Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:
“Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis on Twitter: “Out of 27 women that were accidentally pregnant during the vacc program. Outcome: 23 spontaneous abortions. 2 premature with neonatal death. 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death. 1 living baby Pfizer doc 5.3.6 page 12 “Safe and effective”” / Twitter”
How is it misleading to cite actual numbers from the original source?
Perhaps they use “misleading” to mean “leading people away from The Narrative,” which would be true but not the normal usage.
Silver lining: women won’t need coat hangers after Roe is overturned. Just vaxx your troubles away.
Joe Doakes
There’s always a silver lining, isn’t there?
Yet, the juice pushing murderers in Fauci’s ministry of death, continues to pay complicit doctors to keep touting how safe it is. Some of them even tout that they have grandchildren, implying that said grandchildren are jabbed. Further, we have all of these DemoCommies that have, allegedly, received three or more jabs, declaring that they tested positive for WuFlu, then exclaim how glad they are that they got jabbed. Same story, verbatim, from all of these accessories to murder.
Silver lining: women won’t need coat hangers after Roe is overturned. Just vaxx your troubles away.
I’ll admit being a bit surprised that the left hasn’t hit the Good Publicity spotlight on this angle (you know, like what they’re doing with pedophilia).
Dr. Malone posted another excellent video on biochemistry of mRNA technology and finished with 9 (nine, девять)! pages of side effects Pfizer and BioTech encountered. These 9 (nine!) pages came from a FOIA disclosure mandated by the courts. But I guess qualifies as disinformation by JD’s definition. Oh, and current jab variants have 0 (zero, ноль)! efficacy against Omicron and later. But jab away! Including your kids – if they are born. The jab is safe and effective – Big Pharma and the Goobernement tells you so. It is not like they have anything to hide, have always been truthful, no agenda, nothing to profit from. So how does not “Fauci” spell “Mengele”?
“Misinformation” — Well at least MBerg’s lede is correct in describing his post.
^ well, at least EI’s comment doesn’t actually present any actual information or data or facts that contradict those from a Pfizer document. I’m sure the little guy is putting together a presentation for later, right?
Right?
The difference is Mitch and I use the word “misinformation” sarcastically, whereas Liberals use it dogmatically.
To us, if information is correct, it can’t be ‘misinformation.’
To them, if information is unhelpful to The Cause, it must be ‘misinformation.’
Moderation. I used a word which included the canine phrase. Second attempt:
The difference is Mitch and I use the word “misinformation” sarcastically, whereas Liberals use it theologically.
To us, if information is correct, it can’t be ‘misinformation.’
To them, if information is unhelpful to The Cause, it must be ‘misinformation.’
/Fact Check-Pfizer FDA document does not show COVID shot caused miscarriages or neonatal deaths in ‘all injected mothers’/
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-documentpregnant-idUSL1N2U81ZL
Nothing to see here… more misinformation is all…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was aware early on that the COVID vaccines could spur viral reactivation of diseases like the varicella-zoster virus (shingles) in some people, but chose not to disclose it, according to renowned vaccinologist and physician Dr. Robert Malone. “They knew about the viral reactivation,” Malone declared during a recent panel discussion (snip)“This is the group that first discovered the signal of the cardiotoxicity, the doctor continued. “They also knew at that time—one of them actually had the adverse event early on of shingles. They knew that the viral reactivation signal—which the CDC has never acknowledged—was one of the major known adverse events.”
^ I especially liked Malone attributing a 17-year-old athlete’s 2013 death to a virus that was discovered in 2019. How does anyone get past that?
Why call him a scientist? Why call him a researcher? He dropped out of the PHD program in grad school. One of his websites posts that many of his publications are in peer-review journals. No decent, self-respecting scientist would ever state that. Look at his CV. He lists several dates that are incongruent with the process of clinical residencies, graduation, and then assist prof positions… He also jumps fields and goes from getting his 4 yr medical degree to a stint in pathology residency, to setting up an immunology lab…. he lists himself as a Harvard Graduate, but he only did a scholar’s program for 1 yr, no degree earned. Again, that doesn’t happen. Do your homework, check his credentials, and stop calling him an expert.
How to lie with statistics. (I am preemptively substituting ABRT for a word I think may trigger moderation).
Another guy in the tweet thread said this was bovine excrement; I followed his lead; he may be right in this case. At https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
you can look at page 12, Pfizer doc 5.3.6, presumably what Dr. Loupis was reading. I see a prominent 270 cases; 238 with no outcome reported. I don’t know if she saw some other version with a typo or what but 27 is not there. I seem to be able to derive it one way:
270 – 238 (no outcome reported) = 32 remaining cases.
32 – 5 (outcome pending reported) = *27* remaining cases.
That should give us 27 known outcomes, but there are 29 reported outcomes with this note: “(note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).” One of the 27 was listed as a normal outcome, so the remaining 26 were among outcomes reported as spontaneous ABRT, premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous ABRT with intrauterine death, and spontaneous ABRT with neonatal death.
The March of dimes tells me “about 10 to 15 in 100 pregnancies (10 to 15 percent) end in miscarriage.” 26 of around 270 is right in the ballpark of 10 percent. Presumably the non-reported outcomes were mostly normal or non-spontaneous ABRT. I don’t see anything in these particular reports to actually be alarmed about.
Don’t get me wrong; while I did personally get the jab, mostly to get around mask requirements, I am not a fan of the way C-19 was handled in any way. I just really don’t like to see my side arguing from an unsupported position.
Dr Malone did complete his MD. It is telling, though, that it seems he has not had a faculty position in any academic department for a while. The “ground breaking work” he did stems primarily from papers published in 1989 and 1990. There’s been a crap ton of work done since then, by dozens of other scientists. Go to google scholar and compare his productivity with Katalin Kariko’s and you’ll quickly see who is the better scientist. We all know someone like Malone — they did a good thing or two as a youngster and then were unable to convert that good thing into a career, so they blame everyone around them but themselves. He’ll be written into history, alright, as a quack and a kook. Congratulations…
Unlike Dr. Fauci, who is – literally – the embodiment of SCIENCE itself.
Turns out MBerg’s “ misinformation” piece is a parody of itself…
How to lie with statistics…
It’s unfortunate that the only people holding our side accountable is everyone on the left and those on our side with the integrity and ability to check the numbers; which, of course, is followed by widespread broadcasting of those errors.
When the other side is held accountable it is done only those on our side with the integrity and ability to check the numbers; and when the errors are found, no one knows.
“ Do your homework, check his credentials, and stop calling him an expert.”
Good idea, rAT Emery
MD; JD; PhD; MBAPLA (Pathological Lying Asshole). . . and the Biden admin disbanded its “disinformation board” today, after public outcry and opposition.
I am going to count this as yet another “unforced error” by the Biden administration. The underlying documentation from DHS was really wild: https://www.cisa.gov/mdm. Although DHS secretary Mayorkas talked about foreign actors, the feds pages on MDM clearly identify MDM actors as being domestic as well as foreign. Psaki was quite open about the feds “working with” social media companies to suppress “disinformation,,” which, according to DHS, can be completely true but is missing DHS approved context.
The hyper-partisan head of Biden’s misinformation board, Nina Jankowicz, has resigned. The whole episode smacks of the amateurishness we have seen again and again from the Biden administration, Jankowicz had a famously long history of defending the debunked “Steele Dossier” story and attacking the now confirmed Hunter Biden laptop story.
I’ve been reading more frequently, lately, from #nevertrumper conservative sources (like Rob Long) that they never thought that the Biden administration would be this incompetent, given the large number of Obama admin veterans in high posts. They can’t even do the basics right.
9 pages of side effects encountered during trials. No efficacy for anything after and including omicron. Safe and effective. But I repeat myself. I am sure Steve will be doing an in-depth analysis and will find that there was a typo on page six so entire 9 pages are null and void.
JPA: I was only arguing with Dr. Loupis’s apparent implication that of 27 pregnancies that encountered the vaccine, one survived. If true, that would be a game changer. But it does not appear to be true, at least the way I read the source material. I went deep in a “show your work” fashion in case I was making errors that someone else could point out to me.
I just think people who want to argue about this vaccine experiment should drop this particular point about number of pregnancies that survive, which appears to be unsupportable, and shift to things that are. If the factoid about no efficacy for omicron and later is accurate and supportable, as I expect, that is a much better target to aim at.