Deja Vu Vu Vu Vu

By Mitch Berg

Joe Doakes, no longer of Como Park, emails:

Here we go again.

The fact that they need to rig and cheat to support an (in effect) incumbent tells you how nervous they are.

5 Responses to “Deja Vu Vu Vu Vu”

  1. jdm Says:

    Trump won’t be allowed to be president.

  2. bosshoss429 Says:

    Yup! Judges, including SCOTUS, are now using that “lacks standing” as an excuse to avoid hearing or worse yet, ruling on the cases! The message here? You peons can’t challenge the elites, even though that is our right under the constitution.

  3. bikebubba Says:

    The standing argument is very interesting, because what she’s saying is that somehow on her planet, the introduction of fraudulent votes does not reduce the voting power of legitimately cast votes. Not quite sure how that works out, except in the land of wishful thinking.

  4. Eric Says:

    Try this. Correct me if I’m wrong. Marbury V Madison established that the courts had the right of Judicial Review. These standing cases…… Are the courts slowly giving up their right of Judicial Review?

  5. TKS Says:

    Funny how ‘lacks standing’ seems to morphs into ‘moot point’ since we can’t see how any individual ballot was cast,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->