Return To Sender

By Mitch Berg

Joe Doakes, formerly of Como Park, emails:

Why fly deportees to Africa?  Is Trump trying to provoke a constitutional crisis?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/stephen-miller-goes-biden-judge-who-ordered-plane/

My understanding is that the animals being deported are so vicious that their own countries won’t take them.  They’re being sent to the only place that will accept them.  Yes, it’s a Third-World shithole. What’s your point?

I’m wondering why the country-of-origin issue isn’t being addressed more forcefully.  If any nation refuses to take their own scum back then the immediate finding by the President should be then NOBODY from that country is allowed to enter or remain here.  Refuse entry to everyone, including diplomatic staff.  Throw all them all out.  Don’t think you can dump your problems on us.  

And maybe take it one step farther:  “The criminals being deported are so vicious that their country of origin won’t take them back.  It’s unfair to American taxpayers to feed and house them forever.  But we recognize the courts have said these criminals must be given due process.  Therefore, we intend to give them a free lawyer and a fair trial after which they will be given a first-class hanging.  If any nation objects to the death penalty and wants to take them, let me know and we’ll pay the freight to ship them to you. Be aware that if you let them go and we catch them again, they will be summarily executed and the cost will be recovered from you in the form of higher tariffs.”

That ought to put the cat among the pigeons.

Joe Doakes

Seems like too much fuss.   

Don’t want your citizen back?   Seems to be that’s what parachutes and C130s are for.  

“Oh, gosh.  You got ’em back anyway”.  

And yes, not taking your own criminals back is a solid case for raising tariffs. 

12 Responses to “Return To Sender”

  1. justplainangry Says:

    What due process? Due process for illegals is very different than for citizens – no court will rule otherwise and if they do, they should be disbarred, stripped of US citizenship and given due process for illegals. Their due process consists of a cot and sustenance until they get thrown off the C130 over their country of origin with a parachute they have to pack themselves. And in the case of disbarred court critters, Uganda will do just fine.

  2. golfdoc50 Says:

    Totally off topic and I apologize but I’m back in Minnesota for a few days to attend the State Fair, one of the few remaining ties I have here besides relatives. Anyway, yesterday on the way out we passed the Republican Party building and saw three or four men standing a few yards in front on the sidewalk, arms akimbo a la German Brownshrts. They had signs attached to their clothes, all variations of the phrase “Republicans are fascists “ and they were repeating it verbally. A pathetic but real attempt to intimidate. Being 75 and of small stature I merely shot them a “Sig Heil” as I passed by. Later we saw a report of police being summoned because they wouldn’t leave when requested. Wonder if anyone knows more? It’s no surprise that Dems project their authoritarian fantasies on opponents, but this is deplorable AF.

  3. bikebubba Says:

    JPA, it’s due process as the Bill of Rights has, in part, been interpreted to protect non-citizens as well as citizens, as long as they are under the jurisdiction of the United States.

    In this case, I am seeing that the people to be (?) deported have some convictions for heinous crimes, but it is not altogether clear that they have served these sentences. Given that U.S. prisons are ordinary pretty secure–far more than many foreign prisons–and that people theoretically can find their way back here if they’re released in these third world countries, why not keep them in prison here and then deal with where they are to be deported to?

    Plus, you have the question of “why should South Sudan be stuck with a dozen more murderers?” Given the troubles there, I can’t see that this is good diplomacy.

  4. SmithStCrx Says:

    In some cases the original country of origin refuses to take them. When that happens, I fully support using Coercive Diplomacy to get that country to accept it’s own citizens back. I’d even go so far as to put the illegals in a plane and air drop them into their home country.
    In some cases, it’s the individual that doesn’t want to go back home, even though their country of origin will take them.

    Abrego Garcia says he’s afraid of going home. He’s also refused to voluntarily go to another Latin American country. I assume that the Trump Administration has tried to get the original order blocking his deportation home lifted, but the Court didn’t acquiesce. The move to deport him to Africa is a threat designed to get him to accept deportation elsewhere voluntarily, which he’s refused. Personally, after every hurdle is cleared, I hope the Trump Administration sticks to the plan and ships Garcia to Africa. The threat loses its bite if individuals can refuse the easy path but still go back to a more familiar country after the Courts finally finish with their Case.

  5. John "Bigman" Jones Says:

    Why send them out of the country? Fence off a square mile of land near Ely, toss in a few pup tents, here you go fellows. If you don’t like it, free airfare to your home country.

    Might even toss in a jack knife. I doubt the timber wolves would object.

  6. Pig Bodine Says:

    Bigman,
    its against the law to use live bait with timber wolves

  7. In The Mailbox: 08.25.25 : The Other McCain Says:

    […] Tank: Lt. Governor Collins Faces Heavy Lifting If He Runs Against Donalds In 2026 Shot In The Dark: Return To Sender STUMP: The Week In Meep – Diving Boards, Servant of God Nicholas Black Elk, and […]

  8. ArthurRadley Says:

    Why are we not flying these border jumpers to Israel?

  9. J. Ewing Says:

    So, the judge says you can’t send him to his home country, and none of us wants him here. So give him a choice: a free, voluntary ride home, or a free, INvoluntary flight halfway.

  10. John "Bigman" Jones Says:

    “Your Honor, the government moves to dismiss removal proceedings. The defendant will not be deported, he has been released from custody and is a free man. When? Yesterday afternoon. Where? I don’t have an exact address, all it says here is Denali National Park. But that park is in the United States and he is not in custody so we have no obligation to keep track of him. Case closed.”

  11. bikebubba Says:

    Regarding Kilmar Abrego Garcia, if the cases against him are strong, just try him for those human trafficking charges, imprison him for a while, and then maybe he’ll have a better idea where he’d like to go after that time. I’d guess human trafficking would be at least a decade. Maybe his MS13 buddies (or non-buddies) will have forgotten about him by then.

    Really, given that one can leave a third world hell-hole and come back to the U.S., there is a certain sense–though a high expense–to keeping them here for a while in our more secure prisons, I’d think. Trump is his own worst enemy a lot of times by being in such a hurry.

  12. Greg Says:

    John,

    I written this before on other threads. As for a place to exile criminals and illegals (same thing), one must wonder why else God created the Aleutian Islands.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->