DFL: the police are in occupying force of oppressors, and must be defunded!
Normies: we oppose defunding the police.
DFL: hey, we never said anything about defunding the police!
6 thoughts on “Communicating With The MN DFL: Part IV”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Sheriff: the reason crime is out of control is because the county board is not adequately funding law enforcement.
Board: The Sheriff is a Racist!
Not kidding – see the recent Fletcher/Ramsey exchange.
MBerg is literally killing trans kids with post.
I think it is worth noting that “defunding the police” is actually a euphemism for reducing the number, to the point of getting rid of those police forces *that help normies*. City police forces, sheriffs, and the highway patrol all exist to “protect and serve” all, including normal people.
As we have seen over the past few years, democommie politicians will pay (using public funds) for private security for their own personal protection. And they will also fund a national Praetorian Guard to protect themselves from normies.
The more I see Liberal Democrat policies being implemented, the more I warm up to the idea of defunding the police. If we got rid of the police entirely, we could move on to more of this:
https://nypost.com/2023/04/25/vigilante-mob-burn-gang-members-alive-in-the-streets-of-haiti/
I’ve got a little list.
They wouldn’t be missed.
Virtually every academic urban researcher will wear on a stack of Bibles that decreasing policing reduces crime.
Bigman, [u]ltimately, cops aren’t there to protect the community from criminals. They’re there to protect criminals from the community. Communities dealt with crime for millennia before police were invented, usually with rather limited due process.
When I was looking for this quote, I found it in a comment from a couple of years ago in conjunction with the Mpls riots. Ironic.