Obama’s Dumbest Idea Yet

By Mitch Berg

Remember all the wondrous things Obama wrought by nationalizing the healthcare system?

Remember?  Heck, you’ve barely started feeling the pain!

But wait.  It gets worse.  Now, he wants to nationalize the police:

The report urges the federal government to federalize police training and practices, via the use of federal lawsuits, grants and threats to cut federal aid. So far, Obama’s deputies have cajoled and sued more than 30 police jurisdictions to adopt federal rules in a slow-motion creation of a national police system, similar to the slow-motion creation of a federal-run health-sector via Obamacare.

Obama also used the press conference to insulate his federalized police program — and his allies in the Black Live Matter movement — from popular rejection after the five police were murdered by the anti-cop African-American in Dallas.

“The danger is that we somehow think the act of a troubled person speaks to some larger political statement across the country — it doesn’t,” Obama insisted. 

This has the potential to be the most corrosive domestic part of an already toxic legacy.

 

18 Responses to “Obama’s Dumbest Idea Yet”

  1. Bento Guzman Says:

    After Ferguson I predicted that a nationalized police force was the goal.
    What they want is for you to pay for the cops with your local property taxes, but the cops will be micromanaged by unelected bureaucrats and JD lawyers instead of your elected officials.

  2. Chuck Says:

    And then there are more mandates. More rules. And if you don’t submit, financing is pulled. And when you hire police, jailers, etc, you have to wonder if some fascist bureaucrat will approve.

  3. bikebubba Says:

    When we federalize the police, does that mean that every police force needs to stand aside as guns are walked to Mexican drug lords and ignore evidence of government corruption?

  4. Bento Guzman Says:

    Yes, Bikebubba, that is exactly what it means.
    Via A&L Daily, I found this excellent piece on the conversion of the civil service into an aristocratic class:
    http://www.iasc-culture.org/THR/THR_article_2016_Summer_Andrews.php
    It begins with a history of the ‘professionalization’ of the British civil service, which it actually makes interesting, and then discusses our modern American and global elites.

    Once again, Khan uncovers the clue to this phenomenon by letting his St. Paul’s students speak for themselves:

    “I don’t actually know much,” an alumnus told me after he finished his freshman year at Harvard. “I mean, well, I don’t know how to put it. When I’m in classes all these kids next to me know a lot more than I do. Like about what actually happened in the Civil War. Or what France did in World War II. I don’t know any of that stuff. But I know something they don’t. It’s not facts or anything. It’s how to think. That’s what I learned in humanities.”

    “What do you mean, ‘how to think’?” I asked.

    “I mean, I learned how to think bigger. Like, everyone else at Harvard knew about the Civil War. I didn’t. But I knew how to make sense of what they knew about the Civil War and apply it. So they knew a lot about particular things. I knew how to think about everything.”

  5. Joe Doakes Says:

    I predict they’ll use the same sales pitch as TSA at airports. We can’t leave security to bumbling yokels. We’ll hire experts, trained to FBI standards, steely-eyed crime fighters to keep us safe.

    Well, we would have hired those people, but they won’t work for $15.00 an hour, so we dropped the high school graduation requirement, dropped the English language competency requirement, and hired resentful Somalis immigrants.

  6. nerdbert Says:

    The similarities to the control the Feds have over education abound. As more and more Federal money comes to finance what should be local responsibilities, it is inevitable that more and more Federal control is mandated.

  7. nerdbert Says:

    “So they knew a lot about particular things. I knew how to think about everything.”

    Said every SJW ever.

  8. Chuck Says:

    Who would have thought…..a bureaucrat sitting in an office in DC makes up the weekly lunch menus for every school in the nation.

  9. swiftee Says:

    I’m guessing the feds approve and encourage the use of remotely detonated, robot bombs. In fact, I’d bet my next paycheck that’s where the Dallas PD got it’s stockpile of C4.

    Now that we know civilian PD’s have explosive ordinance, it makes a lot more sense for them to have MRAP’s, too.

    They’re gonna need some fed help getting their drones armed too, probably

    http://www.governing.com/gov-data/safety-justice/drones-state-local-law-enforcement-agencies-license-list.html

  10. Bento Guzman Says:

    No, Swiftee, they aren’t remotely detonated robot bombs! They are KILLER ROBOTS! AAAAH!

  11. Joe Doakes Says:

    In the olden days, firecrackers had instructions: “Lay on ground, light fuse, get away.” Minnesota Democrats decided that was too complex for Minnesotans to understand and banned firecrackers.

    BUT, if I can have a remote-control Killer Robot, the instructions could become: “Place in robot hand, light fuse, drive robot away.” Perfectly safe. We could celebrate Independence Day in the traditional manner, legally.

  12. nerdbert Says:

    Swiftee, having an MRAP makes sense in Mpls and St. Paul just due to the condition of the side streets, especially in winter. In Baldwin, WI, though, it seems hard to justify — but they have one. Giving away military equipment to police makes sense only in the craziest cities (NYC, LA, Mpls, etc) and to defense suppliers, but that’s also why it’ll never go away.

  13. justplainangry Says:

    Police State anyone? Somebody gotta enforce martial law.

  14. Night Writer Says:

    And when the federal police force round folks up and move them to ghettos or reservations, they will only be following orders.

  15. Dangerous Donald Says:

    As this week’s events have shown, the federal government needs to do more to encourage diverse communities.

  16. The Big Stink Says:

    Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the old paradigm. The new one is: diversity, dammit! If you’re not diverse, you’re racist. Diversify or die!

  17. In The Mailbox: 07.11.16 : The Other McCain Says:

    […] Radical Jihadis Shark Tank: Prominent Democrats Want Debbie Wasserman Schultz Out Shot In The Dark: Obama’s Dumbest Idea Yet The Jawa Report: Sandcrawler PSA – Facebook Safe And Welcoming To Everyone The Lonely […]

  18. Bento Guzman Says:

    Of the three ‘racial’ incidents this past week in LA, Minneapolis, and Dallas, only one was explicitly racism motivated, premeditated murder. And that incident was, of course, the Dallas mass shooting of white people by a Black man.
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->