Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
College professor teaches students that if you’re White and you’re breathing, you are an oppressor. That’s the Initial Premise.
Oppression is bad. We must end oppression. That’s the Secondary Premise.
Logically, then, White college students breathing = oppression = must end. We must stop White college students breathing. And if the individual students won’t stop breathing/oppressing, and the government won’t stop them, individuals will simply have to pitch in to help.
Conclusion: Who’s got an assault rifle?
What? It’s the logical conclusion to the chain of reasoning resulting from the Initial Premise that White people breathing equals oppression. Isn’t mass murder what the prof wanted us to conclude? How else will society get White students to stop oppressing/breathing?
If mass murder is not the Conclusion you expected, perhaps the Initial Premise is incorrect?
On the one hand, I’m gonna guess the “professor’s” desired resolution is “reeducation”.
OTOH, what alternative awaits those who won’t willingly be sufficiently enlightened?