Bradley Versus Prosser
By Mitch Berg
Ann Althouse notes that it looks like Bradley was trying to be “first to the Courthouse” in her physical and then legal scuffle with David Prosser:
Who gets to frame the story of the workplace bully? A person who fears accusation as the aggressor might opt for a preemptive strike, and that could have been the case here. During the incident, Justice Roggensack pulled Bradley away from Prosser and said, more than once, “This is not like you.” Bradley describes herself becoming very emotional. Perhaps she was shocked by her own behavior and self-defensively saw it as in her interest to portray Prosser as the aggressor
Read, naturally, the whole thing.
August 30th, 2011 at 11:32 am
But…but…Democrats are the tolerant, sensible party. The party of inclusion. Of justice. The party that just wants everyone to get along. They’re good enough, they’re smart enough, and gosh darn it, people like them!
August 30th, 2011 at 12:17 pm
I’ve been following the Bradley-Prosser saga over at Althouse on a fairly regular basis. From reading the parts of the investigators report featured there it is clear Bradley was the aggressor. She tried to draw a smaller, older person (Prosser) into an altercation from which she could claim victim status because of the double standard we have in this country regarding women in the workplace. What she mainly accomplished, in both her physical altercation with Prosser as well as the strategy she executed prior to and after the altercation was diminish the stature of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and put all men on notice that (some) women don’t want equal rights, they want seperate and better rights.