While Hatred Is Not A Value I Espouse…
By Mitch Berg
…or, truth be told, allow myself, I have to say that sometimes it’s enticing to think it’s very, very justified.
19 Responses to “While Hatred Is Not A Value I Espouse…”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
July 29th, 2011 at 7:25 am
They’re dinks. No doubt about that.
July 29th, 2011 at 8:30 am
It’s Tracy Eberly!
July 29th, 2011 at 9:19 am
Dinks = 0 kids
Muslim famlies = 5+ kids per family
Any questions?
July 29th, 2011 at 10:15 am
What does it do to one’s thinking and voting if there are no future generations to be concerned about? Who will plant an olive tree?
July 29th, 2011 at 10:56 am
You want spontaneous? Try being a Single Income Two Kids. You’d be amazed at the kind of spontaneous shit you can come up with.
July 29th, 2011 at 11:10 am
Yoss, you just described Berg.
July 29th, 2011 at 11:16 am
Watch Idiocracy..
Then make sure any DINKs in your life watch it.
July 29th, 2011 at 11:51 am
SIENs Single Income Empty Nesters 8)
July 29th, 2011 at 12:30 pm
One thing I’ve come to realize is that in real terms the nest is never completely empty….sigh!! Even with grown (cough) children it’s unlikely my wife and I will ever be DINK’s…cry.
July 29th, 2011 at 12:49 pm
Curious.
Do leftist DINKS discount children they have allowed Dr. Frankenstein to rip from the female DINK’s body limb from limb?
“Call Roto-Rooter, that’s the name, and away go troubles down the drain!!”
Redicioulus!
July 29th, 2011 at 1:27 pm
DINK myth #2: DINKs hate kids.
No they don’t. They love kids. They also love the fact that YOU are paying full freight to raise and educate YOUR kids so that YOUR kids can afford to pay the Social Security and Medicare benefits these selfish pricks will undoubtedly demand on retirement.
We’re all in this together, after all.
July 29th, 2011 at 6:21 pm
And to be fair, the people with kids love that the DINKs are paying all that property tax that goes to fund K-12 education (which is what, half the budget?), even though they have no children. Small house-5kids- small property tax. Larger house, no kids -large property tax.
July 29th, 2011 at 8:21 pm
I would think that dinks would a net financial contributor to society.
Unless they took out a $250,000 2nd mortgage in 2006.
July 29th, 2011 at 9:06 pm
Anyone here feed a family of four? Pay for water, sewer and electricity? Clothing for growing children? Daycare? Doctor bills? Birthday parties?
DINKs are not a net financial contributor to society.
July 29th, 2011 at 9:50 pm
So foodstamps, public housing, and AFDC makes you a net contributor? I didn’t know.
July 29th, 2011 at 11:05 pm
Typical far-right kooks. All resentful over people who make rational economic choices. Buy a condom, you freaks. Nobody wants any more of your kind.
July 30th, 2011 at 1:28 am
Angry Clown’s “rational economic choice” was dictated by a hunchback and acne vulgaris.
July 30th, 2011 at 8:04 am
No Terry, raising children on your own dime makes you a net contributor. Being an angryclown makes you a waste of oxygen.
July 30th, 2011 at 1:45 pm
look at it this way folks, DINK’s don’t get to pass their values onto the next generation. Everyone is mad at them, I find it refreshing, screw them.