Hot Strategic Doctrine Friday
By Mitch Berg
Ryuichi from Richfield writes:
Your blog has been really remiss in failing to cover the finer points of modern Japanese Self Defense Force armored combat doctrine.
I know, I know.
6 Responses to “Hot Strategic Doctrine Friday”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
May 21st, 2021 at 7:55 am
This should have been filed under Hot Gear
May 21st, 2021 at 8:38 am
Good catch.
Done.
May 21st, 2021 at 12:42 pm
Ah, the good old M1A Abrams Main battle Tank. The most bad a*s tank to ever grace the planet.
Hell, the baddest a*s military vehicle period.
Of course the dhimmicraps fought tooth and nail against the US fielding them.
May 21st, 2021 at 10:20 pm
They did, Kinlaw? I’d have thought I’d have remembered that, but then again, I was only just getting into high school when the M1 was introduced.
My thought on tanks in Japan is that the terrain there would have made it poor country for tanks, and much better for well-distributed artillery and such, but huh. Pretty stuff.
May 22nd, 2021 at 9:44 am
bike: yeah, they tried to argue that it was too heavy, a C5 could only carry one of them at that time as I recall. The C-17 came into service later, probably because of that discussion, and could carry two, and I think C-5 upgrades allowed it to carry two as well.
May 24th, 2021 at 12:04 pm
That I remember. My thought at the time was “didjaknow that there are these things called ‘ships’ which can carry tanks? My grandfather served on one.”