Trailer for the new Hunter Biden satirobiopic:
Note that Breitbart is joining Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire and Salem (which owns my radio station, AM1280) in the guerrilla film business.
So there is a chance we could see Trulbert: The Movie after all.
33 thoughts on “Just Take My Money”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This is especially important since Hunter worked in the White House for four years even though he was rejected for a security clearance and then later got a $2 billion investment from the Saudis … oh wait
Once again, hypocritical moron Emery the bot boy, deflects.
The Salon poison pen review of the movie is hilarious. The reviewer spends 95% of his words attacking the film’s writers, actors, producers, and especially viewers. There is just one teensy-tiny bit that actually covers the accusations made by the film:
“Hunter Biden, a young gentleman with a prep-school background and a fondness for narcotics and the company of sex workers, used his dad’s name to get paid big-time by shady companies in China and Ukraine (so far this is almost inarguably true) and his father delivered big U.S. government contracts to those companies and their official benefactors while taking kickbacks.
Yes, libs, that last part is almost certainly false . . . ”
Got that, Emery? “almost certainly false.”
BTW, you really have to twist the King’s English to string together three adverbs like that.
One would think that if it was possible that Joe Biden profited from an influence peddling scheme, that might be of enough importance to Americans that it would merit investigation by LE.
https://www.salon.com/2022/09/08/my-son-hunter-review-theres-barely-even-a-movie-inside-this-deep-state-right-wing-grift/
Emery is working diligently to somehow work the Russki’s into his Saudis-Jew-Trump conspiracy theory.
I think that this thread is a good place to repost this link to a New Yorker expose on the secret history of the Bidens: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/08/22/the-untold-history-of-the-biden-family
It’s an interesting read. It isn’t quite a fitzgeraldesque story because its characters aren’t grand enough, they are low rent Jay Gatsbys.
A publisher abruptly recalled the ‘2,000 Mules’ election denial book. NPR got a copy.
https://www.npr.org/2022/09/08/1121648290/a-publisher-abruptly-recalled-the-2-000-mules-election-denial-book-npr-got-a-cop
What kind of publisher gets all the way through editing, proofing, fact-checking, approving, printing, and shipping a non-fiction book only to recall it over inaccurate content immediately after arriving at stores. The kind of publisher that would release a book of fractured fairy tales in the first place. The publisher—Regnery is a division of Salem Media Group.
Ha! Emery, you ass hatted bot boy, you will look for anything to support your twisted and false worldview, won’t you.
^^ Is this what the book was about?
Nigeria Seizes Thousands of Donkey Penises That Were Being Smuggled to Hong Kong
https://apnews.com/9aa1a8b599263c3620991571bf91b8fe
NPR contacted organizations named in the book for comment about some of D’Souza’s written claims. They referred to passages in the book as “malarkey,” “inaccurate,” and “trash.”
One group</strong?, whose data are cited in the book, said it would request a correction. Another raised the possibility of legal action. OOOOOooooo…better call Saul, Dinesh! hahahaha!
“Malarkey”?? 🤣, NPR labels it “libelous” and sent someone to find out who is actually lawyering up…
“One of the groups D’Souza names is the New Georgia Project…Khondoker declined to say whether the New Georgia Project would take legal action in response to the book”
And…
“A spokesperson for the labor union the National Education Association (NEA), which D’Souza also names in the book, condemned the allegations as “trash,” noting that D’Souza’s attorneys apparently would not allow him to name any groups in his film.”
But he did name them in the book. Lawyering up? Nah.
And finally…
“Other groups declined to comment, with one citing a desire not to give the project “further oxygen.” Given the dubious nature of the allegations, NPR is not naming the groups that did not comment.”
Hahahahaha!
NPR’s product is inchoate papspew, aimed at 80 IQ Dunning Kruger patients, who love that shit because it’s pre-digested for them. 🤡
^^ True the Vote completely distanced itself from the book. The same True the Vote that Trump is directly connected to…..
Moderation has a brother here on SITD now. The bot has taken to just disappearing comments into binary heaven. It’s bad enough to have a lengthy comment hidden until Berg gets around to springing it from jail usually long after it is relevant, but this new deal is just bullshit.
So, for today I have one comment in moderation, and one…out there somewhere at an undisclosed location.
^^^ Look everyone! Watch my dancing nitwit puppet! Dance, rAT…dance!
🕺🏻🕺🏻🕺🏻
To the topic: This movie is exactly what I’d expect from Ben Shapiro & Company. It’s the Neo-con version of NPR “All Things Considered”. It’s grifting, aimed at nitwits.
But worse, it undermines credible investigations. It’s insures Crack Boy will never be indicted for anything.
^^ I can imagine many a MAGA men sitting in their recliners with a sock jerkin to this movie.
Conservatives think they’re still trolling the libs, but they crossed over into full time circle jerking a long time ago.
sitting in their recliners with a sock jerkin to this movie
Pretty detailed description there, rAT. Sounds like an activity you’re very familiar with. Your laundry must be a real bio-hazard! ☣ LMAO!
If there’s one thing Conservatives and Republicans can’t tolerate, it’s amoral, nepotistic grifters. This movie convinced me. I won’t be voting for Hunter Biden in any upcoming elections, and I’ll scream bloody murder if Biden ever puts him in his cabinet or otherwise gives him a position in his administration. K?
Back on topic-
The reason that the Salon writer had to say that the Hunter Biden film’s claim that Joe Biden, the current occupant of the oval office, took payoffs in an influence peddling scheme is not “false,” but “almost certainly false,” is because the prima faci evidence on Hunter Biden’s laptop has never been seriously investigated. The Salon writer would have loved to have been able to say the story is false, but obviously he knows no such thing, and there has never been an investigation that exonerated Joe Biden of getting kickbacks for awarding his son’s business clients contracts. No LE official has investigated and made a pronouncement about whether or not charges against Hunter or Joe should be filed.
What we do know from the laptop and other evidence is that after his term as veep, Joe and Hunter Biden’s finances were intricately involved, to the point where they had financial accounts that both Biden’s made deposits into and withdrawals from.
Since the charges are serious and involve a sitting president of the US, and the MSM has done everything possible to downplay the story, any attention brought to the matter is appreciated.
^^ Seriously, if Woolly had a therapist we would all be better off as a result.
I AM A THERAPIST!!!
Hey Emery.
Isn’t it time to do your patriotic duty to your masters and get your fifth death jab? You know? The most recent one that hasn’t been tested on humans and that Albert Bourla insists is safe and effective, even though he got WuFlu.
Seig Heil, komeraden!
^ my mistake
^^ Fess up, rAT. You’re tossin’ one off into a 🧦 rn, aren’t you? We don’t need graphic details, just a simple grunt will do.
And as said, it’s probably time to get juiced again 💦💦. I bet your spike protein 🎇, stainless steel and rubber bits blood count is really low.
Say rAT? You ever get jealous watching Pedo Joe sniffin’ those 👶🏻? I think everyone here would agree, we think you do.
(BTW, that’s not an invitation for you to tia about what you do while watching Pedo Joe while reclining, and imbibing gin.)
Thread jack deleted.
We’ll talk about polling next week.
OK, there is a danger in arguing against a work that admits that it’s fictionalized, but if we’re really going to argue that the Biden “influence for bucks” scheme is “almost certainly false”, wouldn’t we have to come up with some other cases where crackhead johns with no discernable qualifications get plum jobs and then patrons who inexplicably support them with tens of thousands of dollars a month, despite having no political connections?
I’m drawing a blank here.
Bikebubba, who cares about Hunter Biden (or Jared Kushner)? It’s only important if Slow Joe (or Trump) got a cut of it.
Now I think that it is true that Slow Joe did take a cut. It fits with what we have seen so far. But I am willing to be shown I am wrong. Money is numbers that can be tracked. It really doesn’t matter if Hunter got high paying gigs because he was peddling his real or imagined influence with his father. Money has to have changed hands and some of it needs to be shown to end up Slow Joe’s pockets.
Now Slow Joe is a lawyer, and they normally can be counted on to keep the payoff off of the books. For example (and I’m not saying this happened), Hunter could buy some investment and then then sell it to Slow Joe at a discount.
But Slow Joe was never a very good lawyer, that’s why he got into politics. And during the period in question he never expected to run again, and he had contacts with Obama, so maybe he figured the Eye of Sauron would never be fixed on his finances.
It would be great, though, if we had an FBI and JD that was, say, 1/10th as interested in finding dirt on Biden as they were in finding dirt on Trump. The media likewise.
UMMP, my thought is that even if “the big guy” didn’t get a cut, selling political favors for money, even to benefit his son, is grounds for impeachment and removal from office, followed by incarceration.
This is especially the case since it appears that Biden putting his son on the board of Burisma kept corruption going in Ukraine, especially when Biden held aid hostage until a prosecutor investigating his son was fired, and then proceeded to stand against military aid to the victim of a proxy war by Russia.
Really, we’re talking tens of thousands of men dead on both sides because Biden decided to sell political power for money and protection of his son. It’s not a forgiveable “mistake”.
Bikebubba, if the worst that you suggest is true, did this take place after or before Biden assumed the presidency? If the criminal acts took place before January 2021, I don’t think that Biden can be impeached for that. It’s an ordinary criminal matter.
Pingback: In The Mailbox: 09.09.22 : The Other McCain
I think you can impeach anyone if you find out they were a crook before they were elected, especially if this fact was not widely known in the electorate, and the crook was doing his crimes as an elected official. The Constitution doesn’t limit these things, so neither should we.
The trailer was embarrassing enough. Imagine thinking your goofy political fanfic hit piece is Goodfellas.
It’s not fanfic, Emery. It’s a dramatization of the life of Hunter Biden and his relationship with his father.
In real life, Hunter Biden, the son of the president of the United States of America, is a hard core drug addict who sold his ability to influence his father. This is the real world we all live in, not the fantasy world you believe in, where Trump colluded with Putin to steal the 2016 election from Hillary.
UMMP;
You’re wasting your time with Emery the bot boy. His handlers in Beijing only want to talk about made up GOP crimes and to ignore the decades of crimes committed by the DemoCommies. Every day they prove what a friend of mine, that retired from a senior level position within a federal law enforcement agency, told me about them. Their money laundering operation puts the mob to shame. In fact, their criminal organization rivals any of the organized crime rings.