From another Financial Advisor and close friend of mine “Casey R.”:
A few very important things occurred to me as I was watching predictable election results unfold last night. An obvious fact remains based on the votes received by each candidate – we are still very much divided in this country, very evenly divided.
Obama won the majority vote and a delivered a corresponding “pounding” in what both parties recognize as a “quirky” electoral college. Even though I was more comfortable with the experience of McCain, I understand and appreciate the rationale that lead so many to look to a motivational and charismatic man as an impetus for change.
I became very worried throughout the campaign as I learned more about Obama’s liberal voting history and limited efforts to vote outside his party. Democrats held McCain to the same standard and found that, although he did tackle non-partisan issues in Washington, he sided too often with a misguided President during his first term for their comfort.
Obama earned respect from me with his moment of candid humility last night. It came with the admittance that for the nearly 50% of the country that didn’t vote for him, he needed to do his best to earn their support and confidence and he knew he couldn’t simply assume it.
I worried about this election because there are social and moral standards I just felt in my heart this country wasn’t really willing to leave behind simply for the sake of a change from an unpopular administration. Worried because even Obama acknowledged his tax policies are not mainstream America and may be risky in a depressed economy (a stark contrast to Reagan’s progressive taxation which never considered re-distribution of income to non-income tax paying citizens – 40% of America today).
Worried because I felt marriage ought to mean something special in this country to a man and a woman.
Worried because I did not want to see abortion politicized further into tax dollar funded programs for such a morally charged but personal issue.
Worried because I believe the troops deserve a proper end to the war for their sacrifice and not a premature end to simply satisfy those seeking retribution against an unpopular President.
Worried because Nancy Pelosi, disliked so fervently by both parties because of her recklessness, has a “mandate” she feels everyone needs to accept to justify her political existence.
I watched all of the debates for both sides, from the primaries to the end. I read copies of voting records and bills proposed by both men. The two men are politicians, they made many promises they cannot keep, they changed views and positions to accommodate the polls and pundits which should surprise no one familiar with politics. But Obama won the election because it was his time and America was hungry for a clean slate. His cult of personality appeal and message obviously resonated with a greater number of Americans, especially young Americans.
Surprisingly, many of the fears I held leading up to the election began to recede over the course of the coverage last night. Because of the class shown by McCain in his words? Yes. The inspiration shared with the country by Obama’s words? Yes. But it was actually in the underlying voting results that my comfort in this country and my faith in the citizens of the country were strengthened and somewhat restored.
Obama is a smart man and his comments last evening inferred his understanding of some very meaningful exit poll results, some of which are in direct contrast to his platform, others which he fondly supports. Facts: an overwhelming majority of voters – 80% – do not feel comfortable having their wealth distributed, a majority want very careful steps taken with healthcare reform versus sweeping change, a majority support a ban on gay marriage (in California of all places!), a majority want reproductive rights out of government hands, and a majority want to see the war ended responsibly and expect Obama to lean on current commanders in Iraq versus congress for guidance.
The message is a mix of centrist and conservative views, forming what many of us recognize as a Center-Right populate of mainstream America – fiscally conservative and social moderate. So I woke this morning with a sense of relief on two fronts.
First, although the candidate I voted for lost, he lost to a man who may have the passion to do great things. Second, though a Democrat will govern from the oval office, the social consciousness of mainstream America is exactly what my heart told me it was. Obama will need to respect and embrace this sentiment in order to deliver the change he hopes to see.
Obama has a tough road ahead because so much of the ‘hope and change’ message is intangible and interpreted differently depending on the social-economic standing of those listening to it. To the supporter who shared a common sentiment “I won’t have to worry any more about paying my mortgage… putting gas in my car… if I help him, he’ll help me,” he needs to quickly shape her expectations and motivate her to work hard rather than relying on a government hand-out. Allowing such unrealistic expectations will quickly alienate a large base of his electorate if mishandled. He needs to meet the racially motivated comments by Sharpton and Jackson with a clear understanding that race became a non-issue as of 11:30 PM, November 4, 2008, and the complaining associated with it needs to go by the wayside. Lastly, I understand the exuberance he must have felt last evening during his speech, but he needs to focus on meaningful and obtainable objectives this term before audaciously referring to his next term already.
The political system in America is truly amazing. Anything can happen and, even if opinions differ, we should always find comfort in the reality that we enjoy a peaceful transfer of power during elections in this country. Barack Obama won an election that was his to secure. I promised myself, regardless of the results, I would support the new President out of respect for the election process and the office itself. The motivation behind my intentions is a combination of patriotism and an effort to take a road much higher than many on the left/media did with the current administration.
They repeatedly showed they lacked class in their actions and judgment and a lack of respect for the office of President. I hope future generations will not be subjected to tasteless and derogatory films released while a President is still in office.
How can anyone honest with themselves be surprised by the lack of stature America has today in the world when we cut and run from our President with Hollywood attacks and mindless commentary? Don’t get me wrong, Bush earned his criticism but he was also the President of the United States. Those expecting the same respect for Obama may have been well served to demonstrate a higher level of respect for past Presidents, even during moments of strained popularity and disagreement.
I hope for some unifying and positive strides for the country. America voted for Obama, with a message to respect not construct the social consciousness, to learn from our history but not feel pressure to repeat it, to recognize party affiliations but not succumb to them, and to manage rational hopes and changes lest they become reckless, broken promises. As Obama has said time and time again, “this is a defining moment,” and my hope is that America capitalizes on it.
HT Casey R
I agree with most of Casey R’s screed. The big exception is:
“forming what many of us recognize as a Center-Right populate of mainstream America – fiscally conservative and social moderate.”
This is one of those statements I hear all the time that bugs the hell out of me (depending on what is meant by “moderate”).
Social moderation or liberalism is not compatible with fiscal conservatism because lax social standards lead to greater expense by the state. No fault divorce and the acceptance of premarital sex has led to single parent families. Single parent families tend to require government assistance. Everyone else pays for two persons’ liberal views on marriage and sex.
Ditto a liberal attitude towards drug use. Johnny uses drugs, becomes addicted, and requires more attention from public health and law enforcement than he otherwise would have.
One person that takes advantage of moderate or liberal social policies can incur far more more financial liability than it is possible for them ever to pay back into the system. Social conservatism makes fiscal conservatism possible. Social liberalism requires profligate spending by the state, which leads to greater control of the economy by the state.
In the real world you can’t believe both in fiscal conservatism and faddish social experiments.
And one more point, since I’m burning pixels and no one else seems to have mentioned it.
McCain lost by 7 million votes. It’s hard to believe that Romney, Giuliani, or Thompson could have done worst than that. So much for reaching to the center, picking a pro-amnesty candidate who was liked by Democrats, had no strong religious affiliation, and most of all, who had a troubled relationship with the GOP base.
Hell, if McCain had chosen a pro-choice VP (as some Republicans suggested) he wouldn’t have gained anything.
Back to basics, conservatives.
Back to basics, conservatives!
In your heart, you know he’s right!
Well, no more time to gloat. So here’s the thought Angryclown wishes to leave with you kooks on this glorious day:
I want the rest of you wingnuts to know something. There’s a new sheriff in town. And his name is Barack Obama. So y’all be cool. Right on.
And he’s wearin’ is big black jack-boots, and a newly starched brown shirt!
Ready to sign yer kids up for the Obama Youth?
_______________________________________
“For if the nineteenth century was a century of individualism it may be expected that this will be the century of collectivism and hence the century of the State….”
-Benito Mussolini, 1932 entry for the Italian Encyclopedia on the definition of fascism
…Angryclown wishes to leave…
Hey everybody, Angryclown wishes to leave! Look at me…I can take things out of context too!
Are you trying to say, AC, that “The sherrif is a ni-“.
Don’t get excited. The line is from Blazing Saddles, which I expect AC was alluding to.
I suppose singing “I Shot The Sherrif” would be in bad taste at this juncture. Not that bad taste has ever been a concern of the Clown.
Well, consider this quote from George W. Bush’s victory speech in 2004:
“Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust.”
We all know how well that worked out. The winners always reach out the losers. And George W. Bush got his hand chewed off.
We’ll have to be better than that to President-elect Obama. But don’t expect the same courtesy when the pendulum swings back our way.
I have no problem with being fiercely partisan, as long the object of partisanship is conservatism rather than Republicanism. That kind of partisanship leads to craziness like Hugh Hewitt hoping that convicted grafter Ted Stevens holds his lead in Alaska. Criminy.
The object of the progressive movement is for the state to dictate all of the moral choices that we make. This is not an “alternative way of managing a complex society” it is annihilation. The only important difference between a human being and an animal is that we make, as individuals, moral decisions of our own free will. The dignity and respect we accord one another as human beings is derived from that fact. If we give that up, we give up everything. The amount of money in our pockets is literally nothing in comparison.
Well Terry, at least you can sit on the beach and watch the distant plume of smoke far off in the East. At least the winds tend to blow in that direction, which means you get a brief respite before the inevitable circumnavigation blows them down on you. Aloha.
Obama and the looney, liberal illuminatis have promised so much and common sense should tell you that many of these promises can’t be kept. Government can’t be expected to solve every problem with handouts. I’m shocked at how blindly people could vote for a socialist like Obama without any thought to what these programs will mean to this country. Time will tell.
Terry, with his usual grasp of the facts, said: “Are you trying to say, AC, that “The sherrif is a ni-”.
Don’t get excited. The line is from Blazing Saddles, which I expect AC was alluding to.”
48 Hours, big guy. You know there’s this thing called “Google” on the intertubes. Maybe you can take one of those extension classes at the community college.
He said the sheriff is near!
Oh no, Terry missed a pop culture reference from 1982 for a pop culture reference from 1974. What a harrowing bobble of “the facts”.
Quit stealing my insults.
Here, I’ll steal one of JRoosh’s insults:
http://www.artzooks.com/files/5273/AZ990313_320.jpg
Get back to work clown boy!
You gotta put quotes around a quote, AC. I’ve never seen 48 hours. I thought you were riffing on the “laurel and hearty handshake” bit from Blazing Saddles.