This is just your periodic reminder that Joe Biden blocked a black woman from the SCOTUS, and a wise Latino from the Federal bench, because they were black and Latino and not progressive.
Berg’s Eighth Law is universal and omnipresent.
26 thoughts on “Berg’s Eighth Law Never Sleeps”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
When the WaPo starts pointing out DemoCommie racism, their house of cards is starting to come down. Let’s Go Racist Brandon!
Fuck Racist Biden. There fixed it for you, boss.
BTW, one of the candidates Brandon is pushing is quite conservative judging by her body of work. Of course, people change, but Brandon is THAT senile and stupid.
I’m more than a little concerned — nobody’s talking about Biden’s opportunity to correct the underrepresentation of Protestants on the Supreme Court.
I’m curious to know, what IS the Black view of the Interstate Commerce Clause and how does it differ from the Wise Latina view or the Accused White Rapist view? How does the Protestant interpretation Equal Protection vary from the Catholic interpretation? Can someone explain why diversity of justices is so important?
To me, the demand for diversity makes no sense. Proper Constitutional law is not made on the basis of race or sex or religion. That’s the whole POINT of having Constitutional law – so we do NOT degenerate back into the warring factions which predated our nation.
Why are people committed to moving the nation forward so intent on implementing practices which will move it backwards?
Perhaps the proposed judges just weren’t clean enough and articulate enough for Joe.
NW, you are right, none of them do hamster-speak.
Isn’t it just as clear that justice Thomas was chosen because of his race? Double standard?
Waittaminute… I thought whatabouting was a bad thing? Are there new rules again?
Emery,
Maybe he was, but the DemoCommies proved their racism by “finding” Anita Hill in their attempt to discredit him. Same playbook that they used on Herman Cain.
“I am announcing today that one of the first Supreme Court vacancies in my administration will be filled by the most qualified woman I can possibly find, one who meets the high standards I will demand for all court appointments,” ~ Ronald Reagan
President Reagan did virtually the same thing Biden is now doing.
Lads, when even a nitwit of rat’s caliber can google up a cogent refutation to this topic, it’s time to take the L.
Leftist reprobates have taken his example to support for degeneracies never considered possible, but the fact is, Reagan did set the table. Good time to condemn that, and to use it as an educational opportunity to warn future “conservatives” to have a care about how they cuck.
Lads, when even a nitwit of rat’s caliber can google up a cogent refutation to this topic, it’s time to take the L.
Leftist reprobates have taken his example to support for degeneracies never considered possible, but the fact is, Reagan did set the table. Good time to condemn that, and to use it as an educational opportunity to warn future “conservatives” to have a care about how they cu_ck.
Lads, when even a nitwit of rat’s caliber can google up a cogent refutation to this topic, it’s time to take the L.
Leftist reprobates have taken his example to provide support for a level of filth never considered possible, but the fact is, Reagan did set the table. Good time to condemn that, and to use it as an educational opportunity to warn future “conservatives” to have a care about how they cuck.
Mod bot is on the warpath. I shall divide my comments and conquer it.
Lads, when even a nitwit of rat’s caliber can google up a cogent refutation to this topic, it’s time to take the L.
Leftist scum have taken his example to provide support for a level of filth never considered possible, but the fact is, RR did set the table. Good time to admit that, and to use it as an educational opportunity to warn future “conservatives” to have a care about how they cuck.
Ha! Not nearly apples to apples, Emery.
Reagan never threatened to filibuster a qualified DemoCommie female candidate of any race, then years later, conveniently forget about it and tell a bald faced lie to the American people.
Twat — quit making sense. I have tried to think of a way to respond, but I do think that identity politics isn’t just a liberal maneuver. Although I don’t think it was as much of a platform with the conservatives as it was more than likely a secondary thing that he simply wanted to state. Either way, hopefully we can become more congenial. Identity politics just seems so obtuse to me as it seems they could be more eloquent. They basically say, “I need an x, y, z, and then another x there,” instead of referring to their unique talents as a primary characteristic. It just seems condescending. But it may be necessary.
Fuck you Ms. Congeniality. I’m not agreeing with you, moron, I’m agreeing with whatever leftist slob you plagiarized that insight from.
Twat — In time we’ll discover modern philosophy and the principle of the separation of powers. Then we might finally join the modern democracies. Until then we’ll continue loading the judiciary with political appointees. 😂
^ You think no other country loads their judiciary with political appointees?
^ Lighten up Francis….
^ Well, gosh, you’re the one who brought up the other more modern democracies. I was just looking for info.
I started with a dry comment and ended with a dry comment. Whether I was successful is anther matter.
No rat. You started with an asinine, moronic comment worthy of your low IQ, and ended it the same way.
It’s the best effort you’re capable of.
I’m sure someday I’ll encounter someone who refers to ideas they don’t like who isn’t an insufferable tool.
But not today.
I’m sure someday I’ll encounter someone who refers to ideas they don’t like who isn’t an insufferable tool.
WTF is that supposed to mean? You’ve mangled your favorite, plagiarized quote, rat. Is there *anything* you can do correctly?