Nobody Expects The Chicago Inquisition
By Mitch Berg
You’ve probably seen this story in the past day or so – Bristol Palin calling out the President’s and, especially, liberals’ hypocrisy in re the “war on women”:
You don’t know my telephone number, but I hope your staff is busy trying to find it. Ever since you called Sandra Fluke after Rush Limbaugh called her a slut, I figured I might be next. You explained to reporters you called her because you were thinking of your two daughters, Malia and Sasha. After all, you didn’t want them to think it was okay for men to treat them that way:
“One of the things I want them to do as they get older is engage in issues they care about, even ones I may not agree with them on,” you said. “I want them to be able to speak their mind in a civil and thoughtful way. And I don’t want them attacked or called horrible names because they’re being good citizens.”
And I totally agree your kids should be able to speak their minds and engage the culture. I look forward to seeing what good things Malia and Sasha end up doing with their lives.
All very, very true.
But here’s why I’m a little surprised my phone hasn’t rung. Your $1,000,000 donor Bill Maher has said reprehensible things about my family. He’s made fun of my brother because of his Down’s Syndrome. He’s said I was “f—-d so hard a baby fell out.” (In a classy move, he did this while his producers put up the cover of my book, which tells about the forgiveness and redemption I’ve found in God after my past – very public — mistakes.)
If Maher talked about Malia and Sasha that way, you’d return his dirty money and the Secret Service would probably have to restrain you. After all, I’ve always felt you understood my plight more than most because your mom was a teenager. That’s why you stood up for me when you were campaigning against Sen. McCain and my mom — you said vicious attacks on me should be off limits.
It didn’t work, of course; the hog trough that is the lefty “alternative” media spawned an entire movement of “Triggers”.
Yet I wonder if the Presidency has changed you. Now that you’re in office, it seems you’re only willing to defend certain women. You’re only willing to take a moral stand when you know your liberal supporters will stand behind you.
But…
What if you did something radical and wildly unpopular with your base and took a stand against the denigration of all women… even if they’re just single moms? Even if they’re Republicans?
Y’see, that’s the thing; the President could do it. He’s got his Daily Koses and Bill Mahers and NPR and a herd of George Stephanopouli to do the actual dirty work for him; the Prez could take the high road!
But he won’t!
Because Bristol Palin, and Alan West, and 4th CD candidate Tony Hernandez, and every black, hispanic, asian, gay or female Republican conservative that you see is the single biggest threat the Democrats face; they’re the apostates.
As the Democrat parts of this country shrink – mostly due to the pathologies that come from Democrat mismanagement – the Dems big long-term hope is “demographic shift” – the idea that as “minorities” become the majority, the Dems will eventually be unstoppable.
That is, of course, entirely predicated on minorities staying on the plantation. and voting in lock step for Democrats forevermore. And those that don’t – the apostates – are the greatest threat that exists to that vision.
Centuries ago, as the Catholic Church’s struggling and corrupt bureaucracy struggled with change, they sent out the various Inquisitions to find and convince the various heretics and apostates to get back in line – by killing them for their own good, if necessary.
It didn’t prevent half a billion unforced turnovers as the Protestant movement established itself – but it wasn’t for lack of trying.
Bristol Pallin may not have expected the Chicago Inquisition. But her mother, and Alan West, and Laura Ingraham and every Asian and Latino conservative that showed up at caucuses this year certainly should.
Because they are the visible signs of the Democratic party bleeding to death.





March 20th, 2012 at 1:23 pm
You must remember, conservative women aren’t really women except in the purely physiologic sense that they can birth children. Beyond that, these women serve no practical purpose, except,of course, birthing babies who can be molded into liberal foot soldiers in the government schools.
March 21st, 2012 at 10:29 am
Crap, I just got a mental picture of a “herd of George Stephanopouli”. It was not pretty.
March 21st, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Kermit, I can see where a vision of perfectly-coiffed livestock all wearing kneepads would be unsettling. Suggest you watch a few “Gunsmoke” reruns for dramatic renewal of purpose. 🙂