Don’t Hate Them Because They’re Beautiful

Joe Doakes from Como Park emails:

This place merits the Groucho treatment.

Joe Doakes

My idea – for a dating app that requires you to read all the text before looking at someone’s pictures – is looking better and better.

6 thoughts on “Don’t Hate Them Because They’re Beautiful

  1. They’ll select for plastic surgery, amazing makeup, and spending hours each day in the gym to look good, and then the patrons of said bar are going to wonder why all the people they’re meeting are extremely shallow.

    Kinda reminds me of politics.

  2. BB,
    and yet when DG submitted her application (including picture nude with dogs) she was turned down – go figure.

  3. Sauk Fantoche, Dogs should be naked.

    But thanks to you and Doakes for giving yet more proof that the right are misogynists, and all too often MCPs (male chauvinist pigs).

    Be it Rush Limpdick or Donald little-hands little prick Trump, you have a candidate who reflects a broad demographic of your side of the political spectrum.

    Now off to find a more cost-effective source for freeze-dried minnows, great for growing hair on dogs. Good for promoting good coat growth on east coast dogs who don’t have the benefit of the MN climate; gotta keep up the rate of new champions every other month. Two in the top 10 last year; 4 this year so far….and the best part, it is creating a whole new path to network with some fairly well connected hard right wing evangelicals. One needs both kinds of ‘grape vine’ access after all. All politics are local – and winning is what appeals to everyone.

  4. Wait a second here, DG. Sauk made a derogatory comment towards you….not exactly an indictment of all conservatives. By your logic, I would assume that your comments about Limbaugh and Drumpf would indict all liberals for anti-male bias.

    Hmmm…..maybe this game is fun after all! Seriously, you and Sauk have both made specific off-color accusations regarding specific people. Let’s leave it at that.

  5. Proof of the Apocalypse, DG replied to a comment and mostly stayed on topic, all within 4 paragraphs.

  6. But thanks to you and Doakes for giving yet more proof that the right are misogynists, and all too often MCPs (male chauvinist pigs).

    Again with the radical leftwing hateful kneejerk reaction.

    Sauk was not impugning ALL women, or event a group of women. He was singling you out from the rest of your gender. That does not make him a misogynist. That makes him observant. You seem to be somewhat of a misandrist.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.