This Is The “October Surprise?”
By Mitch Berg
Apparently Mitt Romney’s big flaw is that when asked for his honest opinion about a company at the time of a divorce trial between a CEO and an insane woman, he didn’t purjure himself. .
UPDATE: “Purger?” Wow. I did need coffee.
October 25th, 2012 at 8:43 am
Perjure.
October 25th, 2012 at 9:05 am
purger brings to mind a bulimic or perhaps someone addicted to the transient buzz of a high colonic irrigation.
October 25th, 2012 at 9:29 am
I will say that “purger” ought to be a word. Not the bulimia thing, but with a hard “g.” I’ll leave it to you to come up with a definition.
October 25th, 2012 at 9:32 am
Kel: Repeat the words ‘high colonic’ in a nursing home and you get 30 wheelchairs sprinting for their rooms.
October 25th, 2012 at 10:39 am
I can’t be the only one who has a desire to ‘purger’ when I see Gloria Allred on camera talking about sex.
October 25th, 2012 at 11:12 am
Axelrod’s track record indicates that Barry can’t win an election without a divorce record being unsealed. The fact that the divorce in this case is as current as one of the remembrances from Mitch’s Twenty(five) Years Ago today series would appear to be immaterial.
October 25th, 2012 at 11:13 am
PS: As pointed out elsewhere… I think they’re gonna need a bigger October Surprise.
October 25th, 2012 at 11:35 am
When your opponent is a devout Mormon, “dirt” becomes relative. A second cup of coffee is about as dirty as you’re going to find. You’d better win the debate!