Berg’s 20th Law is clear and unambiguous . To wit:
All incidents of “hate speech” not captured on video (involving being delivered by someone proven not to be a ringer) shall be assumed to be hoaxes until proven otherwise.
Is the Law right about the recent case at the U of Cincinnati, about which so many prog brows were furrowed in recent days?
One of his most recent tweats indicated that he’s on his way to UCSB. Maybe just shut up about all this?
One would think the parties involved would WANT to talk about this event, because “I just wanted to start a discussion” is used as an excuse for hate crime hoaxes.
There is a signature to these fraudulent “hate crimes.” You can’t miss it.
-The “hate crime” is a one-off event, not a part of a pattern. With no warning or precursor crimes, nooses are hung from trees, an unsigned letter is received by a political activist, an obnoxious poster mysteriously appears in a public place.
-The event is used as an excuse by the establishment to condemn unnamed (or maybe named, but not personally known) people that they want to condemn.
-Vows are made to find the responsible party & bring them to justice.
-Then, as the investigation proceeds, certain discrepancies & holes in the story appear. If the investigation is internal, it will stall out. If the police have been called in, witnesses and college officials will stop cooperating with them. It may even be hinted that the police were the perpetrators, or at least the enabler, of the hate crime.
-The people who eagerly held press conferences & public hearings to expose the crime suddenly become difficult to question, or will only submit to talking to the media on their own terms.
-The investigation is forgotten.
Another tactic is shifting focus. We saw this in the Oberlin v Gibson’s bakery hate crime fraud.
First specific accusations are made against named people. When those accusations are easily and publicly rebutted, maybe even via lawsuit, the accusation changes to a “pattern of behavior” by the individuals, or the company, or maybe just the community as a whole.
Hard to refute that. If a person says that Midwest One Bank’s lending practices are an example of the systemic racism & white supremacy embedded in American culture, I don’t think that Midwest One Bank can sue. They haven’t really been accused of doing anything in particular. How would you prove the statement true or false?
Someone, troll or otherwise tell me (prove to me) that this is NOT always done by the left. Don’t tell me I am politicizing this, it is always leftists?
Is there a parallel on the right?
There’s a .org that collects fakehatecrimes, I think they’re up to around 480 incidents now in the last decade.
So according to the college, this man, a black scholar mind you, was just living his best scholar’s life and some White Supremacist picked him out of the blue for persecution.
Why would anyone bother a humble fellow trying to improve the world by advancing the science of bioengineering?
They wouldn’t. Antar’s PhD is Urban Education (’cause they teach maff and reading different in the city), and his scholarship revolves around improving the public perception of EEOC students and spreading CRT.
#ThisIsMAGAcountry!
https://researchdirectory.uc.edu/p/tichavaa