Shot in the Dark

The Democrats Haven’t Squashed the Entrepreneur Yet

This is how a recession gets fixed…

A crop of potentially groundbreaking companies is emerging from the wreckage of the Great Recession. No question, some will blow up, and others will fail to reach their potential. But the downturn has done little to dampen the entrepreneurial spirit. During the first half of this year, angel investors financed 24,500 new ventures, 6% more than during the same period last year, according to the Center for Venture Research. The overall amount of money going into startups has declined, but the figures suggest that this year will see the birth of roughly 50,000 companies with enough promise that someone is betting money on them. “It may be that this is the best time to start a company,” says Carl Schramm, president of the Kauffman Foundation, an organization that promotes entrepreneurship.

History shows that great companies are often built during bad times. In 1939, at the tail end of the Great Depression, two engineers started Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) in a garage in Northern California. Silicon Valley itself was largely created during the nasty recession of the mid-1970s. During that decade, entrepreneurs laid the groundwork for the boom of the 1980s, building companies that pioneered three new industries: Atari in the video game business, Apple (AAPL) in personal computers, and Genentech in biotechnology. “The only people who venture out in tough times are on a mission, which is what you need,” says Michael Moritz, managing partner of Sequoia Capital, a venture capital firm that invested in Apple back in the ’70s.

The entrepreneur; the capitalist, seeking the American dream of wealth and freedom, has always been the seed of who we are as a nation, our standard of living and what we’ve done for other nations. Despite Michael Moore’s attempts to discredit it, and Barack Obama’s attempts to destroy it, capitalism is still our only hope for recovery.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

8 responses to “The Democrats Haven’t Squashed the Entrepreneur Yet”

  1. apathyboy Avatar

    I don’t understand why there is such a drive for new businesses when the entire economy is on the brink of an inevitable collapse. They deserve to fail for their poor judgment.

  2. Mitch Berg Avatar
    Mitch Berg

    AB,

    Actually, recessions are a great time to start new businesses (issues with the credit market notwithstanding). Not all new businesses, of course; it’d be a lousy time to start a restaurant.

    But anything where you have to start developing something with a long lead time? Lots of biotechs, software, hardware and other companies are starting now, because it’s a great time to woodsheed on new stuff. Creative destruction is everywhere (Obama’s meddling notwithstanding), and best of all your investors don’t expect to get rich right now, so you have some time to get your product, marketing and business model right the first time.

  3. nate Avatar
    nate

    Wait a minute, how’d they get venture capital to invest in the first place?

    By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there’s ever going to be any progress . . . .

    [end Wellstone voice]

  4. apathyboy Avatar

    Mitch, the type of company plays a huge role, that is true. I guess my point is that I see this as a sign that the market is recovering and not that it is continuing to decline. A recovery of the market over the course of the next year will (at least seem to) indicate that TARP and Obama’s stimulus is working.

    If the Obama administration was truly harming the American market, the economy would not be showing signs of recovery and there would be a decline in the number of ventures being financed. [Please keep in mind that I am not necessarily crediting Obama with economic recovery, but that his administration is in no way leading us to ruin.]

  5. Mitch Berg Avatar
    Mitch Berg

    A recovery of the market over the course of the next year will (at least seem to) indicate that TARP and Obama’s stimulus is working.

    I salted my sidewalk last winter. A recovery in the market will indicate that salting my sidewalk led to a market recovery. Wouldn’t it?

    Maybe, maybe not. It’s entirely possible that the market will recover (very, very incompletely and sluggishly) in spite of Tarp and Porculus.

  6. apathyboy Avatar

    I like your use of de-icing to demostrate “slippery slope.” If that was intentional, it was genious. (If not, it’s still great.)

    If a solution is intended for a given effect and the effect happens it is not unreasonable to believe that there is a direct correlation, although its not proof either:

    I salted my sidewalk on Friday. It is no longer icey. However it was also sunny all weekend. Whether or not the salt caused success is debatable. But you can’t call it a failure.

    [I’m sure that the analogy fails somewhere, and you can always speculate that market would have had a larger rebound without the stimulus, but I think that if the market recovers next year people will credit the stimulus and Obama will be re-elected.]

  7. apathyboy Avatar

    [and yes, I suck at spelling genius, one of the most unfortunate words to misspell at a witch hunt.]

  8. Johnny Roosh Avatar

    if the market recovers next year people will credit the stimulus and Obama will be re-elected

    I think you should stick to writing about sidewalks. The market is up dramatically already.

    Tell that to an Obama voter that is out of a job with Christmas -er, sorry- the Holidays coming

    It’s The Unemployment, stupid.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.