For Paris
By Mitch Berg
Dear France, Paris and Parisiens,
Our thoughts and prayers are with you – knowing you’ve been through much worse, but that that doesn’t help much.
I’ll send back to you a few minutes of the second-greatest gift this nation ever gave you (after D-Day):
And this – from your own history, and heaven forefend not your future:
More tomorrow on the show. Much, much more.
November 13th, 2015 at 7:56 pm
At least in America we still have rednecks with guns who will at least give us a fighting chance. /s
November 13th, 2015 at 8:15 pm
Emery, France has unfortunately been subjected to nearly a century of progressive leadership of one degree or another that has earned them the unenviable sobriquet “cheese eating surrender monkeys”. There are plenty of French citizens who would step up and confront the Muslim menace were they not disarmed already by those same progressive elites you so earnestly champion. You and your embrace of extreme progressive values are directly responsible for the murders that took place today.
November 13th, 2015 at 9:12 pm
For anyone (this means you DG & Peev) that doesn’t think this Muslim roadshow is coming here – You’re wrong. If not sooner then certainly expect it to be part of next year’s October Surprise
November 13th, 2015 at 10:05 pm
Do you not realize these are the people the refugees are trying to run away from?
November 13th, 2015 at 10:09 pm
do you not realize these are the “refugees”?
November 14th, 2015 at 1:31 am
France has the kind of centralized government libs pray they will get in the US.
Doesn’t help with fighting an external enemy.
November 14th, 2015 at 6:19 am
It doesn’t help when your “external enemy” is is a religion of fanatics trying to destroy a world that they cannot live in, much less understand or build.
November 14th, 2015 at 8:29 am
Say Emery?
Ever wonder why Obama’s JV team never attacks a bar in San Antonio? What about a nice operation at Darlington speedway?
See what you can do, M’k?
November 14th, 2015 at 1:03 pm
Emery wrote:
“Do you not realize these are the people the refugees are trying to run away from?”
Reality objects:
Syrian passport found on Paris attacker’s body belonged to refugee who passed through Greece
http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/nov/14/paris-terror-attacks-attackers-dead-mass-killing-live-updates#block-564760d1e4b091c2edb6cc74
November 14th, 2015 at 3:33 pm
“,,,these are the people the refugees are trying to run away from”
Pulled straight from the front page of Mother Jones.
Say, Emery? These people are running from their sons, brothers, uncles and fathers. It’s not “them, it’s “us”….Since when do family squabbles have to involve everyone on the planet? Did the Yankees shoot up Mecca because they were fighting the CSA in 1863?
Fuck the muzzies, and fuck you.
November 14th, 2015 at 5:36 pm
I don’t especially want to fight a war for the hearts and minds of Muslims. But war has been declared, and to refuse to fight is to concede defeat to an aggressively expansionist Islamic state. I judge that it is better and easier to fight this war than to have my children fight the inevitable war with the Islamic state that would result from the first defeat.
November 15th, 2015 at 7:43 am
My wife asked me yesterday, why do we “Stand with Paris?” Why we did we not stand with Russia? With Mumbai? With Mosul? With Syria? etc…ad nauseum… all victims of islamonazi terrorism. Why do 129 French lives matter more than 224 Russian lives? When did we dehumanize the East? Maybe if ALL stood together, there would be less terrorism around the world. Waiting for something to happen on your home turf until acting does not work. And if you can’t identify who your enemy is, how can you act or even react?
You gotta love libturds suicidal tendencies and delusions – climate change causes terrorism? Really? That is libturd’s best chance at presidency? Well, it is their smartest and brightest who are running for office.
Oh, and I am glad to hear 0bamanus Rex thinks more of gay rights then he does of victims of terrorism.
November 15th, 2015 at 8:15 am
Let’s try to regain some perspective, here after the ISIS atack. Islamic terrorism is not an existential threat to the West. It is and is designed to be frightening and annoying and frustrating. It is a tactical move in a war, but what war?
We are fighting a war for the hearts and minds of 1 billion Muslims. On the one side are the liberal democrats, who argue that free speech, individual freedom to live as you choose (including women), the rule of law, the right to own property and free markets are a path that will lead to comfort and happiness. On the other are Islamic traditionalists, who argue that strict adherence to religious dogma and rules, the oppression of women and non-believers, and dictatorial rule by a theocratic cabal of ‘wise men’ results in a just society that is best for all. The traditionalists aim to win by pulling down the existing order, creating chaos, and presenting their path as the only means to order. When we declare the mass of Muslim people to be our enemy, when we refuse to offer them aid in the face of the chaos, we concede to the Jihadists leadership of the Muslim world, because the forces of modernity in the Muslim world are weak, and the Jihadists are the alternative.
And if we do that, if we create a Muslim world led by a Caliphate, we do create an existential threat, just as the Caliphates from 700 to 1500 CE were existential threats to Europe. And that is why we must be harsh to the Jihadists, but kind to the Muslim world in general. We are fighting a war for their hearts and minds. The Jihadists will not win by killing a few hundred of us, or a few thousand. In a sense, every Muslim who chooses to leave the lands controlled by the Jihadists and come to the Modernist lands is a victory for Modernity, even if a fraction of those immigrants or their children changes their minds later. We lose if we reject the Muslim majority and push them into the arms of the Jihadists. Those who, in our frustration, argue for a war on Islam, rather than a war on ISIS and Al Qaeda, have already conceded defeat.
November 15th, 2015 at 11:04 am
You fucking dhimmi! At least two scumbags in Paris had been identified as migrants. You pacifist waste of oxygen.
November 15th, 2015 at 11:25 am
Maybe it’s time to divvy up these little fiefdoms ala Berlin. Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Somalia, Libya have proved the only thing their bloodthirsty populations respect is raw power.
Let the UN Security council set up ruling juntas made up of representatives from all the biggest countries. Americans can do the administrative work, Russians and Chinese handle the wet work when the population needs to be cooled down.
Who knows, after a few generations they may be able to handle some experiments in self-rule.
But we’ll have to pacify ISIS first, the proper strategy is clearly not mass invasion, that’s what these lunatics want. Rather, it seems to me the right move is to go after their cash flow. Shut down the oil from Iraq and Syria and ISIS will run low on ammo and food. We’ll probably need to assign someone to keep an eye on George Soros too.
November 15th, 2015 at 4:08 pm
Whichever side wins over the non-Jihadi Muslims wins the war.
November 15th, 2015 at 4:41 pm
As clearly shown by the appeasement and kumbaya moments, especially over the last 7 years, the winning is just around the corner. There it is! I can almost see it! Jihadi violence is all but eliminated, it is a lot less frequent and savage now than ever before, save for the dark ages, which were lifted by 600 years of kumbaya and appeasement, dontchaknow?
You are a fucking pacifist tool. You would rather die on your knees than live on your feet. There are no amoral depths you would not sink too, EmeryTheAntisemiticSoci@list.
November 15th, 2015 at 7:06 pm
As Swift suggests: Follow the money. Who funds ISIS? Who enables them financially? Who facilitates their mobility across international borders? That’s where we need to strike first.
Perhaps it is time to put serious pressure on the greatest supporter of Sunni extremism, Saudi Arabia. The Saudi’s have supported terror via its wealthy citizens and at the same time been excused because of their vast oil resources. Wahhabi Islam is the direct inspiration for the Al Qaeda and ISIS as well as other jihadist terror groups around the world.
November 16th, 2015 at 9:56 am
Non-Jihadi Muslims are those that haven’t been through the training course yet.
ISIS is following the Koran, to the letter. It’s all in there; killing off the infidels; enslaving apostate women and children; crucifixion; beheading; stoning; dismemberment for thievery; tossing homos off rooftops; keeping women in their (low) place. If you’re an observant muzzy, you really cannot condemn them; the only muzzy’s doing so are the Islamic version of the UUC.
November 16th, 2015 at 10:19 am
I’m half with you. ISIS is following the Koran to the letter of the law. The article I link at the bottom of the post explains what “caliphate” and “Caliph” mean in the Koran. It’s a fascinating read.
But there are plenty of Muslims who haven’t been thorugh the training course, and never will. I got to talk with a counterterrorism expert on the show over the weekend. They figure 10-15 % are sympathetic to the radicals. And it’s among the other 85-90% that, among other things, our counterterrorism and intelligence people get their information about the rest of them.
And remember – there are huge swathes of the Muslim world that aren’t killing anyone; Senegal, Albania, Bosnia, even India (where the violence is ethnic along religious lines) and even Indonesia. Could they be radicalized? Sure – and that’s something to watch out for – but they’re not now.
November 16th, 2015 at 1:07 pm
10% of 1,000,000,000 is 100,000,000. That’s how many sympathizers there are willing to die for Allah (dbuh) and take as many infidels with them as they can. Odds are, alas, not in our favor to marginalize these many individuals and reach harmony through kumbaya policy.