The new Victorians, part MMMCCLXXIX
By Mitch Berg
They said that if I voted for Mitt Romney, our institutions would become overwhelmed with caustic sexism.
And they were right!
3 Responses to “The new Victorians, part MMMCCLXXIX”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
April 24th, 2013 at 6:12 am
Next thing we know, it will be exposed that those Ivy League schools, have “binders full of women.”
April 24th, 2013 at 8:06 am
This is what “white male privilege” is all about, really. The huge advantage that I have as a white dude is that I can believe whatever I want and am free to pursue my own agenda without having to please racial and/or gender commissars who believe they have purchase over the lives of those who share certain physical characteristics.
If a woman goes to an Ivy League school and ends up leaving the workforce to rear children, what concern is it of anyone else? The proper response to people like this is to gently suggest that they piss up a rope.
April 24th, 2013 at 8:39 am
Saw this yesterday at WSJ and Perfesser Reynolds had more this morning…
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/167667/ (Hopefully the Shot in the Dark-a-lanche doesn’t crash the server.)
Best part… a reader points out that Justice Ginsburg was asked the same question in the 50’s, only you have to substitute “man” for “woman who won’t go on to be a stay at home mom” for the “spot you are taking” part.
These Lefty’s and their ingrained prejudicial stereotypes based on skin color, genitalia, sexual preference, etc. When will it end?