Our Lazy Biased Media Overlords

Last week, the MSM and its greek chorus in the lefty noise machine were all a’-chortle over Marco Rubio’s driving records.

Such as they were; two dismissed tickets and two trivial moving violations in 18 years.  No innocent women drowned; he apparently paid the fines, unlike a certain sitting celebrity Minnesota congressman.

And how did that happen (emphasis added)?

A couple of Times reporters spent Friday morning basking in praise for their “nice scoop” — the less-than-remarkable public knowledge that Marco Rubio was written four traffic tickets over the course of two decades — but, as Brent Scher of the Washington Free Beacon pointed out, neither of the reporters in the byline — Alan Rappeport and Steve Eder — nor the researcher also credited by the Times for the piece — Kitty Bennett — ever accessed the traffic records in question. But somebody did: American Bridge, a left-wing activist group, had pulled the records just before the Times piece appeared, and the Times employed some cagey language, with the relevant sentence beginning: “According to a search of the Miami-Dade and Duval County court dockets. . . . ” A search? Yes. Whose search? A piece of the news that apparently is not fit to print.

It’s not just national politics, of course; for a decade and a half, the vast majority of “reporting” on Michele Bachmann was done by her stalkers in the lefty alt-media, with few questions asked other than “how fast can I type my byline on this pre-written story?”

4 thoughts on “Our Lazy Biased Media Overlords

  1. Far-left freakazoid Michael Tomasky recently wrote an essay in NYRB complaining about the Times picking on Hillary:
    “Whether it will devote similar resources to scrutinizing Jeb Bush or other prospective Republican nominees seems a fair question.”
    Fair, maybe, but also stupid, Tomasky. Unfair attacks on any politician with an “R” after his or her name is the only purpose of the Times. Without that, it’s just a jumped up Sunday supplement version of the New York Review of Books.

  2. Hillary Clinton…….she’s like the lady in Driving Miss Daisy. Get it. An old lady who doesn’t drive.

  3. Not only is Hilliary a woman who doesn’t drive, she’s a woman who doesn’t drive because her driving gave the Secret Service the willies. Can we PLEASE do the math on this one?

  4. “…with few questions asked other than “how fast can I type my byline on this pre-written story?”

    Mitch, what do you have against increased productivity amongst Democrats?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.