This Is A Sincere Question…

…for any DFLers that happen to be reading.

Yesterday, on the one hand, DFL rep Jennifer McEwen, sounding as if she were nearly in tearms, chided her GOP colleagues for attacking Maxine Waters, who spent her weekend telling Demcorats to riot if they didn’t get the verdict they wanted in the Chauvin trial…

Right after that, the DFL moved a resolution condemning the National Guard – part-time soldiers who live among us all – for supporting the effort to keep “Anti”-Fa from burning down. more poor, immigrant and minority neighborhoods:

Do these people speak for you?

And if you deflect to “January 6”, in the seeming belief that there was no pollitical violence in this country before that day, I will mock and taunt you for a month straight, and you will deserve it.

21 thoughts on “This Is A Sincere Question…

  1. “I’ll give you that Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned.” ~ Judge Peter Cahill

    Maxine Waters getting Derek Chauvin sprung from prison was a plot twist I did not see coming.

    Hard to see how Waters could have prejudiced the jury by warning that things will get, “more confrontational” if Chauvin is acquitted when literally everyone in Minnesota already keenly understands that.

  2. If the GOP would “roll tape” at this kind of chicanery by Democrats, I find it hard to believe that we’d ever lose an election, even in California. Pelosi and others denying the obvious–that telling people to step up the protests when the whole city has been rocked by riots and is bracing for more–is more or less endorsing the work of the Ku Klux Antifa.

  3. ” . . . when literally everyone in Minnesota already keenly understands that.”

    Translation: Democrats have succeeded in making it clear that Chauvin cannot get a fair trial, that he must be sacrificed to the mob, pour encourager les autres.

  4. ^ It wouldn’t be the Democratic Party if they weren’t being their own worst enemy.

  5. If Chauvin is convicted, then the harsher sentence, the more likely the appeal. So they kind of have a feedback loop going that will keep trials & riots going on for years.
    All because the Democrats are terrified of their own radical base.

  6. Hard to see how Waters could have prejudiced the jury by warning that things will get, “more confrontational”

    Am I the only one who notices the naunced doublespeak? Warning vs Inciting. You see, Mad Maxine did nothing wrong! Unlike that orange fella.

    So yes Mitch, failing to condemn this action you have your proof, that indeed, talking points rule, there is no integrity, morality, scruples or honesty among the liberal set.

  7. It is really difficult to imagine that Walz could have made worse policy decisions.

  8. ^^ I’ve started reading your comments in the voice of Paul Lynde at his campiest. Circle gets the Square!

  9. ^^ I usually read your comments in the sound of a squirrel chirping. Squeek!

  10. Listen to the emotion in that kook’s voice; she’s near tears as she speaks of Mad Maxine. I bet she gathered her cats around her and hugged them tight when she got home.

    These people are a danger to themselves and everyone around them.

  11. Dr Pete
    “Listen to the emotion in that kook’s voice”
    Agreed, this is what ESLD (End Stage Liberal Disillusionment) sounds like…always on the edge of tears.

  12. I bet she gathered her cats around her and hugged them tight when she got home.

    That is certainly possible, but she appears to be normal. Married (to a man) with two children, one of each gender. She’s a lawyer. A sensitive caring politician.

    And from this position of apparent normalcy she tearfully defends Maxine Waters for flying into Mpls, throwing a bomb, and flying out. She is the face of the DFL, the Democrat party, who uses her elected position to smooth over the Waters’ cynical call for insurrection and rioting. I have to wonder if the Democrats knew this would allow for an appeal and possible mistrial in the Chauvin case so as to keep the violence and looting and destruction going?

  13. JDM
    you are on to something. An appeal, reversal, and/or mistrial resulting in a new trial would provide BLM and MN Progressives truly bountiful fund raising opportunities.

  14. Has anyone told politicians that they only have to shut up for a few more days and then they can talk about the case?

  15. Has anyone told politicians that they only have to shut up for a few more days and then they can talk about the case?

    I think Ron White’s comment on his right to remain silent applies here:
    “I had the right to remain silent. What I lacked was the ability.”

  16. JPA,

    FUCK moderation!

    Enh. I’ve had roughly 250,000 spam comments (and a few spammy commenters) blocked in the past 14 years. That’s a lot of spam.

  17. There are a ton of reasons to throw out a verdict. You’ve got pathologists ignoring Floyd’s drug levels and heart disease, threats from rioters, threats from politicians, the NY Times releasing sensitive information about the jurors, Antifa……maybe it’s just me not watching many trials closely, but it’s one of the smelliest ones I can think of.

  18. Right after that, the DFL moved a resolution condemning the National Guard – part-time soldiers who live among us all – for supporting the effort to keep “Anti”-Fa from burning down. more poor, immigrant and minority neighborhoods

    The NG was activated by Gov Walz. They’re just doing what he told them to do. I hope someone points this out to the sponsors and affirmative voters.

    What should they have done? Disobeyed the governor’s orders? Effing DFL Morons and the effing morons who keep voting them in office.

  19. I just got moderated as well and I do not see anything in my post that might have caused this except the words “effing” and “morons”

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.