So Let Me See If I Got This Straight

By Mitch Berg

Democrat operatives, November 7, 2016:  “Our electoral system is rock solid, there is no election fraud, the results we get are impeccable, and failing to accept its results is paranoia and maybe treason.

Democrat operatives, November 26, 2016:  “We can not accept the results of the election in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, because our election system is rife with fraud and easily hacked by…Russians”.

Make no mistake, this isn’t about trying to get Hillary into the White House; it’s about trying to delay three large states’ electoral vote totals long enough to throw the election to the Congress, thereby giving Democrats leverage to try to illegitimize President-Elect Trump, give the demented Democrat chanting classes a bloody shirt to wave at the ignorant for the next 4-8 years, and set up a narrative in which Hillary – among the wealthiest, most powerful people in the world – is a victim.

7 Responses to “So Let Me See If I Got This Straight”

  1. Swiftee Plisken Says:

    You have mis-characterized the reprobates motive, Mitch. They know there is fraud. They are just hoping it wasn’t properly included in the count.

  2. nerdbert Says:

    You can’t verify the votes in Milwaukee in the time needed.

    But I’d welcome an accurate, thorough audit of all the votes out of Milwaukee and Madison. If draining liberal coffers is on the table, I say that WI should do the recount very thoroughly by vetting each vote and trying to trace back who actually voted. Get the Green/Hillary crowd to really pay for a complete, thorough audit of all the mail-in absentee ballots and get to the bottom of the real rate of fraud. After all, in WI we can make the ones who want the recount with this margin of win pay the costs. It should be fun to have an excuse and nearly unlimited budget to pay for investigating the Milwaukee/Madison machines.

  3. DMA Says:

    They hope to force Congress to decide the election so they can say Trump is not a “real” President and so has no mandate to rule.

  4. Scott Hughes Says:

    Trump may want to hold his cards closer with regard to Hillary and the potential for her to be investigated by a special prosecutor. I wonder if the Dem operatives have considered if that Pandora Box is opened. That may give new meaning to the waving of the bloody shirt.

    One thing about Jill Stein is she’s a loser in politics, a bad loser at that.

  5. J. Ewing Says:

    Maybe we should start with a “study” that decides who would most likely benefit by findings of election fraud, hmmm?

  6. Chuck Says:

    This may be a case where the Greenies are doing fundraising for themselves. Meaning get a bunch of liberal dupes to give them money. Stein and her pals will then use that money to pay themselves a handsome salary to run the recount.
    Think 1980s televangelists. Or today the NAACP, SLPC, etc.

  7. bikebubba Says:

    Part of me has to wonder what the real connections are out there in politics. Jill Stein, by running, pretty much hands the Presidency to Trump, then she calls for a recount she has no chance of winning, all of her funders have connections to George Soros apparently….

    ….sad to say, the conspiracy theories of groups like the Birchers seem more plausible each day. Or perhaps it’s simply a way of hamstringing the new President.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

--> Site Meter -->