It’s a good thing we only end decades every ten years. The endless round of “looking back at the decade” stories inflicted on us takes a good chunk of the joy out of the new year.
Of course, this past ten years has been a time of massive changes, socially and politically and, of course, technologically.
Huffpo ran a list earlier this week of the “12 Things That Became Obsolete This Decade“. And it’s a mixed bag of good and bad news.
I won’t quote the Huffpo piece – you can click the link for all of the giggly, not-one-degree-behind-the-vacuous-trend-curve snarkiness you could want. But the list itself is interesting, more or less:
Calling (onthe phone): The text message, they say, is replacing the phone call. Huge net loss. Unless you’re stuck in a meeting, text messaging sucks chunks through a straw. It’s slow (yeah, yeah, I know, kids today can text 200 wpm, but I guarantee you we can all talk even faster), it degrades language, and in the end it dehumanizes us all; it’s such a natural progression on the way to Duckspeak, I’m amazed nobody else has brought it up. Verdict: Unambiguously Bad.
Classifieds: I’ll cop to it; I jumped on the Craigs List bandwagon with both feet. Sorry, newspapers; technology wins. The buyer needs to beware, but no moreso than with classifieds – and you can at least read Craigslist (and Twin Cities Free Market) without a magnifying glass. Verdict: Acceptable.
Dial-up Internet: Creaky? Unreliable? Begone. Verdict: Unambiguously good.
Encyclopedias: Yeah, I know, Google is fast and ubiquitous and everywhere. And the various online encyclopedias, including Wikipedia, have pretty much slurped up the market. But we’re raising a generation of kids who have absolutely no idea how to find information that doesn’t respond to a three word search string. In a generation, the art and skill of finding information that isn’t parsed, indexed and Google-ready will be even more concentrated in the hands of the very, very few (I’m talking lawyers, here) than it already is. Verdict: Neutral-to-bad.
CDs: I hated CDs when they came out. Compared to well-cared-for-vinyl, CDs – especially DDD CDs (material that was recorded, mastered and delivered digitally) sounded cold, harsh and teutonic. I’m not alone in thinking this; one of the big stories this past year or two in music technology has been the comeback of vinyl, with its warm, human-sounding frequency response. And I still want to find all those bobbleheads from the eighties who were saying “CDs are indestructible, and they will never skip!”; on the balance, I have found CDs to be much, much less reliable than well-cared-for vinyl. And I’m no audiophile (although as I buy more classical music, I could easily become one); for casual music listening, the MP3 is just fine. Verdict: Good riddance.
Landline Phones: As little as I like text messaging, I like cell phones even less. Why? Because you’re always “on” when you have a cell phone; you have to make a considered action to drop off the grid. And worst of all, cell phones are small, usually dark-colored, and easily lost. You can not lose a landline phone. After my little fracas with the garage last summer – where I had to race downstairs to try to find my cell phone, which it took me a second or two to remember I’d left in the handlebar-bag on my bike – I reaffirmed my belief; people need landlines. Verdict: A cursed wolf in blessing-y sheep’s clothing.
Film: The film camera, in theory, is similar to the CD. Digital cameras – at least, the ones I will ever be able to afford – are basically scanners. They sweep their field of view for the data in their response range, and plunk it, according to an automagic algorithm, into memory. It has none of the warmth or idiosyncrasy of film, the use of which is itself an art form. My daughter – who inherited the family photography gene, and is quite talented at the art of composing and lighting a shot – vastly prefers good old film for doing real photography, in the same way that I love analog music. But who am I kidding? If I remembered to take film to the store to be developed, it was a minor miracle. The digital camera fills the niche of the old 110 cameras, without the whole ‘pick up the film” hasslte. Verdict: Ambiguously good with a big asterisk.
Yellow Pages: I always hated trying to parse the phone company’s logic in parsing and sorting the content in the Yellow Pages. Verdict: Unalloyed Blessing.
Catalogs: I never read catalogs. Verdict: Who cares.
Fax Machines: I hated, hated, hated fax machines. Always. Fussy, temperamental, slow, with an action-to-feedback loop an order of magnitude beyond the attention span I devote t o “sending documents”, I learned to detest the buzzing, beeping, paper-shredding, hidden-code-dependent monstrosities. Especially when I was working as a contractor; I’d fax my invoices to whomever was collecting them, and run about my business, and find out a day later that something, somewhere in the chain, had squibbed, leaving me scrambling to make sure I got paid on time…Grrr. Hate ’em. Verdict: Yaaaay!
Wires: Wires, they say, are obsolete. Wireless will replace it all, they say. But after six years of wrestling with anomalous propagation, signal quirks and hardware and user-interface bumfuzzlery, I’m very, very unconvinced. And you just know the Center for Science in the Public Interest is going to find that wireless causes cancer, don’t you? Verdict: Get back to me in ten years, trekkie.
Hand-written letters: Ugh. There’s something so nice about a hand-written letter. Unless it’s from me. Between my ADD and decades of bad habits ranges from an unintelligible scrawl to, if I’m paying attention, a painfully slow all-cap script that looks like it was written by an addled first-grader. On the other hand, I type 70 WPM, and still do it with style. Verdict: I’m so sorry, but I’m totally there.
Thoughts are solicited.