Open Letter To Ramco Attorney John Choi

To: John Choi, Ramco Attorney
From:  Mitch Berg, uppity peasant
Re: Wrist Slaps

Mr. Choi,

This week, you charged the three accomplices of Laurentai Broadbent – the Saint Paul teen and apparent gang wannabe – with aggravated robbery, vehicle theft, and discharge of a firearm.

The law allows you to charge accomplices in a crime that leads to a death – even of one of the criminals – with murder.

So why not murder, or manslaughter?

Gang activity in Saint Paul is booming – or at least that’s how it appears on the street.  So why not deter all those young wannabees from committing crimes against, y’know, actual citizens?

It almost looks like you don’t want to deter them all that bad.

Please think about it.  Then think about it harder.

That is all.

8 thoughts on “Open Letter To Ramco Attorney John Choi

  1. As a hard working conservative/libertarian, I see the world turning upside down. -Netflix is being hailed as a great company because they give employees 12 mos paid leave if they have a kid.
    -Mpls is “receptive” to $15 minimum wage and also something called “fair scheduling” for unskilled workers.
    -Protestors at MOA get most charges dismissed because of their politics
    -Fed’l gov’t is more or less forcing all mid to large private companies to enact affirmative action programs (there is a lot to this that those out in business know about)
    -Gov’t is forcing section 8 housing in nice towns
    -and on and on and on

    So you have 2 choices. You can get 1 or 2 good useful college degrees, take on $35-40,000 in debt. Work 45-60 hours a week. Take minimal time off.

    Or become a Democrat.

    Same end result.

  2. I’m thinking this is a response to Ferguson, Baltimore, and the like. Want to keep the minority communities sort of on your side. Flip side is that it’s probable that these kids might have killed the couple had the gentleman not been armed. Choose your poison these days, no?

  3. 2nd white officer murdered by a black man this week. Now its Shreveport. The skin hue of the killer isn’t important to me, just making a point about the lefties fits in support of criminals.

  4. Baltimore aftermath is a case in point when you stop police from doing their jobs.

  5. I haven’t heard it mentioned the ethnicity of the shooter. Also to my knowledge not a peep from “black lives matter” folks. Possibly a correlation?

  6. Scott, I would have guessed the slur was “honky” or some such thing, but if it was that other word, that would certainly be part of why there is no sound from “black lives matter”. Probably another thing that suppresses the thought is that the deceased had a significant record and a gun with his prints on it. Harder to talk around those realities.

  7. For the St Paul shooting, one of the papers worded it like this “blah blah (racial slur) blah blah”. So I assume the word was not fit for print.

    For Shreveport, black killer, white officer. But not all lives matter, right O’Malley?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.