“You’re Pigs”, She Explained
By Mitch Berg
Women in Portland, Maine W “protest” social mores and laws by marching topless about the place…:
The women, preceded and followed by several hundred boisterous and mostly male onlookers, many of them carrying cameras, stayed on the sidewalk because they hadn’t obtained a demonstration permit to walk in the street. About a thousand people gathered as the march passed through Monument Square, a mix of demonstrators, supporters, onlookers and those just out enjoying a warm and sunny early-spring day.
After the marchers reached Tommy’s Park in the Old Port, some turned around and walked back to Longfellow Square, but most stayed and mingled in the park. Some happily posed for pictures.
…and then getting outraged that anyone thought it was out of the ordinary:
Ty McDowell, who organized the march, said she was “enraged” by the turnout of men attracted to the demonstration. The purpose, she said, was for society to have the same reaction to a woman walking around topless as it does to men without shirts on.
However, McDowell said she plans to organize similar demonstrations in the future and said she would be more “aggressive” in discouraging oglers.
So let me get this straight, Ms. McDowell; you want to “desensitize” society, as it were, to topless women…
…but you’re going to do it by not only parading about topless, but being “aggressive” about anyone that takes notice, thus giving the ebulliently-un-PC the two things they love to watch the most – boobs and confict? It’ll be like a hockey game with partial nudity.
Joe Doakes of Como Park writes:
And that, right there, is the essence of the entire Progressive mind-set. We acknowledge that we are legally free to wander around topless, but that’s not enough; we must control what the rest of you THINK about us wandering around topless. Or else we’re victims.
That’s pretty much it.
April 6th, 2010 at 9:47 am
The type of women who do this are not the type you want to see topless.
April 6th, 2010 at 10:21 am
Short hair, often brightly colored, offended that men would look at their breasts when they deliberately expose them. Five will get you ten you won’t see any of these ladies in a white dress walking through a hail of rice with a man in a tux anytime soon, if you catch my drift.
April 6th, 2010 at 11:11 am
“However, McDowell said she plans to organize similar demonstrations in the future and said she would be more “aggressive” in discouraging oglers.”
And so she’ll have Pelosi, Boxer, and Shrill Hill lead the next parade. Maybe throw in Anderson-Kelliher as Grand Marshal……yucko!!!!!!!!!
April 6th, 2010 at 11:33 am
Three words: Janet Napolitano topless.
I am going to throw up now.
April 6th, 2010 at 12:26 pm
Here’s one that will help you purge Kermit…..Madeleine Albright. One would think she had some handsome legs though…well if you’re a male rhino anyway!!!
April 6th, 2010 at 12:38 pm
I got you all beat:
Helen Thomas.
April 6th, 2010 at 1:50 pm
About six months ago, my friends and I were having lunch at a Minneapolis resteraunt.
One of the guys leans over and quietly points out a woman (let’s call her “portly”), openly nursing a baby in the booth across from us (openly as in double E boob and babe swinging out in the breeze).
Joe says “whoa”!, and scoots a chair over to peer intently.
The woman asks Joe what he thinks he’s doing….
“Honey, if you’re going to interrupt our meal with that fat tit, I’m going to give you all the attention you can handle so my brothers can eat in peace!”
Fred’s a giving kind of guy.
April 6th, 2010 at 2:44 pm
resteraunt…
You know, when you misspell some words reading them back is it’s own punishment.
April 8th, 2010 at 10:57 am
An appropriate illustration:
http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2001/02/21/