Open Letter To The MinnPost Editorial Team

To:  Joel Kramer (CEO/Editor), Roger Buoen and Susan Albright (Co-Managing Editors) Don Effenberger (News Editor)
From:  Mitch Berg, Uppity Peasant
Re:  They Get What They Pay For

Esteemed Editors:

I was never much of a reporter.  I could always do the “who, what, when, where, why and how” of a story just fine, and earned a living at it, off and on.  But it was never really my thing.

But I do remember, when I worked in the business, that the fastest way to get a reporter, producer or editor up on their back legs was to suggest that journalism partner with business or government to do the job.  They would say – with righteousness rivaling any Baptist minister or Trappist monk – that Journalism’s mission was to be a check and balance on government, business, anyone with power.    To comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.   Any whiff of filthy lucre was to be kept on the other side of the thick wall and locked door that separated the Sales department from the newsroom. 

Media analysts – I’m thinking Garfield and Gladstone’s “On The Media” on NPR, and the whole Romanesko borg – go through gyrations worthy of a Talmud symposium sifting through the ethics of mixing journalism and money. 

Now, theMinnPosttalks a big game about journalism.  And you’ve certainly staffed your site with a lot of people with long pedigrees in the regional news business.  And Brian Lambert. 

But I’ve noticed on one issue that your site gets a fair chunk of money from from the Joyce Foundation.  The Joyce Foundation also bankrolls most of the major gun control organizations in the United States, including Mayor Bloomberg’s efforts and “Protect Minnesota“. 

And along with this financial link, the MinnPost’s coverage of Second Amendment issues has gotten more and more slanted, and not a little bit risible in the bargain:

  • Doug Grow has positively fawned over Heather Martens and Jane Kay (of “Moms Want Action”, another astroturf anti-gun group that gets money from the same pool of liberals with deep pockets that bankrolls Protect MN and, I suspect, the MinnPost); his coverage has been less “journalism” and more “holding a rhetorical slumber party”.  His piece on Rep. Hillstrom’s counter to the Paymar/Hausman gun grab bills – one of which Martens, a lobbyist, read into the record, a bizarre flouting of House rules – was so devoid of fact I concluded it could only have been written in advance. 
  • I’ve got nothing but respect for Eric Black as a journalist – but his coverage of Second Amendment issues and their Constitutional history this past year has been a fount of inspiration for us on this blog

The MinnPost gets big bucks from Joyce, and starts a wave of anti-Second-Amendment (I’ll be charitable) cheerleading.  Coincidence?

Which leads us to this week, and Susan Perry’s piece on an academic “study” on gun violence.  It was a puff piece about a junk study

…and it was sponsored – as noted in the story’s headline – by UCare.  An arm of the government of the State of Minnesota.  Now, leave aside that that government is currently controlled by the extreme metrocrat wing of the DFL party.  Here’s the question:  if journalism is supposed to hold government accountable, should be finacially beholden to government?

Or does that only count when it’s not a DFL sacred cow being promoted?

Because when your “journalism” is being done at the behest of issue-oriented non-profits and the government you’re theoritically supposed to hold accountable, isn’t it really just public relations?  Or campaign media?


Mitch Berg
Uppity Peasant

14 thoughts on “Open Letter To The MinnPost Editorial Team

  1. When they go days without some tidbit supporting the Brokeback mountain crew, you know money has exchanged hands.

    Filthy lucre? They don’t even understand the meaning.

  2. First – ditto what Troy said.
    Second – I hope you’re not holding your breath waiting for a response. You would be all blue in the face and I don’t think Keegans lets blue faced people in.
    Third – With the way 15 so called Mainstream “Journalists” have gone to work in the Obama Administration, does anyone really believe mainstream reporters have any integrity anymore? I don’t mind that they do paid advocacy reporting; I just wish they would admit to doing paid advocacy reporting (the way sports broadcasters declare that they have been approved by and work for the team whose game they are broadcasting) so the less informed reader knows they are being manipulated by one side of the argument.
    Fourth – Why was there so much fear and loathing when it was rumoured that the Koch Bro’s were going to buy the LA Times if advocacy journalism is okay when it’s Joyce Foundation/Rockefeller money paying for it?

  3. Of course the entire study is crap because it limited the sample. ” Only countries with available data on gun ownership and not currently involved in a civil war were included.”

    Then the premise of the study defines a safer nation as one with fewer gun deaths. Then it finds that nations with guns have more gun deaths.

    So let me suggest another study to them. There is a widespread belief that a watchdog will safeguard a home. Then start with the premise that a safeguarded home has fewer instances of dog bites. It might be just a coincidence then when a nation with more watchdogs has more instances of dog bites. What do you think the odds are of that. I can see the headline now. “Watchdogs do not make a nation safer.”

  4. From the 70’s TV show All In The Family:

    Liberal daughter Gloria Stivic and her father Archie Bunker debating the gun issue.

    Gloria: Do you know that 60 percent of all deaths in America are caused by guns?

    Archie: Would it make you feel any better, little girl, if they was pushed out of windows?

    Crime is less serious if committed using other means … except to the victim.

  5. Pingback: An Open Letter To MPR News | Shot in the Dark

  6. Pingback: Distrust But Verify | Shot in the Dark

  7. Pingback: Rant And Slant | Shot in the Dark

  8. Pingback: Watching The Astroturf Grow: Nuts and Bolts And More Nuts | Shot in the Dark

  9. Pingback: Watching The Astroturf Grow: Money Changes Everything | Shot in the Dark

  10. Pingback: Carpetbaggers: Of Moo And Cow | Shot in the Dark

  11. Pingback: Divide And Conquer | Shot in the Dark

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.