Question For NPR/MPR, The Strib, Alondra Cano, Betsy Hodges And Every Other Minnesota Liberal Figurehead

To:  NPR, the Strib,  Alondra Cano, and every other Twin Cities liberal that’s spent the lasdt six months romanticizing the NoDAPL “pipeline” protest
From:  Mitch Berg, Ornery Peasant and actual North Dakota native
Re:  Just Curious, Here

All,

You all – media and political figures alike – have spent the past six months romanticizing the “No Dakota Access Pipeline” protests more thoroughly than a Scarlett Johansson cheesecake photo shoot.

NPR / MPR?  You had your reporters out in the wilds of south-central North Dakota, doing your best to make the protests sound like an organic grassroots phenomenon, sprung up from the soil to protect the river.  Y’know – the Missouri.  The river that flows through middle of the Dakotas and Nebraska.

Of course, while your reporters (yours too, Strib) plead “It’s Settled Science” on many convenient issues, you ignored it over and over again on this issue.  It’s a simple fact – while the oil that powers your Subarus does indeed have some risk of spilling in its remote location far from any major population center, it’s many orders of magntitude per barrel lower that that same risk the way the oil is currently transported – by truck and train, through the middle of Bismarck, Jamestown (blocks from my father’s house, actually), Fargo, Fergus Falls, Saint Cloud, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Madison and Chicago.   As in astronomically more safe.

But let’s not pretend that Alondra Cano knows the first thing about statistics, or cares a rats ass about a bunch of white, rural, Trump-voting North Dakotans’ safety (or, for that matter, how many Strib or MPR reporters could name the river the “protesters” are “protecting”).   And your logical consistency about the oil that powers your cars and buses and printing presses and transmitters is no less dubious than about where your food comes from.  Yep, same place.

In fact, let’s forget the logical and moral inconsistency of your entire story – you media figures’ selective and incurious reporting, you politicians’ illiterate grandstanding.  Ignore it all for now.

Let’s focus on today – where the “protesters” have left an ungodly mess at their “protest” site.  North Dakota’s top tow-truck driver notes:

There are roughly 200 vehicles down there at last count, ranging from cars and pickups to rental trucks. We’re going to have a very drastic situation trying to keep these vehicles from getting into the river – what everybody’s been trying to protect from day one. We can’t leave them there. We don’t know what kind of biohazard is going to be produced with all the fluids or any other garbage that’s inside the vehicle.

Here’s a Bismarck TV station’s report:

So – for six months you, the Twin Cities’ left leaning media and grandstanding left-wing politicians, romanticized the NoDAPL “protests” and “protesters”.

Just as you did “Occupy”, and the RNC protests , and the various G7 protests, and every other “protest” you can imagine (except the Tea Party, naturally).

And just like every protest other than the Tea Party, the NoDAPL “protesters” left behind filth and squalor.

And they left by the banks of the river they were supposedly “protecting” – cars full of fuel, human waste, and over a thousand tons of general trash.   All right there, waiting for the next Missouri River flood.

This, mind you, in a part of the state that is very sparsely populated even by North Dakota standards – miles down a two-lane road from Mandan.   Not the wealthy exurbs from which most of you media and political figures hail.

Oh, yeah – and it’s upstream from the Standing Rock reservation.

So – if you’re not running stories about the squalor left behind, and – this is for you, Alondra Cano – actively soliciting people and money and other resources for cleaning up after the people you encouraged to leave the mess, you’re not only hypocrites…

…you’re racists.

Suck on that.

That is all.

7 thoughts on “Question For NPR/MPR, The Strib, Alondra Cano, Betsy Hodges And Every Other Minnesota Liberal Figurehead

  1. Mitch, you know as well as anybody else that to a liberal it’s all about showing how much you care not about the actual effects. You see it in environmental policy, anthropogenic globull warming, Head Start and univerisal pre-K programs, etc. It’s not about actually doing something, it’s feeling good intentions.

  2. And just like every protest other than the Tea Party, the NoDAPL “protesters” left behind filth and squalor.

    Well, most of them are probably Keynesians. They probably think of it as job creation…

  3. Mitch, why do you hate alternate facts so much? The real factual facts are the people speaking to power – NO DAPL!

  4. As nerdbert notes, it’s not about what you achieve, but about your motivations. That’s why solar panels are the “environmental choice” despite the fact that until 2010, they used more energy to make ’em (and that with dirty Chinese coal fired plants) than they got out of ’em, and why the EPA doesn’t include the power plant’s efficiency in calculating MPGe for electric (coal) fueled cars.

    And it feels so good to have Chinese youngsters filling their lungs with soot while their dads end their lives in an iron lung, I tell ya.

  5. Ask Tucson, AZ residents about the tons of trash that those poor, disadvantaged illegals looking for a better life, leave behind just outside of the city limits. At least, the Fox affiliate there reported it a few years ago, but, funny… it never made the lame stream feeds.

  6. Its like trying to explain to a liberal that putting huge numbers of illegal aliens into your school district means you have to hire a large number of ESL teachers, which may be offset by cutting back the music programs. And providing 3 free meals a day to foreigners may mean fewer teachers overall so larger class sizes.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.