Rumors Of Its Demise Were Exaggerated

A few years ago, quite a number of talk radio programming execs – including those at both of the Twin Cities’ big talk stations, Hubbard’s KSTP-AM and (later, in 2006) Clear Channel’s KTLK-FM – greeted the latest news from “the consultants”.  Although “The Consultants” have gotten nearly every trend in talk radio throughout the medium’s history utterly wrong, this time the prediction – that conservative political talk radio was dead – was going to be right. 

Of course, it was right after the ’04 elections, when talk ratings had noplace to go but down; exactly as they had after every election cycle since conservative talk had risen to dominate the format.

This past winter, after the ’06 elections, talk in general – and conservative talk in particular – took another hit in the ratings.  And the consultants – many of whom date back to the business’ pre-Limbaugh days, many of whom really really don’t like conservative talk, to say nothing of conservatism itself – cried “the witch is dead” yet again.

And, yet again, it seems they celebrated too soon

Where it really counts, Limbaugh / Hannity affiliate WABC scored big gains, moving from a 3.5 overall share of the audience to 3.9. That was good for fifth place among listeners 12 and older, higher than we’ve recently seen for the format in the Big Apple.

Though ratings are tracked monthly, the four quarterly “books” are what actually count. From those, the spring and fall surveys are most critical for setting future advertising rates, as well as sheer bragging rights.

No word on the NARN’s numbers, yet.  But  you can bet we’re kicking whatever hamster KTLK is putting up against us in the utterly make-or-break Saturday Afternoon time slot – and that Air America Minnesota might as well broadcast static for all the good tackling us will do ’em.

2 thoughts on “Rumors Of Its Demise Were Exaggerated

  1. Pingback: FND Blog

  2. “Conservative” talk radio is significant because it IS significant. It deals with real issues, allows contrary opinions, can defend the stands made, and is generally willing to admits wrongs when appropriate. The primary difference between talk radio and most other forms of acquiring information–from classrooms, print media, and other television and radio–is that hosts have to defend there stands. In leftist talk, the defenses are shallow and easily dismissed. (Strange, but that just happens to be the kind of national defense the left wants for us as well)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.