17 thoughts on “Clinton Campaign: Beware Of Foreigners Hacking Emails…

  1. The evidence that it was Russians is pretty thin. The evidence that it was Russians intending to weaken candidate Hillary is entirely non-existent. Why would the Russians prefer Hillary to Trump? Because she talks tough? She hasn’t managed to foil Putin’s plans so far.

  2. NW its a safe bet that the WikiLeaks servers are harder to crack than Hillary’s

  3. That’s it! The Russians didn’t hack Hilliary’s servers because it would be too easy and….oh never mind.

  4. “So, the Russians hacked Wikileaks – but never accessed Hillary’s emails on her home server?”

    That’s exactly why Hillary had her own server and was pushing the delete button 40,000 times to avoid this type of situation. ;^)

  5. I don’t know if Hillary was smart enough to delete emails. Supposedly most of her email responses were ‘pls pr’, meaning print it out and send her the hard copy.

  6. Guccifer and Assange claim to have more that they will release today or tomorrow.

  7. Scary to think that these clowns could be in charge of national security. Also interesting that DWS is out as chair of the DNC and in the blink of an eye is a Clinton “honorary” chair.

  8. The myth of the privacy of email is something I’ve never understood. The major protocols have always been plain text with security and encryption at best an afterthought. Emails tend to be stored on systems that are subject to random folks wandering through them; I’ve had to fire sysadmins for reading other folks emails. And I’ve actually HAD to read other folks’ email and wanted to burn out my eyeballs when I’ve been asked to rebuild their email after some sort of corruption (hint: I don’t want to read your email, and I especially don’t want to have to wade through gay “bear” porn while checking to make sure your email database is no longer corrupt). How folks ever got the idea that email could even remotely be considered private is something I’ve never understood.

    At best email should be considered at the privacy level of a soft conversation in a public restaurant, i.e. none, except for that granted by the indulgence of fellow diners and the staff.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.