It’s understandable that you wingnuts need a day to whine and make excuses (It was the media! Obama’s lies!) for yesterday’s nationwide rejection of who you and what you stand for. It’s gotta hurt.
Just wondering if you’ll nut up one of these days soon and admit that your worldview was soundly rejected by most Americans yesterday. Cause there’s really nothing more pathetic than a whiny bully.
On the other hand, it gives Angryclown plenty to mock.
I’m just curious to see how “The Daily Show” will survive the next four years.
I’m just curious to see how “The Daily Show” will survive the next four years.
They’ll be covering the wacky exploits of reprobate golfer and Hooters spokesman John Daly, most likely.
Did someone elect a worldview last night? I hear a “buzz”, “buzz”, “buzzing” in my ear. Something pathetic and whiny, and it mentioned “worldview”. 🙂
AC:
Never confuse consensus with wisdom my friend.
Furthermore, It was no mandate all in all.
Don’t you have some parking meters to empty?
Really, JRoosh? Cause Obama won by a bigger margin than Shrub in 2004. And of course the current presidunce had a negative margin in 2000. Yet he claimed a “mandate” both times. Not to mention embarassing the Republican Party by carrying several states that should have been completely safe.
Well, now that he is president and the democrats control congress it’s time to put up or shut up. Unlike AC during the last 8 years, I sincerely hope they are up to the job. I see no reason to engage AC at this point, time will tell if we were right, or if he was. At this point I really really really hope he was.
Roosh, Bush claimed a ‘mandate’ after winning in 2004, why would it be inaccurate to claim that a victory by 7 Million or so voters, vs. 3 Million in 2004, for which you made comments like “Bush got the largest vote total in history…”
Barack Obama won in massive fashion considering the enormous split that exists in this country. Not since Reagan has someone NOT either the incumbant or VP had this kind of victory. Any of you(us) who think 400 EV totals are routine, or 60/40 splits are the bellweather of mandate, have not noted the polarized state of the current union.
I agree with Buzz.. I hope Obama can do more than he planned, as much as is required. I doubt, however, the government is going to solve all problems, those of you who now set that bar before him, are doing so with knowing disbelief, how can you say you’d hold him to a standard you feel is not achievable?
One other comment, I’m a fair student of Lincoln, probably the only President I can say that of. It’s my humble opinion Lincoln holds far more in common with Obama, than the neo-cons. Lincoln sought to unite, sought to avoid intolerant reprisal, sought to teach all that we all are flawed, that slavery was allowed by God, and once God determined to do so, punished both sides for their sin. Read his 2nd innagural address if you doubt this. He did not seek to support the separatist attitudes of the south, and which are so repeatedly mouthed and mimicked by the right these past 3 decades, especially during Clinton, and presumably even more stridently now.
You have no claim to Lincoln, his version and vision of democracy is a far cry from what it appears you believe in. He was, above all, sincerely interested in the common good, in comprimise if it would save lives – I don’t think that can reasonably said of your approach to foriegn (or even domestic) policy disputes.
“in comprimise if it would save lives ”
Right, that Ulysses S. Grant fellow he put in charge of the Union army was one helluva comprimiser. Saved a ton of lives.
Your frothing hatred for all things “neo-con” is – words fail me – interesting.
Another word might be “too deranged and removed from reality to be funny anymore”, except that’s not a word, per se.
Seriously – I can tell your hatred is choking you even in your writing.
how can you say you’d hold him to a standard you feel is not achievable?
We did not.
His supporters and proponents did.
Waiting for him to pay my gas and my mortgage and make me feel proud of this country for the first time and save the national soul-ily,
MBerg
Peev claims he’s in no way obsessive,
Despite comments so long, they’re oppressive,
He haunts Mitch’s blog,
Is a comment thread hog.
His behavior is downright possessive.
Yossarian…nice…it missed awesome only to the degree it didn’t utilize the word assnozzle.
In all fairness, a hard word to rhyme.
Should I take my cues for how to behave the next 4 years from my Liberal friends? (may a merciful God make it just 4 years) Do as they did the last 8 years, demonize President Obama as the next Hitler and hope for his untimely demise? (oh God, President Joe Biden…) I don’t think I have it in me.
If you have any friends in Israel, you might want to advise them to get the hell out of Dodge. And if the Iraqi’s are wondering how this will play out, all they have to do is look at what happened in South East Asia after we bailed out on Viet Nam. 2.5 million dead in the re-education camps and killing fields, and 30 years under the boot heel of Communism. Funny how the Dems point to that as a great “accomplishment”. The worst part is that it’s likely Obama will appoint 2 or more Supreme Court Justices. That’s not something our Constituiton is likely to survive. Oh well, we had a great 232 year run, didn’t we?
Peev’s comments are chock full of bile
And written in assnozzle style
With words he won’t proof
He comes off like a goof
And his output is one steaming pile
There ya go, Mr. Mayor.
Help me out here, moonbats; just how does this Obamanation stuff work?
Where do I go to get my Obamacheck? Also, I really need a new set of wheels….do I just go pick out what I want and tell the dealer to send the bill to Washington?
When will Al Queda start turning themselves in? Will we get free gasoline from Venezuela now that we’re on the same page?
And now that we’re seeking good relations with Iran, do we have to start beating our women on the streets if they happen to step ahead of us?
So many questions.
Hard to say, Swiftee. What with Inauguration Day more than 10 weeks from now. I guess today’s a good day for you to concentrate on the fact that Obama won the White House and Democrats are in solid control of the House and Senate. As a result, vicious wingnut brownshirts like you, who fancied yourselves the vanguard of a neo-fascist takeover of America, are forced to slither back under the rocks you came from. 🙂
Ahh, so all that “Americans united” stuff that Obamessiah was spewing was just more Democrat lies.
Got it.
Actually that makes me feel better, ’cause I was really having trouble coming to grips with a future that didn’t include a good, healthy dose of liberal bashing.
Thanks. Now get back in the kitchen, b*tch.
NYSE 500 points down today.
angryclown said:
“vicious wingnut brownshirts like you, who fancied yourselves the vanguard of a neo-fascist takeover of America”
I don’t think anyone “fancied” themselves in this way. You may have, and many a time, but that never made it true, angryclown.
The second cartoon is in direct contradiction to the first.
52% of voters is only 21% percent of the people.
There ya go, Mr. Mayor.
Schwing!
Clownie, the “neo-fascist takeover of America” started last night. Didn’t you get your shirt? First up on the agenda, amend that pesky First Amendment. Joseph Pelosi has much to do.
And the Fascists were originally Marxists, they just decided to take a more active stance!
Fascists began as collective leftists they continue to be collective leftists.
They would be proud of someone proclaiming that we are not a society of individuals.
If you do not understand this, you do not understand fascism in any way, shape, matter or form. Sorry to keep beating this drum, but it is imperative that people understand the truth no matter how uncomfortable.
Stock marker down 500 points, biggest post-election drop evuh!
I guess investors with real money don’t read Krugman.
“For if the nineteenth century was a century of individualism it may be expected that this will be the century of collectivism and hence the century of the State…. “
-Benito Mussolini, 1932 entry for the Italian Encyclopedia on the definition of fascism
It’s understandable that you wingnuts need a day to whine and make excuses (It was the media! Obama’s lies!) for yesterday’s nationwide rejection of who you and what you stand for. It’s gotta hurt.
Just wondering if you’ll nut up one of these days soon and admit that your worldview was soundly rejected by most Americans yesterday. Cause there’s really nothing more pathetic than a whiny bully.
On the other hand, it gives Angryclown plenty to mock.
I’m just curious to see how “The Daily Show” will survive the next four years.
I’m just curious to see how “The Daily Show” will survive the next four years.
They’ll be covering the wacky exploits of reprobate golfer and Hooters spokesman John Daly, most likely.
Did someone elect a worldview last night? I hear a “buzz”, “buzz”, “buzzing” in my ear. Something pathetic and whiny, and it mentioned “worldview”. 🙂
AC:
Never confuse consensus with wisdom my friend.
Furthermore, It was no mandate all in all.
Don’t you have some parking meters to empty?
Really, JRoosh? Cause Obama won by a bigger margin than Shrub in 2004. And of course the current presidunce had a negative margin in 2000. Yet he claimed a “mandate” both times. Not to mention embarassing the Republican Party by carrying several states that should have been completely safe.
Well, now that he is president and the democrats control congress it’s time to put up or shut up. Unlike AC during the last 8 years, I sincerely hope they are up to the job. I see no reason to engage AC at this point, time will tell if we were right, or if he was. At this point I really really really hope he was.
Roosh, Bush claimed a ‘mandate’ after winning in 2004, why would it be inaccurate to claim that a victory by 7 Million or so voters, vs. 3 Million in 2004, for which you made comments like “Bush got the largest vote total in history…”
Barack Obama won in massive fashion considering the enormous split that exists in this country. Not since Reagan has someone NOT either the incumbant or VP had this kind of victory. Any of you(us) who think 400 EV totals are routine, or 60/40 splits are the bellweather of mandate, have not noted the polarized state of the current union.
I agree with Buzz.. I hope Obama can do more than he planned, as much as is required. I doubt, however, the government is going to solve all problems, those of you who now set that bar before him, are doing so with knowing disbelief, how can you say you’d hold him to a standard you feel is not achievable?
One other comment, I’m a fair student of Lincoln, probably the only President I can say that of. It’s my humble opinion Lincoln holds far more in common with Obama, than the neo-cons. Lincoln sought to unite, sought to avoid intolerant reprisal, sought to teach all that we all are flawed, that slavery was allowed by God, and once God determined to do so, punished both sides for their sin. Read his 2nd innagural address if you doubt this. He did not seek to support the separatist attitudes of the south, and which are so repeatedly mouthed and mimicked by the right these past 3 decades, especially during Clinton, and presumably even more stridently now.
You have no claim to Lincoln, his version and vision of democracy is a far cry from what it appears you believe in. He was, above all, sincerely interested in the common good, in comprimise if it would save lives – I don’t think that can reasonably said of your approach to foriegn (or even domestic) policy disputes.
“in comprimise if it would save lives ”
Right, that Ulysses S. Grant fellow he put in charge of the Union army was one helluva comprimiser. Saved a ton of lives.
Your frothing hatred for all things “neo-con” is – words fail me – interesting.
Another word might be “too deranged and removed from reality to be funny anymore”, except that’s not a word, per se.
Seriously – I can tell your hatred is choking you even in your writing.
how can you say you’d hold him to a standard you feel is not achievable?
We did not.
His supporters and proponents did.
Waiting for him to pay my gas and my mortgage and make me feel proud of this country for the first time and save the national soul-ily,
MBerg
Peev claims he’s in no way obsessive,
Despite comments so long, they’re oppressive,
He haunts Mitch’s blog,
Is a comment thread hog.
His behavior is downright possessive.
Yossarian…nice…it missed awesome only to the degree it didn’t utilize the word assnozzle.
In all fairness, a hard word to rhyme.
Should I take my cues for how to behave the next 4 years from my Liberal friends? (may a merciful God make it just 4 years) Do as they did the last 8 years, demonize President Obama as the next Hitler and hope for his untimely demise? (oh God, President Joe Biden…) I don’t think I have it in me.
If you have any friends in Israel, you might want to advise them to get the hell out of Dodge. And if the Iraqi’s are wondering how this will play out, all they have to do is look at what happened in South East Asia after we bailed out on Viet Nam. 2.5 million dead in the re-education camps and killing fields, and 30 years under the boot heel of Communism. Funny how the Dems point to that as a great “accomplishment”. The worst part is that it’s likely Obama will appoint 2 or more Supreme Court Justices. That’s not something our Constituiton is likely to survive. Oh well, we had a great 232 year run, didn’t we?
Peev’s comments are chock full of bile
And written in assnozzle style
With words he won’t proof
He comes off like a goof
And his output is one steaming pile
There ya go, Mr. Mayor.
Help me out here, moonbats; just how does this Obamanation stuff work?
Where do I go to get my Obamacheck? Also, I really need a new set of wheels….do I just go pick out what I want and tell the dealer to send the bill to Washington?
When will Al Queda start turning themselves in? Will we get free gasoline from Venezuela now that we’re on the same page?
And now that we’re seeking good relations with Iran, do we have to start beating our women on the streets if they happen to step ahead of us?
So many questions.
Hard to say, Swiftee. What with Inauguration Day more than 10 weeks from now. I guess today’s a good day for you to concentrate on the fact that Obama won the White House and Democrats are in solid control of the House and Senate. As a result, vicious wingnut brownshirts like you, who fancied yourselves the vanguard of a neo-fascist takeover of America, are forced to slither back under the rocks you came from. 🙂
Ahh, so all that “Americans united” stuff that Obamessiah was spewing was just more Democrat lies.
Got it.
Actually that makes me feel better, ’cause I was really having trouble coming to grips with a future that didn’t include a good, healthy dose of liberal bashing.
Thanks. Now get back in the kitchen, b*tch.
NYSE 500 points down today.
angryclown said:
“vicious wingnut brownshirts like you, who fancied yourselves the vanguard of a neo-fascist takeover of America”
I don’t think anyone “fancied” themselves in this way. You may have, and many a time, but that never made it true, angryclown.
The second cartoon is in direct contradiction to the first.
52% of voters is only 21% percent of the people.
There ya go, Mr. Mayor.
Schwing!
Clownie, the “neo-fascist takeover of America” started last night. Didn’t you get your shirt? First up on the agenda, amend that pesky First Amendment. Joseph Pelosi has much to do.
And the Fascists were originally Marxists, they just decided to take a more active stance!
Fascists began as collective leftists they continue to be collective leftists.
They would be proud of someone proclaiming that we are not a society of individuals.
If you do not understand this, you do not understand fascism in any way, shape, matter or form. Sorry to keep beating this drum, but it is imperative that people understand the truth no matter how uncomfortable.
Stock marker down 500 points, biggest post-election drop evuh!
I guess investors with real money don’t read Krugman.
“For if the nineteenth century was a century of individualism it may be expected that this will be the century of collectivism and hence the century of the State…. “
-Benito Mussolini, 1932 entry for the Italian Encyclopedia on the definition of fascism