Joe Doakes, formerly of Como Park, emails:

Dumb thing for him to say. 

He’s making the same mistake that every juror makes in a gun case.  He’s looking at the situation from every angle, having all the time in the world to analyze frame by frame and second by second.

But that’s not the law. The question is did the officer have a reasonable belief that his life was in danger at the time he pulled the trigger?

That means the only angle that matters is the angle the officer was able to see. What’s happening from the back or the side or above is not relevant.

If the shooter couldn’t see the gray coat agent take the gun from the victim’s back, then as far as the shooter knew he was still facing an armed assailant who voluntarily thrust himself into the fray to attack the officers.

How did he know the assailant was armed? Because one of his team members shouted “gun.”  Is he justified in relying on that team members warning? Absolutely. Did he see the victim pointing at him holding something in his hand? Yes, but it turned out to be a phone not a gun.  Doesn’t matter. Under the totality of the circumstances, the shooting was justified. 

 I understand the lawyer/lobbyist wants to protect Second Amendment rights, but this is a terrible case to do that. And now he just handed the rabble a huge propaganda victory.  Mistake.  

Joe Doakes

 

It’s going to be a terrible case on which to be that juror, too – if it goes to trial. 

This entry was posted by by Mitch Berg on Monday, January 26th, 2026 at 9:49 am and is filed under The Second Civil War. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.