I, Obama
By Johnny Roosh
NarcIssIst-In-Chief, Barack Obama
“I‘m not the fIrst presIdent to take up thIs cause…but I‘m determIned to be the last.”
It’s all about the “O” – er the I – that is.
Behold a man who spends a quarter mIllIon taxpayer dollars to take hIs wIfe on a date In Chicago yet can’t get on a plane to New York to observe a moment of sIlence (a dIffIcult feat indeed for SIr Talkalot) for the over three thousand vIctIms of the 9/11 attacks.
Three days later he’s on a plane to New York to “celebrate” the fIrst annIversary of the fall of Lehman Brothers and to take credIt for the economIc non-recovery engIneered by he and hIs tax-evading, crack economIc team.
In every one of the Emperor Hussein’s speeches, not only does the song remain the same, so do the words. I want you to do this. I am going to force you to do that. I will not allow you to do whatever. Not since Thomas Friedman got his column at the New York Times has anyone so abused the first-person singular. Indeed, Barry’s patented speeches are an orgy of solipsistic onanism, his animus apparent, his feelings deeply sensitive. Even though he’d like to discuss these crucial reforms civilly, the time for talking is over. Cross him and he will call you out. And whatever you do, don’t get him all wee-wee’d up.
It’s all about hIm, our Super-Ream Leader™.
September 15th, 2009 at 8:03 am
Awesome photoshop, Johnny Doosh. I guess this means you’re fresh out of Hitler clip art?
September 15th, 2009 at 8:08 am
SitD Intern #1 criticized: “Behold a man who spends a quarter mIllIon taxpayer dollars to take hIs wIfe on a date In Chicago yet can’t get on a plane to New York to observe a moment of sIlence (a dIffIcult feat indeed for SIr Talkalot) for the over three thousand vIctIms of the 9/11 attacks.”
Angryclown totally agrees. He should have followed the 9/11 example of former pResident Shrub, who got on a plane to embolden the troops at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.
September 15th, 2009 at 8:50 am
Obama is just like Bush!
September 15th, 2009 at 9:04 am
pResident Shrub, who got on a plane to embolden the troops at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.
You are right, assclown, Zero did not even do that!
September 15th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Poor Obama. The best thing his sychophant worshippers can say about him is “he’s not Bush”.
Such a distinction.
September 15th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Wasn’t Obama an ACORN leadership trainer? Maybe he was busy training people to setup brothels with underage girls.
September 15th, 2009 at 9:56 am
OBAMA: I am your king!
DENNIS: Well, I didn’t vote for you.
OBAMA: You don’t vote for kings.
DENNIS: Well, ‘ow did you become king then?
OBAMA: Chris Matthews of the Media, [angels sing] his leg trembling in the purest shimmering ecstasy, held aloft Incurious from the bosom of the media signifying by Divine Providence that I, Obama, was to carry the day.
[singing stops] That is why I am your king!
DENNIS: Listen — strange pundits lying in droves distributing favor is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical media ceremony.
OBAMA: Stop bickering and be quiet!
DENNIS: Well you can’t expect to wield supreme executive power just ’cause some talking head threw an election at you!
OBAMA: Shut up!
DENNIS: I mean, if I went around sayin’ I was an empereror just because some moistened pundit had lobbed a poll at me they’d put me away!
OBAMA: Shut up! Will you shut up! [SEIU purple shirts move in.]
DENNIS: Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system.
ARTHUR: Shut up!
DENNIS: Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help! Help! I’m being repressed!
ARTHUR: Bloody peasant!
DENNIS: Oh, what a give away. Did you hear that, did you hear that,
eh? That’s what I’m on about — did you see him repressing me, you saw it didn’t you?
September 15th, 2009 at 9:56 am
Excellent article John, you nailed the O man and in typical socialist fashion the Assclown can’t dispute your very valid point. He has to try and change the subject by disqualifying your opinion by pointing out his perceived view of a flawed President Bush who you, of course, voted for. I’ve observed socialists for many years and I know that when they squeal like this you’ve gotten to them. They just try and pretend that you haven’t by changing the subject. Hey Assclown, we’re talking about what Omental said and did, not W. Focus!
September 15th, 2009 at 9:59 am
J-Ro, come on now, just because the community organizer wrote two 700 page books about himself before he turned 35, doesn’t mean he has the biggest ego in the world. Oh wait, it does.
September 15th, 2009 at 10:07 am
Nice parody, NR. Barry O and the Holy Fail.
September 15th, 2009 at 10:08 am
NW. I are a product of public edumacation.
September 15th, 2009 at 10:11 am
Mike observed ” Assclown can’t dispute your very valid point”.
Clownie does not indulge in dispute. He is all about derisive poo-flinging. It’s in his contract.
September 15th, 2009 at 10:17 am
Not a problem, Kermit. I had some typos myself there; I just thought you were using angryclown’s abreviations for me.
September 15th, 2009 at 10:27 am
Let’s see, we have a President for 8 years who was the ‘Decider in Chief’ – who decided he really didn’t need to know details, who basically told the other party to “f-off” about bipartisanship, about requested, logical oversight, and was often referred to as the “Emperor who had No Clothes” – but now, we get King Obama.
Pot = kettle.
Where were your complaints 5 years ago? President Bush spent the greatest amount of time of any President in history (that we know of) on vacation – roughly 42% of his time was ‘out of Washington’ seemingly on vaction – he also was well known for short hours, getting up early, but quitting early. His mother once opined that the people who suffered in Katrina and were sent to the Astrodome really (paraphrase here) didn’t have that much they should complain about, after all, they were already poor, and while I understand she probably was misunderstood, it came out as the epitome of conciet.
Yeah Roosh, sensitivity , efficiency and hard work, thy name is the GOP. LOL.
Both sides suffer from a terrible tin ear – neither should be taken seriously when they complain any longer as BOTH willingly abided at least as bad from their party. Each violates, in different ways, but to equal degrees, the basic principles of integrity, accountability and transparency we expect of government, and should expect of government, but do not receive.
The ONLY difference I see right now is that many in the Democratic Party are willing to criticize Obama (including me), but the silence was deafening during Bush’s faux war on terror in Iraq, his violations of basic civil liberties, and his raiding of the treasury for his corporate buddies.
September 15th, 2009 at 10:30 am
AC, had the honor of carrying BHO piss bucket during his recent visit ot Minneapolis. He poured into ice cube trays and inserted tooth pick to make mini popsickles
September 15th, 2009 at 10:33 am
Penny boy, Bush got hammered by the MSM for the time he spent away from the White House. Why lie about it?
September 15th, 2009 at 10:55 am
“His mother once opined “… His Mother? Seriously, are you criticizing a President’s mother?
September 15th, 2009 at 11:00 am
I’ll only do a little of this.
Let’s see, we have a President for 8 years who was the ‘Decider in Chief’
He said “I’m the decider”. Since he was a CEO and CinC that was an accurate statement, and you have no point.
who decided he really didn’t need to know details
Quite simply pulled straight out of your butt, Peev. He wasn’t an obsessive micro-manager like Clinton, which is actually a more effective management style.
who basically told the other party to “f-off” about bipartisanship
Yeah, Nancy Pelosi has always been about bipartisanship. Bush was so one-sided in his support of No Child Left Behind, Perscription drug coverage in Medicare, steel tariffs…
about requested, logical oversight
Because when you are fighting a war on terrorists who murdered 3000 people you want as many political hacks as possible to get access to intelligence, right?
and was often referred to as the “Emperor who had No Clothes” – but now, we get King Obama.
I wish I had a dime for every time one of you lefties accused Bush of being a “King”.
I could go on, but why? You are so effing blind.
September 15th, 2009 at 11:08 am
He wasn’t a king. He was Prince Regent. Everyone knows Darth Cheney was in charge.
September 15th, 2009 at 11:32 am
Bush told the other party to “f-off ” on bipartisanship? Is this the same President Bush that (sadly) worked with Senator Kennedy to craft “Most children left behind”? the same one who (sadly) kept a lot of Clinton appointees instead of sending them out to pasture where they belonged?
Penigma, your perspective is….deeply flawed, to put it mildly.
September 15th, 2009 at 11:37 am
Penny…..you ever hear of phones, fax machines, laptop computers? You can get work done at your house these days. Many people I work with do that.
September 15th, 2009 at 11:57 am
NW. I are a product of public edumacation.
I is a kollage stoodent whoo am a kkkoncervtive.
September 15th, 2009 at 12:04 pm
I nominate NR for the best post response of the week and Frogman for the best tagline.
September 15th, 2009 at 12:45 pm
“who basically told the other party to “f-off” about bipartisanship”
Penigma, for good or ill, Bush got bipartisan support for all of his major policies. This includes congressional resolutions authorizing use of force in Afghanistan & Iraq (Obama’s secretary of state voted them!), continuing funding for these conflicts AFTER the dems had retaken control of congress, the Patriot Act, the creation of DHS and TSA, the Medicare prescription drug plan, and last year’s Wall Street bailout. His amnesty legislation had more support among democrats than republicans. He signed McCain-Feingold fer Gawd’s sake.
The first thing your guy did when he got in office was pass a trillion dollar deficit that received a single GOP vote from the most liberal Republican in the senate. Now Obama’s talking about using a loophole in the senate rules to pass Obamacare with 51 votes — and there enough Democrats in the senate that they could make with the 60 they’ve got if they all support it.
Once again, the beliefs you use to form political opinions are demonstrably, objectively false.
The ‘King Obama’ metaphor is apt.
September 15th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
Ohhhhh boy, Johnny you scored a two-ferr. You got pigsh#t all frothy mouthed over Dubya too! Funny though, I didn’t hear any actual criticism of bHo coming out of the pigsh#t’s mouth, want to try again piggy? Remember John, when you get ’em going off like this you’ve gotten to them. Good job.
September 15th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
The Monty Python bit just isn’t as funny without the phrase “because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at you.”
September 15th, 2009 at 4:07 pm
Terry (et.al.)
I do not agree, and whether you agree with my perspective, that’s your call, but this is the President who forced James Jeffords out of the party because Jeffords worked with the Dems. NCLB was worked with Kennedy, but that was the exception whcih proves the rule. Further, frankly I find your memories (collectively) rather short – this is the President who routinely threatened the Dems with calling them ‘weak on Terror’ because they balked at his run up to war, because he REFUSED for 3.5 years to fix things in Iraq until he (and his party) lost the 2006 election. While I get you don’t agree, I will tell you MANY MANY MANY people in this country saw Bush as hyperpartisan, and it is routinely cited as one of the leading reasons Bush’s policies were repudiated both in 2006 and 2008.
and Terry, he SIGNED McCain FienGold, he didn’t support it, didn’t want it, and wished it had never passed, that doesn’t make him bipartisan. Bush used signing statements to obviate Democratic portions of bills which HE didn’t approve of, even when his Republican counterparts in the legislature did. That’s not bipartisan, it’s outrageous.
BTW, is this the model of civility (all of you claim) that Republicans offer? I.E. the good conduct which you have (at times) suggested it is? My comments criticized both sides, I assail Obama, and say the issue is (to me) that both sides can’t admit to fault, and then your liliputians (Terry and a few other excepted) go and prove my point — by REFUSING to a. behave civily, and b. abide any criticism of Bush. Nice owrk you guys… good job. I really like the pigs%$# comment, classy, wow.. I’m sooo put in my place… phew.
Look at your conduct – I commented BOTH people, Obama and Bush have serious issues – and question the timing of this complaint, I comment both parties lack objectivity, and I get comments absolutely validating my points.
Thank you.
September 15th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
“on vacation – roughly 42% of his time”
How long will Peni’s BDS last? We have yet to see any skepticism or criticism toward Obama from peevee and the left.
Now run back to PenisBlog you coward; before we call Bachmann over.
Bwwwwaaaaahahahahahahahaha
September 15th, 2009 at 4:24 pm
“I assail Obama,”
😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
Peevee thinks assailt means idolize, ie blind adoration for the Obamassiah!!!!
As for civil, how about this one:
“put another nail in the coffin of the idea of Isreal” – Penigma
September 15th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
The Monty Python bit just isn’t as funny without the phrase “because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at you.”
I guess the question might come down to whether or not the moistened bint had a permit to legally carry the scimitar, and if merely carrying it could be construed as “lobbing” it at someone. It would make a good headline, regardless.
September 15th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Pernicious Peevy,
Let’s see if we can get this through to the dormant organ you have hidden in your rats’ maze of a skull.
George W. Bush is not in office any longer.
Oh, and ACORN called… they said the advice you gave them isn’t working.
September 15th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
And Peevee, like every good Lib should, just has to bring up Katrina one more time. For the millionth time-Katrina, in few words: You live in city that sits in a BOWL about 6 feet below sea level, right next to the ocean. A category 5 hurricane is coming. You know all this, so what do you do? The rest is all MSM bullshit.
September 15th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Penigma, I have no problem with you refering to Bush as ‘partisan’, but the hyperpartisan’ claim is simply not supported by the facts. Politicians are supposed to be partisan. Abe Lincoln was partisan. So was Harry Truman. The problem with claiming that Bush is ‘hyperpartisan’ is that you can’t support the charge. You have to show that his partisanship exceeded the partisanship of other,comparable politicians to an extreme degree.
Jim Jeffords left the GOP when the senate (not Bush) refused to fund one of his pet projects. How does it even make sense to say that Bush was being ‘hyper-partisan’ by turning a significant Republican senate vote into a non-republican vote that caucuses with the opposition party?
A number of highly thought-of conservatives wanted to challenge Chaffee for his senate seat in the Republican primary. Bush and the RNC gave the cold shoulder and throuw there support behind Chaffee. This is standard partisan activity by a politicians.
I understand that you want to believe very badly that Bush was some kind of fascist dictator, but he was not. He was a standard GOP politician, somewhat (not ‘extremely’) conservative on social issues, somewhat more nationalistic than most democrats (again, not ‘extremely’ so), and notoriously poor on spending issues.
The fact that a lot of people think of him as hyperpartisan does not make him so.
You’ve tried and failed here to make an objective case for his supposed ‘hyperpartisanship’. All you’ve done is listed examples of occasions when he did act in a less than ‘hyperpartisan’ manner and stick cliches like ‘the exception that proves the rule’ to them, or claim that he supported bipartisan legislation ‘reluctantly’.
I would be happy to criticize Bush. The reson that I have not done in SITD comments is that Mitch & Co generally have written posts supporting certain policies of the Bush administration rather than blanket support for whatever the Bush administration does. I have, I think, commented several times on SITD about the foolishness of Bush’s immigration scheme, his aborted appointment of Harriet Meirs, and especially the tendency of Bush (& the GOP) to back Wall Street interests over the interests of working Americans.