the Right to Carry a Bucket of Urine?

And Now She’s A Weapons Expert

The Star Tribune listed an abbreviated list of said items; conveniently omitting those that tend to be less useful for domestic chores, some of those items included throwing knives, a gas mask and filter, homemade caltrops (everyone that reads this blog surely knows what they are by now), and empty plastic buckets cut and made into shields.

Despite hundreds of arrests and the generous use of mace and teargas, the event went on without making national news for the wrong reason. Clearly this was the result of a conspicuous show of force and a proactive approach on the part of law enforcement.

But it could have been en entirely different story if it weren’t for the aforementioned approach, and as it turns out a little luck.

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) – Two Texas men are charged in federal court in Minneapolis with illegally possessing Molotov cocktails. Authorities say the men planned to target law enforcement during the Republican National Convention.

Twenty-two-year-old David Guy McKay and 23-year-old Bradley Neil Crowder are each charged with one count of possession of firearms that were not registered to them.

The two Austin men are in custody following an initial court appearance Friday.

According to the criminal complaint, law enforcement officers overheard a conversation in which McKay said the Molotov cocktails he and Crowder made would be thrown at vehicles parked in a lot in St. Paul.

The lot was used by law enforcement, and patrolled by U.S. Secret Service and the military.

Just for fun, I would entertain anyone’s offering as to other common household uses for the molotov cocktail. Thank you in advance for your creativity as a liberal to defend almost any behavior as a personal freedom or exercise of free speech.

Not ready to lead

Saturday, September 6th, 2008

Take away the celebrity, the thrilling words; what’s left?

Old Ideas masquerading as change.

This is a short  campaign ad that doesn’t break any new ground in it’s content but I do think its production values are artistically relevant, submitted for your discussion.

My spokesman can kick your spokesman’s…

Friday, September 5th, 2008

Dagnabbit. I wish I would have caught this myself. Reposting this is admittedly a thinly veiled piece of plagiarism, but I dutifully submit it for your enjoyment in case you didn’t catch it in the WSJ or NYT.

I remember Sarah Palin’s commentary on Senator Harry Reid during her acceptance rout speech:

Harry Reid, the majority leader of the current do-nothing Senate, not long ago summed up his feelings about our nominee. He said, quote, “I can’t stand John McCain.” Ladies and gentlemen, perhaps no accolade we hear this week is better proof that we’ve chosen the right man. Clearly what the majority leader was driving at is that he can’t stand up to John McCain.

And Reid’s response…

Now Harry Reid is hardly thin-skinned and almost anything else Ms. Palin could have said about him might not have drawn much of a reaction. But to the former boxer from tiny Searchlight, Nev., that insinuation from Governor Palin amounts to fighting words. He sees himself as more than capable of standing up to Mr. McCain and, through spokesman Jim Manley, Mr. Reid fired back.

“Anyone who knows Senator Reid knows he never backs down when he’s fighting for what’s right and that he always stands up to John McCain when he is wrong,” said Mr. Manley. “Shrill and sarcastic political attacks may fire up the Republican base, but they don’t change the fact that a McCain-Palin administration would mean four more years of failed Bush-Cheney policies.”

Via a spokesman (Reid was getting a pedicure) by the name of Manley.

The Five Hundred Thousand Man March

Friday, September 5th, 2008

Despite McCain’s lack of hokey Styrofoam props…and big-name rock bands, Senator McCain’s convention acceptance speech garnered 500,000 more viewers than Senator Obama’s speech the week earlier, despite being shown on less networks.

I’m thinking they were all men.

In fairness to Obama, the GOP has two smokin’ hot -er I mean rather comely ladies on the ticket – Sarah Palin, and of course first lady Cindy McCain…

Sorry. Sort of lost my train of thought.

…where was I?

Oh, here it is…

Sept. 5 (Bloomberg) — Republican presidential candidate John McCain attracted a record 38.9 million television viewers to his acceptance speech last night, surpassing Democratic rival Barack Obama and McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin.

The total exceeded the 38.4 million who watched Obama accept the Democratic nomination in Denver on Aug. 28, Nielsen Media Research said today in a statement. Palin drew 37.2 million on Sept. 3 after three days of intense media coverage.

The last night of the Republican gathering in St. Paul, Minnesota, was seen in 28.3 million homes, breaking the record of the 27.7 million who watched Obama’s speech at the Democratic National Convention. McCain’s ratings are the highest for a political convention since Nielsen began collecting data in 1960.

Combined, McCain and Palin, who is Alaska’s first-term governor, drew 76.2 million viewers, compared with the 62.4 million who tuned in to see Obama and running mate Joe Biden

The Republican nominee’s audience last night also exceeded the typical nightly viewing for the Beijing Olympics

No wonder Oprah doesn’t want Sarah Palin on her show. Her ratings would probably embarass Obama’s there too.

Nevermind.

Who gives a crap about Oprah.

Unifying

Friday, September 5th, 2008

That is the one word that describes Senator John McCain’s speech last night. Also, warm, humble and endearing.

My friends, I’ve been an imperfect servant of my country for many years, but I’ve been her servant first, last and always. And I’ve never — (cheers, applause) — I’ve never lived a day, in good times or bad, that I didn’t thank God for the privilege. (Cheers, applause.)

…and after we’ve won, we’re going to reach out our hand to any willing patriot, make this government start working for you again and get this country back on the road to prosperity and peace.

Despite a few gaffes and interruptions from protestors, it was, as it needed to be, his best ever.

By no means is John McCain a legendary orator but that made it real.

The McCain introductory video chronicled the generations of service the McCain family has given to America and featured the Senator’s 96-year old mother “a navy family is wonderful.” It served to illustrate the campaign’s “Country First” mantra while at the same time possibly standing in contrast to Obama’s lack of family history and murky genealogy.

Instead of bowing to critics and leaving out his well-worn tale of his time in the Hanoy Hilton, he delved deeper and the story was renewed, serving to fortify the case for his character and to also underpin “Country First.”

No one would have begrudged McCain taking more than a few shots at Obama and Biden, he took a couple, by name; but mostly McCain cleared a path to the highground, congratulating Obama and emphasizing what they shared in common.

And finally, a word to Senator Obama and his supporters. We’ll go at it — we’ll go at it over the next two months. You know that’s the nature of this business, and there are big differences between us. But you have my respect and my admiration. Despite our differences — (applause) — much more unites us than divides us. We are fellow Americans, and that’s an association that means more to me than any other.

We’re dedicated to the proposition that all people are created equal and endowed by our creator with inalienable rights. No country — no country ever had a greater cause than that. And I wouldn’t be an American worthy of the name if I didn’t honor Senator Obama and his supporters for their achievement.

Instead of — (chants of “Zero! Zero!”) — instead of rejecting good ideas because we didn’t think of them first, let’s use the best ideas from both sides. Instead of fighting over who gets the credit, let’s try sharing it. This amazing country — (cheers, applause) — this amazing country can do anything we put our minds to. I’ll ask Democrats and independents to serve with me, and my administration will set a new standard for transparency and accountability. We’re — (cheers, applause) — we’re going to finally starting get — getting things done for the people who are counting on us, and I won’t care who gets the credit.

It was a brilliant move; and clearly sincere.

When he did go into after Obama, it was rarely by name, and it was brief.

I will keep taxes low and cut them where I can. My opponent will raise them. (Boos.)

I will open — I will open new markets to our goods and services. My opponent will close them. (Boos.)

I will cut government spending. He will increase it. (Boos.)

My tax cuts will create jobs. His tax increases will eliminate them. (Boos.)

Now, my opponent promises to bring back old jobs by wishing away the global economy. We’re going to help workers who’ve lost a job that won’t come back find a new one that won’t go away.

Senator Obama wants our schools to answer to unions and entrenched bureaucrats. I want schools to answer to parents and students.

If there truly was an indictment, it was delivered to both parties equally, to all of Washington; it was a complicit admission of guilt and failure. It was another brilliant move, emphasizing McCain’s reform manifesto and his reputation as an outspoken “maverick”.

You well know I’ve been called a maverick, someone who — (cheers, applause) — someone who marches to the beat of his own drum.

Sometimes it’s meant as a compliment and sometimes it’s not. (Laughter.) What it really means is I understand who I work for. I don’t work for a party. I don’t work for a special interest. I don’t work for myself. I work for you. Thank you.

I’ve fought corruption, and it didn’t matter if the culprits were Democrats or Republicans. They violated their public trust and they had to be held accountable. (Applause.) I’ve fought big spenders — I’ve fought the big spenders in both parties who waste your money on things you neither need nor want. And the first big-spending, pork- barrel earmark bill that comes across my desk, I will veto it. I will make them famous and you will know their names. (Cheers, applause.) You will know their names.

We need to change the way government does almost everything, from the way we protect our security to the way we compete in the world economy; from the way we respond to disasters to the way we fuel our transportation network; from the way we train our workers to the way we educate our children. All these functions of government were designed before the rise of the global economy, the information technology revolution and the end of the Cold War. We have to catch up to history, and we have to change the way we do business in Washington.

I fight to restore the pride and principles of our party. We were elected to change Washington, and we let Washington change us. (Applause.) We lost — we lost the trust of the American people when some Republicans gave in to the temptations of corruption. We lost their trust when rather than reform government, both parties made it bigger.

We lost their trust when instead of freeing ourselves from a dangerous dependence on foreign oil, both parties and Senator Obama passed another corporate welfare bill for oil companies. We lost their trust when we valued our power over our principles.

He failed to mention George Bush by name; honored “The President” for leading our nation through the dark times of 9/11 and in more than a symbolic gesture, his speech ran from the Bush administration, putting as much distance there as possible.

I’m grateful to the president of the United States for leading us in these dark days following the worst attack on American history — (extended cheers and applause) — the worst attack on American soil in our history and keeping us safe from another tack — attack that many — many thought was inevitable;

His case for national security hung on his experience and his family history.

I know how the military works, what it can do, what it can do better, and what it shouldn’t do. I know how the world works. I know the good and evil in it. I know how to work with leaders who share our dreams of a freer, safer and more prosperous world, and how to stand up to those who don’t. I know how to secure the peace.

My friends, when I was 5 years old, a car pulled up in front of our house. A Navy officer rolled down the window and shouted at my father that the Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor. I rarely saw my father again for four years.

In the end, he unified all that watched in a JFK-like call to action.

My friends, I’ve been an imperfect servant of my country for many years, but I’ve been her servant first, last and always. And I’ve never — (cheers, applause) — I’ve never lived a day, in good times or bad, that I didn’t thank God for the privilege.

I’m going to fight for my cause every day as your president. I’m going to fight to make sure every American has every reason to thank God as I thank him: that I’m an American, a proud citizen of the greatest country on Earth, and with hard work — with hard work, strong faith and a little courage, great things are always within our reach.

Fight with me. Fight with me. Fight for what’s right for our country. Fight for the ideals and character of a free people.

Fight for our children’s future. Fight for justice and opportunity for all.

Stand up to defend our country from its enemies. Stand up for each other; for beautiful, blessed, bountiful America.

Stand up, stand up, stand up and fight. Nothing is inevitable here

We’re Americans, and we never give up. We never quit. We never hide from history. We make history.

A Community Organizer is a person in your neighborhood, in your neighborhood, in your neighborhood

Thursday, September 4th, 2008

Okay, so maybe not in your neighborhood. 

The Republicans were having some fun last night at the expense of Obama and all other “Community Organizers” across the land who are running for national office with such a prestigious entry on their resumes. 

Sarah Palin was especially animated given the Obama campaign’s insistence of focusing on the VP candidates tenure as Mayor of a small town while conspicuously omitting the same as Governor of a State with hundreds of employees and a 6 billion dollar budget. 

In response, Obama’s peeps felt the need to clarify just what a community organizer is. 

The ‘Community Organizer’s’ New Clothes

But the mystery of the “community organizer’s” job description was solved this morning, when an Obama campaign email, signed by the delightfully named David Plouffe, popped into our inbox. 

I wasn’t planning on sending you something tonight. But if you saw what I saw from the Republican convention, you know it demands a response.

I saw John McCain’s attack squad of negative, cynical politicians. They lied about Barack Obama and Joe Biden, and they attacked you for being a part of this campaign. 

But worst of all–and this deserves to be noted–they insulted the very idea that ordinary people have a role to play in our political process. 

You know that despite what John McCain and his attack squad say, everyday people have the power to build something extraordinary when we come together. Make a donation of $5 or more right now to remind them. 

Both Rudy Giuliani and Sarah Palin specifically mocked Barack’s experience as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago more than two decades ago, where he worked with people who had lost jobs and been left behind when the local steel plants closed. 

Let’s clarify something for them right now. 

Community organizing is how ordinary people respond to out-of-touch politicians and their failed policies. 

And it’s no surprise that, after eight years of George Bush, millions of people have found that by coming together in their local communities they can change the course of history. That promise is what our campaign has been about from the beginning.  

That’s right–community organizing consists of helping elect Barack Obama president! This fits right in with Obama’s claim, noted here yesterday, that he is more qualified to be president than Palin is to be vice president because, whereas she has run a mere town, he has run a campaign for himself. 

I personally am not so impressed with experience as I am accomplishment. I am surrounded by people that have much experience in their given occupation but little accomplishment. 

Palin’s speech included a joke that was not part of the prepared text: “You know what they say about the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.”

Perhaps someone can recast this as an Obama joke. Here’s our attempt: 

What’s the difference between a “community organizer” and a Chihuahua? A Chihuahua has a real job. 

Sarah Palin has relatively little executive experience, although certainly more than the other three candidates. What she does have, is a series of significant accomplishments that belie her young political career. She has leveraged that experience to serve someone other than herself.

As far as I can tell, Obama has leveraged his position to serve no one but himself.

If you were to extrapolate Palin’s and Obama’s career, ostensibly multiplying each candidate’s accomplishments pro forma, you would in Obama’s case, confirm the theorem that zero times zero is zero. 

Are we supposed to cast our eyes on the slums of Chicago, behold how well organized they are, and exclaim in wonder, “Wow, Barack Obama did that!”?

So maybe zero times zero is negative five? 

From the Governor’s speech last night:  

Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown. And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves.  

I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a “community organizer,” except that you have actual responsibilities.  

It’s a good line, but it still doesn’t explain what a “community organizer” does. Take away the “actual responsibilities” of a small-town mayor, and you have . . . nothing. Oh wait, that’s her point, isn’t it?  

The community Barack Obama has organized is, in Plouffe’s own telling, the community of those who admire Barack Obama. He is mayor of Obamaville and aspires to be president of Barackistan. 

It is a sad state of affairs that national politics have become so polarized that a politician with no experience, a history of unsavory associations and no accomplishments to speak of can acquire so much political capital, despite the free flow of information in our connected world. Maybe Obama should have selected Al Gore as an encore VP.

He, like Obama, has done so much with so little.  

State of the Race

Thursday, September 4th, 2008

the “Big O,” or, as I like to think, the “Big Zero”

Thursday, September 4th, 2008

CNN interviewed lifelong conservative and Rock and Roll legend Pat Boone at the CNN Grill.

A couple highlights:

I thought because of the tremendous media adulation problem [over Sen. Barack Obama] and also because George Bush’s rating is low that it was like everybody seemed to think it was a slam dunk for the Democrats. And, amazingly, despite all of that adulation, hype and everything else, [Sen. John] McCain is sticking right in there with Obama, and he really hasn’t begun his campaign yet.

On Governor Palin

Here’s somebody in a party that is living its principles

Sen. Obama, I  think, showed his lack of judgment by not choosing the best-qualified woman that he could have chosen as his running mate, one who had already proven able to get 18 million votes. He passed, and he took Joe Biden, who has been in the Senate longer than McCain, which doesn’t bespeak change. Meanwhile, McCain chooses a highly qualified, attractive woman, and I think it just shows that the “Big O,” or, as I like to think, the “Big Zero,” has missed his golden chance. I think he will lose because of this.

CNN.com: Is there a Pat Boone classic you’d like to play for McCain?

Boone: I wrote and produced a music video which I’m offering to the campaign called “For My Country,” the ballad of the National Guard. It is supportive of the troops, supportive of the surge, supportive of McCain who is, whose slogan is “Country First.” And the National Guard and our military are winning the battle in Iraq, even though Obama says we did not support it, we’re winning.

It’s always fun, and unfortunately a novelty, to see an entertainer that is a conservative.

Obama’s best qualities…

Thursday, September 4th, 2008

Charisma.

Magnetism.

Youth.

Vigor.

Icon for Change.

Oratorical Skills.

Accomplishment.

…were all trumped last night. Every last one of them…only Sarah Palin actually possesses the last one.

Sarah Palin dashed the hopes of Obamanistas by standing in front of thousands as millions watched, and nailed it – never sounding artificial and never not being herself. She confidently delivered a masterful speech with a dash of Alaskan twang,  then pulled out the whoopin’ stick and gave Obammy a lickin’ only she could deliver.

…and he was stinging already as Romney, Huckabee and Giuliani had already softened him up for her.

And to the media…

“Here’s a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion. I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country.”

Despite her disdain for them, they gushed for her.

Media swoons over Palin’s fiery speech

Fired-up Palin rocks arena, rips her foes

Palin Assails Critics and Electrifies Party

Afterwards, John McCain ambled onstage in a surprise early appearance, and wisely had little to add. Essentially saying “See?”

Obama’s camp responded with already well-worn talking points; a veritable knife in a gunfight.

“The speech that Gov. Palin gave []well delivered, but it was written by George Bush’s speechwriter and sounds exactly like the same divisive, partisan attacks we’ve heard from George Bush for the last eight years. If Gov. Palin and John McCain want to define ‘change’ as voting with George Bush 90 percent of the time, that’s their choice, but we don’t think the American people are ready to take a 10 percent chance on change,” said Bill Burton, Obama campaign spokesman.

And now they must scramble to adjust…again.

 

John McCain…

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

LIVE BLOGGED

…is getting much more than he bargained for tonight.

Sarah Palin is on tonight. She is as comfortable in front of this crowd as she is at her son’s hockey game.

This bodes well so far.

…and now she’s going after Obama and Biden! Un bee leeeev a bull! She aint wastin’ no time!

So much for the motherly image!

I can guarantee you that Obama’s handlers are peeing their pants at this very moment. Sarah Palin is stealing this race before the paint dries on the yard signs.

She does look like Tina Fey.

…and she is abolutely crusifying Obama.

Other highlights:

I was just your average hockey mom, and signed up for the PTA because I wanted to make my kids’ public education better.

When I ran for city council, I didn’t need focus groups and voter profiles because I knew those voters, and knew their families, too.

Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown.

And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves.

I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a “community organizer,” except that you have actual responsibilities. I might add that in small towns, we don’t quite know what to make of a candidate who lavishes praise on working people when they are listening, and then talks about how bitterly they cling to their religion and guns when those people aren’t listening.

We tend to prefer candidates who don’t talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco.

 

Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all of America’s energy problems – as if we all didn’t know that already.

But the fact that drilling won’t solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all.

 

And there is much to like and admire about our opponent.

But listening to him speak, it’s easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform – not even in the state senate.

 

But when the cloud of rhetoric has passed … when the roar of the crowd fades away … when the stadium lights go out, and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot – what exactly is our opponent’s plan? What does he actually seek to accomplish, after he’s done turning back the waters and healing the planet? The answer is to make government bigger … take more of your money … give you more orders from Washington … and to reduce the strength of America in a dangerous world. America needs more energy … our opponent is against producing it.

Victory in Iraq is finally in sight … he wants to forfeit.

Terrorist states are seeking new-clear weapons without delay … he wants to meet them without preconditions.

Al Qaeda terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America … he’s worried that someone won’t read them their rights? Government is too big … he wants to grow it.

Congress spends too much … he promises more.

Taxes are too high … he wants to raise them.

 

In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers.

And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change.

They’re the ones whose names appear on laws and landmark reforms, not just on buttons and banners, or on self-designed presidential seals.

 

A leader who’s not looking for a fight, but is not afraid of one either. Harry Reid, the Majority Leader of the current do-nothing Senate, not long ago summed up his feelings about our nominee.

He said, quote, “I can’t stand John McCain.” Ladies and gentlemen, perhaps no accolade we hear this week is better proof that we’ve chosen the right man. Clearly what the Majority Leader was driving at is that he can’t stand up to John McCain.

 

My fellow citizens, the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of “personal discovery.” This world of threats and dangers is not just a community, and it doesn’t just need an organizer.

 

To the most powerful office on earth, (Senator McCain) would bring the compassion that comes from having once been powerless … the wisdom that comes even to the captives, by the grace of God … the special confidence of those who have seen evil, and seen how evil is overcome.

She pulled it off. The crowd is absolutely electrified.

Blitzer on CNN: She hit it out of the Park! Clearly a star has been born in the United States.

Anderson Cooper: if anyone is wondering why she is such a popular governor, they know now

Campbell: John McCain got his attack dog!

CNN: The most macho speech of the night was given by a woman

John McCain’s choice is so very justified…and he just walked onto stage…surprise!

Rudy Giuliani…

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

LIVE BLOGGED

…is giving the speech of his lifetime.

If you believe in Voodoo, Barack’s backside is quite sore by now from the application of Rudy’s foot.

Cindy McCain is cradling Sarah Palin’s baby boy as Rudy speaks.

Highlights:

A few years later, he ran for the U.S. Senate. He won and has spent most of his time as a “celebrity senator.” No leadership or major legislation to speak of. His rise is remarkable in its own right – it’s the kind of thing that could happen only in America. But he’s never run a city, never run a state, never run a business.

He’s never had to lead people in crisis.

This is not a personal attack….it’s a statement of fact – Barack Obama has never led anything.

Nothing. Nada.

 

Look at just one example in a lifetime of principled stands — John McCain’s support for the troop surge in Iraq. The Democratic Party had given up on Iraq. And I believe, ladies and gentlemen, that when they gave up on Iraq they were giving up on America. The Democratic leader in the Senate said so: “America has lost.”

Well, if America lost, who won? Al Qaida? Bin Laden? In the single biggest policy decision of this election, John McCain got it right and Barack Obama got it wrong.

 

Obama was going to take public financing for his campaign, until he didn’t.

Obama was against wiretapping before he voted for it.

When speaking to a pro-Israel group, Obama favored an undivided Jerusalem. Until the very next day when he changed his mind.

I hope for his sake, Joe Biden got that VP thing in writing.

 

When Russia rolled over Georgia, John McCain knew exactly how to respond.

Having been to that part of the world many times and having developed a clear worldview over many years, John knew where he stood. Within hours, he established a very strong, informed position that let the world know exactly how he’ll respond as President. At exactly the right time, John McCain said, “We’re all Georgians.”

Obama’s first instinct was to create a moral equivalency – that “both sides” should “show restraint.” The same moral equivalency that he has displayed in discussing the Palestinian Authority and the State of Israel.

Later, after discussing it with his 300 foreign policy advisors, he changed his position and suggested that the “the UN Security Council,” could find a solution. Apparently, none of his 300 advisors told him that Russia has a veto on any UN action. Finally Obama put out a statement that looked …well, it looked a lot like John McCain’s.

Here’s some free advice: Sen. Obama, next time just call John McCain.

 

She’s not one of the good ‘ol boys…and that’s bad?

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

They want McCain to be a maverick and then when he acts like one they pounce like hyenas.

They want women to assume more dominant roles and when an ascendant, accomplished and confident one does, they say she’s too young, too cute, too average, too motherly.

They want reform and an end to the entrenched policies and personalities of Washington; along comes an agent of that very change and they attack her for not being chosen by them; for not being of the ilk.

WSJ: Even as the Obama camp ponders how best to handle John McCain’s veep pick of Sarah Palin, the high priests and priestesses of the media have marked her as an apostate. The Beltway class is in full-throated rebellion against a nondomesticated conservative who might pose a threat to their coronation of Barack Obama and the return of Camelot-on-the-Potomac.

If we know anything about John McCain, it is that he is by instinct a reformer, sometimes to a fault. Yet when he acts like McCain and picks a maverick reformer in his own mold, his former media cheering squad turns on him for not conforming to Beltway mores and picking someone they’ve all met 10 times in the CNN green room.

They want a break from politics as usual and then won’t recognize Sarah Palin for how much she has accomplished in a short time as Governor, not to mention fighting her very own party in the interest of her citizenry.

The Beltway class whines constantly about how it wants fresh voices in politics, but we guess this means a first-term Democratic Senator rather than a first-term Republican Governor from some godforsaken U.S. state few of them have ever been to. 

A sample of some of the spray from the media of late on the Palin candidacy:

– Eleanor Clift, the McLaughlin Group: “If the media reaction is anything, it’s been literally laughter in many places across newsrooms.”

– Sally Quinn, Newsweek: “It is a political gimmick . . . I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country.”

– E.J. Dionne, Washington Post: “Palin is, if anything, less qualified for the vice presidency (and the presidency) than [Harriet] Miers was for the court. But there is one big difference: Palin passes all the right-wing litmus tests.”

– Maureen Dowd, New York Times: “They have a tradition of nominating fun, bantamweight cheerleaders from the West.”

– Ruth Marcus, Washington Post: “But as a parent in the media, I also know that the Palins assumed this risk. Anyone who watched coverage of the Bush twins’ barroom exploits knew that the avert-your-eyes stance toward candidates’ children has its limits.”

– Charlie Cook, Beltway pundit, on PBS’s “Charlie Rose”: “I had a friend that had a young person tell them that they had three interviews to get a job as a server at Ruby Tuesday! So this is like putting a whole — for someone that hasn’t played on a national — Geraldine Ferraro had more — Dan Quayle had undergone more scrutiny, had played on a bigger stage than this. This is putting an enormous risk on someone he didn’t know. And he has to just pray that it works!”

Watching the Obama/Biden camp squirm is a lesson in political schizophrenia.

We are instructed that Mrs. Palin isn’t qualified, because she lacks Washington experience. But until recently that was said to be a virtue in Mr. Obama, who is at the top of his ticket. Meanwhile, there’s hardly a peep of media notice that the Obama campaign is preposterously trying to remake Joe Biden into a poor scrapper from Scranton when he’s been in the Senate for 36 years. They all know Joe. But when Mr. McCain picks an authentic middle-class mother who is also a Governor, we are told she’s not up to the job.

Tonight, in what will undoubtedly be one of the most-watched events of the presidential race, the American people will find out if in fact she is up to the job. Ostensibly even more so when she enlists her intellect in a VP debate with Joe Blow’s mouth.

That night we may find ourselves witness to one of the most historic debates of all time as most certainly Joe will underestimate Mrs. Palin or will otherwise be incapacitated by her charms and his inability to control his diction in the presence of a lady.

John McCain is counting on it.

--> Site Meter -->