Here We Go Again

I’m not much of a conspiracy-theory-monger.   The most direct answer to most things is the right answer.  Generally.

So I’ve always been inclined to take most stories about the Clinton Famiglia with a block of salt.   For example, when Vince Foster committed suicide with eight shots to the back of his head, I dismissed talk of “murder”. 1  What’s the point?

But when Julian Assange – the official counter-official-culture hero of the left and libertarian right – suggests that the DNC knows something about the murder of Seth Rich, whom he claims was his informant on the DNC email hacking case?  Well…:

Julian Assange seems to suggests on Dutch television program Nieuwsuur that Seth Rich was the source for the Wikileaks-exposed DNC emails and was murdered.

Tangential takeaway:  wouldn’t it be cool if American reporters asked questions of both parties like the Dutch anchor does.

Upshot:  Assange won’t be doing lunch in Georgetown any time soon.

[1] Let’s just see who flies off the handle at that reference, shall we?

12 thoughts on “Here We Go Again

  1. Care to bet when he’ll get let out of the Ecuadoran embassy? If Hillary gets in, I wouldn’t give a fig for his life or freedom chances.

  2. One has to wonder though. This makes the third person with DNC connections to die under mysterious circumstances since June.

  3. DG,

    Grayed out ’til you start following the rules.

    Zzzzzz.
    ———-
    http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/08/09/videotrump-surrogate-roger-stone-reveals-touch-wikileaks-assange/

    ———-
    Gosh DG – you’ve been sucked into the tinfoil-hat brigade too?

    Or sucked even further into it?

  4. DG,

    Still not responding responses to your little tirades. Still getting grayed out.
    ———-
    Eight shots to the back of Vince Foster’s head, Mitch?

    Is that sarcasm or satire criticizing the right wing propaganda machine by any chance, since that didn’t happen? No, I didn’t think so.

    A little fact checking for you, since you can’t / won’t (same difference in outcome) fact check for yourself.

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

    “Is that sarcasm or satire criticizing the right wing propaganda machine ”

    Oh, DO YOU THINK SO?

    I mean, wasn’t the footnote predicting you’d take the bait clue enough for you?

    How many points do I have to spot you, DG?

  5. Adds to the humor of Liberals losing their minds over Trump urging Second Amendment supporters to oppose Hillary. No, he didn’t call for us to assassinate her; he doesn’t work that way. How do I know? Trump’s not the one with the trail of bodies stretching out behind him for decades.

  6. If one were to answer Dog Bone’s screeds without said screeds being visible, people would accuse one of concocting straw men. Seriously, she’s that bizarre.

  7. Liberals have a disturbing amount of lack of self awareness, irony, and humor.

  8. Trump is Trump. At some level I am certain that he knows the GOP figures advising him also advised the popular vote losers in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2008, and 2012.
    All I’ve seen on the news for the last 24 hours is free advertising for Trump saying that Hillary will take your guns away and that he will not take your guns away.
    If Trump wins the election, political advisers are going to have to rewrite their textbooks.

  9. If Trump wins the election, political advisers are going to have to rewrite their textbooks.

    As someone who read a lot of those textbooks in college I was screaming in 2009-10 that they were idiots and didn’t know what they were talking about because unlike a lot of them at the university level I actually, ya know, worked on a couple of actual political campaigns. If Trump ends up winning a couple generations of political theory will be thrown in the trashbin of history, and that is a good thing. People’s life work destroyed by Trump, I will enjoy dancing on their metaphorical (if not literal) graves.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.