Archive for April, 2008

Allah And Man At TIZA

Thursday, April 10th, 2008

When it comes to education, the separation of church and state has never really worked.  Not that it’s not possible, or even in a sense very desirable, to have a secular education system, really – but ours just keeps getting worse and worse.

Among Minnesota’s charter schools are several successful programs that adopt the structure and ideals of religious schools – with the religion itself kept carefully segregated out.  Even amid the chaos (and success) of Minnesota’s charter schools, these schools frequently stand out as excellent ones (although they are far from the only successful idea in Minnesota’s charter system).

So when word came out that someone was going to try an Islamic charter school, I thought “let’s wait and see what happens”.  If they followed the model of Minnesota’s other pseudo-religious charter programs, it could be a very good thing, a model for helping Minnesota’s mass of Moslem immigrants both assimilate and retain the parts of their culture they care about.  Minnesota already has Hispanic, Afro-centric and H’mong charter schools – and some of them are among Minnesota’s most successful charter schools.  They are a success largely because parents are voting for them with their feet; one in eight Saint Paul public school parents has decamped their kids for the charters in recent years.

But Katherine Kersten – the single best columnist at the Strib – shows us that the one bit “if” seems to have come up “No”:

Evidence suggests, however, that TIZA is an Islamic school, funded by Minnesota taxpayers.

TIZA has many characteristics that suggest a religious school. It shares the headquarters building of the Muslim American Society of Minnesota, whose mission is “establishing Islam in Minnesota.” The building also houses a mosque. TIZA’s executive director, Asad Zaman, is a Muslim imam, or religious leader, and its sponsor is an organization called Islamic Relief.

None of those are, in and of themselves, dispositive, of course.

But we’ll get to that:

Students pray daily, the cafeteria serves halal food – permissible under Islamic law — and “Islamic Studies” is offered at the end of the school day.
And again, no biggie – presuming that the “Islamic Studies” were offered outside the publicly-paid school day.

But the story wears a bit thin later on:

Zaman maintains that TIZA is not a religious school. He declined, however, to allow me to visit the school to see for myself, “due to the hectic schedule for statewide testing.” But after I e-mailed him that the Minnesota Department of Education had told me that testing would not begin for several weeks, Zaman did not respond — even to urgent calls and e-mails seeking comment before my first column on TIZA.

Now, however, an eyewitness has stepped forward. Amanda Getz of Bloomington is a substitute teacher. She worked as a substitute in two fifth-grade classrooms at TIZA on Friday, March 14. Her experience suggests that school-sponsored religious activity plays an integral role at TIZA.

Getz described a routine…:
Arriving on a Friday, the Muslim holy day, she says she was told that the day’s schedule included a “school assembly” in the gym after lunch.

Before the assembly, she says she was told, her duties would include taking her fifth-grade students to the bathroom, four at a time, to perform “their ritual washing.”

Afterward, Getz said, “teachers led the kids into the gym, where a man dressed in white with a white cap, who had been at the school all day,” was preparing to lead prayer. Beside him, another man “was prostrating himself in prayer on a carpet as the students entered.”

“The prayer I saw was not voluntary,” Getz said. “The kids were corralled by adults and required to go to the assembly where prayer occurred.”

Let’s take a moment to talk about charter schools, since they are both very popular in Minnesota, and not well understood.  A charter school is a school program chartered to operate by the local school board; they have to have an educational sponsor (some organization with an idea about how to educate kids and, usually, a community they wish to serve.  Sponsors can include college education departments, non-profit organizations, and so on.  As to the ideas – they vary.  In Saint Paul we have ideas ranging from highly-strict back to the basics programs to ethnic-focus schools; from a military charter to montessori schools and one that borrows heavily from the Sudbury and “unschool” movements.  The school gets each student’s allotment of money from the chartering district.

So while charter schools can borrow some of the ideals of private schools at a price that any parent can afford (since they’re already paying for them with their tax money), they are not private schools.  And – this is important – any kid has to be able to attend.  They can’t turn down kids based on their ethnicity or – this is important – religion.
Which brings is to TIZA’s religious training (with emphasis added):

Islamic Studies was also incorporated into the school day. “When I arrived, I was told ‘after school we have Islamic Studies,’ and I might have to stay for hall duty,” Getz said. “The teachers had written assignments on the blackboard for classes like math and social studies. Islamic Studies was the last one — the board said the kids were studying the Qu’ran. The students were told to copy it into their planner, along with everything else. That gave me the impression that Islamic Studies was a subject like any other.”

After school, Getz’s fifth-graders stayed in their classroom and the man in white who had led prayer in the gym came in to teach Islamic Studies. TIZA has in effect extended the school day — buses leave only after Islamic Studies is over. Getz did not see evidence of other extra-curricular activity, except for a group of small children playing outside. Significantly, 77 percent of TIZA parents say that their “main reason for choosing TIZA … was because of after-school programs conducted by various non-profit organizations at the end of the school period in the school building,” according to a TIZA report.

And if it’s voluntary, bully for them!
But it would seem that these classes are not voluntary.   If true, that’s a problem.

Student “prayer is not mandated by TIZA,” [the schools’ principal] wrote, and so is legal. On Friday afternoons, “students are released … to either join a parent-led service or for study hall.” Islamic Studies is provided by the Muslim American Society of Minnesota, and other “nonsectarian” after-school options are available, he added…Until recently, TIZA’s website included a request for volunteers to help with “Friday prayers.” In an e-mail, Zaman explained this as an attempt to ensure that “no TIZA staff members were involved in organizing the Friday prayers.”But an end run of this kind cannot remove the fact of school sponsorship of prayer services, which take place in the school building during school hours.

Now, charter schools are supposed to be open to everyone.  Granted, it’s presumed that parents and kids have an interest in the program; I cant’ see pacifist parents sending their kids to, say, the General John Vessey charter, which borrows heavily from the military school model (with great results, according to some parents I’ve heard), but I can’t imagine Vessey would either turn ’em down or try to turn them into soldiers.  Would TIZA have the same forbearance with, say, a Lutheran kid who had no intention of converting?
What to think…

Conceptually?  If we blow open the restrictions about public funding for religious schools, then I say “go to it!”.  We can have Moslem, Hindu, Catholic, Buddhist, Jewish and many flavors of Protestant schools to go along with the agnostic ones we already have!

But given the current set of laws that we current have, for better or worse, I’m just not seeing that.  And with that as the case, I’m not sure there’s any way around the notion that we, the Minnesota taxpayer, are footing the bill for one brand of religious education that’s barred to everyone else.

Brodkorb Far Ahead Of The Curve Again

Thursday, April 10th, 2008

A few weeks ago, the local Sorosphere tried to unload their brickbats at Michael Brodkorb for reporting that Al Franken’s handlers were working hard to insulate the former comic and SNL star from reporters.

“Pshaw” they said.  Not exactly Pshaw, although I think the word is long overdue for a comeback.

But the story’s gone all national now; Kevin Duschere, of the Strib’s Big Question blog, notes:

According to The Atlantic Monthly, reporters covering Minnesota’s U.S. Senate race this year shouldn’t count on getting a lift from Al Franken.

That’s one of the amusing bits arising out of a largely flattering piece in the May Atlantic on Franken, considered the favorite to secure the DFL Party endorsement to run against incumbent Norm Coleman this fall.

The theme of the story by Atlantic senior editor Joshua Green is that Franken, who has built a wildly successful career out of being both funny and confrontational, needs to convince Minnesotans that he’s as serious and somber — and presumably dull — a candidate as any of the rest of them.

One of the ways for the Franken campaign to do this, according to Green, is to limit face time for reporters with the candidate as much as possible, to avoid the chance that he will make an unguarded remark that will explode into the headlines the next day.

Green found this out when he wasn’t allowed to ride along with Franken and his staff on a campaign swing in February through St. Paul, the suburbs and Isanti County.

Can you imagine if Michele Bachmann’s handlers kept reporters from seeing she was conservative?  Or if Jesse Ventura was crazy?  Or that Tim Pawlenty is a lawyer?  Like all of those, “Funny” and “unpredictable” is Franken’s stock in trade.  Is it honest, keeping that from the public?

Maybe, maybe not.  You be the judge.

Guilty

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

Myon Burrell has been convicted a second time for the 2002 murder of Tyesha Edwards:

Hennepin County Judge Charles Porter found Burrell guilty of two murder counts: first-degree murder and first-degree murder for the benefit of a gang. He was acquitted of several other charges.

Edwards was shot in the heart as sat in her house in Minneapolis and did homework.

The just ended trial is the second for Burrell in the 2002 shooting. He was convicted in 2003 of first-degree murder in Tyesha’s death, but the state Supreme Court set aside the conviction in 2005, saying a statement he made to police was inadmissible. Burrell has remained in jail in lieu of $1 million bail.

The defense contends that the case was a rush to judgment and that Burrell was charged in a politically volatile atmosphere because of community outrage over Edwards’ death. In a bid to solve the killing quickly, police failed to follow other leads, the defense also said.

Hopefully that’ll be the end of it.

Although Minneapolis’ status as a criminal cesspool, thought slightly improved in recent years, just goes on and on.

Teachable Moment

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

Last week, I went to a district party leadership meeting.

Most of the leadership in my district is guys who’ve been in the GOP for a while – I remember some of them from the 2000 election. There was one young woman who is a pretty enthusiastic Ronulan. And that kicked off an interesting discussion.

She was a little put off by some of the rhetoric aimed at the Paul crowd by the mainstream GOP. We, in turn, are a little put off not so much by Paul’s rhetoric itself – several of us in the party’s leadership have fundamentally small-l libertarian sympathies; I, indeed, was a big-L Libertarian for a few years, ten years ago. So, outside of foreign policy – an areas where Libertarians and Ron Paul are dogmatically naive – it’s not like Ron Paul and his followers are preaching to a completely hostile choir – at least at a policy level.

But all questions have two levels; Policy (“What we want!”) and Implementation (“How we’re gonna get it”).

Around the time of the precinct caucuses and the first round of district meetings last February some of us activists started getting emails from other activists; the Paul crowd was going to try to game the rules to try to bum-rush the conventions; to try to snag a disproportionate number of district, state and national delegates, to make Paul, if not a contender for nomination this fall, at least a broker of some legitimate delegate power when the horse-trading before and during the convention takes place.

And they were  pissed!

It reminded me of some of the irate long-time GOP activists in the Sixth District two years ago, who argled and bargled over Michele Bachmann’s “tactics” for getting the nomination to run against Patty Wetterling.  She got her people to go to the caucuses and conventions, and to vote for her.

Which, really, was what Paul’s MN campaign did.  And did with amazing success.

Chief, over at the Dogs and True North, has the big takeaway.

The buzz about the Ron Paul delegates from the Republican CD conventions is still coming. Today, the Star Tribune had this report:

…[snip]…

Delighted about what was something of a coup over the Republican establishment, she added, “We’re just a bunch of disorganized people who happened to get lucky. At least that’s the impression we want to leave.”

Um, not really. The Paul supporters are anything but “just a bunch of disorganized people who happened to get lucky”. The Paul campaign deserves high praise for systematically working the web, having dedicated and organized people at every possible opportunity for promotion and finding ways in to the process. I would question why Marianne Stebbins wants to leave the impression of just getting lucky by having just stumbled into this? The Paul Campaign utilized many ingenious, innovative techniques with new media, viral marketing, true grassroots campaigning, web meet-ups, systematic focusing on BPOUs.

Call it false modesty on Stebbins’ part.  She should pat herself on the back.

It’s time for the GOP to call a spade a spade; the Paul campaign hit the MNGOP status quo in the way…

…that we all need to hit the bad guys DFL.  They played the convention game.

In my district, “we” – the people who’d been in District 66B since before Ron Paul – held the Paulites’ gains off, more or less; “we” got together and talked some of them out of some of the more tinfoil-hatted Paulite resolutions (we got the “pullout from Iraq” and “oppose the Trans-America highway” bits voted down pretty convincingly).

But let’s give credit where it’s due; they conventions the way you’re supposed to if you’re an insurgency; by organizing, by motivating, and by having their people show up.

This should be a wake-up call to the leadership of the 4th, 5th and 6th District GOPs.  Let’s hope someone at the wheel is capable of responding to the challenge.

More on this later.

Above And Beyond The Call Of Duty

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

The fourth Medal of Honor of the Iraq War (CORRECTION: the third, actually) was presented yesterday, to Navy Seal Mike Monsoor.

From the President’s remarks:

In May 2006, Mike and another SEAL ran into the line of fire to save a wounded teammate. With bullets flying all around them, Mike returned fire with one hand while helping pull the injured man to safety with the other. In a dream about the incident months later, the wounded SEAL envisioned Mike coming to the rescue with wings on his shoulders.

On Saint Michael’s Day — September 29, 2006 — Michael Monsoor would make the ultimate sacrifice. Mike and two teammates had taken position on the outcropping of a rooftop when an insurgent grenade bounced off Mike’s chest and landed on the roof. Mike had a clear chance to escape, but he realized that the other two SEALs did not. In that terrible moment, he had two options — to save himself, or to save his friends. For Mike, this was no choice at all. He threw himself onto the grenade, and absorbed the blast with his body. One of the survivors puts it this way: “Mikey looked death in the face that day and said, ‘You cannot take my brothers. I will go in their stead.’”

His brothers in arms noticed, of course:

Perhaps the greatest tribute to Mike’s life is the way different service members all across the world responded to his death. Army soldiers in Ramadi hosted a memorial service for the valiant man who had fought beside them. Iraqi Army scouts — whom Mike helped train — lowered their flag, and sent it to his parents. Nearly every SEAL on the West Coast turned out for Mike’s funeral in California. As the SEALs filed past the casket, they removed their golden tridents from their uniforms, pressed them onto the walls of the coffin. The procession went on nearly half an hour. And when it was all over, the simple wooden coffin had become a gold-plated memorial to a hero who will never be forgotten.

Read the whole thing, of course.

Oddly, the New York Times has yet to cover the story. (UPDATE: They covered it, eventually. As of 6PM Central last night, when I originally wrote this piece, they had not).

The Clue Might Slowly Sink In

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

Andy Birkey in the Minnesota Monitor:

Gov. Tim Pawlenty used his line-item veto on Monday to shred a portion of the capital investment bonding bill that hit his desk last week. He cut $208 million out of the $925 million bill, with a large amount coming out of requests for St. Paul. Pawlenty told reporters Monday, “It’s not about being a Democrat or a Republican. It’s about setting the right priorities for the state and living within our means. There’s no personal messages in here for anybody in particular.”

Yet the investments [Hahahahahahahahaahahahahahaaahaaaahaaa – Ed.] Pawlenty deleted create the appearance of political game-playing.

Gosh.  D’ya think?

Let’s take a trip back in time:  Margaret Kelliher standing around giggling like a schoolgirl after overriding the veto.  The DFL fracturing the GOP over the light rail subsidy “transportation bill”.  Larry Pogemiller grunting that the peasants were too stupid to spend their own money.

The Governor is doing what he was elected to do.  He’s telling the districts whose representatives were dancing in the streets last month (and possibly even puking on Dave Thune’s lawn, although we don’t know for sure) that the sheriff ain’t dead yet.  He’s giving his party something around which to rally.

Damn straight it’s a political game.

And Pawlenty is better at it than your people are. Oh, the DFL has the numbers – for now.

But Pawlenty, playing to the autumn, is showing that there’s an alternative to Larry “the peasants are stupid” Pogemiller, to Cy “when we win, we keep your money!” Thao, to Lori Sturdevant.

And it’s in November that it’ll count.

Written From A Puddle Of My Own Vomit

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

I wrote this to my City Council Rep yesterday:

———-

Mr. Stark, Mitch Berg here. I’m a constituent of yours…

…sorry. I had to go clean up after another spell of “puking”. And I apologize if my spelling suffers; as I’m a Republican, the delerium tremens makes it hard to type whenever I’m not hammered out of my mind.

I’m writing on behalf of the 28-40% of Saint Paulites who vote Republican, but whom you and Council Prez Dave Thune represent in city government…

…oh, damn. Hang on. Gotta puke…

…Sorry. Where was I? Oh, yeah – Republicans who, when we rouse ourselves from our drunken stupor, somehow manage to pay taxes and raise kids when we’re
not vomiting in Dave Thune’s daisies.

All joking aside – it’s a little disconcerting to read that the *elected leader* of the city to whom I pay taxes has such a caustically hateful opinion of over a third of his city’s residents. Is it any wonder that people are leaving, pulling their kids out of the
school system, and taking their entertainment and shopping dollar elsewhere?

Mitch Berg
Minnehaha and Pascal
21-year Saint Paul taxpayer, who’s raised/is raising three kids here, is a GOP district officer, and is sick to death of a city that treats me like a ripe suck on the one hand and a hated adversary on the other.

Now I really DO need a drink.

———-

It’s true.

To be fair, Stark voted against the extension in bar hours – although his stated reasons weren’t anything I’d disagree with. There are, frankly, reasons to oppose the extension; one of them is not that Republican activists and staffers are going to turn Saint Paul into a huge frat party.

Merry Christmas, Minneapolis!

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

Republicans are, by nature, a fairly good-tempered lot. Especially in Saint Paul. You have to be, living in a city where one of your key government figures thinks – and says, in friendly surroundings – that you, the Republican, are a drunken lout.

But eventually, even we can be pushed too far. I got this email from a source in the know about these things:

After Thune’s comments two major players in the bar/restaurant scene lost huge contracts. One was a $50,000 dinner and another was a $800,000 party…Minneapolis was happy to have them and their lobbyists, puking or not.

$850,000 at Saint Paul’s 7.5% Sales Tax rate comes to $59,500.

Councilman Thune; that’s money that could have helped ameliorate some of the taxes you’ve been jacking up in this city.

Care to puke that up?

Open Letter to St. Paul City Council President Dave Thune

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

I sent this to Councilman Thune and his assistant:

Councilman Thune,

Mitch Berg here.

I just got off the phone with Ms. Lindgren, who said she’d leave a message for you. It occurred to me that she never asked me for any contact information – an oversight, I’m sure. In any case, I’m writing to follow up.

I’d like to extend an open-ended invitation to join Ed Morrissey and I this weekend on the Northern Alliance broadcast, any time between 1PM and 3PM, at your convenience. We’d love to discuss to your statements, in public and on the Saint Paul Information Forum, about the 28-40% of your constituents who vote Republican, and are (or so you seem to believe) drunken, puking, drug-dealing warmongers.

Now, I know that every time I’ve requested an interview in the past, you’ve pled “busy”. And I know you’re a busy guy, and respect that fact.

So in the interest of reaching “across the aisle” to make sure you’re able to communicate with Saint Paul’s Republicans, and the other Republicans nationwide who’ll be travelling to *our* city, I’d like to stress that this invitation is good for ANY SATURDAY between now and the end of human existence on this or any planet (or your retirement or ejection from politics, whichever comes first). You can come into the studio, or appear via phone – whatever’s most convenient!

If you are not available on a Saturday, I will be happy to *tape* an interview with you, in studio or via phone, at ANY TIME convenient to you, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. I will also be happy to meet you with a tape recorder, any place, any time, at your leisure (provided I’m not incapacitated by fits of drunken vomiting and delirium tremens). You, as an elected official, DESERVE the opportunity to reach across the aisle and speak with the 28-40% of your constituents who likely voted against the DFL and you, but whom you nevertheless still represent as president of the city council of one of America’s great cities.

Finally, in the unlikely event that you can’t free up fifteen minutes between now and the end of time for a radio interview, I’d like to submit some questions – under separate cover, obviously – for you to answer at your leisure via email. Pardon my presumption, but this seems reasonable, given that I am a Saint Paul taxpayer.

I will hope you will do me the estimable honor of responding to this invitation (which I’m making public via my various blogs and, this weekend, the show), rather than having to lead a contingent of “drunk, puking, warmongering, drug-dealing, family-values-flouting” Saint Paul Republicans to deliver it in person at an upcoming City Council meeting.

Sincerely,

Mitch Berg
Sober, peace-loving Republican and 21-year Saint Paul Taxpayer

Northern Alliance Radio Network
AM1280thepatriot.com

Shot In The Dark
www.shotinthedark.info

I’ll keep y’all posted.

Dave Thune Doesn’t Apologize. Nosirreebob.

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Last week, the Saint Paul City Council rejected the idea of allowing bars in Saint Paul to stay open an extra two hours during the week of the convention.

Fair enough. No biggie.

Except that the rationale of Councilman Dave Thune was that he didn’t want thousands of Republican lobbyists “puking” on his lawn.

Now, Dave’s a jocular guy. And I know as well as anyone that people will josh around, especially when the subject is partisan politics.

Still – in a purple state, and in a city where between 30-40% of the city does generally vote Republican – the remark was considered inflammatory enough that Senator Sandy Pappas – who represents the same general area at the Capitol that Thune does in City Hall – felt obliged to apologize for Councilman Thune at the podium in the Senate last week.

So what does Dave Thune really think?

Over at the Saint Paul Information Forum – an email discussion group that purports to be open to all, but is basically a DFL hive and news-release outlet – Thune elaborated over the weekend. Read the whole thing at the link, because he slips in some modestly sensible stuff before the really defamatory howler), but to save space I’m going to excerpt it a bit.

It’s a long email – and it makes a few good points. I’m hacking out most of it, but to be fair, he notes…:

Its hard work to be a good owner/neighbor, refereeing domestic disputes and picking up litter and hosing down sidewalks the next morning. I like bars (believe it or not) and I like bars to be on our commercial streets and in our neighborhoods, but I am no fool and I know that:

1. The adjacent homeowners and neighbors will hate the 4 AM close time.
2. There is no way to rule that only a few “select” bars can be open til 4.
You either let them all, or none. The law protects them all equally.
3. Limiting 4AM closing to downtown still puts them beside residences who pay as much taxes as you do and did not purchase a condo on Bourbon Street – they chose Wabasha, Minnesota or Wall Streets.
4. Limiting to downtown is in reality unworkable because you would be
leaving out the popular Mancinis, O’Gara’s and Dixie’s bars.
5. We’ve been told that the cost of law enforcement due to extended hours is upwards to half a million bucks – payable via your property taxes.
6. The test of a great city is not how long you can drink alchohol. To hear
a legislator say that we just don’t want to be a big city is insulting and
obviously the words of a moron.

OK. So far so good. A few minor logical howlers, but nothing we can’t expect from a DFL poobah.

Fasten your seatbelts. The rest of this post is a bumpy ride.

I also know that ocassionally I speak frankly and with a bit of passion.
But I am angry that this is being suggested, to cater to a “special” group
of conventioneers who will be judging us predominately by our bar hours. I am more than a little irritated that cities are being played off against
each other (“we can’t be at a competitive disadvantage”).

It’s called the “Free Market”, Mr. Thune, and cities do compete with each other – ferociously – for conventions.

Now, let’s move to the last bit. And in doing so, remember who’s actually coming to Saint Paul for the convention. Lobbyists? Sure! They go wherever government business is transacted; you can expect there’ll be plenty of ’em here. Media, too – by the tens of thousands. GOP staffers and politicians? Yep. Demonstrators, of course – and Dave Thune has already gone far out of his way to make them feel welcome.

And – most of all, the people around whom the whole event is actually centered; delegates. Thousands of ’em. And their families. And who are these people? Regular folks; working stiffs who’ve plugged away working for the GOP long enough to be recognized; in many cases, being a national delegate is a reward for years, even decades, of phone-banking and fund-raising and walking door-to-door handing out literature and counting ballots at precinct caucuses. Work-a-daddy, hug-a-mommy schlemiels who, through the grace of their state conventions, get to spend a week in Saint Paul participating in a political ritual at once ridiculous and vital to our functioning democracy.
People like you and I and, as it happens, Dave Thune.

People that, at first glance, seem unlikely to puke on Dave Thune’s lawn, at least to you and I…

…but not, apparently, to Dave Thune.

I add emphasis below:

Finally, I may have unfairly sullied the reputation of lobbyists. My friend
[redacted, a lobbyist] pointed out that lobbyists don’t puke, they’re professionals who have experience holding their liquor. Its the amateurs who spew.

He may be right, but the particular lobbyists we’ll have in town that week
are the ones who have initiated this whole discussion.

And of course these are the lobbyists who brought us an illegal and tragic war, a recession, polluted water, expensive drugs, and even the moralists who preach family values but play “outside the box” themselves. They are enough to make me queasy without a snootful…

Sorry Sandy, I don’t apologize.

dave thune
ward 2

Wow.

So a city crammed (for a week) full of responsible, hard-working Americans whose only real “crime” is disagreeing with Dave Thune on politics provoke that much hatred?

This guy is the president of the city council in one of America’s great cities?

If you’re one of the 30-40% of Saint Paul’s voters who vote Republican, this is your government talking (and talking informally among friends; remember, the “Saint Paul Information Forum” is a DFL club in all but name), what does this say to you? Maybe that while the city loves your money (you plutocratic, cigar-smoking Republican, you!), they hate you to the point of venting noxious bilge like this – in private, among friends, anyway?

If you’re one of the Republicans who’s coming to Saint Paul, and planning on spending money (at premium rates, no less) and stuffing the coffers of these two ideological gulags, Saint Paul and Minneapolis, what do you think? Did you start any wars, wreck any economies, pollute any water, import any drugs or cheat on your spouses?

Ask Councilman Thune. Here’s the City of Saint Paul City Council website.

And I’ll be inviting him onto the NARN to elaborate on these statements.

I’ll keep you posted.

UPDATE:  Welcome, Powerline readers.  I follow up this story here, here, here and here.

And we’re not done yet.

Fake But Accurate Arguably Germane

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Sunday evening, as I was driving to drop Scarlett Johannson off at her hotel after a torrid, memorable weekend, we were talking about the free-market solution to the mortgage crisis. Now, as you know, Scarlett is a bit of a a lefty, but by the time we got to the hotel, she was nodding in agreement.

“The market has an inherent wisdom – almost an…”, she thought, “invisible hand, that is both faster and smarter than thuddish government regulation”, she said, running her tongue up my neck under my ear as I drove.

I love economics.

UPDATE: OK, so I’ve never actually dropped Scarlett Johannson off at a hotel. But the real point is, that most rational people will agree that the free market is the best solution to most problems, including – somewhat paradoxically and, to leftists, counterintuitively – problems caused by corruption and malfeasance in sectors of the market.

UPDATE 2: Lev from Miami writes “but you kicked off the story, correct as it may have been in economic terms, by claiming to have gotten this anecdote in the context of a “torrid, memorable weekend” with Scarlett Johannson. Isn’t that inherently dishonest?”

Sorry, Lev. There was a time I might have thought so, too. According to the Associated Press, as long as the point you’re making with an allegedly-fictitious story is legit, really, anything goes.

(Well, and as long as the point agrees with the AP’s institutional bias, of course).

Fake but accurate; the new “true”.

Oh, Lev? Scarlett says “hi, and shut up”.

Affordable Housing

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008

Markets change.

Left to their own devices, markets for pretty much anything will move in some kind of cycle or another.

Remember Beanie Babies?  As demand boomed, the prices skyrocketed; when supply couldn’t keep up, fights broke out as the demand curve shot out past the bounds of reason.  Then the supply caught up, and a huge collectors market – let’s call it a “Beanie Baby Bubble” – erupted.  People, awash in “irrational exuberance”, started banking lots of money on the future upside of the Beanie Baby; there were even stories of people betting their retirement funds on the Beanie Baby market.

The bubble deflated, eventually. First, the supply of Beanies caught up with, then surpassed, and finally obliterated demand, as the supply of common sense finally caught up with the supply of duuuuuhhhhhh.

Today, Beanies have a respectable market.  As toys.  Not as investment products.Stores, adjusting to the demand, changed what they stocked;  more XBox 360s, less Beanies.

But then, RT Rybak wasn’t mayor at the time.  Had he been, perhaps – to try to prop up the city pension fund’s investments in Beanies (one can imagine), or to punish stores for having participated in the bubble, he might have instituted policies as stupid as this one:

As New Prague and other cities see more single-family homes changing over to renters because of the national housing market meltdown, many are enacting tougher rental policies. Since February, Minneapolis has decided to collect a $1,000 fee when a home is converted to rental.

The Minneapolis fee will cover costs such as inspections.

Leaving aside the first, obvious question – does it really cost $1,000 per house to send a city droog to “inspect” the property?

What’s the percentage for Minneapolis stifling a sane, rational response to the situation?  Given a choice between renting a house out and leaving it sit vacant, isn’t it better for the neighborhood, the city’s tax base, the crime rate, and “affordable housing” situation to have rentals than block after block of those blue (in St. Paul, anyway) “Vacant Building” posters?

I know – that’d require a city government that believed in the market – or was at least well-enough informed about it to hate it articulately.

The Vapors

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Andy Birkey is very, very concerned about violence at the Republican National Convention this September.

Well, at least about violence that hasn’t a snowball’s chance in hell of ever happening – like the button-pushing comment of a couple of morning talk show hosts.

The Twin Cities’ newest conservative talk show host has an idea for managing the thousands of protesters coming to the Republican National Convention in St. Paul in September: machine guns.

Chris Baker, formerly a talk radio host in Houston, took over the morning spot on KTLK in early March. On Friday, he took issue with the debate among Minneapolis law enforcement personnel as to whether police should limit the use of Tasers and pepper spray on protesters in Minneapolis (link to audio file). Baker’s suggestion is violent suppression of what he calls “stinky protesters” that are part of “an industry funded by billionaires and communist organizations (and) they are well-coordinated and incredibly dangerous.”

Dog bites man. The MNMon gets its monthly stipends from Mr. Soros. A talk show host pushes peoples’ buttons to elicit a controversial, emotional reaction from everyone in the audience, thereby generating more publicity, ergo more traffic.

Which doesn’t fit?

Trick question, of course; they’re all the same.

Baker continued: “So we’ve been talking about police protection during the upcoming convention when all those stinky protesters are coming. There seems to be a big debate over whether or not police officers will be able to wear helmets, carry shields, use pepper spray and Tasers on this crowd. You know, I’ll tell you what works on a crowd like this — a machine gun, that always works very well.

Baker’s co-host, “Jordan,” agreed: “Mow ’em down, baby!” he added.

Yawn.

Seriously. So friggin’ what?

Does Chris Baker run any police department?

Closed-Circuit to Birkey:  talk with Media reporter Paul Schmelzer; talk radio is all about pushing buttons.  Not to say I agree with this particular stunt or statement – doy – but please.

Peace advocate and former FBI agent Coleen Rowley heard the violent rhetoric on Friday. “It doesn’t take an expert on the First Amendment to recognize that suggesting the ‘good ol’ boy network’ hand out ax handles and machine guns be used to mow a crowd down comes close to inciting violence,” she wrote at the Huffington Post. “This inflammatory rhetoric looks no different than the reason we are not allowed to falsely yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater.”

Ah. So Colleen Rowley – via the left’s paid stooges in the Sorosphere – is calling for censorship.

Whew.  To think we coulda had her in Congress!

She continued: “I can also speak from personal experience — having worked almost 24 years as an FBI agent — that such remarks would almost certainly elicit investigative concern if the tables were turned and such speech came out of the mouth of someone critical of the government.”

Well, about that…

I have no idea what the “official” level of concern is, but I can’t help but notice that while Andy Birkey is right on the remarks of an obscure morning host in Minneapolis who has absolutely no police command authority, neither he nor the Monitor have ever written about the many, many remarks by the anarkids, and their plans to disrupt the convention, and life in Saint Paul in general (either actively or by passive, tacit approval), plans that are even making putative peaceniks nervous.  Plans to stalk delegates, to attack military recruiters and war memorials, plans (and rehearsals) to actively provoke violence.

So answer me this question, Andy Birkey (or anyone who is paying attention to this story):  who is more likely to actually cause any sort of problem at all in Saint Paul this September?

The “anarchists”  – upper-middle-class fops who are taking out their anger at mommy and daddy by playing at being working-class heroes, who’ve been chattering like a bunch of lemurs on amyl about the disruption they want to cause, the vandalism they want to wreak, the mayhem they plan?

Or a talk show host?

Backup question:  The Minnesota Monitor has been, since its founding, largely a joke.  So what’s the next step down from “joke?”

Note to Comedy Central

Monday, April 7th, 2008

To: Comedy Central
From: Mitch Berg
Re: Lewis Black

To whom it may concern,

It seems odd to be lecturing “Comedy Central” on the subject of comedy. But it seems intervention is in order.

Lewis Black is not funny.

He has never been funny.

He will never be funny.

I know – he’s supposed to be a “dyspeptic crank”.  Sure, it could work; George Burns and George Allen and, what the hell, Dennis Leary have all made careers – and gotten a billion laughs – playing cranky misanthropes.

The difference, of course, is that with each of ’em there was something behind the dyspepsia; something you could identify with.  And I can’t even imagine the dissociative guy on the bus identifying with Black.
Summary: Lewis Black – not funny.

Thank you for your consideration.

That is all.

Raising the Wrong Age Limit

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Phyllis Kahn – a woman for whom the Strib normally carries the water in the most baldfaced possible way – has introduced a bill that would lower the drinking age to 18, again.

They are not amused:

If a 19-year-old can sign a contract and get married, shouldn’t she be able to legally sip champagne at her own wedding? And if an 18-year-old can be sent to war in Iraq or Afghanistan, why can’t he have a beer in a bar? Furthermore, teens will always find ways to drink — why not let them do it legally? A proposed bill at the Legislature this year poses these questions, but it provides the wrong answer.

And in response, the Strib provides even wrong-er responses.

But we’ll get to that. Kahn’s rationale – and it’s one of precious few times “rationale” has been used unironically in reference to Rep. Kahn – is that criminalizing drinking merely makes the behavior more pronounced. Underground drinking, already illegal, is more flagrant than measured, legal drinking.

Overwhelmingly, the evidence supports a drinking age of 21. Studies of the still-developing teenage brain show that adolescents are more vulnerable than adults to the effects of alcohol on learning, memory and judgment. And those who begin drinking in their early teens are at greater risk to become alcoholics.

Well, yeah. The “Teenage Brain” is more vulnerable to everything. It’s why we send teenagers, rather than thirty-somethings, to school. It’s why the military knocks itself out recruiting high school kids rather than married family guys.

Every stimulus meets a more intense response when you’re dealing with teenagers.

The question is, why single out drinking?

The Strib comes close to making a point…:

In addition, the lower age limit was tried before — and it didn’t work. Similar concerns were raised in the 1970s during the Vietnam War, prompting many states to lower the drinking age. But in the following decade younger drunken drivers became a bigger issue than war or the military service. As a result, Congress said it would pull federal funds from states that did not set 21 as the drinking age. By 1988, every state was in compliance.

But then…:

The results speak for themselves. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration reported that the number of drunken drivers under age 21 involved in fatal crashes decreased by 61 percent from 1982 to 1998. The agency also estimated that tens of thousands of lives were saved from 1975 to 2003 by higher age limits.

I don’t know exactly what studies they’re talking about – and it’s likely the Strib doesn’t either. The Strib Editorial Board tends to get its talking points from whatever pressure group has their ear at the moment; see their editorial on the “Stand Your Ground” bill.

But does the Strib think that drinking age laws operated in a vacuum? Laws about drunken driving in general got much stricter, especially against teenagers.

And five years ago, the Centers for Disease Control reviewed 49 studies on drinking age laws. Nearly all of them found that a 21-year-old drinking age saved lives.

As much as these people genuflect to Europe, you’d think they’d be a bit more cosmopolitan.

In most of Europe, drinking age laws (while more strict than they were a generation ago) are much lower than in the US, if they exist at all. And drunk driving rates are infinitesimal compared to the US.

Why?

Attitudes toward drinking are different, for starters; alcohol is a way of life in Europe, while in America it’s been regarded as a drug, a sin, contraband (by the Constitution, no less), a social problem. Scottish football hooligans notwithstanding, getting hammered and staggering around drunk doesn’t have quite the same cachet in Europe that it does among Americans, especially younger ones and Packer fans.

But laws about driving are much more strict in Europe. It takes serious time and effort – a year’s worth of classes, a lot of money, a hard test – to get a driver’s license in Europe. And part of that training involves learning the penalties for drunk driving – which are unambiguously severe.

So young Europeans drink. And yet they don’t drive drunk in anywhere near the numbers American teens did, and do.

Seeing a pattern here?

We admit that it seems inconsistent that young men and women who can be sent to war can be too young to drink legally. Yet that’s more an argument to raise the minimum age for military service than to lower the minimum age for drinking.

Well, no. It’s an argument to make driving more a privilege than a right; to put some teeth in driver education. There’s at least a fair argument that Minnesota’s new, more restrictive laws on teenage driving (they’re all on probation, in effect, until 18, with zero tolerance for screw-ups) have done at least as much to cut the death rate among young drivers as raising the drinking age did.

There’s nothing wrong with the fact that a kid can get a hunting license at age 12, drive at 16…

Actually, that example proves the opposite point.

Teenage hunters – like concealed carry permit holders – receive training that focuses intensely on the consequences of screwing up. And who causes the problems with hunting rifles and handguns in our state? Not teenage hunters (or carry permittees).

Forget the drinking age; it’s time to raise the driving age.

To Bury Betty

Monday, April 7th, 2008

My congressional “representative” here in the Fourth CD is Betty McCollum.

She is – I’ll be charitable, given the respect due her as an elected member of Congress – not the brightest light on the creator’s Christmas Tree.

Mark Heuring at True North has her pretty well dialled in:

If Betty were running for Congress in many of the other districts in the state, she’d have been hooted off the stage long ago. Betty managed to best a primary opponent in 2000 after Vento died and has held the seat without a serious challenge ever since. Since that time, about the only thing she’s managed to do is regularly issue especially shrill denunciations of the president. Her list of legislative accomplishments is slight.

Mark is right – although we had high hopes for Obi Sium in ’06, it was a lousy time to run anything as a Republican.

But oh, lord, does something need to be done about this woman:

An example of Betty’s legislative prowess and judgment came a few years back, while Arden Hills was negotiating with the federal government to gain control of the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP). Arden Hills had a number of ideas ready to go and the feds were working with local officials to get things done, in the usual painful bureaucratic way. Enter Betty. Betty had a brainstorm — why not use the land, which when developed has enormous potential, to build a giant post office processing facility for the Twin Cities?

There were a few problems with this idea — it would have scuttled any plans that Arden Hills had; it would have inundated an already truck-clogged area with many more massive trucks; and, most importantly, the postal service didn’t want to build in a location that is across town from the airport, preferring instead to expand their existing facilities in Eagan. In other words, Betty’s plan had zero support from anyone who had an interest in the future of the TCAAP site. Eventually Sen. Coleman quietly got invovled and stopped McCollum from pursuing her ridiculous idea any further. Those of us who live in the area haven’t heard much from Betty since, except for the shrill denunciations of Bush she sends periodically by franked mail. I guess we can count that as a benefit.

Other than signing on to absurd anti-war resolutions and yapping like an lemur on Red Bull about education funding, she is really as close to worthless as a Congressperson can be.  Indeed, she is everything that the Twin Cities’ deranged-left imagines Michele Bachmann to be; imperious, disconnected, not very bright.  It’s wishful thinking with Rep. Bachmann; with Betty McCollum – who is too gutless even to respond to media requests from people who might dissent from her point of view – you’re talking the real thing.

Heuring:

The upshot of all this is pretty simple — if the Republican Party could field a qualified, intelligent candidate, he might have a shot at beating ol’ Betty. And this time, the Republican Party has found just such a candidate. Ed Matthews is his name. Ed is a practicing attorney and has an extensive financial background as well. He’s young, smart and understands the issues very well. I suspect that Betty will do everything possible to avoid sharing a stage with Mr. Matthews, because she would suffer greatly from any direct comparison. I met Ed briefly at the 50B BPOU and was very impressed. My guess is that you will be, too.

I also met Ed, at the 66B meeting.  He’s sharp, works a room well, and – unlike McCollum – doesn’t give you the impression that there are wires connected to his limbs and jaw controlled by the Minnesota Federation of Teachers, controlling his every move.

Count on hearing much from Mr. Matthews in coming months.  It’s always an uphill fight for Republicans in the Fourth (AKA “The Venezuela of the North”), but so was Iwo Jima.

How Effin’ Cool!

Monday, April 7th, 2008

My site ranks friggin’ “Low” on the durn burned “Cuss-O’Meter”.

The Blog-O-Cuss Meter - Do you cuss a lot in your blog or website?
Created by OnePlusYou

Shiznit, I’m good!  Actually, I’d figured it’d be a lot lower than that.  Must have been my commenters.  Yeah.  That’s it.
So I had to go and find out how the late Norwegianity, by the not-late Mark Gisleson, fared:

The Blog-O-Cuss Meter - Do you cuss a lot in your blog or website?
Created by OnePlusYou

Wow. That was a kick in the yarbles.

Compare and Contrast

Monday, April 7th, 2008

Steve Perry at the MNMon on John McCain’s blog success story, quoting Steven Dinan of the WashTimes:

[Official McCain website blogger Patrick]  Hynes said the back-and-forth with bloggers took ‘a great deal of sting out of the criticisms’ over immigration, Mr. McCain’s push for campaign-finance changes and other areas where conservatives have registered their discontent with the senator, who has secured enough delegates to win the Republican Party’s presidential nomination.

“‘It gave him a microphone when others had already left the building,’ said David All, one of the Republicans’ Web pioneers who runs SlateCard.com and who said Mr. McCain has benefited from Mr. Hynes’ ties to bloggers. ‘That very much symbolizes the role of bloggers: We don’t have editors to report to, and there isn’t a big meeting with editors every morning. What that comes down to is personal relationships.'”

Perry:

McCain has gotten good mileage out of his conference calls with righty bloggers, as these posts at Captain’s QuartersTownhall and Race42008 attest.

As opposed to the left, which spends millions subsidizing blogs like…well, MNMon, and get…

…well, Ted Lamont.  And Obama Girl.

Heston

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

Go ahead and pick your Heston:

The academy award-winner?

Ben Hur was probably the first “serious” movie I sat through as a kid – the first time I ever got that a movie could be more than simple yuks and scenery, that a story could mean more than what was being put in front of you. Heston won his Oscar almost fifty years ago, before I was born – and the movie still amazes me.

Heston was an amazing actor. Brad Carlson links to an excellent video retrospective of Heston’s film career.

And nobody, anywhere, writes about actors like Sheila O’Malley does:

My brother Brendan and I watched The Ten Commandments on the night before Easter, and expressed amazement, for the 100th time, how incredible Heston is, how inevitable. …even today, lulled to sleep by CGI effects, there is something stunning and terrifying about the Red Sea parting, well done! – but none of it would matter a whit if it weren’t for Heston’s commanding (pun) performance. He had no fear. He embodied courage, and was able to portray it larger than life. This is something NO actors have today – NONE – it is no longer the “style” of acting, and no longer in vogue. And that’s fine. Things don’t have to stay the same forever. But at least we could look back at one of the greats and say, “Ah. There. That is how it was done. That is how it should have been done.”

Absolutely true.

How about the “other” Charlton Heston, the man that stood for his beliefs at every turn – the one who marched on Washington in 1963 with Martin Luther King, at the height of his career…

…at a time when social activism was not the fashion in Hollywood.

Joel Rosenberg:

In 1961, he attended a premier of one of his movies in Oklahoma.  The theater was segregated; he joined the picket line.  At a time when it was by no means politically expedient to do so, he marched with Martin Luther King Jr.  He was, throughout his adult life, a staunch opponent of communism, McCarthyism, and racial segregation.

A quarter-century later, Heston went on to spend the last fifteen years of his working life tirelessly fighting to protect the civil liberties of law-abiding Americans…

…which, for many people who were born too late to see Heston’s glory years on the big screen, was the Heston they knew best.

The Charlton Heston that drove more than a few people over the edge, helping cement the career of at least one polemicist, and assuring that he’d never do lunch in Hollywood again?  That was him.
Gary Miller:

Few did more than Charleston Heston to keep the stinking paws of the damned dirty apes off the firearms of law-abiding Americans.

Just like the patriarch Moses he played in the magnificent 1956 Cecil B. DeMille classic, he did not live to see the promised land. But if an originalist majority on SCOTUS prevails in the soon-to-be-decided Heller case he will have died just short of the River Jordan.

Of course I owe that Charlton Heston – the guy who helped galvanize millions to turn the tide on two issues that mean a lot to me and many like me, civil rights that are seen as two sides of a coin, but should not be – something, too.

Or maybe the guy in a city and business and society full of libertines and faux libertarians, who achieved far beyond anyone’s dreams and ascended to the pinnacle of a career that he’d stumbled into and yet mastered, and devoted a fair chunk of his life to doing what was right and, at the end of the day, stayed married to his high school sweetheart for an entire lifetime?

How do you reconcile all those different Charlton Hestons?

You don’t. You appreciate the entire package on its own terms. Back to Sheila, who comes up with the words I was flailing at trying to find on the show yesterday, to capture an ideal that as usual Sheila nails without effort. I’ll be slathering on the emphasis:

The most stunning tribute of all, it takes my breath away to this day, is Richard Dreyfuss’ tribute. He wrote it for National Review – obviously a publication with political leanings that has nothing to do with who Richard Dreyfuss is, and how he votes. But, as I have said repeatedly on my blog, as I have chased people away from my site who seem constitutionally unable to play by my rules, as I have stated in my comment policy: when you are dealing with art, and the appreciation thereof, politics must take a backseat. At least if you want to have a worthwhile conversation. And then there are those who say, “I liked Charlton Heston BECAUSE of his politics” and that is just as idiotic. His work transcends. He was an actor, first and foremost, a “great pretender”. So talk about his work, please – there is plenty there to keep us chatting for 100 years at least! Nobody “owns” Charlton Heston. Nobody “owns” John Wayne. The most flaming liberal in the world could appreciate and love Red River, and those who put politics at the forefront are completely missing the point. What we are talking about here is love. And these actors who touch us, who get beneath our skins, who create something indelible … transcend all of that. The editors at National Review knew that, and so did Richard Dreyfuss.

I agree – and am awash in profound respect for a man that worked so tirelessly at the love he had for his craft, his country and its principles, and his family. Whose entire life is a monument to his love for all three.

As with Ronald Reagan (an underappreciated actor, albeit nowhere near Heston’s league), the different parts went together to make the whole man. You can – you have to, as Sheila correctly notes – appreciate them separately, and keep your art and your politics in separate silos. As Richard Dreyfus does, in the piece Sheila called out, and that you need to read. Written right after Heston’s diagnosis with Alzheimer’s was made public five and a half years ago, it’s almost too full of perfect quotes. I’m going to grab two of them

I believe that films like Ben Hur were conceived because Heston was there to make them. He allowed these stories to be told because he was there to play the parts. …When I saw Charlton Heston as a kid, he took me far, far away, to places few actors could go. The only other American actor so comfortable outside of this era was Wayne, and Heston could time travel farther. Both held the magical alchemy that made me forget the commonplace of here and now completely. John Wayne allowed us into our American past. Heston, because of his perfectly male face, the depth of his voice, the measured almost antique rhythm of his speech, the oddly innocent commitment that allowed him to dive without looking into the role, took me farther, before the common era, as they say.

Somehow he was able to cut the myriad strings that connect us to our current lives, so he could inhabit our imagined past and imagined future so perfectly. So well did he do this that his discomfort was obvious when he played in the Now (actually, make that my discomfort, because he more than likely had a ball in the rare instances when he played something current). If it wasn’t the past it was the future. I could never have gotten to Ancient Rome without him, nor Ape City.

And…:

It has become fashionable to characterize his politics; almost as if his politics were a separate thing, like Diana’s popularity. People are either defensive or patronizing (if not contemptuous). I can only say I wish all the liberals and all the conservatives I knew had the class and forbearance he has. Would I be as patient or serene when so many had showed me such contempt, or tried to make me feel stupid or small? I doubt it, truly I do. This is dignity, simply and completely. A much more important quality than political passion at the end of the day, and far more lacking, don’t you think?

That may be the biggest thing to take away from Heston; to love what you do, to fight for what you believe in, to live a life you’re proud of, and to do it all with grace.

In remembering the man, his life, his accomplishments, his impact on this world – and as Dreyfus noted, the man in which they were all wrapped up and and coexisted so famously – you can note them all in parallel, and fondly remember them all.

And so I do.

And rest in peace, great American icon. You will not be forgotten.

I’ll take all of the Charlton Hestons. Thanks.

(more…)

If It’s Nae Scots, It’s Crap

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

Happy Tartan Day, all you Scottish-Americans.

It’s a good day to observe all of Scots culture that we in America have to be proud of.

No, no no. It goes way beyond that. (Although perfecting the art of distilling spirits is no mean feat).

No, there’s the whole Edinburgh Renaissance…:

…of whom James Watt was the most famous result. The Edinburgh Renaissance was a flowering of intellectual, scientific, artistic, engineering and political thought which was, according to Paul Johnson, behind much of what we regard as “modern” today; everything from the macadam road to trousers to yellow-pigmented paint…:

…to the very means to the industrial revolution itself, found their practical application among Scots inventors. These were largely self-educated men who simultaneously mastered science, humanities and the arts at a time when they were regarded as inseparable (which is something the modern American academy would do well to re-learn). All of their stories – Watt, MacAdam, Turner, the whole amazing crew – are worth reading and learning from.

And when all the intellectual stuff wears you out, let’s not forget that when called upon, Scotland also does the music that inflames the savage beast…:

Well, no, not them, per se, although I’m nothing if not a yuuuuge fan of both. No, I’m talking about the traditional music Scots play to get the good guys into the mood to thump the bad guys…:

…which has led Scots as they kicked ass for freedom around the world, from Bill Millin leading the commandos at Sword Bearch…

…to today…

…all the way back to the founding of democracy – including the many Scots who helped found our democracy.

Congrats, Scottish-Americans!

This Better Be Worth All The Breath I’m Wasting

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

Today on the Northern Alliance Radio Network:

  • Volume I “The First Team” – Chad, John and Brian will do their thing from 11-1.  Given the success of last week’s interview with Ross Bernstein, I expect two solid hours of audio from hockey fights.
  • Volume II “The Headliner”Ed and I will be on from 1-3.  I think it’s a safe bet we’ll be talking about politics.
  • Volume III, “The Final Word”King joins Michael from 3-5.

So tune in to all six hours of the Northern Alliance Radio Network, the Twin Cities’ media’s sole guardians of sanity. On the air at AM1280 in the Metro, or streaming at AM1280’s Website, or via podcast at Townhall.

It Was Forty Years Ago Today

Friday, April 4th, 2008

My dad doesn’t remember this – but I do.

We were driving down Sixth Street Southeast in Jamestown, heading toward the tracks.

Dad was listening to the radio (tuned in to KEYJ, naturally) in our old Mercury.  It was bright and clear outside.

And the announcer led with a story about “Martin Luther King” being shot.  It’d be absurd to say I knew what was going on – but I remember being familiar with the name.  He’d been on the TV a time or two.
And it seemed pretty obvious it was an important story.   I obviously didn’t know why – I was still probably ten years away from meeting my first black person.  Jamestown North Dakota was pretty white, back then.

More people remember.

Submitted Without Comment

Friday, April 4th, 2008

Nope.  No comment at all.

Nope, they’re not mine.

(Via Jim @ AntiStrib)

Minnesota Blogs You Should Be Reading: Market Power

Friday, April 4th, 2008

Phil Miller might be known as “the King Banaian of Mankato”.

Or he might not.

But “Market Power” is very worth a read.  I liked this bit on non-profits’ penchant for institutional self-glorification:

There is a statement on a another department’s bulletin board near my office that states that “non-profits are the driving force behind change in our community.”  Of course the statement is nonsense aside from its rhetorical content.  That something needs to “change” means that something is not working well.   If something is to change, someone has to realize it and he must take actions to make things work better.  That means he has to have the right incentives.  Why is it that the incentives are better and/or the information use is better in non-profits than in the profit seeking world?

At any rate, “Market Power” is an excellent economics blog, sort of like “SCSU Scholars” but with less Red Sox and – this is important – more home-brewing recipes.

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Media? Democrats Are!

Friday, April 4th, 2008

It’s now been two solid weeks since Andy Birkey, acting in his capacity as a conduit for lefty talking points, gurgitated:

Have Michele Bachmann’s media gaffes and extreme conservative views driven her to speak mainly to conservative and Christian-right news outlets? Bachmann’s media appearances since her election create the impression of a member of Congress who is shy when not among friends, and perhaps a campaign that is concerned about what happens when a nonconservative microphone or camera is pointed in her direction.

So Rep. Bachmann – the conservative firebrand and lighting rod from the Sixth District – has consistently shied away from the regional, left-leaning media, which has engaged in bald-faced campaigns of context-mangling character assassination against every single Republican to the right of Arne Carlson in recent memory (see: Rod Grams, Norm Coleman, Alan Fine), and has been in the bag for every single DFL candidate for every single office in every election in recent history. Their claims – and those of their apologists – that outlets like MPR and WCCO are “balanced” are utterly disingenuous, and about as plausible as Flash claiming he’s a Centrist, my claims to be the “best” feminist in the Twin Cities, or the Minnesota Monitor’s claims to being “independent media”.
Hm.

In response, I wondered – would local lefty politicians be any different? So I sent invitations, two weeks ago, to the following:

  1. Senator Amy Klobuchar (Emailed and left a phone message for her press person)
  2. Senate Candidate Al Franken (Emailed and left a voice mail message)
  3. Rep. Keith Ellison (left a voicemail and an email)
  4. Rep. Betty McCollum (I left a message with her local press assistant)
  5. Minneapolis Mayor RT Rybak (Email sent).
  6. “Growth and Justice” poobah Joel Kramer President Dane Smith (email sent)

In this email, I told the truth; that Ed Morissey and I are overt conservatives – and that we pride ourselves on doing incisive, but fair, interviews. Not ambushes. Not slime jobs. Which is better than an awful lot of the Twin Cities’ media (to say nothing of the ever-hack-ier Monitor) can say.

Responses:

  1. Senator Amy Klobuchar: Nothing.
  2. Senate Candidate Al Franken: Nothing.
  3. Rep. Keith Ellison: Nothing.
  4. Rep. Betty McCollum – my “representative” did not respond.
  5. Minneapolis Mayor RT Rybak: I did get an automated response – but nothing else.
  6. “Growth and Justice” poobah Joel Kramer President Dane Smith: Eureka! Mr. Smith will appear on an upcoming Northern Alliance broadcast.

So – the obvious conclusions are that, even when faced with a chance to “reach across the aisle” to the half of Minnesota that is to the right of center, in a medium that pledges to be fair and even-handed (and has demonstrably delivered on that pledge over the course of four years), Minnesota’s elected DFL politicians and candidates are a bunch of snivelling cowards.

(Comments stating anything to the effect of “I’m glad they didn’t waste their time responding to a bunch of conservatives” will be mocked for what they are – the enabling of craven cowardice).

--> Site Meter -->