On the one hand, Fareed Zakaria – the perpetually hapless hack for the left – has been suspended for plagiarism.
On the other hand? At least when he plagiarizes, he has a chance of sounding smart.
On his dim little CNN show a few weeks back, in the immediate aftermath of the Aurora shooting, Zakaria noted perfunctorily that (and i’m paraphrasing closely here) “while some people note that there might be a link between psychology and gun violence, you are entitled to your opinion, but not to your own facts; it’s all about the availability of guns”.
In so doing, he ignored, well, the facts:
- Crime is broadly down nationwide – a drop that has closely paralleled the skyrocketing sales in guns.
- Notwithstanding the nationwide trend, violence is steady to up in places with the tightest gun control – Chicago and DC.
- On the other hand, it’s been generally down in New York, which has gun laws that Benito Mussolini would love.
- On the other hand, crime is lower still in many places with gun-friendly shall-issue laws…
- …and plenty high in other places with shall-issue laws, like the Deep South, with a culture of violence that started long before the age of civilian firearms (where crime is well above the national average, but has also fallen faster than the national average).
- Even in areas that are ostensibly identical, violent crime rates vary wildly. Minneapolis and Saint Paul are part of the same metro area; by state statute, they have identical gun laws. And yet Minneapolis’ murder and violent crime rates are a dramatically – as in, 50% – higher than in Saint Paul.
So when Zakaria – one of the most noxious anti-Second Amendment orcs there is – says “you’re not entitled to your own facts”, what he really means is “ignore the facts that gut the chanting point I’m repeating”.
Good riddance.
Interesting how one area where the Left absolutely abandons moral relativism is the subject of plagiarism. It’s pretty much anything goes with other crimes, but should a writer publish fiction and label it non-fiction, or copy and paste several paragraphs of vacuous opinion masquerading as fact, they really get their undies in a bunch. Zakaria wrote a bunch of crap even when he wasn’t stealing copy , so ask me if I care? I think I’ve got a tiny violin around, someplace.
There is this:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/08/13/lederhosen_on_fire?page=full
Why do they plagiarize? I write academically on occasion. It is tedious. Synthesizing knowledge and deriving new insights from it may be difficult for our wannabe nomenklatura.