The Question Is Not…
By Mitch Berg
…did gun control fail. Civilian guns are pretty much trayf in Canada.
The question is not were the two shooters acting in the interest of Jihad.
No. The question is “How will Kim Norton try to blame this on the law-abiding gun owners of Minnesota”.
January 12th, 2016 at 6:33 am
“Mohamed Elmi, 31, and Mohamed Salad, 29,”
hmmm must be radical Methodists.
January 12th, 2016 at 6:55 am
Since we already reward bureaucrats for signing up more people for public assistance and increasing the number of abortions, what is so outrageous about rewarding bureaucrats for disarming the law-abiding?
Still think that we live in a republic?
January 12th, 2016 at 7:47 am
I love how far you have to go in the article before you find the names of the two Swedish nuns that fired the guns.
January 12th, 2016 at 7:50 am
I always knew Salad will kill you given a chance. Go Pork!
January 12th, 2016 at 9:45 am
The fundamental mistake Obama is making — and it is a stupid mistake — is to equate terrorism to other tragedies. Car crashes, violence by criminals, things like that. What are a handful of deaths in a nation of 300 milliion+ people?
It is a mistake because terrorists learn from their mistakes and adjust their plans. Before 9/11, beginning with the WTC bombing, you saw terror attacks increase in complexity and the death toll throughout the 90s.
Obama’s rhetorical mistake is almost as bad as his stupid mistake. If a few dozen deaths in the US last year due to terrorism weren’t worth getting excited about, than neither are the deaths of a handful of Black parishioners gunned down by a white racist. It’s not an existential threat either.