Chanting Points Memo: Emmer’s Detailed Plan!

By Mitch Berg

Back during Desert Storm, Saturday Night Live – which still had Phil Hartmann, Dennis Miller, Jan Hooks and Dana Carvey, and was hence still funny at the time – parodied one of the military press conferences that were such a staple of the coverage of that war, way back when.

In it, a stoic military officer (played, if I remember correctly, by Kevin Nealon) stood, trying to remain unruffled, as “journalists” asked a series of increasingly absurd questions:

 

REPORTER:  “Tell us, Colonel:  what will be the targets, strike times and units involved in any air raids today?” 

OFFICER:  “Um, I am afraid I can’t, er, discuss that…”

ANOTHER REPORTER:  “Colonel, when exactly will the ground attack take place, and where?”

OFFICER:  “Um…”

The media’s coverage of Tom Emmer’s gubernatorial campaign reminds me of that skit.

I noticed this bit in Erik Black’s piece in the MinnPost that I covered yesterday (and that Black’s old colleague John Tevlin, in true “Circle The Wagons!” style, also covers today, in nearly identical thoughts if not words):

[Emmer] owes the voters of Minnesota some straighter talk, not about what he could do, but what he would do to balance the budget. (Not to say that all the other guv candidates have been clear abut how they would do it. They haven’t.)

I asked yesterday – Emmer “owes” the people “straight talk”, while the DFLers merely get a mild joshing nod?

Still, I’ve heard this from a few people; “If Emmer’s so great, and if he’s going to rebuild government, then where is his master plan on how he’s going to do the whole thing?”

I gotta confess sometimes, I”m curious myself.

But it doesn’t take a political consultant or an especially curious journalist to see that…:

  1. We are still two months away from having a DFL candidate.
  2. We do, however, have a huge pool of establishment journalists, “alternative” media figures who are dying for material, and…
  3. …a legion of DFL hacks and flacks whose mission it is to try to take the battle to Tom Emmer during these two months, to try to derail any momentum he builds while the Dems are noodling around with their primary process (and, let’s be honest, most of the “establishment” media in #2 above is at the very least sympathetic with, if not actively working to promote at some level, the DFL).

So with that in mind, tell me – what sense would it make for Tom Emmer to release “the master plan” for his administration, two months before there is an alternative to compare it to?  All that would do is give the DFL and the media (that is, let’s be honest, largely on the DFL’s side) time to define, frame, and re-spin it, long before the Dems ever have a candidate, much less a “plan” to “scrutinize”.  Which I put in scare quotes, since I’m not willing to take it on faith that anyone in the Twin Cities’ establishment media will “scrutinize” the DFL’s “plan” so much as run cover for it; that’ll be, as usual, the job of the conservative alternative media.

What’s Emmer’s plan?  I dunno.  His rhetoric is certainly building up expectations; if he’s not swinging for the fence, he’s at least aiming for the outfield. He’s be nuts not to, in my humble opinion; this is a year when people want to see results, and are showing everyone who cares how sick they are of arrogant, rapacious, thud-witted goverment and the bills it leaves us.

But is he wrong to sit on that plan until it matters?  Even if , horror of horrors, it leaves the state’s chattering classes and the designers of the DFL’s Chanting Points less material for the time being?

I’ll give you my answer when I see Mark Dayton’s plan.

…which, I confidently predict, will be “raise taxes on “the rich” (people making over $80,000, by the time he, heaven forfend, takes office), and keep the public employees unions happy at all costs”. 

DISCLAIMER:  Since two people have asked – I am not employed by, or affiliated with in any way, official or under-the-table, the Emmer Campaign or Republican Party of Minnesota.  I get nothing from either entity; no money, no in-kind consideration, not even a free drink outta this.  I am a private citizen who wants better for Minnesota, and I”m convinced beyond any rational doubt that Tom Emmer is the best choice – the only choice, really – to get us there.

20 Responses to “Chanting Points Memo: Emmer’s Detailed Plan!”

  1. golfdoc50 Says:

    Mark Dayton’s plan appears to be: raise taxes on the “wealthy”. Not exactly original, but predictable.

  2. dave_h Says:

    The follow on questions to Daytons “plan” who is rich and how much money do you expect to gain from taxing them. Next question how are you going to spend those taxes you raised.

  3. Scott Hughes Says:

    Hold your cards close until it’s time to lay them on the table!

  4. Chuck Says:

    I still believe both Dayton and Entenza (likes to spenza) are funded by the Sioux Falls Development Corp. And Barrett in Wisconsin is funded by Minnesota in efforts to make Minnesota look good in comparison to Wisconsin.

  5. GOPLawyer Says:

    “So with that in mind, tell me – what sense would it make for Tom Emmer to release “the master plan” for his administration, two months before there is an alternative to compare it to? ”

    It makes sense to release some sort of a coherent plan to make us feel like he can hit the ground running. This is a different year and we need to know what the candidate can do immediately, not 6 months after inauguration.

  6. mnbubba Says:

    Mark Dayton has a plan? Who knew?

  7. tom a. Says:

    Actually, Mr. Emmer doesn’t need to articulate his positions and ideas. The opposition candidates are more than happy to tell us what they are.

  8. nerdbert Says:

    Mark Dayton has a plan, but it involves bunkers, hazmat suits, gas masks, and running away fast.

  9. K-Rod Says:

    Is that Dayton’s plan or peevee’s plan?

  10. fingers Says:

    Now we just imbed them so they’re too busy ducking and covering to ask stupid questions!

  11. Kermit Says:

    Mark Dayton has a plan. He just hasn’t been told yet.

  12. Night Writer Says:

    It’s a two-point plan.

    1. Chew gum.
    2. Kick butt.

  13. justplainangry Says:

    Don’t forget #3. Play another round of golf

  14. Shot in the Dark » Blog Archive » What If Matt Entenza Released A Plan In The Woods, And Nobody Heard? Says:

    […] swat at Emmer is the left’s latest meme, trying to drag Emmer into talking specifics so the left and media (pardon the redundancy), as we […]

  15. Bill C Says:

    It’s a two-point plan.

    1. Chew gum.
    2. Kick butt.

    2 questions:

    1) what happens when he runs out of gum?
    2) can we call him Rowdy?

  16. nerdbert Says:

    NightWriter, that might work, but he better not try both at once. That could be fatal to him.

  17. Night Writer Says:

    Nerbert, not to worry – he’s all out of chewing gum. Rowdy Emmer’s plan in comparison to the three DFL contenders (straight out of “They Live”):

    Matt Entenza:
    1. Chew gum.
    2. Kiss butt

    Mark Dayton:
    1. Chew gum
    2. Find butt

    MAK
    1. Chew gum
    2. Reattach butt that was handed to her by TPaw in last session.

  18. Kermit Says:

    I think MAK would be grateful if someone detached her butt. They would, of course, need an environmental impact statement first. Maybe some rezoning…

  19. Shot in the Dark » Blog Archive » Chanting Points Memo: Cue Captain Renault Says:

    […] few weeks ago, we talked about (and conclusively shredded) the DFL’s other contrived controversy – the Dems’ harping on Emmer to […]

  20. Top Five Reasons Dayton Should Not Be Governor – #5: We Are Better Than This | Shot in the Dark Says:

    […] Phantom Plan: Until about Labor Day – four solid months – the DFL and its minions caterwauled about Emmer’s lack of a “budget plan“.  Then he released a plan – which balanced the budget – and pointed out the […]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->