Free At Last

Michael Hansen was freed last month after six years in prison for a murder he didn’t commit.

And now the county attorney has finally dropped the charges, aborting the new trial that was called for last summer:

…Douglas County Attorney’s Office dropped all charges against him and said it “no longer believes that it can prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The exoneration came after a judge in July had vacated Hansen’s conviction and ordered a new trial based on evidence presented by the Innocence Project of Minnesota, saying that there was evidence that the Ramsey County medical examiner might have given “false or incorrect” testimony at the first trial. He was released from prison in August.

The death of Hansen’s daughter was a tragedy.   His conviction and imprisonment were partly the result of a bureaucrat’s botch…

In a review whose results were issued early this month, Ramsey County said [Ramco medical examiner Michael] McGee complied with all state laws and with his contract with the county.

…(in other words, “the dog ate his homework, but the rules say there’s nothing you can do about it), and the assumption that the father had to be guilty.

McGee couldn’t be reached for comment Sunday.

Erika Applebaum, executive director of the Innocence Project of Minnesota, said that if anything can be learned from Hansen’s experience, it’s that juries should not blindly accept all expert testimony.

Naturally, The System doesn’t like mere peasants getting uppity and questioning their “experts”; they’ve been bellyaching about juries asking too many questions – the “CSI Effect” – and in some places is taking action to stymie those exact questions.

It’s not the only question being raised about the work of McGee, the Ramco medical examiner whose testimony put Hansen away  Without casting specific aspersions on the work of McGee specifically – there will be plenty of litigation that’ll address those questions – perhaps the real answer is to have prosecutors and “experts” that flagrantly bugger justice start serving some of the time they rip from the lives of the innocent.

5 thoughts on “Free At Last

  1. “…juries should not blindly accept all expert testimony.”

    DuPont learned that one the hard way and we are still paying for in with less medical device innovation…

  2. “…juries should not blindly accept all expert testimony.”

    What?! Next thing you know you wingnuts will be rejecting “settled science”! You anti-science Christianist denialists are teh crazie! Next thing you know you’ll be advocating jury nullification!

    You know, when you’re a hard science/engineering type they tend to not let you on juries. On a societal level that’s a bad thing, but on a personal level I don’t mind too much.

  3. “…juries should not blindly accept all expert testimony.”

    They should also recognize that most all of these “experts” are being paid, both those for the prosecution and the defense. I’ve sat in the jury box and listened to an “expert” that I knew with absolute certainty was full of B.S.

  4. Punishment for wrongful imprisonment is part of the Scriptures–and for that matter, the reason we punish perjury. Let’s go with it.

    (difficult part being, of course, that you’ve got to figure out that someone knowingly suppressed exculpatory evidence….)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.